Model-Informed Precision Dosing Strategy for Sitagliptin and Duloxetine in Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Interventional Pilot Study

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

The study developed and validated physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for sitagliptin and duloxetine, first in healthy participants and then adapted to incorporate hepatic cirrhosis pathophysiology across Child–Pugh (CP) classes A, B, and C. The PBPK approach predicted pharmacokinetic exposure metrics (AUC and Cmax), compared them with observed data with agreement within 2-fold, and calculated dose adjustments to match unbound drug exposure levels observed in healthy volunteers; a clinical evaluation was also conducted to assess effectiveness and safety. PBPK-guided dosing reduced duloxetine to 48.8%, 24.3%, and 11.6% of standard doses in CP A–C, and reduced sitagliptin to 83.3%, 71.4%, and 62.5%, with duloxetine showing larger kinetic effects than sitagliptin, while clinical outcomes reported improved glycemic control and pain reduction without safety issues across cirrhosis severities. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Liver cirrhosis can change antidiabetic and analgesic drug pharmacokinetics, mandating the need for dose modifications. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic PBPK modeling helps expect these pharmacokinetic alterations in cirrhotic patients and estimate dosage across various degrees of cirrhosis severities with subsequent evaluation of the recommended doses. Methods PBPK models were first validated in healthy participants and then adapted to incorporate cirrhosis‑related pathophysiological changes. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and plasma maximum concentration (C max ) were predicted and compared with observed data. Dose adjustments were calculated to achieve unbound drug exposures comparable to those seen in healthy volunteers, and recommendations were made across Child–Pugh (CP) classes A, B, and C. Clinical evaluation was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBPK‑guided dosing. Results Predicted AUC and C max values showed good agreement with observed data (within 2‑fold). The models were also used to predict unbound plasma AUC across various disease stages and to evaluate change in the dosing for untested cirrhotic populations. The latter results have been compared with the healthy population. The model-informed dose adjustment reduced duloxetine to 48.8%, 24.3%, and 11.6% and sitagliptin to 83.3%,71.4%, and 62.5% of their standard doses across CP classes A, B, and C, respectively. Clinical evaluation confirmed that PBPK‑guided dosing improved glycemic control and pain reduction while maintaining safety across cirrhosis severities. Conclusion Duloxetine kinetics are significantly affected by hepatic impairment, whereas sitagliptin shows modest pharmacokinetic changes. Integrating PBPK modeling with clinical evaluation provides reliable, evidence‑based guidance for dose optimization of these drugs in cirrhotic patients. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07439536), registered retrospectively on 17 February 2026.
Full text 15,294 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Model-Informed Precision Dosing Strategy for Sitagliptin and Duloxetine in Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Interventional Pilot Study | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Model-Informed Precision Dosing Strategy for Sitagliptin and Duloxetine in Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Interventional Pilot Study Aya Fouda, Noha M EL-Khodary, Ahmed A. Amin, Mohammed Hussien Ahmed Hussien, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Purpose Liver cirrhosis can change antidiabetic and analgesic drug pharmacokinetics, mandating the need for dose modifications. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic PBPK modeling helps expect these pharmacokinetic alterations in cirrhotic patients and estimate dosage across various degrees of cirrhosis severities with subsequent evaluation of the recommended doses. Methods PBPK models were first validated in healthy participants and then adapted to incorporate cirrhosis‑related pathophysiological changes. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and plasma maximum concentration (C max ) were predicted and compared with observed data. Dose adjustments were calculated to achieve unbound drug exposures comparable to those seen in healthy volunteers, and recommendations were made across Child–Pugh (CP) classes A, B, and C. Clinical evaluation was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBPK‑guided dosing. Results Predicted AUC and C max values showed good agreement with observed data (within 2‑fold). The models were also used to predict unbound plasma AUC across various disease stages and to evaluate change in the dosing for untested cirrhotic populations. The latter results have been compared with the healthy population. The model-informed dose adjustment reduced duloxetine to 48.8%, 24.3%, and 11.6% and sitagliptin to 83.3%,71.4%, and 62.5% of their standard doses across CP classes A, B, and C, respectively. Clinical evaluation confirmed that PBPK‑guided dosing improved glycemic control and pain reduction while maintaining safety across cirrhosis severities. Conclusion Duloxetine kinetics are significantly affected by hepatic impairment, whereas sitagliptin shows modest pharmacokinetic changes. Integrating PBPK modeling with clinical evaluation provides reliable, evidence‑based guidance for dose optimization of these drugs in cirrhotic patients. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT07439536), registered retrospectively on 17 February 2026. PBPK Sitagliptin Duloxetine Diabetes Peripheral neuropathy Cirrhosis Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files SupplementaryinformationforsitagliptinandduloxetineEJCPdocx.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 30 Apr, 2026 Reviewers invited by journal 28 Apr, 2026 Editor assigned by journal 28 Apr, 2026 Submission checks completed at journal 28 Apr, 2026 First submitted to journal 24 Apr, 2026 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9517990","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":633060686,"identity":"dbadaa0b-53f3-4861-b182-7e524f73f337","order_by":0,"name":"Aya Fouda","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kafrelsheikh University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Aya","middleName":"","lastName":"Fouda","suffix":""},{"id":633060687,"identity":"3e72eb1d-fe85-4240-9ee0-d88b579ae158","order_by":1,"name":"Noha M EL-Khodary","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kafrelsheikh University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Noha","middleName":"M","lastName":"EL-Khodary","suffix":""},{"id":633060688,"identity":"8e4f507d-e32b-4ea5-82c3-5d16e6ce9b1a","order_by":2,"name":"Ahmed A. Amin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kafrelsheikh University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ahmed","middleName":"A.","lastName":"Amin","suffix":""},{"id":633060689,"identity":"b66d952d-e2ab-403c-8519-beb32d0bb170","order_by":3,"name":"Mohammed Hussien Ahmed Hussien","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kafrelshiekh University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Mohammed","middleName":"Hussien Ahmed","lastName":"Hussien","suffix":""},{"id":633060690,"identity":"da34023f-138d-4d99-b48c-1e4a11a9e05c","order_by":4,"name":"Khaled Abdelkawy","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Kafrelsheikh University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Khaled","middleName":"","lastName":"Abdelkawy","suffix":""},{"id":633060691,"identity":"a5a975eb-25be-4061-9a45-b0955c449f2a","order_by":5,"name":"Eman El-Khateeb","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Certara Predictive Technologies (CPT)","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Eman","middleName":"","lastName":"El-Khateeb","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-04-24 13:53:36","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":108645048,"identity":"15124f7e-719e-4bc8-b4d9-6e2dd6a2df0d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-06 22:15:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1028332,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"AyaresearchEJCPrevised.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9517990/v1_covered_77b1f9e7-34a1-4b4e-932c-f23126287259.pdf"},{"id":108645047,"identity":"06ff5327-3a09-4ed8-949d-5c6f39d3137f","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-05-06 22:15:47","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":5120976,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryinformationforsitagliptinandduloxetineEJCPdocx.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9517990/v1/6f933e3765bda0a22a3e2621.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Model-Informed Precision Dosing Strategy for Sitagliptin and Duloxetine in Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Interventional Pilot Study","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-clinical-pharmacology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejcl","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology](http://link.springer.com/journal/228)","snPcode":"228","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/228/3","title":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"PBPK, Sitagliptin, Duloxetine, Diabetes, Peripheral neuropathy, Cirrhosis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePurpose\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Liver cirrhosis can change antidiabetic and analgesic drug pharmacokinetics, mandating the need for dose modifications. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic PBPK modeling helps expect these pharmacokinetic alterations in cirrhotic patients and estimate dosage across various degrees of cirrhosis severities with subsequent evaluation of the recommended doses.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;PBPK models were first validated in healthy participants and then adapted to incorporate cirrhosis‑related pathophysiological changes. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as\u0026nbsp;area\u0026nbsp;under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and plasma maximum concentration (C\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e) were\u0026nbsp;predicted and compared with observed data. Dose adjustments were calculated to achieve unbound drug exposures\u0026nbsp;comparable to those seen in healthy volunteers,\u0026nbsp;and recommendations were made across Child–Pugh (CP) classes A, B, and C. Clinical evaluation was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBPK‑guided dosing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Predicted AUC and C\u003csub\u003emax\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026nbsp;values showed good agreement with observed data (within 2‑fold).\u0026nbsp;The models were also used to predict unbound plasma AUC across various disease stages and to evaluate change in the dosing for untested cirrhotic populations. The latter results have been compared with the healthy population. The model-informed dose adjustment reduced duloxetine to 48.8%, 24.3%, and 11.6% and sitagliptin to 83.3%,71.4%, and 62.5% of their standard doses across CP classes A, B, and C, respectively.\u0026nbsp;Clinical evaluation confirmed that PBPK‑guided dosing improved glycemic control and pain reduction while maintaining safety across cirrhosis severities.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;Duloxetine kinetics are significantly affected by hepatic impairment, whereas sitagliptin shows modest pharmacokinetic changes. Integrating PBPK modeling with clinical evaluation provides reliable, evidence‑based guidance for dose optimization of these drugs in cirrhotic patients.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eClinical Trial Registration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eClinicalTrials.gov\u0026nbsp;(Identifier: NCT07439536), registered retrospectively on 17 February 2026.\u003cstrong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Model-Informed Precision Dosing Strategy for Sitagliptin and Duloxetine in Hepatic Cirrhosis: An Interventional Pilot Study","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-05-06 22:15:31","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9517990/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"54170608850326325119656912349833520051","date":"2026-04-30T14:19:13+00:00","index":"hide","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2026-04-28T13:32:51+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2026-04-28T06:20:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2026-04-28T06:20:28+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","date":"2026-04-24T13:46:18+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"european-journal-of-clinical-pharmacology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"ejcl","sideBox":"Learn more about [European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology](http://link.springer.com/journal/228)","snPcode":"228","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/228/3","title":"European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"e0ce514f-61b8-499f-afe2-9c1f8cd346d5","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 6th, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"54170608850326325119656912349833520051","date":"2026-04-30T14:19:13+00:00","index":13,"fulltext":""}],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-06T22:15:31+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-05-06 22:15:31","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9517990","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9517990","identity":"rs-9517990","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00