Environmental context shapes microbial co-occurrence

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The analysis of microbial co-occurrence patterns promises to uncover the elusive interactions underlying the many important functions microbiomes perform. We test such co-occurrence analysis on a dataset generated by a spatially explicit meta-community generalized Lotka-Volterra model, to investigate how environmental confounders affect co-occurrence patterns. We show that strong species interactions, particularly positive ones, remain detectable despite environmental complexity. However, in this context the number of spurious co-occurrences, with no correspondence to specific ecological drivers are inflated. We also explored two types of homogenization: intrinsic (via dispersal among communities) and extrinsic (via sample aggregation). In our settings both types inflate positive co-occurrences, improving the recon-struction of the environmental signal at the cost of the precision for reconstructing interactions. Negative ones, however, exhibit contrasting responses: intrinsic homogenization obscures them, while extrinsic homogenization increases their number, but at the cost of reduced precision in linking co-occurrences to ecological drivers. Our findings underscore the complex interplay between environmental factors and sampling strategies in shaping microbial co-occurrence patterns and their ecological interpretation.
Full text 1,430 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The analysis of microbial co-occurrence patterns promises to uncover the elusive interactions underlying the many important functions microbiomes perform. We test such co-occurrence analysis on a dataset generated by a spatially explicit meta-community generalized Lotka-Volterra model, to investigate how environmental confounders affect co-occurrence patterns. We show that strong species interactions, particularly positive ones, remain detectable despite environmental complexity. However, in this context the number of spurious co-occurrences, with no correspondence to specific ecological drivers are inflated. We also explored two types of homogenization: intrinsic (via dispersal among communities) and extrinsic (via sample aggregation). In our settings both types inflate positive co-occurrences, improving the recon-struction of the environmental signal at the cost of the precision for reconstructing interactions. Negative ones, however, exhibit contrasting responses: intrinsic homogenization obscures them, while extrinsic homogenization increases their number, but at the cost of reduced precision in linking co-occurrences to ecological drivers. Our findings underscore the complex interplay between environmental factors and sampling strategies in shaping microbial co-occurrence patterns and their ecological interpretation. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00