Breaking open the jail gates: Debating leadership, conformity and dissent within the Stanford Prison Experiment
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
It is now possible to debate the processes involved in the Stanford Prison Experiment, and the broader nature of human cruelty, because the original materials from the study are now publicly accessible. Thanks to this access we can now see how leadership permeated the study from start to finish. While social norms of harshness may have played a key role in the Stanford Prison Experiment, these did not arise spontaneously but rather were carefully crafted and activated by the experimenters. These insights not only advance our understanding of the original research, but also contribute to a growing body of work on the importance of identity and leadership for the emergence of cruelty.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00