Effects of commercial unflavored and vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine intake and withdrawal

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) often contain flavors and solvents that may influence nicotine addiction. In this study, we characterized the dose-response relationship of commercial unflavored nicotine e-liquids and investigated the impact of vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine vapor self-administration (VSA) and withdrawal in rats. Male adolescent Sprague Dawley rats self-administered aerosols generated from commercial e-liquids containing 0, 3, 6, or 12 mg/ml nicotine in a propylene glycol (PG) and glycerol (G) vehicle. The vehicle (0 mg/ml nicotine) supported robust VSA, indicating the reinforcing effects of PG/G vapor. 3 mg/ml nicotine did not support VSA, while both 6 and 12 mg/ml nicotine concentrations produced significant reinforcement, with 6 mg/ml yielding the most stable responding. The 6 mg/ml concentration was selected for subsequent comparisons with vanilla-flavored e-liquids. Vanilla flavor (0 mg/ml nicotine) led to maintained VSA behavior, confirming its reinforcing effects. However, the combination of vanilla and nicotine (6 mg/ml) did not alter nicotine intake or withdrawal severity, as assessed by mecamylamine-precipitated somatic signs. Blood nicotine and cotinine levels were similar between nicotine and vanilla + nicotine conditions, indicating that vanilla flavor did not affect systemic nicotine metabolism. Additionally, the PG/G vehicle induced significant somatic signs, suggesting that vapor exposure itself, independent of nicotine, contributes to these physiological responses. These findings provide critical insights into the reinforcing and physiological effects of both nicotine and non-nicotine constituents in e-cigarette aerosols, underscoring the need for future studies and regulatory strategies that consider the abuse liability of flavors and solvents, such as PG/G, particularly among adolescents. Significance Statement Flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems raise concern for promoting nicotine use in youth. Using a rat vapor self-administration model, we show nicotine produces concentration-dependent reinforcement, while vanilla flavor is reinforcing but does not enhance nicotine intake or withdrawal.
Full text 2,387 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) often contain flavors and solvents that may influence nicotine addiction. In this study, we characterized the dose-response relationship of commercial unflavored nicotine e-liquids and investigated the impact of vanilla-flavored e-liquids on nicotine vapor self-administration (VSA) and withdrawal in rats. Male adolescent Sprague Dawley rats self-administered aerosols generated from commercial e-liquids containing 0, 3, 6, or 12 mg/ml nicotine in a propylene glycol (PG) and glycerol (G) vehicle. The vehicle (0 mg/ml nicotine) supported robust VSA, indicating the reinforcing effects of PG/G vapor. 3 mg/ml nicotine did not support VSA, while both 6 and 12 mg/ml nicotine concentrations produced significant reinforcement, with 6 mg/ml yielding the most stable responding. The 6 mg/ml concentration was selected for subsequent comparisons with vanilla-flavored e-liquids. Vanilla flavor (0 mg/ml nicotine) led to maintained VSA behavior, confirming its reinforcing effects. However, the combination of vanilla and nicotine (6 mg/ml) did not alter nicotine intake or withdrawal severity, as assessed by mecamylamine-precipitated somatic signs. Blood nicotine and cotinine levels were similar between nicotine and vanilla + nicotine conditions, indicating that vanilla flavor did not affect systemic nicotine metabolism. Additionally, the PG/G vehicle induced significant somatic signs, suggesting that vapor exposure itself, independent of nicotine, contributes to these physiological responses. These findings provide critical insights into the reinforcing and physiological effects of both nicotine and non-nicotine constituents in e-cigarette aerosols, underscoring the need for future studies and regulatory strategies that consider the abuse liability of flavors and solvents, such as PG/G, particularly among adolescents. Significance Statement Flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems raise concern for promoting nicotine use in youth. Using a rat vapor self-administration model, we show nicotine produces concentration-dependent reinforcement, while vanilla flavor is reinforcing but does not enhance nicotine intake or withdrawal. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. The list of nonstandard abbreviations - VSA - vapor self-administration - PG - propylene glycol - G - glycerol

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00