Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) is widely used in environmental health research to model complex, nonlinear, and interactive relationships in high-dimensional datasets. However, using a fixed posterior inclusion probability (PIP) threshold can lead to inconsistent test size control, influenced by the coefficient of variation (CV) and sample size. This study introduces a dynamic thresholding approach that adapts to these dataset characteristics, improving the sensitivity and reliability of BKMR analyses. A four-parameter logistic regression model was developed to estimate the 95th percentile of PIP as a function of the log-transformed CV and sample size. Simulations were performed across a broad range of CV values and sample sizes to evaluate test size performance for fixed and dynamic thresholds. The dynamic threshold was validated with independent simulated datasets and applied to the 2011–2014 NHANES data. The dynamic threshold consistently maintained nominal test sizes near five percent, outperforming the fixed threshold, which exhibited substantial variability. Validation with empirical data identified cadmium, manganese, and lead as significant contributors to cognitive performance, with cadmium emerging as the most influential. The dynamic threshold approach improves the precision of variable selection in BKMR, offering a more reliable method to analyze complex exposure-response relationships in environmental health research.
Full text 57,583 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data | medRxiv /* */ /* */ <!-- <!-- /*! * yepnope1.5.4 * (c) WTFPL, GPLv2 */ (function(a,b,c){function d(a){return"[object Function]"==o.call(a)}function e(a){return"string"==typeof a}function f(){}function g(a){return!a||"loaded"==a||"complete"==a||"uninitialized"==a}function h(){var a=p.shift();q=1,a?a.t?m(function(){("c"==a.t?B.injectCss:B.injectJs)(a.s,0,a.a,a.x,a.e,1)},0):(a(),h()):q=0}function i(a,c,d,e,f,i,j){function k(b){if(!o&&g(l.readyState)&&(u.r=o=1,!q&&h(),l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=null,b)){"img"!=a&&m(function(){t.removeChild(l)},50);for(var d in y[c])y[c].hasOwnProperty(d)&&y[c][d].onload()}}var j=j||B.errorTimeout,l=b.createElement(a),o=0,r=0,u={t:d,s:c,e:f,a:i,x:j};1===y[c]&&(r=1,y[c]=[]),"object"==a?l.data=c:(l.src=c,l.type=a),l.width=l.height="0",l.onerror=l.onload=l.onreadystatechange=function(){k.call(this,r)},p.splice(e,0,u),"img"!=a&&(r||2===y[c]?(t.insertBefore(l,s?null:n),m(k,j)):y[c].push(l))}function j(a,b,c,d,f){return q=0,b=b||"j",e(a)?i("c"==b?v:u,a,b,this.i++,c,d,f):(p.splice(this.i++,0,a),1==p.length&&h()),this}function k(){var a=B;return a.loader={load:j,i:0},a}var l=b.documentElement,m=a.setTimeout,n=b.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o={}.toString,p=[],q=0,r="MozAppearance"in l.style,s=r&&!!b.createRange().compareNode,t=s?l:n.parentNode,l=a.opera&&"[object Opera]"==o.call(a.opera),l=!!b.attachEvent&&!l,u=r?"object":l?"script":"img",v=l?"script":u,w=Array.isArray||function(a){return"[object Array]"==o.call(a)},x=[],y={},z={timeout:function(a,b){return b.length&&(a.timeout=b[0]),a}},A,B;B=function(a){function b(a){var a=a.split("!"),b=x.length,c=a.pop(),d=a.length,c={url:c,origUrl:c,prefixes:a},e,f,g;for(f=0;f<d;f++)g=a[f].split("="),(e=z[g.shift()])&&(c=e(c,g));for(f=0;f<b;f++)c=x[f](c);return c}function g(a,e,f,g,h){var i=b(a),j=i.autoCallback;i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift(),i.bypass||(e&&(e=d(e)?e:e[a]||e[g]||e[a.split("/").pop().split("?")[0]]),i.instead?i.instead(a,e,f,g,h):(y[i.url]?i.noexec=!0:y[i.url]=1,f.load(i.url,i.forceCSS||!i.forceJS&&"css"==i.url.split(".").pop().split("?").shift()?"c":c,i.noexec,i.attrs,i.timeout),(d(e)||d(j))&&f.load(function(){k(),e&&e(i.origUrl,h,g),j&&j(i.origUrl,h,g),y[i.url]=2})))}function h(a,b){function c(a,c){if(a){if(e(a))c||(j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}),g(a,j,b,0,h);else if(Object(a)===a)for(n in m=function(){var b=0,c;for(c in a)a.hasOwnProperty(c)&&b++;return b}(),a)a.hasOwnProperty(n)&&(!c&&!--m&&(d(j)?j=function(){var a=[].slice.call(arguments);k.apply(this,a),l()}:j[n]=function(a){return function(){var b=[].slice.call(arguments);a&&a.apply(this,b),l()}}(k[n])),g(a[n],j,b,n,h))}else!c&&l()}var h=!!a.test,i=a.load||a.both,j=a.callback||f,k=j,l=a.complete||f,m,n;c(h?a.yep:a.nope,!!i),i&&c(i)}var i,j,l=this.yepnope.loader;if(e(a))g(a,0,l,0);else if(w(a))for(i=0;i (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;j.type='text/javascript';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-P4HH5NV'); Skip to main content Home About Submit ALERTS / RSS Search for this keyword Advanced Search Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data View ORCID Profile Kazi Tanvir Hasan , Gabriel Odom , Zoran Bursac , Roberto Lucchini , Boubakari Ibrahimou doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.14.25325822 Kazi Tanvir Hasan 1 Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Department of Biostatistics , 11200 S.W. 8th Street, AHC5, Miami, FL 33199 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site ORCID record for Kazi Tanvir Hasan Gabriel Odom 1 Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Department of Biostatistics , 11200 S.W. 8th Street, AHC5, Miami, FL 33199 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Zoran Bursac 1 Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Department of Biostatistics , 11200 S.W. 8th Street, AHC5, Miami, FL 33199 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Roberto Lucchini 2 Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Department of Environmental Health Sciences , 11200 S.W. 8th Street, AHC5, Miami, FL 33199 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site Boubakari Ibrahimou 1 Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health & Social Work, Department of Biostatistics , 11200 S.W. 8th Street, AHC5, Miami, FL 33199 Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this author on this site For correspondence: bibrahim{at}fiu.edu Abstract Full Text Info/History Metrics Supplementary material Data/Code Preview PDF Abstract Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) is widely used in environmental health research to model complex, nonlinear, and interactive relationships in high-dimensional datasets. However, using a fixed posterior inclusion probability (PIP) threshold can lead to inconsistent test size control, influenced by the coefficient of variation (CV) and sample size. This study introduces a dynamic thresholding approach that adapts to these dataset characteristics, improving the sensitivity and reliability of BKMR analyses. A four-parameter logistic regression model was developed to estimate the 95th percentile of PIP as a function of the log-transformed CV and sample size. Simulations were performed across a broad range of CV values and sample sizes to evaluate test size performance for fixed and dynamic thresholds. The dynamic threshold was validated with independent simulated datasets and applied to the 2011–2014 NHANES data. The dynamic threshold consistently maintained nominal test sizes near five percent, outperforming the fixed threshold, which exhibited substantial variability. Validation with empirical data identified cadmium, manganese, and lead as significant contributors to cognitive performance, with cadmium emerging as the most influential. The dynamic threshold approach improves the precision of variable selection in BKMR, offering a more reliable method to analyze complex exposure-response relationships in environmental health research. Introduction The study of health effects from exposure to complex multipollutant mixtures is a critical area of focus in environmental health research 1 – 3 . Mixtures, which include air pollutants, toxic waste and persistent organic chemicals, can potentially display nonlinear and non-additive exposure-response relationships 4 , 5 . Such complexities, coupled with the high dimensionality of data and intricate intercorrelations among exposures, pose significant challenges to risk assessment based on traditional statistical methodologies 5 – 8 . Addressing these challenges requires advanced analytical frameworks capable of disentangling the complex interdependencies inherent in environmental health data 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 . Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) is a powerful tool for modelling nonlinear and interactive relationships between exposures and outcomes 5 , 6 , 11 – 14 . By leveraging kernel functions, such as the Gaussian kernel, BKMR provides a flexible framework for analyzing exposure-response dynamics. Its Bayesian structure further strengthens its utility in high-dimensional contexts by offering robust posterior probability estimates for predictors 5 , 6 , 12 – 15 . Despite these advantages, BKMR exhibits limitations, particularly in scenarios involving high variability or skewness in response data 5 , 6 , 16 . These factors can adversely impact the model’s sensitivity and reliability, necessitating enhancements to its foundational methodology. One critical limitation of traditional BKMR is its reliance on fixed thresholds for posterior inclusion probabilities (PIP), such as the commonly used value of 0.5 14 , 15 , 17 – 21 . This static approach does not account for variations in sample size or the response variable’s coefficient of variation (CV), which measures relative variability in the data. As a result, test size—the probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis—can deviate significantly from the nominal level (e.g., 5%), leading to suboptimal statistical inferences. This shortcoming can compromise the sensitivity and reliability of BKMR analyses, particularly in high-dimensional or highly variable datasets. For instance, our previous studies 16 have shown that small CV values can cause test size to be overly conservative, approaching 0%. In contrast, high CV values often result in anti-conservative test sizes exceeding 50%. Such inconsistencies compromise the ability of BKMR to accurately identify important predictors and highlight the inadequacy of fixed thresholds in diverse datasets 16 . Test size plays a fundamental role in hypothesis testing, influencing the validity and reliability of statistical inferences 22 – 24 . Deviations from nominal test size levels may result in either conservative outcomes, characterized by reduced statistical power, or anti-conservative outcomes, where false positive rates are inflated 25 . These issues are particularly relevant in environmental health contexts, such as studies predicting cognitive decline from heavy metal concentrations in blood or urine, where data are often skewed 26 – 30 . Our findings suggest that relying on a fixed PIP threshold of 0.5 to infer variable importance may lead to overlooking relevant variables associated with the outcome or including irrelevant variables by mistake. The skewed data distribution introduces complexities that challenge the appropriateness of this conventional threshold, emphasizing the need for a subtle understanding of variable importance determination in skewed data scenarios 16 , 27 , 31 . Despite these challenges, BKMR’s ability to incorporate off-diagonal covariance information, which captures interdependencies among predictors, remains a key strength 5 , 6 . This feature enhances statistical power and accuracy, making BKMR a valuable tool for unravelling complex exposure-response relationships 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 . Building on these foundational strengths, this study seeks to evaluate BKMR’s variation in test size—a fundamental property representing the probability of falsely rejecting the null hypothesis—under diverse CV and sample size conditions. Addressing these limitations is vital to enhancing BKMR’s reliability and robustness. We propose a dynamic thresholding framework to address the limitations of fixed thresholds in BKMR. By incorporating a logistic regression-based threshold function, our approach adaptively adjusts for CV and sample size variations, enhancing the method’s sensitivity and reliability. This study makes several contributions to the advancement of health studies involving mixtures by improving the BKMR methodology: Performance Evaluation: We systematically evaluate BKMR’s ability to detect actual effects under varying CV and sample size conditions. Development of a Dynamic Thresholding Framework: Using a four-parameter logistic regression model, we introduce an adaptive thresholding approach that accounts for variability in data characteristics. Comparative Analysis: We compare the proposed dynamic thresholding method with the traditionally employed fixed threshold, demonstrating its superior ability to maintain nominal test size and improve sensitivity. Application to Environmental Health Data: We apply the enhanced BKMR framework to an environmental health dataset examining metal mixtures and cognitive function in a U.S. population. By addressing the limitations of fixed thresholds, our proposed methodology provides a robust framework for utilizing BKMR in high-dimensional and variable-rich datasets. This research offers a significant contribution to environmental health studies and beyond, paving the way for more accurate risk assessment through reliable exposure-response analyses. The findings are anticipated to inform public health interventions and policies by improving the robustness of BKMR analyses. Methodology Overview of Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) is a sophisticated statistical approach to model complex, nonlinear, and interactive relationships between predictors and outcomes. By leveraging kernel functions, such as the Gaussian kernel, BKMR flexibly captures high-dimensional exposure-response dynamics, making it a valuable tool in environmental health studies. The BKMR model is an extension of the Kernel Machine Regression model that allows for including a mixture component 5 , 6 . The BKMR model is given by where Y i is a health endpoint, z i = ( z i1 ,.. ., z iM ) T is a vector of M exposure variables (e.g. heavy metals), X i contains a set of potential confounders, and ϵ i i.i.d. ∼ N (0,σ 2 ) 5 , 6 . Its Bayesian framework enhances reliability, offering robust posterior probability estimates and allowing for a nuanced variable importance assessment 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 – 14 . Despite its strengths, the BKMR model’s performance can vary significantly based on factors such as the response variable’s coefficient of variation (CV) and the sample size, mainly when relying on fixed thresholds like the commonly used posterior inclusion probability (PIP) threshold of 0.5 13 , 14 , 16 – 21 . The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate BKMR’s sensitivity to varying CV and sample size conditions, focusing on the test size (the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true). In our prior work16, we demonstrated that the BKMR test size varies dramatically with CV, ranging from 0% (highly conservative) for near-zero CV values to over 50% (highly anti-conservative) for CV values exceeding 10. To address this limitation, we aimed to predict the 95th percentile of PIP ( PIP q95 ) as a function of CV and sample size, ultimately deriving dynamic threshold values to maintain a consistent nominal test size of 5%. This analysis was conducted in three phases: BKMR model evaluation: Estimation of PIP q 95 across various CV and sample size combinations using simulation training data. Logistic model fitting: Development of a nonlinear regression model using the Richard Curve to predict PIP q 95 in the training data. Threshold comparison: Assessment of the new dynamic thresholds against the traditional fixed threshold of 0.5 using independent validation data. Phase 1: BKMR Model Evaluation Data Inputs Simulated datasets were created to represent a range of response variability and sample sizes: Coefficient of Variation (CV): 41 unique CV values ranging from 0.0235 to 15.0000. Sample Sizes: Six groups were analyzed, with sizes of 150, 300, 600, 1000, 2000, and 2934 (100% of data) 16 , 32 – 36 . Model Setup Software/Method: The BKMR model was implemented using the kmbayes function in R. Each model was run for 10,000 Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations 37 . Performance Metric: The 95th percentile of PIP ( PIP q 95 ) was computed for each combination of CV and sample size. Repetition: For each combination, 100 simulated datasets were analyzed to ensure robust results and reduce variability due to random factors. First, 50 randomly selected datasets were used to build the model equation (training analysis), and the remaining 50 datasets were used for model evaluation (validation analysis). In this analysis, we used a high-performance computing (HPC) node. The node is equipped with four Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8890 v3 processors, each operating at 2.50GHz, providing a total of 72 CPU cores. Additionally, the node has 512 GB of RAM. Phase 2: Logistic Model Fitting To understand the relationship between PIP q 95 , CV, and sample size, a four-parameter logistic regression model (Richard Curve) was employed 38 . Model Specification The four-parameter logistic equation is: Where: y: the 95th percentile of the PIP values PIP q 95 A: Left asymptote, fixed at 0. K: Right asymptote, bounded above by 1. C: Constant. β 1 , β 2 : Midpoint shift parameters for CV and sample size. x1: Log-transformed CV log 2 (CV). x2: Log-transformed sample size log 10 (Sample Size). Nonlinear Regression Procedure The relationship was modeled using the nls function from the R stats package 39 , and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm 40 – 42 was employed for optimization. Parameter Initialization: Initial values for C, βJ 1 , and βJ 2 were set to 1, based on prior knowledge and typical system behavior 38 , 43 . Also, the value of k is fixed at 1 as the maximum of PIP. Residual Diagnostics: Residuals were analyzed to ensure no significant bias or deviation from randomness. Convergence Validation: Model assumptions and convergence were confirmed through parameter stability and goodness-of-fit measures. Validation Steps: Alternative initial values were tested to ensure robustness against local minima, and residual diagnostics validated the model’s reliability. Phase 3: Threshold Comparison A dynamic threshold function was derived from the logistic model to adjust thresholds based on CV and sample size. Dynamic Threshold Function The dynamic thresholds were compared with the traditional fixed threshold of 0.5. Dynamic Threshold Function Test Size Control: The ability of each threshold approach to maintain a nominal test size of 5%. Sensitivity: The rate of correctly identifying actual effects under varying CV and sample size conditions. This methodology combines simulation-based BKMR evaluation, nonlinear logistic regression modelling, and comparative threshold analysis to address the limitations of fixed thresholds in high-dimensional datasets. The proposed dynamic threshold function enhances the reliability and validity of BKMR analyses, paving the way for more robust exposure-response modelling in environmental health research. Results Model Fit and Predictions The logistic model demonstrated a strong fit, effectively capturing the relationship between the 95th percentile of posterior inclusion probabilities PIP q 95 , the coefficient of variation (CV), and sample size. A non-linear regression model was fitted using the Richard Curve 38 , as shown in Figure 1 . Parameter estimates were highly significant (p < 0.000001), with a residual standard error of 0.05911. Key parameter values are presented in Table 1 . Download figure Open in new tab Figure 1. Non-Linear Regression Model Fitted Using the Richard Curve View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 1. Logistic Model Parameter Estimates Observed (dots) and predicted PIP q 95 values (lines) demonstrated a strong association, shown in Figure 1 that highlighted minimal deviation between the two. The four-parameter logistic model effectively captured nonlinear relationships, but it displayed slight over conservatism for large sample sizes and slight anti-conservatism for smaller sample sizes. These limitations warrant further exploration in future studies. Test Size Performance New Dynamic Threshold The dynamically calculated threshold function, based on the logistic model, maintained test sizes closer to the nominal 5% across all conditions. This adaptive approach addressed the inconsistencies of the fixed threshold and provided more reliable statistical inferences. The new threshold function, calculated by fitting a four-parameter logistic model, dynamically adjusted PIP thresholds based on CV and sample size: Next, we compared the test size for both the fixed (constant at 0.5), and new dynamic thresholds, by evaluating them across all CV and sample size combinations using another 50 simulated datasets (validation datasets). The graph depicts the relationship between the Coefficient of Variation (CV) (log2-transformed) and test size (y-axis), with a threshold of 0.95 represented by a red dashed line indicating the ideal test size. The graph also incorporates sample size (log10-transformed) as the point size and differentiates between threshold classifications, namely Dynamic and Fixed 0.5, through color and shape. Key observations from the graph include the trend of test sizes clustering near the ideal threshold of 0.95, particularly at lower CV values. As the CV increases, test sizes generally decrease, suggesting a potential loss of statistical power with a higher CV. When comparing the dynamic and fixed thresholding methods, dynamic thresholds (represented by green diamonds) exhibit more variability in test size adjustments, indicating greater adaptability to different conditions. In contrast, fixed thresholds (orange circles) display a more consistent pattern, maintaining a relatively stable distribution of test sizes. The impact of sample size is also evident, as