Ongoing Range Shift of Mangrove Foundation Species: Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle in Georgia, USA

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Ongoing climate change is leading to shifting vegetation patterns in coastal areas worldwide. One such shift in vegetation is the ability of tropical species to establish and survive farther north than they would have in the past. A well-studied example of this tropicalization is the expansion of mangroves at the marsh-mangrove ecotone, thought to be controlled by a decrease in extreme freeze events in the SE USA. However, accurate mangrove distribution data at their poleward limit in this region is currently lacking. Here, we report information collected from targeted surveys along the Atlantic coasts of Florida and Georgia at the poleward limit of mangroves in the USA. We document both Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle individuals naturally occuring in Georgia, USA, poleward of previous reports by more than 23 km (A. germinans) and by almost 80 km (R. mangle), respectively. Results highlight the lack of distributional information in this under-sampled region, and the need for additional study of species-specific physiology and tolerance, especially for R. mangle which exhibited surprising resilience and responses to freeze events. These data will be crucial to validate models showing a northern shift of mangroves. Knowing where mangroves have established and the associated conditions that allowed establishment will help inform models of tropicalization and ecotonal shifts in areas where foundation species are expanding, giving managers and researchers needed insight as current landscapes change.
Full text 79,836 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Ongoing Range Shift of Mangrove Foundation Species: Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle in Georgia, USA | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Ongoing Range Shift of Mangrove Foundation Species: Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle in Georgia, USA William Vervaeke, Ilka Feller, Scott Jones This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Estuaries and Coasts → Version 1 posted 5 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Ongoing climate change is leading to shifting vegetation patterns in coastal areas worldwide. One such shift in vegetation is the ability of tropical species to establish and survive farther north than they would have in the past. A well-studied example of this tropicalization is the expansion of mangroves at the marsh-mangrove ecotone, thought to be controlled by a decrease in extreme freeze events in the SE USA. However, accurate mangrove distribution data at their poleward limit in this region is currently lacking. Here, we report information collected from targeted surveys along the Atlantic coasts of Florida and Georgia at the poleward limit of mangroves in the USA. We document both Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle individuals naturally occuring in Georgia, USA, poleward of previous reports by more than 23 km ( A. germinans ) and by almost 80 km ( R. mangle ), respectively. Results highlight the lack of distributional information in this under-sampled region, and the need for additional study of species-specific physiology and tolerance, especially for R. mangle which exhibited surprising resilience and responses to freeze events. These data will be crucial to validate models showing a northern shift of mangroves. Knowing where mangroves have established and the associated conditions that allowed establishment will help inform models of tropicalization and ecotonal shifts in areas where foundation species are expanding, giving managers and researchers needed insight as current landscapes change. saltmarsh mangrove ecotone tropicalization range shift climate change Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction Climate change is altering environmental conditions and causing range shifts of foundation species, including through the tropicalization of temperate areas (Bates et al. 2014 , Osland et al. 2021 , McLean et al. 2021 ). Tropicalization, caused by decreases in the frequency of extreme cold events, may be driving latitudinal shifts of foundation species within some temperate-tropical ecotones (Osland et al. 2021 , Parmesan et al. 2000 ). The marsh-mangrove ecotone in particular may be an ideal study system for investigating tropicalization, as it occurs along the border of potentially expanding tropical climates and has a visible foundation species change when conditions shift (Osland et al. 2023 ). Subtropical saltmarshes in the SE USA, for example, are expected to experience mangrove expansion as a result of tropicalization, which could profoundly affect coastal ecosystem structure and function (Cavanaugh et al.2019, Chapman et al 2021 , Osland et al. 2022 ). In contrast, other regions especially in the Southern Hemisphere are experiencing mangrove expansion from non-temperature drivers, including estuarine geomorphology (Raw et al. 2019 , Whitt et al. 2020 ) and relative sea-level rise (Saintilan et al. 2019 ). In the SE USA, where increased minimum temperatures are likely driving mangrove expansion, climate projection models suggest a 5°C increase in annual temperature minimums, potentially allowing mangrove distribution to expand as far north as South Carolina, USA (Cavanaugh et al. 2019 ). This region also has a strong research base exploring the functional implications and drivers of ecotonal shifts with climate change (Rodriguez et al. 2016 , Simpson et al. 2017 , Osland et al. 2019 ). Due to rapidly changing environmental conditions and potential shifts in ecosystem function across an area with large expanses of saltmarsh habitat (Worthington et al. 2023 ), a regional approach to tracking species range shifts may be most useful, as demonstrated for expanding mangroves in Apalachicola Bay, Florida (Snyder et al. 2022 ). Currently, this approach is lacking for the range limit of mangroves on the Atlantic Coast, despite evidence that mangroves in NE Florida may respond most strongly to a warming climate at their poleward range edge (Chapman et al. 2021 ). Reports of mangrove presence and abundance at this range limit are scarce; the region is known to be undersampled (Bardou et al. 2023 ). Currently, the northernmost published mangrove location ( Avicennia germinans ), is at Fort George Inlet in the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve in Jacksonville, FL USA (Cavanaugh et al. 2019 ) with the northernmost individual on the southern tip of Amelia Island (Kennedy et al. 2020 ). The northernmost reported R. mangle is in the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (Frazel 2009 ). However, despite these records, there remains a distinct data gap on the current distribution of the northernmost mangroves on FL’s Atlantic coast (Bardou et al. 2023 ), which are the northernmost mangroves in the USA. This gap is hindering prediction of future mangrove expansion and the ecological effects of foundation species turnover. Here, we detail the results of field surveys aimed at filling mangrove distribution gaps at their range limit in NE FL, conducted in 2024. We report both black mangrove ( A. germinans ) and red mangrove ( R. mangle ) as naturally-occurring in Georgia, USA, at latitudes > 30.72 °N. Materials and Methods Site setting The northern range limit of mangroves in the SE USA currently occurs near the Florida-Georgia border. This border follows the St. Mary’s River, which ends between two barrier islands: Cumberland Island (north) and Amelia Island (south) (Fig. 1 ). This region marks a transition from bar-built lagoonal systems (St. Augustine, FL southward) to riverine estuaries with back-barrier complexes (Jacksonville, FL northward) (Dame et al. 2000 ). Marshes in the region are typically dominated by Spartina alterniflora in the low marsh, with Juncus romerianus in the high marsh and in areas with brackish salinities (Odum 1988 , Dame et al. 2000 ). The area of Cumberland Bay is bordered on the west by Kings Bay Naval Base and the east by Cumberland Island, a National Park Service (NPS) designated National Seashore. In FL, there are extensive marshes south of the St Marys River along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW). The mean tidal range in this area is 1.83 m; some of the largest tides in the SE USA. The climate in this region is humid subtropical (Köppen Cfa; Beck et al. 2018 ) with the lowest average monthly temperature 8.7°C and highest 32.3°C (usclimatedata.com) . The region sees frequent tropical storm systems, and although initial direct hits are rare has had 8 storms track within 100 km over the last 10 years, (noaa.gov) . Field surveys and data collection Surveys were conducted by small watercraft at high tide during winter, when Spartina is senescent and evergreen mangrove shrubs are easier to locate. Surveys in January and February 2024 were conducted between the Nassau River, FL, and St. Mary’s River along the ICW (Fig. 1 ). Both surveys expanded to the north side of the St. Mary’s River in Georgia, with the February survey following Cumberland Island north to East River and west to Kings Bay Naval Base. A final survey was conducted in May 2024 to confirm locations and collect additional data on the northernmost mangroves in FL (Fig. 1 ). Geodetic locations of individual mangroves were collected with Trimble Mobile Manager software using a Trimble R12i GNSS receiver. Positions are relative to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 1983 (2010.0)) and elevations are relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) using Geoid18. Corrections were completed in real-time kinematic (RTK) with minimum vertical precision of 0.02 m and minimum horizontal precision of 0.01 m. Each mangrove reported was measured for total height (m), and two diameter measurements (m) were collected at perpendicular angles as a metric of size and shape (Feller et al. 2023 ). Mangrove species identity and reproductive status were also noted, by the presence of flowers, fruit, and/or propagules. To record the approximate age of each mangrove, we located annual increments of growth (leaf nodes) from branch tips to as close to the base of the plant as possible (Duarte et al.1999, Feller et al.2023). Results The northernmost A. germinans and R. mangle individuals were found in GA, USA, with an R. mangle individual the northernmost mangrove at 30.7353 °N (Fig. 2 , Table 1 ). The northernmost A. germinans individual is nearby, at 30.7314 °N (Fig. 2 , Table 1 ). Surveys in 2024 recorded a total of eight A. germinans and 40 R. mangle individuals, all north of published mangroves and north of the previously known range limit of 30.5646 °N along the Nassau River, FL (Vervaeke, unpub. data). Northernmost mangrove individuals were generally small and young (Figs. 3–4, Table 1). All R. mangle individuals reported here were shorter than 0.75 m tall and estimated to be younger than 5 years old. Most A. germinans individuals were similarly small and young, save for one large individual 1.33 m tall that was estimated to be greater than five years old. Table 1 Location, elevation, and plant structural data for all currently-known mangroves in Georgia and the northernmost mangroves in Florida, USA. Location Species ID Location (lat, long) Elevation (m NAVD88) Height (m) Diameter (m) Age (years) Reproductive status Georgia, USA R. mangle 30.73529, -81.49527 0.798 0.74 0.40, 0.33 4 Y(flowers and fruit) R. mangle 30.73479, -81.49554 0.889 0.57 0.29, 0.28 3 Y(flowers) R. mangle 30.73471, -81.49557 0.876 0.45 0.23,0.19 3 N R. mangle 30.73438, -81.49561 0.754 0.69 0.58,0.44 4 N A. germinans 30.73139, -81.50038 0.693 0.80 0.46, 0.34 4 N A. germinans 30.73152, -81.48027 0.717 0.76 0.30, 0.22 3 N A. germinans 30.73030, -81.50053 0.809 1.33 1.66, 1.49 5 to 7 Y (propagules) Florida, USA R. mangle 30.68624, -81.46477 0.624 0.70 0.31, 0.28 3 N A. germinans 30.67149, -81.47694 0.799 0.70 1.55, 1.48 > 5 Y(flowers) Discussion Our report of naturally-recruited A. germinans and R. mangle individuals in GA provides evidence that mangroves may be establishing poleward of their historical range limits in the SE USA. This expansion is often attributed to anthropogenic climate change and associated global warming in this region, allowing these tropical plants to survive at more northern latitudes (Osland et al. 2021 ). Periods of warming followed by periodic freeze events are natural and expected to continue (Cavanaugh et al. 2019 ). Other periodic disturbances, such as hurricanes, also influence the rate at which mangrove propagules disperse and affect their poleward expansion (Kennedy et al. 2020 ). Similar to the mangroves we report here, John Muir observed mangroves in 1867 growing in clumps in the coastal marshes near present-day Fernandina Beach, FL (Muir 1919). At that time, Ponce Inlet, > 160 km to the south, was considered the northern limit of mangroves along the Atlantic coast of North America (Cavanaugh et al. 2019 ). Based on our recent observations and the 1867 historical data from Muir’s book, we conclude that while in the past mangroves were distributed further north than previously recognized, there has been a rapid expansion of mangroves since the turn of the millennia (Cavanaugh et al. 2019 , Osland et al. 2021 , 2022 , Snyder et al. 2022 ). Anthropogenic climate change has likely already altered the conditions that allow mangrove survival poleward up the coast of Georgia. Over the past 54 years, average winter temperatures in Jacksonville, FL, and Savannah, GA have risen 3.4°C and 4.1°C, respectively ( Climate Central ). The lowest officially recorded temperature in Jacksonville, FL for the last 10 years ranges between − 4°C in 2014 and − 3°C in 2023. The coldest temperature recorded for the last 25 years was − 7°C in 2013 ( Current Results ), a temperature likely fatal to A. germinans (Osland et al. 2019 ). Surreptitiously planted A. germinans individuals have also been identified growing at St Simon’s Island at 31.1408°N, north of the mangroves described here by over 42 km (Vervaeke personal observation). While they are no longer extant, these mangroves survived for ~ 15 to 20 years, showing the possibility of mangroves establishing poleward of current distributions. Mangrove expansion is difficult to detect without intensive on-the-ground surveying, as temperature data alone cannot predict individual mangrove establishment and survival. Remote sensing can underestimate mangrove expansion due to patchy distributions within the marsh-mangrove ecotone, small stature, and rapid recruitment and change relative to image availability and resolution at higher latitudes (Jia et al. 2023 ). Newly available high-resolution imagery shows promise for detecting mangroves at ecotone, but small size and height below the marsh canopy during initial establishment make mangroves difficult to detect (Doughty et al. 2024 ). Ground surveying has its constraints, such as appropriate tides and access to difficult-to-reach areas. A combination of regional imagery analyses coupled with ground surveys may therefore be the best practice for detecting and reporting expanding foundation species, especially in under-surveyed regions such as NE Florida and SE Georgia (Bardou et al. 2023 ). The emerging pattern of mangrove distribution from the northern range limit in the SE USA has highlighted the distinct need for additional investigation into the eco-physiology of R. mangle . Despite lower inherent physiological tolerance to freeze events (Kang et al. 2024 ), R. mangle is currently distributed as far north as A. germinans , similar to patterns observed on the FL Gulf Coast in Apalachicola Bay (Snyder et al. 2022 ). Temperature thresholds that lead to damage and mortality of R. mangle are less understood than those for A. germinans , but they are generally thought to be warmer (~ -4.5°C for R. mangle mortality compared to -6.6°C for A. germinans ; Osland et al. 2020, Kang et al. 2024 ). Mangroves of both species found in GA, all estimated to be three years old or older, survived a freeze event on December 24, 2022, when a nearby NOAA Gauge (8679598) recorded a low temperature of -4.6°C. This freeze event was nearly concurrent with high tide, potentially buffering the microclimate these mangroves experienced (Osland et al. 2019 ). Beyond open questions on the potential differences between fundamental physiological freeze tolerance and realized freeze tolerance of R. mangle , there is a need for basic physiological stress response research. Freeze-affected A. germinans individuals often show leaf browning when damaged and can exhibit epicormic growth in the recovery phase, leading to shrubby growth (Feller et al. 2023 ). Less is known about how R. mangle individuals show sub-lethal freeze damage. The northernmost R. mangle individuals demonstrate a distinct shrubby morphology that may be in response to freeze events, and the authors have observed regrowth from seemingly dead stems (Fig. 5 ), contrary to the prevailing understanding of Rhizophora physiology based on storm damage recovery and experimental pruning (e.g., Gill and Tomlinson 1969 , 1971 ). Further investigations exploring the drivers controlling mangrove distribution and eco-physiology at the range limit will be important to predict future expansion. Surveys conducted on Amelia Island have found large numbers of A. germinans propagules stranded on the beach at Fort Clinch at the mouth of the St Mary’s River after Hurricane Irma in 2017 (Kennedy et al 2020 ); it is unclear if such stochastic storm events led to pulsed age cohorts of expanding mangroves. Post-storm surveys could be conducted at the northern range limit to quantify the number of propagules of both species available for recruitment. Hydrologic drivers disperse mangrove propagules and influence successful establishment after stranding (Balke et al. 2015, Yando et al. 2020 ). The regular semidiurnal tides along this coast may move A. germinans propagules around the lower marsh, whereas the elongated shape of R. mangle propagules may facilitate entrapment in the dominant low marsh Spartina alterniflora (Goldberg and Heine 2017 ). There is an urgent need for additional field surveys of mangrove distribution, field experiments testing R. mangle eco-physiology, and focused landscape analysis of potential dispersal pathways at the northern range limit of mangroves on the SE Atlantic Coast of the USA. Declarations Acknowledgments We thank R. Feller, M. Adno, P. Essick, UNF undergraduates M. Tuckey, L. Rawat, and A. Krogmann for field assistance, and M. Gregory for a review. References Balke, T., P. M. J. Herman, and T. J. Bouma. 2014. Critical transitions in disturbance-driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery. Edited by Christer Nilsson. Journal of Ecology 102: 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12241. Bardou, R., M. J. Osland, S. Scyphers, C. Shepard, K. E. Aerni, J. B. Alemu I, R. Crimian, et al. 2023. Rapidly Changing Range Limits in a Warming World: Critical Data Limitations and Knowledge Gaps for Advancing Understanding of Mangrove Range Dynamics in the Southeastern USA. Estuaries and Coasts 46: 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01209-7. Bates, A. E., G. T. Pecl, S. Frusher, A. J. Hobday, T. Wernberg, D. A. Smale, J. M. Sunday, et al. 2014. Defining and observing stages of climate-mediated range shifts in marine systems. Global Environmental Change 26: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.009. Beck, H. E., N. E. Zimmermann, T. R. McVicar, N. Vergopolan, A. Berg, and E. F. Wood. 2018. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Scientific Data 5: 180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214. Cavanaugh, K. C., E. M. Dangremond, C. L. Doughty, A. P. Williams, J. D. Parker, M. A. Hayes, W. Rodriguez, and I. C. Feller. 2019. Climate-driven regime shifts in a mangrove–saltmarsh ecotone over the past 250 years. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116: 21602–21608. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902181116. Chapman, S. K., I. C. Feller, G. Canas, M. A. Hayes, N. Dix, M. Hester, J. Morris, and J. A. Langley. 2021. Mangrove growth response to experimental warming is greatest near the range limit in northeast Florida. Ecology 102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3320. Dame, R., M. Alber, D. Allen, M. Mallin, C. Montague, A. Lewitus, A. Chalmers, et al. 2000. Estuaries of the South Atlantic Coast of North America: Their Geographical Signatures. Estuaries 23: 793. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352999. Doughty, C. L., K. C. Cavanaugh, S. Chapman, and L. Fatoyinbo. 2024. Uncovering mangrove range limits using very high resolution satellite imagery to detect fine‐scale mangrove and saltmarsh habitats in dynamic coastal ecotones. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation : rse2.394. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.394. Duarte, C. M., U. Thampanya, J. Terrados, and O. Geertz-Hansen. 1999. The determination of the age and growth of SE Asian mangrove seedlings from internodal counts. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 3: 251–257. Feller, I. C., U. Berger, S. K. Chapman, E. M. Dangremond, N. G. Dix, J. A. Langley, C. E. Lovelock, T. Z. Osborne, A. C. Shor, and L. T. Simpson. 2023. Nitrogen Addition Increases Freeze Resistance in Black Mangrove (Avicennia germinans) Shrubs in a Temperate-Tropical Ecotone. Ecosystems . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-022-00796-z. Frazel, D. (2009). Site Profile of the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine. Gill, A. M., and P. B. Tomlinson. 1969. Studies on the Growth of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) I. Habit and General Morphology. Biotropica 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989744. Gill, A. M., and P. B. Tomlinson. 1971. Studies on the Growth of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) 3. Phenology of the Shoot. Biotropica 3: 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989815. Goldberg, N. A., and J. N. Heine. 2017. Life on the leading edge: Phenology and demography of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle L. at the northern limit of its expanding range. Flora 235: 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.09.003. Jia, M., Z. Wang, D. Mao, C. Ren, K. Song, C. Zhao, C. Wang, X. Xiao, and Y. Wang. 2023. Mapping global distribution of mangrove forests at 10-m resolution. Science Bulletin 68: 1306–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.05.004. Kang, Y., D. A. Kaplan, and M. J. Osland. 2024. Linking temperature sensitivity of mangrove communities, populations and individuals across a tropical‐temperate transitional zone. Journal of Ecology : 1365-2745.14296. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14296. Kennedy, J. P., E. M. Dangremond, M. A. Hayes, R. F. Preziosi, J. K. Rowntree, and I. C. Feller. 2020. Hurricanes overcome migration lag and shape intraspecific genetic variation beyond a poleward mangrove range limit. Molecular Ecology 29: 2583–2597. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15513. McLean, M., D. Mouillot, A. A. Maureaud, T. Hattab, M. A. MacNeil, E. Goberville, M. Lindegren, G. Engelhard, M. Pinsky, and A. Auber. 2021. Disentangling tropicalization and deborealization in marine ecosystems under climate change. Current Biology 31: 4817-4823.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.034. Muir, J. 1916. A thousand mile walk to the gulf . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Odum, W. E. 1988. Comparative Ecology of Tidal Freshwater and Salt Marshes. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 147–176. Osland, M. J., B. Chivoiu, L. C. Feher, L. L. Dale, D. Lieurance, W. M. Daniel, and J. E. Spencer. 2023. Plant migration due to winter climate change: range expansion of tropical invasive plants in response to warming winters. Biological Invasions 25: 2813–2830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03075-7. Osland, M. J., J. B. Grace, G. R. Guntenspergen, K. M. Thorne, J. A. Carr, and L. C. Feher. 2019. Climatic Controls on the Distribution of Foundation Plant Species in Coastal Wetlands of the Conterminous United States: Knowledge Gaps and Emerging Research Needs. Estuaries and Coasts 42: 1991–2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00640-z. Osland, M. J., A. R. Hughes, A. R. Armitage, S. B. Scyphers, J. Cebrian, S. H. Swinea, C. C. Shepard, et al. 2022. The impacts of mangrove range expansion on wetland ecosystem services in the southeastern United States: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and emerging research needs. Global Change Biology 28: 3163–3187. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16111. Osland, M. J., Stevens, P. W., Lamont, M. M., Brusca, R. C., Hart, K. M., Waddle, J. H., Langtimm, C. A., Williams, C. M., Keim, B. D., Terando, A. J., Reyier, E. A., Marshall, K. E., Loik, M. E., Boucek, R. E., Lewis, A. B., & Seminoff, J. A. (2021). Tropicalization of temperate ecosystems in North America: The northward range expansion of tropical organisms in response to warming winter temperatures. Global Change Biology, 27, 3009–3034. https://doi.org/10.1111/ gcb.15563 Parmesan, C., Root, T. L., & Willig, M. R. (2000). Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , 81 (3), 443-450. Raw, J. L., J. A. Godbold, L. van Niekerk, and J. B. Adams. 2019. Drivers of mangrove distribution at the high-energy, wave-dominated, southern African range limit. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 226: 106296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106296. Rodriguez, W., I. C. Feller, and K. C. Cavanaugh. 2016. Spatio-temporal changes of a mangrove–saltmarsh ecotone in the northeastern coast of Florida, USA. Global Ecology and Conservation 7: 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.07.005. Saintilan, N., K. Rogers, and K. L. McKee. 2019. The Shifting Saltmarsh-Mangrove Ecotone in Australasia and the Americas. In Coastal Wetlands , 915–945. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63893-9.00026-5. Simpson, L. T., T. Z. Osborne, L. J. Duckett, and I. C. Feller. 2017. Carbon Storages along a Climate Induced Coastal Wetland Gradient. Wetlands 37: 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0937-x. Snyder, C. M., L. C. Feher, M. J. Osland, C. J. Miller, A. R. Hughes, and K. L. Cummins. 2022. The Distribution and Structure of Mangroves (Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle) Near a Rapidly Changing Range Limit in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Estuaries and Coasts 45: 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-00951-0. Whitt, A. A., R. Coleman, C. E. Lovelock, C. Gillies, D. Ierodiaconou, M. Liyanapathirana, and P. I. Macreadie. 2020. March of the mangroves: Drivers of encroachment into southern temperate saltmarsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 240: 106776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106776. Worthington, T. A., M. Spalding, E. Landis, T. L. Maxwell, A. Navarro, L. S. Smart, and N. J. Murray. 2023. The distribution of global tidal marshes from earth observation data. bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.26.542433 Yando, E. S., S. F. Jones, and M. W. Hester. 2020. Limited Mangrove Propagule Retention at a Latitudinal Range Limit: Spatiotemporal Patterns at the Patch Scale. Estuaries and Coasts . https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00805-1. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 04 Mar, 2025 Read the published version in Estuaries and Coasts → Version 1 posted Reviewers agreed at journal 19 Jun, 2024 Reviewers invited by journal 19 Jun, 2024 Editor invited by journal 19 Jun, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 19 Jun, 2024 First submitted to journal 18 Jun, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4601188","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":316570258,"identity":"d9437098-305c-43f4-abf8-24c6a42fe13e","order_by":0,"name":"William Vervaeke","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1518-5197","institution":"National Park Service","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"William","middleName":"","lastName":"Vervaeke","suffix":""},{"id":316570259,"identity":"9b129bcb-2c60-4136-92a6-a6622582a796","order_by":1,"name":"Ilka Feller","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Smithsonian Environmental Research Center","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ilka","middleName":"","lastName":"Feller","suffix":""},{"id":316570260,"identity":"e1a1547c-97d3-4ae9-b73b-6aa93fd72951","order_by":2,"name":"Scott Jones","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"UNF: University of North Florida","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Scott","middleName":"","lastName":"Jones","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-06-18 16:03:23","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-025-01501-8","type":"published","date":"2025-03-04T15:57:09+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":60448645,"identity":"ec08e42c-318a-4c86-877a-c6a5bacd2891","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-16 22:16:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":115409,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMap of the region under study with specific survey areas in Florida and Georgia, USA, and current northern distributional limits of mangrove species reported in the literature.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/f735144cdfc0ee257ac22a27.jpg"},{"id":60448641,"identity":"7f04c78e-468c-4395-8b6a-6cf2a84766ac","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-16 22:16:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":178770,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMap of study area and mangrove point data locations for red (\u003cem\u003eRhizophora mangle\u003c/em\u003e) and black (\u003cem\u003eAvicennia germinans\u003c/em\u003e) mangroves at their current northern limit in Georgia, USA.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/90f75e4b83e8a0c9a6987351.jpg"},{"id":60449050,"identity":"6508461e-8020-47d9-9ea6-dcac370082d4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-16 22:24:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":161000,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePhotographs of red mangrove, \u003cem\u003eRhizophora mangle\u003c/em\u003e, individuals in early 2024 from Georgia, USA. Photo credits: A-B S.F. Jones, University of North Florida.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/4293ddfc9c6935121da7b084.jpg"},{"id":60448644,"identity":"60407aaf-bff7-437c-8ee6-a412915e5ffc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-16 22:16:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":178246,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePhotographs of black mangrove, \u003cem\u003eAvicennia germinans\u003c/em\u003e, individuals in early 2024 from Georgia, USA. Photo credits: A S.F. Jones, University of North Florida; B W.C. Vervaeke, National Park Service.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/b94e18fc766704b3f0578a54.jpg"},{"id":60448646,"identity":"5b5152c8-19c2-42bb-abc9-a414ddd5228a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-07-16 22:16:12","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":159403,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePhotographs of red mangrove, \u003cem\u003eRhizophora mangle\u003c/em\u003e, individuals in 2024 exhibiting regrowth after freeze damage from late December 2022. A) individual showing one surviving stem and several dead stems, with regrowth at base of live main stem. B) close-up photo of regrowth from individual in A. C) regrowth initiating from below stem that had been mortally damaged from freezing temperatures. D) basal regrowth of several shoots from individual that had appeared dead after initial freeze damage. Photo credits: A-C S.F. Jones, University of North Florida; D W.C. Vervaeke, National Park Service.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/60e9aafd8fce2c0d0bfc2a89.jpg"},{"id":78183936,"identity":"1ca716ba-3adc-4621-ad03-76aa6b843955","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-10 18:19:36","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1268155,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4601188/v1/8782f321-ab1c-4b9a-8245-a9277c4d8292.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Ongoing Range Shift of Mangrove Foundation Species: Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle in Georgia, USA","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eClimate change is altering environmental conditions and causing range shifts of foundation species, including through the tropicalization of temperate areas (Bates et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e, Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, McLean et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Tropicalization, caused by decreases in the frequency of extreme cold events, may be driving latitudinal shifts of foundation species within some temperate-tropical ecotones (Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, Parmesan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). The marsh-mangrove ecotone in particular may be an ideal study system for investigating tropicalization, as it occurs along the border of potentially expanding tropical climates and has a visible foundation species change when conditions shift (Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Subtropical saltmarshes in the SE USA, for example, are expected to experience mangrove expansion as a result of tropicalization, which could profoundly affect coastal ecosystem structure and function (Cavanaugh et al.2019, Chapman et al \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). In contrast, other regions especially in the Southern Hemisphere are experiencing mangrove expansion from non-temperature drivers, including estuarine geomorphology (Raw et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e, Whitt et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e) and relative sea-level rise (Saintilan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the SE USA, where increased minimum temperatures are likely driving mangrove expansion, climate projection models suggest a 5\u0026deg;C increase in annual temperature minimums, potentially allowing mangrove distribution to expand as far north as South Carolina, USA (Cavanaugh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). This region also has a strong research base exploring the functional implications and drivers of ecotonal shifts with climate change (Rodriguez et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e, Simpson et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e, Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Due to rapidly changing environmental conditions and potential shifts in ecosystem function across an area with large expanses of saltmarsh habitat (Worthington et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), a regional approach to tracking species range shifts may be most useful, as demonstrated for expanding mangroves in Apalachicola Bay, Florida (Snyder et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Currently, this approach is lacking for the range limit of mangroves on the Atlantic Coast, despite evidence that mangroves in NE Florida may respond most strongly to a warming climate at their poleward range edge (Chapman et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReports of mangrove presence and abundance at this range limit are scarce; the region is known to be undersampled (Bardou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Currently, the northernmost published mangrove location (\u003cem\u003eAvicennia germinans\u003c/em\u003e), is at Fort George Inlet in the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve in Jacksonville, FL USA (Cavanaugh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) with the northernmost individual on the southern tip of Amelia Island (Kennedy et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The northernmost reported \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e is in the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (Frazel \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). However, despite these records, there remains a distinct data gap on the current distribution of the northernmost mangroves on FL\u0026rsquo;s Atlantic coast (Bardou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e), which are the northernmost mangroves in the USA.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis gap is hindering prediction of future mangrove expansion and the ecological effects of foundation species turnover. Here, we detail the results of field surveys aimed at filling mangrove distribution gaps at their range limit in NE FL, conducted in 2024. We report both black mangrove (\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e) and red mangrove (\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e) as naturally-occurring in Georgia, USA, at latitudes\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;30.72 \u0026deg;N.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eSite setting\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe northern range limit of mangroves in the SE USA currently occurs near the Florida-Georgia border. This border follows the St. Mary\u0026rsquo;s River, which ends between two barrier islands: Cumberland Island (north) and Amelia Island (south) (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). This region marks a transition from bar-built lagoonal systems (St. Augustine, FL southward) to riverine estuaries with back-barrier complexes (Jacksonville, FL northward) (Dame et al. \u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Marshes in the region are typically dominated by \u003cem\u003eSpartina alterniflora\u003c/em\u003e in the low marsh, with \u003cem\u003eJuncus romerianus\u003c/em\u003e in the high marsh and in areas with brackish salinities (Odum \u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e, Dame et al. \u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). The area of Cumberland Bay is bordered on the west by Kings Bay Naval Base and the east by Cumberland Island, a National Park Service (NPS) designated National Seashore. In FL, there are extensive marshes south of the St Marys River along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW). The mean tidal range in this area is 1.83 m; some of the largest tides in the SE USA. The climate in this region is humid subtropical (K\u0026ouml;ppen Cfa; Beck et al. \u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e) with the lowest average monthly temperature 8.7\u0026deg;C and highest 32.3\u0026deg;C \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e(usclimatedata.com)\u003c/span\u003e. The region sees frequent tropical storm systems, and although initial direct hits are rare has had 8 storms track within 100 km over the last 10 years, \u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003e(noaa.gov)\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\n \u003ch2\u003eField surveys and data collection\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSurveys were conducted by small watercraft at high tide during winter, when \u003cem\u003eSpartina\u003c/em\u003e is senescent and evergreen mangrove shrubs are easier to locate. Surveys in January and February 2024 were conducted between the Nassau River, FL, and St. Mary\u0026rsquo;s River along the ICW (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Both surveys expanded to the north side of the St. Mary\u0026rsquo;s River in Georgia, with the February survey following Cumberland Island north to East River and west to Kings Bay Naval Base. A final survey was conducted in May 2024 to confirm locations and collect additional data on the northernmost mangroves in FL (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGeodetic locations of individual mangroves were collected with Trimble Mobile Manager software using a Trimble R12i GNSS receiver. Positions are relative to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 1983 (2010.0)) and elevations are relative to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) using Geoid18. Corrections were completed in real-time kinematic (RTK) with minimum vertical precision of 0.02 m and minimum horizontal precision of 0.01 m.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eEach mangrove reported was measured for total height (m), and two diameter measurements (m) were collected at perpendicular angles as a metric of size and shape (Feller et al. \u003cspan class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Mangrove species identity and reproductive status were also noted, by the presence of flowers, fruit, and/or propagules. To record the approximate age of each mangrove, we located annual increments of growth (leaf nodes) from branch tips to as close to the base of the plant as possible (Duarte et al.1999, Feller et al.2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe northernmost \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals were found in GA, USA, with an \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individual the northernmost mangrove at 30.7353 \u0026deg;N (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). The northernmost \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e individual is nearby, at 30.7314 \u0026deg;N (Fig. \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e, Table \u003cspan class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). Surveys in 2024 recorded a total of eight \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e and 40 \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals, all north of published mangroves and north of the previously known range limit of 30.5646 \u0026deg;N along the Nassau River, FL (Vervaeke, unpub. data). Northernmost mangrove individuals were generally small and young (Figs. 3\u0026ndash;4, Table 1). All \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals reported here were shorter than 0.75 m tall and estimated to be younger than 5 years old. Most \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e individuals were similarly small and young, save for one large individual 1.33 m tall that was estimated to be greater than five years old.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLocation, elevation, and plant structural data for all currently-known mangroves in Georgia and the northernmost mangroves in Florida, USA.\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLocation\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSpecies ID\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLocation (lat, long)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eElevation (m NAVD88)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHeight (m)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDiameter (m)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eAge (years)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eReproductive status\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eGeorgia, USA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73529, -81.49527\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.798\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.74\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.40, 0.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY(flowers and fruit)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73479, -81.49554\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.889\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.57\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.29, 0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY(flowers)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73471, -81.49557\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.876\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.45\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.23,0.19\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73438, -81.49561\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.754\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.69\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.58,0.44\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73139, -81.50038\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.693\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.80\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.46, 0.34\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73152, -81.48027\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.717\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.76\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.30, 0.22\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.73030, -81.50053\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.809\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.33\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.66, 1.49\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e5 to 7\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY (propagules)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eFlorida, USA\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.68624, -81.46477\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.624\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.31, 0.28\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eN\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e30.67149, -81.47694\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.799\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e0.70\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e1.55, 1.48\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;5\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eY(flowers)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eOur report of naturally-recruited \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals in GA provides evidence that mangroves may be establishing poleward of their historical range limits in the SE USA. This expansion is often attributed to anthropogenic climate change and associated global warming in this region, allowing these tropical plants to survive at more northern latitudes (Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e). Periods of warming followed by periodic freeze events are natural and expected to continue (Cavanaugh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Other periodic disturbances, such as hurricanes, also influence the rate at which mangrove propagules disperse and affect their poleward expansion (Kennedy et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Similar to the mangroves we report here, John Muir observed mangroves in 1867 growing in clumps in the coastal marshes near present-day Fernandina Beach, FL (Muir 1919). At that time, Ponce Inlet, \u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;160 km to the south, was considered the northern limit of mangroves along the Atlantic coast of North America (Cavanaugh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Based on our recent observations and the 1867 historical data from Muir\u0026rsquo;s book, we conclude that while in the past mangroves were distributed further north than previously recognized, there has been a rapid expansion of mangroves since the turn of the millennia (Cavanaugh et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e, Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e, Snyder et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAnthropogenic climate change has likely already altered the conditions that allow mangrove survival poleward up the coast of Georgia. Over the past 54 years, average winter temperatures in Jacksonville, FL, and Savannah, GA have risen 3.4\u0026deg;C and 4.1\u0026deg;C, respectively (\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eClimate Central\u003c/span\u003e). The lowest officially recorded temperature in Jacksonville, FL for the last 10 years ranges between \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;4\u0026deg;C in 2014 and \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3\u0026deg;C in 2023. The coldest temperature recorded for the last 25 years was \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;7\u0026deg;C in 2013 (\u003cspan type=\"Underline\" class=\"Underline\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eCurrent Results\u003c/span\u003e), a temperature likely fatal to \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e (Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Surreptitiously planted \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e individuals have also been identified growing at St Simon\u0026rsquo;s Island at 31.1408\u0026deg;N, north of the mangroves described here by over 42 km (Vervaeke personal observation). While they are no longer extant, these mangroves survived for ~\u0026thinsp;15 to 20 years, showing the possibility of mangroves establishing poleward of current distributions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMangrove expansion is difficult to detect without intensive on-the-ground surveying, as temperature data alone cannot predict individual mangrove establishment and survival. Remote sensing can underestimate mangrove expansion due to patchy distributions within the marsh-mangrove ecotone, small stature, and rapid recruitment and change relative to image availability and resolution at higher latitudes (Jia et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Newly available high-resolution imagery shows promise for detecting mangroves at ecotone, but small size and height below the marsh canopy during initial establishment make mangroves difficult to detect (Doughty et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Ground surveying has its constraints, such as appropriate tides and access to difficult-to-reach areas. A combination of regional imagery analyses coupled with ground surveys may therefore be the best practice for detecting and reporting expanding foundation species, especially in under-surveyed regions such as NE Florida and SE Georgia (Bardou et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe emerging pattern of mangrove distribution from the northern range limit in the SE USA has highlighted the distinct need for additional investigation into the eco-physiology of \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e. Despite lower inherent physiological tolerance to freeze events (Kang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e), R. \u003cem\u003emangle\u003c/em\u003e is currently distributed as far north as \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e, similar to patterns observed on the FL Gulf Coast in Apalachicola Bay (Snyder et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). Temperature thresholds that lead to damage and mortality of \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e are less understood than those for \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e, but they are generally thought to be warmer (~ -4.5\u0026deg;C for \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e mortality compared to -6.6\u0026deg;C for \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e; Osland et al. 2020, Kang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2024\u003c/span\u003e). Mangroves of both species found in GA, all estimated to be three years old or older, survived a freeze event on December 24, 2022, when a nearby NOAA Gauge (8679598) recorded a low temperature of -4.6\u0026deg;C. This freeze event was nearly concurrent with high tide, potentially buffering the microclimate these mangroves experienced (Osland et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Beyond open questions on the potential differences between fundamental physiological freeze tolerance and realized freeze tolerance of \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e, there is a need for basic physiological stress response research. Freeze-affected \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e individuals often show leaf browning when damaged and can exhibit epicormic growth in the recovery phase, leading to shrubby growth (Feller et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). Less is known about how \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals show sub-lethal freeze damage. The northernmost \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals demonstrate a distinct shrubby morphology that may be in response to freeze events, and the authors have observed regrowth from seemingly dead stems (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e), contrary to the prevailing understanding of \u003cem\u003eRhizophora\u003c/em\u003e physiology based on storm damage recovery and experimental pruning (e.g., Gill and Tomlinson \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1969\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1971\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurther investigations exploring the drivers controlling mangrove distribution and eco-physiology at the range limit will be important to predict future expansion. Surveys conducted on Amelia Island have found large numbers of \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e propagules stranded on the beach at Fort Clinch at the mouth of the St Mary\u0026rsquo;s River after Hurricane Irma in 2017 (Kennedy et al \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e); it is unclear if such stochastic storm events led to pulsed age cohorts of expanding mangroves. Post-storm surveys could be conducted at the northern range limit to quantify the number of propagules of both species available for recruitment. Hydrologic drivers disperse mangrove propagules and influence successful establishment after stranding (Balke et al. 2015, Yando et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The regular semidiurnal tides along this coast may move \u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e propagules around the lower marsh, whereas the elongated shape of \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e propagules may facilitate entrapment in the dominant low marsh \u003cem\u003eSpartina alterniflora\u003c/em\u003e (Goldberg and Heine \u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). There is an urgent need for additional field surveys of mangrove distribution, field experiments testing \u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e eco-physiology, and focused landscape analysis of potential dispersal pathways at the northern range limit of mangroves on the SE Atlantic Coast of the USA.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eWe thank R. Feller, M. Adno, P. Essick, UNF undergraduates M. Tuckey, L. Rawat, and A. Krogmann for field assistance, and M. Gregory for a review.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBalke, T., P. M. J. Herman, and T. J. Bouma. 2014. Critical transitions in disturbance-driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery. Edited by Christer Nilsson. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Ecology\u003c/em\u003e 102: 700\u0026ndash;708. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12241.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBardou, R., M. J. Osland, S. Scyphers, C. Shepard, K. E. Aerni, J. B. Alemu I, R. Crimian, et al. 2023. Rapidly Changing Range Limits in a Warming World: Critical Data Limitations and Knowledge Gaps for Advancing Understanding of Mangrove Range Dynamics in the Southeastern USA. \u003cem\u003eEstuaries and Coasts\u003c/em\u003e 46: 1123\u0026ndash;1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01209-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBates, A. E., G. T. Pecl, S. Frusher, A. J. Hobday, T. Wernberg, D. A. Smale, J. M. Sunday, et al. 2014. Defining and observing stages of climate-mediated range shifts in marine systems. \u003cem\u003eGlobal Environmental Change\u003c/em\u003e 26: 27\u0026ndash;38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.009.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBeck, H. E., N. E. Zimmermann, T. R. McVicar, N. Vergopolan, A. Berg, and E. F. Wood. 2018. Present and future K\u0026ouml;ppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. \u003cem\u003eScientific Data\u003c/em\u003e 5: 180214. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCavanaugh, K. C., E. M. Dangremond, C. L. Doughty, A. P. Williams, J. D. Parker, M. A. Hayes, W. Rodriguez, and I. C. Feller. 2019. Climate-driven regime shifts in a mangrove\u0026ndash;saltmarsh ecotone over the past 250 years. \u003cem\u003eProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences\u003c/em\u003e 116: 21602\u0026ndash;21608. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902181116.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChapman, S. K., I. C. Feller, G. Canas, M. A. Hayes, N. Dix, M. Hester, J. Morris, and J. A. Langley. 2021. Mangrove growth response to experimental warming is greatest near the range limit in northeast Florida. \u003cem\u003eEcology\u003c/em\u003e 102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3320.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDame, R., M. Alber, D. Allen, M. Mallin, C. Montague, A. Lewitus, A. Chalmers, et al. 2000. Estuaries of the South Atlantic Coast of North America: Their Geographical Signatures. \u003cem\u003eEstuaries\u003c/em\u003e 23: 793. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352999.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDoughty, C. L., K. C. Cavanaugh, S. Chapman, and L. Fatoyinbo. 2024. Uncovering mangrove range limits using very high resolution satellite imagery to detect fine‐scale mangrove and saltmarsh habitats in dynamic coastal ecotones. \u003cem\u003eRemote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation\u003c/em\u003e: rse2.394. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.394.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDuarte, C. M., U. Thampanya, J. Terrados, and O. Geertz-Hansen. 1999. The determination of the age and growth of SE Asian mangrove seedlings from internodal counts. \u003cem\u003eMangroves and Salt Marshes\u003c/em\u003e 3: 251\u0026ndash;257.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeller, I. C., U. Berger, S. K. Chapman, E. M. Dangremond, N. G. Dix, J. A. Langley, C. E. Lovelock, T. Z. Osborne, A. C. Shor, and L. T. Simpson. 2023. Nitrogen Addition Increases Freeze Resistance in Black Mangrove (Avicennia germinans) Shrubs in a Temperate-Tropical Ecotone. \u003cem\u003eEcosystems\u003c/em\u003e. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-022-00796-z.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFrazel, D. (2009). Site Profile of the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGill, A. M., and P. B. Tomlinson. 1969. Studies on the Growth of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) I. Habit and General Morphology. \u003cem\u003eBiotropica\u003c/em\u003e 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989744.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGill, A. M., and P. B. Tomlinson. 1971. Studies on the Growth of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) 3. Phenology of the Shoot. \u003cem\u003eBiotropica\u003c/em\u003e 3: 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989815.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGoldberg, N. A., and J. N. Heine. 2017. Life on the leading edge: Phenology and demography of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle L. at the northern limit of its expanding range. \u003cem\u003eFlora\u003c/em\u003e 235: 76\u0026ndash;82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2017.09.003.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJia, M., Z. Wang, D. Mao, C. Ren, K. Song, C. Zhao, C. Wang, X. Xiao, and Y. Wang. 2023. Mapping global distribution of mangrove forests at 10-m resolution. \u003cem\u003eScience Bulletin\u003c/em\u003e 68: 1306\u0026ndash;1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.05.004.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKang, Y., D. A. Kaplan, and M. J. Osland. 2024. Linking temperature sensitivity of mangrove communities, populations and individuals across a tropical‐temperate transitional zone. \u003cem\u003eJournal of Ecology\u003c/em\u003e: 1365-2745.14296. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14296.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKennedy, J. P., E. M. Dangremond, M. A. Hayes, R. F. Preziosi, J. K. Rowntree, and I. C. Feller. 2020. Hurricanes overcome migration lag and shape intraspecific genetic variation beyond a poleward mangrove range limit. \u003cem\u003eMolecular Ecology\u003c/em\u003e 29: 2583\u0026ndash;2597. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15513.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcLean, M., D. Mouillot, A. A. Maureaud, T. Hattab, M. A. MacNeil, E. Goberville, M. Lindegren, G. Engelhard, M. Pinsky, and A. Auber. 2021. Disentangling tropicalization and deborealization in marine ecosystems under climate change. \u003cem\u003eCurrent Biology\u003c/em\u003e 31: 4817-4823.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.034.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMuir, J. 1916. \u003cem\u003eA thousand mile walk to the gulf\u003c/em\u003e. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOdum, W. E. 1988. Comparative Ecology of Tidal Freshwater and Salt Marshes. \u003cem\u003eAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics\u003c/em\u003e 1: 147\u0026ndash;176.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsland, M. J., B. Chivoiu, L. C. Feher, L. L. Dale, D. Lieurance, W. M. Daniel, and J. E. Spencer. 2023. Plant migration due to winter climate change: range expansion of tropical invasive plants in response to warming winters. \u003cem\u003eBiological Invasions\u003c/em\u003e 25: 2813\u0026ndash;2830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-023-03075-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsland, M. J., J. B. Grace, G. R. Guntenspergen, K. M. Thorne, J. A. Carr, and L. C. Feher. 2019. Climatic Controls on the Distribution of Foundation Plant Species in Coastal Wetlands of the Conterminous United States: Knowledge Gaps and Emerging Research Needs. \u003cem\u003eEstuaries and Coasts\u003c/em\u003e 42: 1991\u0026ndash;2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00640-z.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsland, M. J., A. R. Hughes, A. R. Armitage, S. B. Scyphers, J. Cebrian, S. H. Swinea, C. C. Shepard, et al. 2022. The impacts of mangrove range expansion on wetland ecosystem services in the southeastern United States: Current understanding, knowledge gaps, and emerging research needs. \u003cem\u003eGlobal Change Biology\u003c/em\u003e 28: 3163\u0026ndash;3187. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16111.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eOsland, M. J., Stevens, P. W., Lamont, M. M., Brusca, R. C., Hart, K. M., Waddle, J. H., Langtimm, C. A., Williams, C. M., Keim, B. D., Terando, A. J., Reyier, E. A., Marshall, K. E., Loik, M. E., Boucek, R. E., Lewis, A. B., \u0026amp; Seminoff, J. A. (2021). Tropicalization of temperate ecosystems in North America: The northward range expansion of tropical organisms in response to warming winter temperatures. Global Change Biology, 27, 3009\u0026ndash;3034. https://doi.org/10.1111/ gcb.15563\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eParmesan, C., Root, T. L., \u0026amp; Willig, M. R. (2000). Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. \u003cem\u003eBulletin of the American Meteorological Society\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003e81\u003c/em\u003e(3), 443-450.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRaw, J. L., J. A. Godbold, L. van Niekerk, and J. B. Adams. 2019. Drivers of mangrove distribution at the high-energy, wave-dominated, southern African range limit. \u003cem\u003eEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science\u003c/em\u003e 226: 106296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106296.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRodriguez, W., I. C. Feller, and K. C. Cavanaugh. 2016. Spatio-temporal changes of a mangrove\u0026ndash;saltmarsh ecotone in the northeastern coast of Florida, USA. \u003cem\u003eGlobal Ecology and Conservation\u003c/em\u003e 7: 245\u0026ndash;261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.07.005.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSaintilan, N., K. Rogers, and K. L. McKee. 2019. The Shifting Saltmarsh-Mangrove Ecotone in Australasia and the Americas. In \u003cem\u003eCoastal Wetlands\u003c/em\u003e, 915\u0026ndash;945. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63893-9.00026-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSimpson, L. T., T. Z. Osborne, L. J. Duckett, and I. C. Feller. 2017. Carbon Storages along a Climate Induced Coastal Wetland Gradient. \u003cem\u003eWetlands\u003c/em\u003e 37: 1023\u0026ndash;1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-017-0937-x.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSnyder, C. M., L. C. Feher, M. J. Osland, C. J. Miller, A. R. Hughes, and K. L. Cummins. 2022. The Distribution and Structure of Mangroves (Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle) Near a Rapidly Changing Range Limit in the Northeastern Gulf of Mexico. \u003cem\u003eEstuaries and Coasts\u003c/em\u003e 45: 181\u0026ndash;195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-00951-0.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWhitt, A. A., R. Coleman, C. E. Lovelock, C. Gillies, D. Ierodiaconou, M. Liyanapathirana, and P. I. Macreadie. 2020. March of the mangroves: Drivers of encroachment into southern temperate saltmarsh. \u003cem\u003eEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science\u003c/em\u003e 240: 106776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106776.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWorthington, T. A., M. Spalding, E. Landis, T. L. Maxwell, A. Navarro, L. S. Smart, and N. J. Murray. 2023. The distribution of global tidal marshes from earth observation data. bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.26.542433\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eYando, E. S., S. F. Jones, and M. W. Hester. 2020. Limited Mangrove Propagule Retention at a Latitudinal Range Limit: Spatiotemporal Patterns at the Patch Scale. \u003cem\u003eEstuaries and Coasts\u003c/em\u003e. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00805-1.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"estuaries-and-coasts","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"esco","sideBox":"Learn more about [Estuaries and Coasts](https://www.springer.com/journal/12237)","snPcode":"12237","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/esco/","title":"Estuaries and Coasts","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"saltmarsh, mangrove, ecotone, tropicalization, range shift, climate change","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eOngoing climate change is leading to shifting vegetation patterns in coastal areas worldwide. One such shift in vegetation is the ability of tropical species to establish and survive farther north than they would have in the past. A well-studied example of this tropicalization is the expansion of mangroves at the marsh-mangrove ecotone, thought to be controlled by a decrease in extreme freeze events in the SE USA. However, accurate mangrove distribution data at their poleward limit in this region is currently lacking. Here, we report information collected from targeted surveys along the Atlantic coasts of Florida and Georgia at the poleward limit of mangroves in the USA. We document both \u003cem\u003eAvicennia germinans\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eRhizophora mangle\u003c/em\u003e individuals naturally occuring in Georgia, USA, poleward of previous reports by more than 23 km (\u003cem\u003eA. germinans\u003c/em\u003e) and by almost 80 km (\u003cem\u003eR. mangle\u003c/em\u003e), respectively. Results highlight the lack of distributional information in this under-sampled region, and the need for additional study of species-specific physiology and tolerance, especially for \u003cem\u003eR. mangle \u003c/em\u003ewhich exhibited surprising resilience and responses to freeze events. These data will be crucial to validate models showing a northern shift of mangroves. Knowing where mangroves have established and the associated conditions that allowed establishment will help inform models of tropicalization and ecotonal shifts in areas where foundation species are expanding, giving managers and researchers needed insight as current landscapes change.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Ongoing Range Shift of Mangrove Foundation Species: Avicennia germinans and Rhizophora mangle in Georgia, USA","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-07-16 22:16:07","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4601188/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2024-06-20T01:15:57+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2024-06-19T20:22:45+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"Estuaries and Coasts","date":"2024-06-19T13:48:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-06-19T04:29:20+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Estuaries and Coasts","date":"2024-06-18T12:03:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"estuaries-and-coasts","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"esco","sideBox":"Learn more about [Estuaries and Coasts](https://www.springer.com/journal/12237)","snPcode":"12237","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/esco/","title":"Estuaries and Coasts","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"7fff51d9-9019-4aa6-8cf2-5d17e22e8a9d","owner":[],"postedDate":"July 16th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-10T17:47:07+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-4601188","link":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-025-01501-8","journal":{"identity":"estuaries-and-coasts","isVorOnly":false,"title":"Estuaries and Coasts"},"publishedOn":"2025-03-04 15:57:09","publishedOnDateReadable":"March 4th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-07-16 22:16:07","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1007/s12237-025-01501-8","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-025-01501-8","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4601188","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4601188","identity":"rs-4601188","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00