We are the sensors of consciousness! A review and analysis on how awakenings during sleep influence dream recall

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Purpose Since the 1930s, researchers have awakened people from different stages of sleep to record what they have experienced. While some aspects, including asking whether participants had dreams or thoughts before awakening, largely remain the same, others, such as the method of awakening, vary greatly. In addition, it is often assumed that the influence of participant characteristics, such as personality traits, motivation, memory, and attention, is reduced by collecting experiences immediately after they occur, rather than through delayed morning recall. However, the extent to which these variables influence dream recall upon awakening has not yet been thoroughly investigated. Materials and methods To explore possible contextual and individual influences, this review analyzed 69 awakening studies conducted between 2000 and 2024 and utilized the DREAM database. Differences between sleep stages were quantified and experiences analyzed using the categories ‘with recall’, ‘without recall’, and ‘no report’. Results Similar levels of null reports were found in NREM stage 2 and stage 3. Significant factors affecting dream recall included the method of awakening (lower recall with an alarm compared to calling the participant’s name), the number of study days (reduced recall for multiple days) and the sleep environment (higher recall at home compared to the laboratory), along with participant characteristics beyond age, sex and study design. Recall rates from NREM sleep are particularly sensitive to the method of awakening and interindividual differences. Conclusion Both the awakening procedure and participant characteristics influence the amount of reported sleep experiences, which can impact study outcomes, such as the identification of neural correlates of consciousness. Therefore, greater emphasis needs to be placed on how experiences are collected and on participant characteristics, such as openness to experience or familiarity with different states of consciousness. Plain Language Summary Have you ever wondered how often you dream while you sleep? We reviewed 69 studies where people were woken up to share their experiences. They reported dreaming most of the time, even in deep sleep. You might ask, “Why don’t I remember much in the morning then?” Well, maybe you forgot your dream because a lot of time has passed. These studies capture the experience right after it happens, but even then, some people remember dreams more than others. This could be because they are more focused on their dreams. How you wake up also matters. If someone shakes you awake, you may forget your dream, but if they gently call your name, you have a better chance of remembering it. You might also fail to recognize more subtle experiences, such as a sense of calm. So perhaps sleep is not as unconscious as we thought, leaving much to be explored in future studies.
Full text 2,973 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose Since the 1930s, researchers have awakened people from different stages of sleep to record what they have experienced. While some aspects, including asking whether participants had dreams or thoughts before awakening, largely remain the same, others, such as the method of awakening, vary greatly. In addition, it is often assumed that the influence of participant characteristics, such as personality traits, motivation, memory, and attention, is reduced by collecting experiences immediately after they occur, rather than through delayed morning recall. However, the extent to which these variables influence dream recall upon awakening has not yet been thoroughly investigated.

Materials and methods

To explore possible contextual and individual influences, this review analyzed 69 awakening studies conducted between 2000 and 2024 and utilized the DREAM database. Differences between sleep stages were quantified and experiences analyzed using the categories ‘with recall’, ‘without recall’, and ‘no report’.

Results

Similar levels of null reports were found in NREM stage 2 and stage 3. Significant factors affecting dream recall included the method of awakening (lower recall with an alarm compared to calling the participant’s name), the number of study days (reduced recall for multiple days) and the sleep environment (higher recall at home compared to the laboratory), along with participant characteristics beyond age, sex and study design. Recall rates from NREM sleep are particularly sensitive to the method of awakening and interindividual differences.

Conclusion

Both the awakening procedure and participant characteristics influence the amount of reported sleep experiences, which can impact study outcomes, such as the identification of neural correlates of consciousness. Therefore, greater emphasis needs to be placed on how experiences are collected and on participant characteristics, such as openness to experience or familiarity with different states of consciousness. Plain Language Summary Have you ever wondered how often you dream while you sleep? We reviewed 69 studies where people were woken up to share their experiences. They reported dreaming most of the time, even in deep sleep. You might ask, “Why don’t I remember much in the morning then?” Well, maybe you forgot your dream because a lot of time has passed. These studies capture the experience right after it happens, but even then, some people remember dreams more than others. This could be because they are more focused on their dreams. How you wake up also matters. If someone shakes you awake, you may forget your dream, but if they gently call your name, you have a better chance of remembering it. You might also fail to recognize more subtle experiences, such as a sense of calm. So perhaps sleep is not as unconscious as we thought, leaving much to be explored in future studies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0