larger sample sizes (larger points) tend to cluster closer to the ideal threshold, supporting the idea that increased sample size helps preserve statistical power. Smaller sample sizes, notably higher CV values, show more deviation from the 0.95 threshold. The new threshold consistently performed closer to the nominal 5% test size, while the old threshold displayed significant deviations, particularly at extreme CV values or smaller sample sizes. Impact of Sample Size and CV As shown in Figure 2 , the test size for both the old and new thresholds was evaluated across all CV and sample size combinations. The fixed PIP threshold of 0.5 exhibited significant variability in test size performance across different CV and sample size combinations. For low CV values, the threshold was overly conservative, resulting in reduced power. In contrast, for high CV values, the threshold was highly anti-conservative, leading to inflated false positive rates. The analysis revealed effects of sample size and CV on PIP q 95 : Smaller Sample Sizes: Higher PIP q 95 values were observed, with greater sensitivity to CV variations. Higher CV Values: Test sizes deviated significantly from the nominal 5% under the fixed threshold, underscoring the need for adaptive sensitivity. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 2. Test Size Comparison Between Fixed and Dynamic Thresholds The dynamic threshold function effectively compensated for these variations, maintaining consistent performance across diverse conditions. The results showed that dynamic threshold outperformed the fixed threshold (0.5) in test size control and sensitivity. Key findings include: Test Size Control: The dynamic threshold consistently achieved test sizes closer to the nominal 5%, regardless of CV and sample size. Sensitivity: The dynamic threshold identified a greater number of true associations, particularly for smaller CV values and larger sample sizes. Positive Test Identification: The new threshold showed enhanced performance in detecting positive tests without increasing false positives. The validation data results for various combinations of sample size and CV values are shown in Table 2 . Detailed results for other combinations can be found in the supplementary material. View this table: View inline View popup Table 2: Sample Validation Data Results for Various Combinations of Sample Size and CV Values Real Data Validation For the real data analysis and performance demonstration, we used the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data for those 60 or older 44 , 45 . The initial sample size was 2934, but after omitting the missing values, we ended up with a dataset with a sample size of 949. Separate datasets were acquired: cognitive function assessments and urine metal concentrations. Cognitive scores (CSCORE) served as the response variable. A cognitive evaluation is a set of tests used to evaluate an individual’s memory, attention, and processing speed. Participants in the NHANES survey who were at least 60 years old, could read and understand one of the stated languages, and did not need a proxy informant to complete the questions, were given this questionnaire. The system consisted of word learning and recall modules from Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease, the Animal Fluency Test, and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test.(citation) Participants who did not answer the cognitive examination were excluded from the results analysis. The education-dependent cognitive z-score is a measure of cognitive performance that takes education level into account. It is calculated by stratifying individuals into three educational levels: less than high school, high school graduate, and greater than high school degree. The education-dependent scores for each cognitive test are then centered and scaled to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1 within each education stratum. A global cognitive measure is calculated as the average of standardized scores from each cognitive test. This allows for a more accurate assessment of cognitive performance, as education level can significantly impact an individual’s cognitive abilities 46 – 48 . Key metals included cadmium, manganese, lead, strontium, tin, uranium, and cobalt available in the NHANES data. All exposure variables were log-transformed and standardized to account for variability and skewness. We then fit the BKMR model to assess the joint effect of metal exposures on the cognitive score. The posterior inclusion probability (PIP) derived from the BKMR model is summarized in Table 3 . View this table: View inline View popup Download powerpoint Table 3: Posterior Inclusion probability (PIP) We then use the above formula (iii) to determine the cutoff point for the PIP to select the most important metals related to the cognitive score. Here, the response variable CV was 15.18098, and the sample size was 949. Using the formula, we calculated that the appropriate threshold for PIP was 0.6463245. In our analysis, urine cadmium was the most important variable, with a PIP of 0.9484, followed by manganese and lead. If we had used the traditional cutoff value of 0.5 instead of this dynamic threshold, strontium, tin, and uranium would also have been selected as important variables, and only urine cobalt (with a PIP value of 0.48496) would not have been selected. Validation with real datasets displays the new threshold’s superiority in identifying potentially impactful associations. After BKMR analysis, post-hoc univariate predictor-response relationships were assessed to evaluate the individual effects of each metal on cognitive scores. The results were visualized in Figure 3 as predictor-response functions: General Patterns: Exposure to specific metals, such as cadmium and manganese, exhibited nonlinear relationships with cognitive scores. Confidence Intervals: The 95% confidence intervals provided insights into the uncertainty around the estimated effects, with narrower intervals observed for more influential metals. Variation Across Metals: Some metals had more pronounced effects, while others displayed flat or negligible relationships with the cognitive outcomes. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 3: Univariate predictor-response functions showing the estimated effects (h(z)) of each metal on cognitive scores, with 95% confidence intervals. Univariate predictor-response relationships revealed nonlinear associations between individual metals and cognitive scores. Metals such as cadmium and manganese exhibited pronounced effects with narrower confidence intervals, reflecting robust and consistent associations with cognitive outcomes. Other metals, such as uranium, displayed negligible effects, underscoring the variability in metal-specific impacts on cognitive performance. Cadmium, manganese, and lead are toxic heavy metals that have been linked to adverse effects on cognitive function 49 . Exposure to the cadmium has been associated with impaired neurodevelopment in children and cognitive decline in adults 50 . Manganese, when accumulated in the brain, can lead to neurotoxicity, particularly affecting the basal ganglia, and has been linked to cognitive deficits, including memory and attention impairments 51 . Lead exposure, especially in early childhood, is known to cause a range of cognitive deficits, including