âš™
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24
· read from full text
ⓘ
The study compared the growth and recovery of an IR64 background near-isogenic rice line carrying both SUB1D and DRO1 (NIL-SUB1DRO1) versus IR64 and single-gene controls under controlled greenhouse submergence and drought, assessing effects before stress, shortly after stress, and after recovery. Seedlings (14–16 days old depending on experiment) were subjected to complete submergence for 10 or 7 days followed by 10 or 7 days of recovery, or to 29 or 18 days of drought followed by rewatering, with growth parameters, chlorophyll content, maximum fluorescence, water status metrics, and recovery performance measured. Submergence and drought reduced growth in all genotypes, with IR64 showing stronger declines in chlorophyll and fluorescence during submergence and worse recovery responses linked to accelerated shoot elongation and higher stomatal conductance during drought (greater water loss). NIL-SUB1DRO1 retained water more effectively under drought and, across experiments, showed improved chlorophyll/fluorescence and growth recovery relative to IR64, with the authors concluding that combining these genes produced no negative interactions for rainfed lowlands. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
Flooding and drought significantly reduce rice yield in rainfed environments. Rice varieties that tolerate complete inundation for up to two weeks carry the SUB1A gene, while those enduring deeper water conditions for weeks or months have the SK1 and SK2 genes. Conversely, the DRO1 gene, responsible for deep-rooting, helps in water acquisition under drought. In this study, we compared the growth of NIL-SUB1DRO1 a novel rice genotype with an IR64 background regarding its dual tolerance to submergence and drought. Additionally, we assessed its recovery capacity after exposure to stress. Sixteen and thirteen-days old seedlings of three genotypes (Experiment 1-1 and 2-1) and fourteen-days old seedlings of the two genotypes (Experiment 1-2 and 2-2) were tested under submergence and drought stress in a greenhouse experimental condition respectively. Seedlings were submerged for 10 and 7 days and then allowed to recover for 10 and 7 days respectively. In the drought experiment, seedlings underwent 29 days of drought (Experiment 2-1) and 18 days of drought, followed by 10 days of rewatering (Experiment 2-2). Growth parameters were measured before and after treatment, 4 days after submergence in experiment 1-1 and after the recovery periods. Submergence and drought adversely affected growth and performance. Shoot elongation in submerged plants was reduced by 29.2% for NIL-SUB1DRO1 compared to IR64. Accelerated shoot elongation of IR64 negatively affected its recovery. Chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence of IR64 were significantly lower than other genotypes after 10 and 7 days of complete submergence. Ten days after recovery in experiment 1-1 the Chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence of IR64 were not significantly different compared to other genotypes. Seven days after of recovery in experiment 1-2, NIL-SUB1DRO1 had significantly higher chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence than IR64. After 29 days of drought the tiller number and leaf area of IR64 was lower than other genotypes (Experiment 2-1), while in Experiment 2-2 during drought treatment and recovery, NIL-SUB1DRO1 had greater relative water content, leaf water potential, leaf area, SPAD value, dry weights of shoots and roots, root length, surface area and volume compared to IR64. stomatal conductance of IR64 was higher than NIL-SUB1DRO1 during drought, leading to greater water loss and reduced growth during recovery. NIL-SUB1DRO1 absorbed and retained water more effectively under dry conditions. NIL-SUB1DRO1 and NIL-SUB1 is tolerant to submergence and NIL-SUB1DRO1 and NIL-DRO1 to drought, with no negative effects from combining these genes in modern rice varieties for rainfed lowlands.
Full text
2,790 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Abstract
Flooding and drought significantly reduce rice yield in rainfed environments. Rice varieties that tolerate complete inundation for up to two weeks carry the SUB1A gene, while those enduring deeper water conditions for weeks or months have the SK1 and SK2 genes. Conversely, the DRO1 gene, responsible for deep-rooting, helps in water acquisition under drought. In this study, we compared the growth of NIL-SUB1DRO1 a novel rice genotype with an IR64 background regarding its dual tolerance to submergence and drought. Additionally, we assessed its recovery capacity after exposure to stress. Sixteen and thirteen-days old seedlings of three genotypes (Experiment 1-1 and 2-1) and fourteen-days old seedlings of the two genotypes (Experiment 1-2 and 2-2) were tested under submergence and drought stress in a greenhouse experimental condition respectively. Seedlings were submerged for 10 and 7 days and then allowed to recover for 10 and 7 days respectively. In the drought experiment, seedlings underwent 29 days of drought (Experiment 2-1) and 18 days of drought, followed by 10 days of rewatering (Experiment 2-2). Growth parameters were measured before and after treatment, 4 days after submergence in experiment 1-1 and after the recovery periods. Submergence and drought adversely affected growth and performance. Shoot elongation in submerged plants was reduced by 29.2% for NIL-SUB1DRO1 compared to IR64. Accelerated shoot elongation of IR64 negatively affected its recovery. Chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence of IR64 were significantly lower than other genotypes after 10 and 7 days of complete submergence. Ten days after recovery in experiment 1-1 the Chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence of IR64 were not significantly different compared to other genotypes. Seven days after of recovery in experiment 1-2, NIL-SUB1DRO1 had significantly higher chlorophyll content and maximum fluorescence than IR64. After 29 days of drought the tiller number and leaf area of IR64 was lower than other genotypes (Experiment 2-1), while in Experiment 2-2 during drought treatment and recovery, NIL-SUB1DRO1 had greater relative water content, leaf water potential, leaf area, SPAD value, dry weights of shoots and roots, root length, surface area and volume compared to IR64. stomatal conductance of IR64 was higher than NIL-SUB1DRO1 during drought, leading to greater water loss and reduced growth during recovery. NIL-SUB1DRO1 absorbed and retained water more effectively under dry conditions. NIL-SUB1DRO1 and NIL-SUB1 is tolerant to submergence and NIL-SUB1DRO1 and NIL-DRO1 to drought, with no negative effects from combining these genes in modern rice varieties for rainfed lowlands.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.