How Rational Is the Reluctance to Be Vaccinated against COVID-19? An Economic Approach
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
This paper considers a static game in which a player makes a decision in the first moment of whether or not to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and then nature acts. In making the decision the player takes into consideration expected costs and benefits of being inoculated in terms of income. The relative speed with which the first vaccines have reached the market has caused some parts of the population to be concerned about the possible side effects of vaccination and, as a result, a part of the population is reluctant to take the vaccine. The papers finds that according to statistics on the pandemic’s evolution and certain assumptions about the likelihood of virus sequelae and vaccine side-effects, the decision to be vaccinated appears to be optimal. Low probability of contagion and a very low vaccine effectiveness rate are needed to make the decision to be vaccinated non-optimal.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00