lower IQ, attention problems, and learning disabilities 52 . These metals can interfere with normal neural function through oxidative stress, inflammation, and disruption of synaptic plasticity 49 – 54 . Overall risk summaries in Figure 4 quantified the combined effect of all urinary metals on cognitive performance. The analysis focused on changes in cognitive scores across quantiles of metal mixture exposure: Quantile-Based Risk Analysis: Cognitive scores were assessed at various quantiles of exposure (25th to 75th percentile) using the median exposure level as a reference. Findings: Increased overall metal exposure was associated with a significant reduction in cognitive scores, with the effect being most pronounced at higher exposure quantiles. Confidence Intervals: Point estimates of risk were presented alongside 95% confidence intervals, providing a clear visualization of the exposure-response relationship. Download figure Open in new tab Figure 4: Overall risk summaries displaying estimated cognitive score changes across exposure quantiles, with error bars representing 95% confidence intervals. These findings highlight the strength of BKMR in capturing complex and nonlinear exposure-response relationships, which are often challenging to model with traditional linear regression techniques. Further, these results highlight the utility of the BKMR updated threshold in disentangling the complex interactions between environmental exposures and health outcomes, providing valuable insights for environmental health research and public health policy. Validation with real-world datasets reinforced the superiority of the dynamic threshold function over the traditional fixed threshold. The dynamic threshold consistently identified true associations while maintaining appropriate test size control, confirming its practical applicability. These findings highlight the necessity of adaptive thresholds for improving the reliability of statistical tests in high-dimensional and variable-rich datasets. Discussion This study presents a significant advancement in applying Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) by introducing a dynamic threshold function for posterior inclusion probability (PIP). Unlike the conventional fixed-threshold approach, which assumes a static PIP threshold (typically 0.5), our dynamic threshold adapts to key dataset characteristics, including the coefficient of variation (CV) and sample size. This adaptability addresses critical limitations in conventional BKMR applications, particularly in high-dimensional and variable-rich datasets, such as those encountered in environmental health research, where exposure-response relationships are often nonlinear and influenced by complex interdependencies. Our results demonstrate that the conventional fixed PIP threshold yields substantial variability in test size performance. Specifically, our simulations reveal that fixed-threshold BKMR is overly conservative for low CV values, reducing statistical power and potentially overlooking important variables. Conversely, for high CV values, the fixed threshold becomes overly liberal, leading to inflated false-positive rates. This variability poses challenges in identifying genuine exposure-response associations, especially in datasets with small sample sizes or high response variability. By contrast, modelled using a four-parameter logistic function, our dynamic threshold function adjusts PIP thresholds based on dataset-specific parameters, maintaining test sizes close to the nominal 5% across various conditions. This ensures a more stable and reliable selection of variables, reducing Type I and Type II errors. The effectiveness of the dynamic threshold function was validated through extensive simulations, where it consistently outperformed the fixed threshold in test size control and sensitivity. The dynamic threshold was particularly beneficial for extreme CV values and smaller sample sizes—scenarios where the fixed threshold exhibited the most substantial deviations. These findings reinforce the necessity of an adaptive thresholding approach in high-dimensional epidemiological studies. Our findings align with and extend prior research on BKMR and variable selection in high-dimensional modelling. Studies such as those by Bobb et al. (2015) and Zigler and Dominici (2014) demonstrated BKMR’s effectiveness in capturing nonlinear exposure-response relationships 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 – 14 . However, they relied on a fixed PIP threshold for variable selection. More recent studies (Wilson et al., 2018; Valeri et al., 2017) have challenged this fixed-threshold assumption, citing its inability to account for dataset-specific variability[[ 55 ; 11 ; 56 ]. Our study empirically confirms these concerns, showing that static thresholds lead to inconsistent test size performance. Alternative variable selection strategies have been explored in the literature. Liu et al. introduced weighting schemes for PIP calculation to enhance sensitivity in high-dimensional models 57 , while other researcher proposed hierarchical Bayesian frameworks to adjust for response variability 58 , 59 . Although these methods improved statistical performance relative to fixed-threshold BKMR, they lacked an explicit mechanism for adapting to sample size and CV variations. Our logistic model-based dynamic threshold approach builds upon this work by offering a transparent, interpretable, and robust framework that ensures reliable test size control across diverse conditions. To assess the practical applicability of our approach, we applied the dynamic threshold to real-world data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2011–2014), focusing on urinary metal exposures and cognitive outcomes in older adults. The results highlighted cadmium, manganese, and lead as significant contributors to cognitive decline—findings well supported by prior epidemiological research 49 , 60 . Notably, the dynamic threshold excluded strontium and tin, which lack strong evidence for neurotoxicity, whereas the fixed threshold would have incorrectly included them as significant variables. This underscores a key advantage of the dynamic approach: reducing false positives while preserving the integrity of variable selection. By refining exposure-response modeling, our method minimizes the risk of spurious associations and enhances the reliability of findings in environmental health research. Furthermore, our cumulative risk analyses revealed a dose-response relationship between urinary metal exposures and cognitive decline, particularly in higher exposure quantiles. These findings underscore the broader implications of mental exposures for cognitive health in ageing populations and highlight the need for targeted public health interventions to mitigate these risks. The dynamic threshold function represents a significant step forward in BKMR applications, providing a more reliable and adaptive framework for variable selection. However, some limitations warrant further investigation. Our simulations suggest that the logistic model is slightly conservative for large sample sizes and slightly liberal for smaller sample sizes, leading to minor biases in threshold estimation under extreme conditions. Future research should refine the dynamic threshold formula to ensure optimal performance across all sample sizes and dataset conditions. Additionally, our study was limited to a fixed number of simulated metal exposures, preventing us from assessing the impact of an asymptotically increasing dimensionality. As computational resources become more powerful and accessible, future work should explore how response CV, sample size, and predictor dimensionality influence PIP thresholds in high-dimensional models. Expanding our approach to incorporate additional linear covariates, such as demographic and socioeconomic factors, could also improve precision and contextual relevance in exposure-response analyses. Building on this study’s strengths, future research should focus on increasing the variety of simulation studies and extending the dynamic threshold approach to other datasets and domains. Beyond environmental health research, the dynamic threshold framework has potential applications in other high-dimensional fields, including genomics, metabolomics, and air pollution epidemiology. Extending this work to longitudinal studies would allow for the exploration of cumulative and long-term exposure effects, providing deeper insights into complex mixtures’ health impacts over time. Conclusion This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a dynamic threshold approach in improving the reliability and sensitivity of BKMR analyses. By accounting for key dataset characteristics such as CV and sample size, the dynamic threshold function addresses the limitations of fixed thresholds, enabling more accurate identification of significant exposure-response relationships. These advancements significantly impact environmental health research, providing a robust methodological foundation for analyzing complex, high-dimensional datasets. The dynamic threshold enhances the precision of variable selection. It underscores the potential of adaptive methods in addressing the challenges of modern data analysis, ultimately contributing to more informed public health interventions and policies. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS All co-authors have meaningfully contributed to the production of this manuscript including funding, conception, data analysis, edition, revision, and final approval of the manuscript. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors declare no potential conflict of interests. Data and Code Availability The code and simulation data will be made available upon acceptance. Supplementary Material Supplementary martial is attached as a separate file Data Availability The code and simulation data will be made available upon reasonable request to the authors. References 1. ↵ Zhu G , Wen Y , Cao K , He S , Wang T . A review of common statistical methods for dealing with multiple pollutant mixtures and multiple exposures . Frontiers in Public Health . 2024 ; 12 . doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377685 OpenUrl CrossRef 2. Sun Z , Tao Y , Li S , et al. Statistical strategies for constructing health risk models with multiple pollutants and their interactions: possible choices and comparisons . Environmental Health . 2013 ; 12 ( 1 ). doi: 10.1186/1476-069x-12-85 OpenUrl CrossRef 3. ↵ Zanobetti A , Austin E , Coull BA , Schwartz J , Koutrakis P . Health effects of multi-pollutant profiles . Environment International . 2014 ; 71 : 13 – 19 . doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.023 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 4. ↵ McDonnell WF . Utility of controlled human exposure studies for assessing the health effects of complex mixtures and indoor air pollutants . Environmental Health Perspectives . 1993 ; 101 ( suppl 4 ): 199 – 203 . doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s4199 OpenUrl CrossRef 5. ↵ Bobb JF , Valeri L , Claus Henn B , et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures . Biostatistics . 2014 ; 16 ( 3 ): 493 – 508 . doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu058 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 6. ↵ Bobb JF , Claus Henn B , Valeri L , Coull BA . Statistical software for analyzing the health effects of multiple concurrent exposures via Bayesian kernel machine regression . Environmental Health . 2018 ; 17 ( 1 ). doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0413-y OpenUrl CrossRef 7. Karim MR , Beyan O , Zappa A , et al. Deep learning-based clustering approaches for bioinformatics . Briefings in Bioinformatics . 2020 ; 22 ( 1 ): 393 – 415 . doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz170 OpenUrl CrossRef 8. ↵ Sarker IH . Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Applications and Research Directions . SN Computer Science . 2021 ; 2 ( 3 ). doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ↵ Suk WA , Olden K , Yang RSH . Chemical mixtures research: significance and future perspectives . Environmental Health Perspectives . 2002 ; 110 ( suppl 6 ): 891 – 892 . doi: 10.1289/ehp.110-1241268 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 10. ↵ Johnstone IM , Titterington DM . Statistical challenges of high-dimensional data . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences . 2009 ; 367 ( 1906 ): 4237 – 4253 . doi: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0159 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 11. ↵ Wilson A , Hsu HHL , Chiu YHM , Wright RO , Wright RJ , Coull BA . Kernel machine and distributed lag models for assessing windows of susceptibility to environmental mixtures in children’s health studies . The Annals of Applied Statistics . 2022 ; 16 ( 2 ). doi: 10.1214/21-aoas1533 OpenUrl CrossRef 12. ↵ Devick KL , Bobb JF , Mazumdar M , et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression-causal mediation analysis . Statistics in Medicine . 2022 ; 41 ( 5 ): 860 – 876 . doi: 10.1002/sim.9255 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 13. ↵ Gerwinn S . Bayesian inference for generalized linear models for spiking neurons . Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience . 2010 ; 4 . doi: 10.3389/fncom.2010.00012 OpenUrl CrossRef 14. ↵ Ibrahimou B , Hasan KT , Burchfield S , et al. Assessing the risk of heart attack: A bayesian kernel machine regression analysis of heavy metal mixtures . Published online June 18 , 2024 . doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4456611/v1 OpenUrl CrossRef 15. ↵ Pesenti N , Quatto P , Colicino E , Cancello R , Scacchi M , Zambon A . Comparative efficacy of three bayesian variable selection methods in the context of weight loss in obese women . Frontiers in Nutrition . 2023 ; 10 . doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1203925 OpenUrl CrossRef 16. ↵ Hasan KT , Odom G , Bursac Z , Ibrahimou B . The sensitivity of bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) to data distribution: A comprehensive simulation analysis . Published online 2024 . doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2411.00286 OpenUrl CrossRef 17. ↵ Li H , Deng W , Small R , Schwartz J , Liu J , Shi L . Health effects of air pollutant mixtures on overall mortality among the elderly population using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) . Chemosphere . 2022 ; 286 : 131566 . doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131566 OpenUrl CrossRef 18. Zhang Y , Dong T , Hu W , et al. Association between exposure to a mixture of phenols, pesticides, and phthalates and obesity: Comparison of three statistical models . Environment International . 2019 ; 123 : 325 – 336 . doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.076 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 19. Coker E , Chevrier J , Rauch S , et al. Association between prenatal exposure to multiple insecticides and child body weight and body composition in the VHEMBE South African birth cohort . Environment International . 2018 ; 113 : 122 – 132 . doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.01.016 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 20. Barbieri MM , Berger JO . Optimal predictive model selection . The Annals of Statistics . 2004 ; 32 ( 3 ). doi: 10.1214/009053604000000238 OpenUrl CrossRef 21. ↵ Zheng Z , Luo H , Xue Q . The association of urinary heavy metal exposure with frailty susceptibility and mortality in middle-aged and older adults: a population-based study . Archives of Public Health . 2024 ; 82 ( 1 ). doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01275-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 22. ↵ Biau DJ , Kernéis S , Porcher R . Statistics in Brief: The Importance of Sample Size in the Planning and Interpretation of Medical Research . Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research . 2008 ; 466 ( 9 ): 2282 – 2288 . doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0346-9 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 23. Taboga M . Size of a test. Lectures on probability theory and mathematical statistics, Kindle Direct Publishing . Published online 2021 . https://www.statlect.com/glossary/size-of-a-test 24. ↵ Emmert-Streib F , Dehmer M . Understanding Statistical Hypothesis Testing: The Logic of Statistical Inference . Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction . 2019 ; 1 ( 3 ): 945 – 961 . doi: 10.3390/make1030054 OpenUrl CrossRef 25. ↵ Meulen EA van der MP , van der Raymond K . Consistent Confidence Limits, P Values, and Power of the Non-Conservative, Size – α Modified Fisher Exact Test . Journal of Biostatistics and Biometric Applications . 2021 ; 6 ( 1 ): 102 . https://www.annexpublishers.com/articles/JBIA/6102-Consistent-Confidence-Limits-P-Values.pdf OpenUrl 26. ↵ Andrade C . Sample Size and its Importance in Research . Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine . 2020 ; 42 ( 1 ): 102 – 103 . doi: 10.4103/ijpsym.ijpsym_504_19 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 27. ↵ Hammouri HM , Sabo RT , Alsaadawi R , Kheirallah KA . Handling Skewed Data: A Comparison of Two Popular Methods . Applied Sciences . 2020 ; 10 ( 18 ): 6247 . doi: 10.3390/app10186247 OpenUrl CrossRef 28. Sasaki N , Carpenter DO . Associations between Metal Exposures and Cognitive Function in American Older Adults . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health . 2022 ; 19 ( 4 ): 2327 . doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042327 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 29. Wang X , Xiao P , Wang R , et al. Relationships between urinary metals concentrations and cognitive performance among u.s. Older people in NHANES 20112014 . Frontiers in Public Health . 2022 ; 10 . doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985127 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 30. ↵ Chatterjee M , Kortenkamp A . Cadmium exposures and deteriorations of cognitive abilities: estimation of a reference dose for mixture risk assessments based on a systematic review and confidence rating . Environmental Health . 2022 ; 21 ( 1 ). doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00881-9 OpenUrl CrossRef 31. ↵ Wallace ML , Buysse DJ , Germain A , Hall MH , Iyengar S . Variable Selection for Skewed Model-Based Clustering: Application to the Identification of Novel Sleep Phenotypes . Journal of the American Statistical Association . 2018 ; 113 ( 521 ): 95 – 110 . doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1330202 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 32. ↵ Levin-Schwartz Y , Claus Henn B , Gennings C , et al. Integrated measures of lead and manganese exposure improve estimation of their joint effects on cognition in Italian school-age children . Environment International . 2021 ; 146 : 106312 . doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106312 OpenUrl CrossRef 33. Henn BC , Schnaas L , Ettinger AS , et al. Associations of Early Childhood Manganese and Lead Coexposure with Neurodevelopment . Environmental Health Perspectives . 2012 ; 120 ( 1 ): 126 – 131 . doi: 10.1289/ehp.1003300 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science 34. Reuben A , Caspi A , Belsky DW , et al. Association of Childhood Blood Lead Levels With Cognitive Function and Socioeconomic Status at Age 38 Years and With IQ Change and Socioeconomic Mobility Between Childhood and Adulthood . JAMA . 2017 ; 317 ( 12 ): 1244 . doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1712 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 35. Barahona AJ , Bursac Z , Veledar E , Lucchini R , Tieu K , Richardson JR . Relationship of Blood and Urinary Manganese Levels with Cognitive Function in Elderly Individuals in the United States by Race/Ethnicity, NHANES 20112014 . Toxics . 2022 ; 10 ( 4 ): 191 . doi: 10.3390/toxics10040191 OpenUrl CrossRef 36. ↵ Micali E , Fenga C , Gangemi S , Alibrandi A , Costa C , Micali E . RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEAD EXPOSURE AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT . Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene . 2016 ;Vol 57 :No 4 (2016): 2016574 . doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/JPMH2016.57.4.514 OpenUrl CrossRef 37. ↵ Bobb JF . Bkmr: Bayesian kernel machine regression . Published online 2022 . https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bkmr 38. ↵ Richards FJ . A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use . Journal of Experimental Botany . 1959 ; 10 ( 2 ): 290 – 301 . doi: 10.1093/jxb/10.2.290 OpenUrl CrossRef Web of Science 39. ↵ R Core Team . R: A language and environment for statistical computing . Published online 2024 . https://www.R-project.org/ 40. ↵ Levenberg K . A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares . Quarterly of Applied Mathematics . 1944 ; 2 ( 2 ): 164 – 168 . doi: 10.1090/qam/10666 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 41. Marquardt DW . An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters . Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics . 1963 ; 11 ( 2 ): 431 – 441 . doi: 10.1137/0111030 OpenUrl CrossRef 42. ↵ Gavin HP . The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least squares curve-fitting problems . Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Duke University . 2019 ; 3 : 431 – 441 . https://people.duke.edu/~hpgavin/lm.pdf OpenUrl 43. ↵ Fekedulegn D , Mac Siurtain M , Colbert J . Parameter estimation of nonlinear growth models in forestry . Silva Fennica . 1999 ; 33 ( 4 ). doi: 10.14214/sf.653 OpenUrl CrossRef 44. ↵ Disease Control C for, (CDC) P . National health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2011-2012 . National Center for Health Statistics. Published online 2011 . https://www.n.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2011 45. ↵ Disease Control C for, (CDC) P . National health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2011-2012 . National Center for Health Statistics. Published online 2011 . https://www.n.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2013 46. ↵ Moms JC , Heyman A , Mohs RC , et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assesment of Alzheimer’s disease . Neurology . 1989 ; 39 ( 9 ): 1159 – 1159 . doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.9.1159 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 47. Carone DA. E. Strauss , E. M. S. Sherman , & O. Spreen , A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary . Applied Neuropsychology . 2007 ; 14 ( 1 ): 62 – 63 . doi: 10.1080/09084280701280502 OpenUrl CrossRef 48. ↵ Taylor MK , Mahnken JD , Sullivan DK . NHANES 20112014 Reveals Cognition of US Older Adults may Benefit from Better Adaptation to the Mediterranean Diet . Nutrients . 2020 ; 12 ( 7 ): 1929 . doi: 10.3390/nu12071929 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 49. ↵ Bakulski KM , Seo YA , Hickman RC , et al. Heavy metals exposure and alzheimer’s disease and related dementias . Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease . 2020 ; 76 ( 4 ): 1215 – 1242 . doi: 10.3233/jad-200282 OpenUrl CrossRef 50. ↵ Ciesielski T , Weuve J , Bellinger DC , Schwartz J , Lanphear B , Wright RO . Cadmium Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in U . S. Children. Environmental Health Perspectives . 2012 ; 120 ( 5 ): 758 – 763 . doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104152 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 51. ↵ Balachandran RC , Mukhopadhyay S , McBride D , et al. Brain manganese and the balance between essential roles and neurotoxicity . Journal of Biological Chemistry . 2020 ; 295 ( 19 ): 6312 – 6329 . doi: 10.1074/jbc.rev119.009453 OpenUrl Abstract / FREE Full Text 52. ↵ Ramírez Ortega D , González Esquivel DF , Blanco Ayala T , et al. Cognitive Impairment Induced by Lead Exposure during Lifespan: Mechanisms of Lead Neurotoxicity . Toxics . 2021 ; 9 ( 2 ): 23 . doi: 10.3390/toxics9020023 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 53. Althobaiti NA . Heavy metals exposure and Alzheimer’s disease: Underlying mechanisms and advancing therapeutic approaches . Behavioural Brain Research . 2025 ; 476 : 115212 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115212 OpenUrl CrossRef 54. ↵ Huat TJ , Camats-Perna J , Newcombe EA , Valmas N , Kitazawa M , Medeiros R . Metal Toxicity Links to Alzheimer’s Disease and Neuroinflammation . Journal of Molecular Biology . 2019 ; 431 ( 9 ): 1843 – 1868 . doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.018 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ↵ Wilson A , Zigler CM , Patel CJ , Dominici F . Model-Averaged Confounder Adjustment for Estimating Multivariate Exposure Effects with Linear Regression . Biometrics . 2018 ; 74 ( 3 ): 1034 – 1044 . doi: 10.1111/biom.12860 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 56. ↵ Devick KL , Bobb JF , Mazumdar M , et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression-causal mediation analysis . Statistics in Medicine . 2022 ; 41 ( 5 ): 860 – 876 . doi: 10.1002/sim.9255 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 57. ↵ Li H , Deng W , Small R , Schwartz J , Liu J , Shi L . Health effects of air pollutant mixtures on overall mortality among the elderly population using Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) . Chemosphere . 2022 ; 286 : 131566 . doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131566 OpenUrl CrossRef 58. ↵ Bayesian Hierarchical Framework for Occupational Hygiene Decision Making . The Annals of Occupational Hygiene . Published online August 28, 2014 . doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu060 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 59. ↵ Lee MD . A Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Human Decision-Making on an Optimal Stopping Problem . Cognitive Science . 2006 ; 30 ( 3 ): 1 – 26 . doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_69 OpenUrl CrossRef 60. ↵ Sanders AP , Claus Henn B , Wright RO . Perinatal and Childhood Exposure to Cadmium, Manganese, and Metal Mixtures and Effects on Cognition and Behavior: A Review of Recent Literature . Current Environmental Health Reports . 2015 ; 2 ( 3 ): 284 – 294 . doi: 10.1007/s40572-015-0058-8 OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed View the discussion thread. Back to top Previous Next Posted April 16, 2025. Download PDF Supplementary Material Data/Code Email Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv. NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article. Your Email * Your Name * Send To * Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas. You are going to email the following Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data Message Subject (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website. Your Personal Message CAPTCHA This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Share Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data Kazi Tanvir Hasan , Gabriel Odom , Zoran Bursac , Roberto Lucchini , Boubakari Ibrahimou medRxiv 2025.04.14.25325822; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.14.25325822 Share This Article: Copy Citation Tools Enhancing Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression: A Dynamic Thresholding Framework to Address Variability and Skewness in High-Dimensional Environmental Health Data Kazi Tanvir Hasan , Gabriel Odom , Zoran Bursac , Roberto Lucchini , Boubakari Ibrahimou medRxiv 2025.04.14.25325822; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.14.25325822 Citation Manager Formats BibTeX Bookends EasyBib EndNote (tagged) EndNote 8 (xml) Medlars Mendeley Papers RefWorks Tagged Ref Manager RIS Zotero Tweet Widget Facebook Like Google Plus One Subject Area Occupational and Environmental Health Subject Areas All Articles Addiction Medicine (566) Allergy and Immunology (863) Anesthesia (297) Cardiovascular Medicine (4411) Dentistry and Oral Medicine (443) Dermatology (380) Emergency Medicine (606) Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1505) Epidemiology (15205) Forensic Medicine (30) Gastroenterology (1119) Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6575) Geriatric Medicine (666) Health Economics (994) Health Informatics (4511) Health Policy (1365) Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1608) Hematology (537) HIV/AIDS (1263) Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15903) Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1103) Medical Education (620) Medical Ethics (144) Nephrology (666) Neurology (6573) Nursing (345) Nutrition (998) Obstetrics and Gynecology (1139) Occupational and Environmental Health (954) Oncology (3319) Ophthalmology (968) Orthopedics (369) Otolaryngology (420) Pain Medicine (435) Palliative Medicine (129) Pathology (662) Pediatrics (1689) Pharmacology and Therapeutics (691) Primary Care Research (710) Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5423) Public and Global Health (9205) Radiology and Imaging (2191) Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1367) Respiratory Medicine (1191) Rheumatology (593) Sexual and Reproductive Health (709) Sports Medicine (529) Surgery (709) Toxicology (99) Transplantation (288) Urology (265) (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fecefda5e024193',t:'MTc3OTI5NjgzOA=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00