Evaluation of immunohistochemically expression of GLUT-1 in benign proliferative, hyperplastic endometrium and endometriosis adenocarcinoma
This study evaluated GLUT-1 expression in endometrial tissues, finding that immunostaining distinguishes hyperplasia with atypia from benign cases and is consistently overexpressed in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This cross-sectional study evaluated GLUT-1 expression in 98 endometrial tissue specimens, including benign proliferative, hyperplastic, and malignant tissues. The results indicated that GLUT-1 positivity was absent in benign proliferative and non-atypical hyperplasia but present in atypical hyperplasia and endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Consequently, the authors concluded that GLUT-1 immunostaining serves as a useful marker for distinguishing between hyperplasia with and without atypia. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one of the tissue types analyzed alongside endometrial pathology, though the paper's main focus is endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma progression rather than endometriosis disease mechanisms.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,063 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (20)
- doi:10.1016/j.crad.2006.06.015 via openalex
- W1742822977 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001 via openalex
- doi:10.12669/pjms.312.6604 via openalex
- doi:10.18632/oncotarget via openalex
- doi:10.18632/oncotarget.17445 via openalex
- doi:10.5603/gp.2019.0102 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2019.06.004 via openalex
- doi:10.5146/tjpath.2015.01352 via openalex
- doi:10.7860/jcdr/2016/19576.7805 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.12.015 via openalex
- W2985610069 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw042 via openalex
- doi:10.3322/caac.21442 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/jcu.22631 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2774::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-i via openalex
- doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15171 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12<2774::aid-cncr16>3.3.co;2-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000356959 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.gene.2018.12.006 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-10T10:42:50.442627+00:00