Women’s preferences for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

M. Brink, Pleun Beelen, Malou C. Herman, Nathalie J.J. Claassen, Marlies Y. Bongers, Peggy M. A. J. Geomini, Jan Willem van der Steeg, Lotte van den Wijngaard, Madelon van Wely
In: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 2018 · vol. 228 , pp. 143–147 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020 · PMID:29945042 · W2808469343
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study investigated women's preferences for the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and endometrial ablation as treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (1)

References (34)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:42:59.773506+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK