Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis and Field Cancerization: A Narrative Review
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This review summarizes findings on daylight photodynamic therapy's efficacy and tolerability for treating actinic keratosis and field cancerization, highlighting its potential as a patient-friendly alternative.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
For patients suffering from actinic keratosis (AK) and clinical evidence of chronic sun damage, achieving both actinic keratosis eradication and treating field cancerization is essential. AKs should not be underestimated. While the majority does not progress to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), most cases of SCC develop from pre-existing AKs and nobody can differentiate between AKs that will develop into SCC and those that will either resolve on their own or remain unchanged. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) ad-dresses AKs and also targets surrounding sun-damaged areas with precancerous cells. This dual action reduces the risk of new AK formation, making PDT a valuable ap-proach for comprehensive skin cancer prevention in chronically sun-exposed individ-uals. The conventional PDT (cPDT) has already been proven a safe and effective method to treat non hyperkeratotic actinic keratosis and field cancerization. However, in the real world, PDT has not reached its maximum potential use, possibly due to the need of an office-based light source equipment and the associated peri-procedural pain. The daylight variation of PDT, which uses natural sunlight to activate the pho-tosensitizer and eradicate the premalignant cells. Daylight PDT (dPDT) is an effective, well-tolerated, and convenient treatment for AKs and field cancerization, with high satisfaction rates reported by both patients and physicians. Although its efficacy may be reduced in hyperkeratotic lesions and areas with insufficient sunlight, combining daylight PDT with lesion-targeted treatments and using indoor alternatives can help overcome these limitations. Additionally, the reduced peri-procedural pain and fewer topical side effects provide a significant advantage over other field treatments, such as 5-FU, imiquimod, and cPDT, making dPDT a highly practical and accessible option in real-world clinical practice in Dermatology.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00