Pain and pathology
letter
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This paper critiques the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology's algorithm for laparoscopic findings, arguing it inadequately addresses patient needs when no pathology is identified.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My main concern with Daniels and Khan’s article is the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology’s algorithm, which states that “if no pathology is seen at laparoscopy, a letter of reassurance should be offered and the woman contacted for review a year later.”1 This ignores the fact that the woman …
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
Cited by (1)
References (2)
- Chronic pelvic pain in women via openalex
- Visceral hyperalgesia in chronic pelvic pain via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-01T06:07:04.264727+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:00.782903+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK