Assessment and Analysis of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Prospective Observational Study
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This prospective study of 125 women with chronic pelvic pain identified endometriosis as the second most common cause, highlighting the diagnostic value of laparoscopy in a multifactorial clinical landscape.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Background: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in females is a common and complex clinical problem that significantly affects quality of life. It encompasses various etiologies, including gynecological, urological, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and psychological causes. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical profile, etiology, and diagnostic approaches in females presenting with chronic pelvic pain through a prospective observational study. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College, and Hospital, Bettiah, Bihar, India for one year. A total of 125 female patients aged 18-50 years presenting with chronic pelvic pain lasting more than 6 months were enrolled. Detailed clinical history, physical examination, relevant laboratory tests, and imaging studies were performed to determine the cause of pain. Results: Among 125 patients, the most common causes of chronic pelvic pain identified were pelvic inflammatory disease (28%), endometriosis (22%), pelvic adhesions (15%), and urological causes (10%). Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 40% of cases and contributed significantly to definitive diagnosis. Psychological factors were identified in 12% of patients. Conclusions: Chronic pelvic pain in females is multifactorial, requiring a thorough and multidisciplinary diagnostic approach. Early identification of the underlying cause facilitates targeted management and improves patient outcomes.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK