Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine IP-10

Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine IP-10 | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine IP-10 Hamza Khalid, Michael Coad, Inga Dry, Catherine McGuinnes, Lindsey Waddell, and 2 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 6 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Research on chemokines in cattle is hampered by the relative lack of reagents. Bovine IP-10 is an important inflammatory chemokine and a promising diagnostic biomarker for an economically important disease (bovine tuberculosis) caused by infection of cattle with Mycobacterium bovis . Currently no monoclonal antibodies are available for bovine IP-10. The goal of this study was to generate novel mAbs for detection of bovine IP-10 using recombinant hybridoma technology. Five mAbs were developed and cross clone inhibition analyses showed a high degree of self-inhibition among the mAbs. One mAb (7C2) was used in conjugation with a commercial polyclonal antibody to develop a sandwich ELISA. Upon testing with recombinant bovine IP-10, this ELISA showed an enhanced linear range compared to the currently available polyclonal antibody-based ELISA. The ELISA using 7C2 was shown to detect native antigen-specific bovine IP-10 in samples from M. bovis infected animals. The 7C2 mAb could also detect intracytoplasmic IP-10. These novel mAbs will be useful in elucidating roles for IP-10 in bovine immune studies in health, disease and vaccination contexts. IP-10 intracellular staining hybridoma technology monoclonal antibody bovine tuberculosis Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Introduction Interferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10), also known as C-X-C chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) is a low molecular weight (10kDa) inflammatory cytokine. IP-10 binds to the receptor CXCR3 to exert its biological functions. CXCR3 is a seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, found on the surface of Th1 lymphocytes and NK cells, among other cell types. IP-10 is produced by various cell types including monocytes, T lymphocytes, NK cells, endothelial and stromal cells [ 1 ]. IP-10 has major role in driving the migration of immune cells towards the site of inflammation [ 2 ]. Other biological functions of IP-10 include, but are not limited to, facilitation of T cell adhesion to endothelial cells, modulating the development and function of T cells, and augmenting NK-cell mediated cytolysis by facilitating the discharge of NK cell cytotoxic granules [ 3 – 5 ]. IP-10 has been widely reported as diagnostic biomarker of high relevance for human tuberculosis (TB) [ 6 – 10 ]. Similarly, detection of IP-10 was shown to have promise when measured alongside IFN-γ for the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and buffalo [ 11 – 14 ]. Despite being a crucial and discriminant biomarker there are no monoclonal antibodies (mAbs available for use in assays to detect bovine IP-10. The current available assays utilise polyclonal antibodies (pAbs); we have previously described their use in ELISA and a user friendly lateral flow assay (LFA) format [ 11 , 15 ] to detect IP-10 in cattle infected with M. bovis , the causative agent of bovine TB (bTB). However, these assays presented respective challenges of high background and an overall reduced signal compared to LFAs developed using mAbs for IFN-γ and IL-2 [ 11 , 15 ]. We reasoned that the use of mAbs would circumvent these challenges and provide opportunities to produce stable reagents of high quality and quantity enabling further characterisation of IP-10 as a diagnostic marker of bTB and its role in other diseases [ 16 , 17 ]. Here, we describe the generation of novel mAbs to detect bovIP-10 using hybridoma technology [ 18 ]. The ability of these mAbs to detect recombinant and native bovIP-10 from bTB was tested in both ELISA and flow cytometric assays. Materials and Methods Animals and Ethical Statement All mice were housed at the Bioresearch & Veterinary Service Facility at the Roslin Institute (BVS-Ros facility) at the University of Edinburgh. Bovine blood samples for mAb testing were taken by venepuncture from the jugular vein of female cattle aged approximately 6 months. These were housed at the University of Edinburgh’s Langhill Farm. Blood samples for measurement of antigen specific IP-10 were also taken from cattle that were bTB reactors (n = 17). These were farm animals that had failed a recent bovine TB surveillance skin test and were re-housed at the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) Weybridge site and were found to be culture positive for M. bovis . All experimental protocols were carried out under the authority of a UK Home Office Project Licence under the regulations of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 with approval from The Roslin Institute’s Local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) or APHA’s AWERB as appropriate. The results are reported in line with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) Guidelines [ 19 ]. Additional bovine blood samples (n = 14) were obtained from bTB-free herds in Scotland as part of routine veterinary surveillance. The blood samples were stimulated with PPDb or left unstimulated for 24h and processed for collection of whole blood supernatants (WBS) as described previously [ 11 , 15 ]. WBS were diluted 1 in 5 in assay buffer (0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.05% Tween-20 (Merck, Gillingham, UK) in PBS) for testing [ 20 ]. Expression and purification of recombinant bovine IP-10 (rbovIP-10) The sequence corresponding to mature protein of bovIP-10 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001046551.2) with a BsiWI restriction site at the 5’ end and a NheI restriction site at the 3’ end was synthesised (IDT) and cloned into the expression vector pFUSEN-hG1Fc (InvivoGen, San Diego, USA) using the complementary restriction sites BsiWI and NheI. The resulting plasmid (pFUSEN-bovIP10) was transformed into E . coli DH5α chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life technologies LTD, Paisley, UK). A Zeocin resistant transformant was selected and the plasmid was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (LightRun Tube services, Eurofins, Ebersberg, Germany) to confirm the open reading frame (ORF). Plasmids for transfection were prepared using EndoFree plasmid kit (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK). Recombinant Fc-IP-10 was expressed using Expi293™ Expression System Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and purified by using a HiTrap Protein G HP antibody purification column (Cytiva, Fisher Scientific; Loughborough, UK) as per manufacturer’s instruction. Molecular weight was determined by Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). One Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Gel (4–15%, Bio-Rad, Watford, UK) was mounted into the electrode assembly, lowered into the Mini tank of Mini-PROTEAN Tetra system (Bio-Rad), and the tank filled with 1× Tris/glycine/SDS running buffer (Bio-Rad). Loading sample was prepared by mixing equal volumes of the purified bovIP-10 (10 µg) and 2×Leammli buffer (Bio-Rad) with 5.0 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Sigma-Aldrich) and then heated at 95°C for 5 min. Precision Plus Protein Dual Colour Standard (Bio-Rad) was loaded in the next well. Gel electrophoresis was carried out at a constant voltage of 120 V for 45 minutes. The gel was stained with InstantBlue™ protein stain (CBS Scientific, Bracknell, UK) for 1 h to visualise the protein. The wet gel was then scanned with an EPSON scanner to generate a digital image. Protein identity was assessed by mass spectrometry (MS), carried out by the Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at RI, University of Edinburgh. Development of anti-bovine IP-10 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) Immunisation of mice Three BALB/C strain mice (Charles River Laboratories, UK) were immunized with Fc-bovIP-10 fusion protein for generation of anti-bovIP-10 antibodies. All mice were pre-bled on day 1 (pre-immunisation) from the tail vein to collect blood for serum. On day 4, 29 and 46 each mouse was immunised by subcutaneous injection of 50 µg purified Fc-bovIP-10 which was emulsified with TiterMax® Gold Adjuvant (Merck). On day 29 and 50 post-immunisation, the mice were bled from the tail vein for serum. Blood was centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 minutes, serum was collected and stored at -20°C. A final boost was performed on day 68 by intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 50 µg purified Fc-bovIP-10 without adjuvant. Mice were sacrificed on day 72 for spleen removal. Evaluation of immune response in sera from immunised mice by ELISA 96 well ELISA plates were coated with 50 µL of Fc-IP-10 or human IgG Fc at 1.0 µg/ml, in Carbonate-Bicarbonate Buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated overnight at 4°C. The following day, plates were washed with PBS-0.05% Tween (PBST) and blocked using 0.1% Casein (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 1 hr at RT. Following three washes with PBST, 50 µl of sera (1/1000 diluted in PBS) from pre- and post-immunisations was added and incubated for 1 hour at RT. After a further three washes with PBST, horse anti-mouse IgG-Horseradish-Peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody (1/5000, Cell Signaling Technology, Dellaertweg, The Netherlands) was added and incubated for 1 hour at RT. Following a final three PBST washes, 3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (1-Step™ TMB ELISA Substrate Solutions; Thermo Scientific) was used to visualise peroxidase activity. After 10–20 min, 2M H 2 SO 4 was used to stop the reaction. Optical density (OD450-OD550) was measured by a Multiskan Ascent spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Fold change i.e., reactivity of the sera against Fc-rbovIP-10 and Fc control, measured by OD value, relative to the secondary antibody only control wells was calculated. Results for binding of serum antibodies to IP-10 were compared with binding to human Fc. Fusion of immunised mouse spleen cells with partner cells, SP2.0/Ag-14 Two days before fusion, mouse thymocytes were grown on flat-bottomed 96-well plates in fusion media [complete media (RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% HI-FBS, 1mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) plus HAT Supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific); Hybridoma Fusion and Cloning Supplement (HFCS) (Merck); and 2.0 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-6 (BioLegend, London, UK)] as feeder cells at 37°C, 5% CO2. Spleens from the three mice were collected and flushed several times with serum free RPMI media containing RPMI-1640 (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 mM Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using a needle and syringe until the tissue appeared pale and empty of cells. Media containing flushed single cells was collected, passed through a 100 µM cell strainer and centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 minutes. The cell pellet was then resuspended in 5 ml serum-free RPMI media and total cells were counted using Trypan Blue exclusion. Prior to counting the cells, cell suspension (100 µl) was mixed with 900 µl of red blood cell lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature to lyse red blood cells. Cells from mice #1 and #3 were cryopreserved in freezing media [90% FBS/10% DMSO (Merck)] and stored at -155 o C, while mouse #2 splenocytes were used for fusion. Fusion partner Sp2/0-Ag14 mouse myeloma cells were maintained in complete media including DMEM medium (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% HI-FBS (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C and 5% CO 2 . Cells were selected in 20 µg/ml 8-Azaguanine (Sigma-Aldrich) for at least one week prior to fusion. One day before fusion, cultured SP2/0 cells were split to ensure that cells were in the exponential phase of growth at the time of fusion. On the day of fusion, Sp2/0-Ag14 cells were harvested, counted and mixed with splenocytes at a ratio of 1:5. The combined cells were centrifuged at 400 x g for 5 minutes. After removal of supernatant, the cell pellet was slowly resuspended in 1 ml pre-warmed Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) (Merck) over 1 minute with continuous stirring, followed by a further 1.5 minutes of continuous stirring. PEG was gradually diluted out using 2 ml RPMI-1640, 10mM Glutamax added over 2 minutes, and a further 8 ml over an additional 2–3 minutes. Cells were left to incubate undisturbed for 20 minutes at RT. The fused cells were pelleted as before, and resuspended in fusion media. Cell density was adjusted to 1×10 6 cells/ml and the cell suspension (100 µl/well), including unfused spleen cells as a control, was plated out into the above plates with mouse thymocytes as feeder cells (0.5-1.0 x 10 6 cells/well) and cultured in the 37°C, 5% CO2 incubator. Selection of positive hybridomas and cloning of monoclonal hybridoma The cells were re-fed after 5 days growth by replacing 150 µl of media from each well with 200 µl of fusion media. After 10 days culture, an indirect ELISA was carried out to identify positive hybridomas specific to bovIP-10 by screening against the immunogen Fc-bovIP-10, recombinant bovIP-10 (Bio-Rad) and human IgG1-Fc tag (Roslin Toolbox) to exclude hybridomas that reacted against the Fc tag. All positive clones were switched to hybridoma HT media [complete media plus HT Supplement (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 6 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-6] followed by expansion into 24 well plates, 6 well and T-25 tissue culture flasks upon reaching confluence. At this stage, the hybridomas represent multiclonal cell lines. These were cryopreserved in freezing media and stored at -155 o C. The two best wells of multiclonal hybridomas, specific to bovIP-10 and with minimum binding to IgG-Fc, were single-cell sorted (BD FACS Aria III by the Bioimaging facility at RI) into 96 well plates with pre-grown thymocytes as feeder cells (0.5-1.0 x 10 6 cells/well). The cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2, media replenished after 5–7 days. The supernatants from these single clones (which originated from single cell sorted hybridomas) were screened by ELISA on day 10 of culture. Cells from the wells that gave the highest ELISA readings i.e., specific reactivity to Fc-bovIP-10, and not against the Fc control, were passaged and grown up in 24-well plates. Upon confluence, the supernatants were confirmed for their bovIP-10 reactivity by an indirect ELISA using commercially available, purified IP-10, without the Fc label (Bio-Rad). The cells were also frozen at this stage, as described for the multiclonal stage, and mAb candidates were cultured for further expansion. Purification, isotyping and labelling of mAbs Antibody was purified from centrifuged, filter-sterilised cell culture supernatant (harvested from five of the expanded clones) using a 1 ml HiTrap Protein G HP antibody purification column (Cytiva) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, samples were passed through the column by use of a peristaltic pump at a speed of 1.0 ml/min. Purified mAb was eluted using elution buffer (0.1 M Glycine buffer, pH2.7; Sigma-Aldrich) and neutralised with neutralising buffer (Tris-HCl, pH9.0; Sigma-Aldrich). Fractions containing purified mAb, as measured by Nanodrop spectrophotometer, were collected, pooled and buffer-exchanged to PBS using an Amicon® Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Unit (Merck). Concentrations of purified mAbs were measured using Nanodrop and these were stored at -20°C. The purified mAbs were isotyped using IsoStrip™ Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Isotyping Kit (Merck), and aliquots were biotinylated using the One-Step Antibody Biotinylation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Antibodies were also labelled with an Alexa Fluor™ 647 (AF647) Antibody Labeling Kit (Molecular Probe; Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer’s instructions for use in intracellular staining. Similarly, isotype control mAb (purified mouse IgG1k, BioLegend) was labelled with AF647. Antibody blocking assay In order to develop a sandwich ELISA for detection of IP-10 using the newly generated mAb, it was essential to identify a pair of mAb that can be used for capture and detection. In order to do this, cross-recognition of IP-10 in a blocking assay was carried out: ELISA plates were coated with rbovIP-10 at 25 ng/well in 50 µl of Carbonate-Bicarbonate Buffer and placed overnight at 4°C. The following day, the plates were washed with PBS-0.05% Tween (PBST) thrice and blocked for 1 hour using 0.1% casein in PBS-Tween (100 µl per well). After washing, purified anti-bovIP-10 mAbs were incubated in duplicates for 1 hour in 100-fold excess (25 µg in 0.1% casein) to enable complete binding to all epitopes on bovIP-10. The plates were washed and the subsequent binding of biotin-labelled anti-bovIP-10 mAbs (0.25 µg in 0.1% casein, 50 µl per well for 1 hour) was determined in a checker-board fashion with Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase conjugate (SAv-HRP, diluted 1 in 5000 with 0.1% casein, 50 µl per well for 45 minutes) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following a final three PBST washes, the next steps were performed as described above. Positive controls were the wells that only received biotin labelled mAbs only (i.e., no 100-fold excess purified mAbs were added and hence no blocking). Complete negative controls (buffer only) were also included. Percentage of inhibition was calculated relative to the positive control wells by the following formula, as described by other groups [ 21 , 22 ]. $$\:\text{P}\text{e}\text{r}\text{c}\text{e}\text{n}\text{t}\:\text{i}\text{n}\text{h}\text{i}\text{b}\text{i}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n}=\frac{Average\:OD-\:OD\:of\:biotin\:labelled\:mAb\:only\:controls}{OD\:of\:the\:biotin\:labelled\:mAb\:only\:controls}\:x\:100$$ Development and evaluation of 7C2 mAb based sandwich ELISA All of the mAbs tested above were found to bind to the same epitope(s) and therefore could not be used as a pair (or pairs) for sandwich ELISA development. To enable further development, one mAb (7C2) was randomly selected and used as a capture antibody. This mAb was paired with a commercially available (Kingfisher Biotech, St Paul, MN, USA) pAb antibody used as a detection antibody. These were tested for detection of rBovIP-10 initially and compared with an ELISA using both capture and detection pAb from Kingfisher Biotech (as described by Goosen et al ., [ 20 ]). The assay was used to detect recombinant bovIP-10 (Kingfisher Biotech). For the development of an assay with the 7C2 mAb, the following modifications were made to the protocol described by Goosen et al : (i) the capture antibody (7C2) was used at a concentration of 10 µg/mL; (ii) the detection antibody (polyclonal anti-IP-10, Kingfisher Biotech, St Paul, MN, USA) was used at 0.2 µg/ml and (iii) a standard curve of recombinant bovine IP-10 (Kingfisher Biotech) ranging from 0–25 ng was used. Optical density (OD 450 -OD 550 ) was measured as described above. The IP-10 ELISAs were compared using rbovIP-10 standard curves and quantification range of both assays determined as described above. Intracytoplasmic IP-10 staining PBMCs were separated from heparinized whole blood based on gradient centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Serumwerk, Stemcell Technologies, Cambridge, UK). Briefly, blood was diluted 1:1 with PBS and overlaid on Lymphoprep and centrifuged for 40 minutes at 1200 × g at RT with brake off. PBMCs were separated from the interface, PBS was added to 50 ml and centrifuged at 400 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Live PBMCs were counted using Trypan blue exclusion, frozen in freezing media and stored at -155 o C. Frozen PBMCs from three individual calves were recovered from − 150°C freezer and washed with warm complete RPMI media [RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% HI-FBS (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific)]. Viable cells were counted using a haemocytometer using trypan blue exclusion. Cells were seeded at 1.0 x 10 6 cells/ml and stimulated with: either 5.0 µg/ml Concanavalin A (ConA) (Sigma-Aldrich), 2.5 µg/ml Pokeweed Mitogen (PWM) (Sigma-Aldrich) or left unstimulated. After 20 hours, cells were treated with BD GolgiStop™ (BD Biosciences, Becton Dickinson, Wokingham, UK) and cultured for a further 4 hours. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed and 2x10 6 cells were added to wells of a 96 well plate. The cells were pelleted at 350 x g for 2 minutes and washed with PBS twice. Cells were then incubated in the dark with Zombie Yellow (1/1000) (BioLegend) at RT for 15 minutes. Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended with 100 µL per well of fixation/permeabilization solution (BD Biosciences) for 20 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice in 1× BD Perm/Wash™ buffer (BD Biosciences) and thoroughly resuspended with 50 µL of BD Perm/Wash™ buffer containing AF647 labelled 7C2 mAb and isotype control (mouse IgG1k-AF647, clone MOPC-21, BioLegend). Staining was carried out at 4°C for 30 minutes in the dark. Then, cells were washed twice with 1× BD Perm/Wash™ buffer and resuspended in Staining Buffer (5% normal goat serum (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBS) prior to flow cytometric analysis with a BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 50,000 cells were collected per sample. The flow cytometry results were analysed using FlowJo™ v10.8 Software (BD Life Sciences). Cells were first gated on Side Scatter Area (SSC-A) and Forward Scatter Area (FSC-A) to discriminate cell debris from the cell population. Dead cells were excluded by staining with Zombie Yellow, a viability dye that selectively penetrates cells with compromised membranes. Doublets and aggregates were discriminated based on signal processing by comparing Forward Scatter Area (FSC-A) and Forward Scatter Height (FSC-H). This ensured that only live and single cells were included in the subsequent analysis. Data Analysis ELISA data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Software, Redmond, WA). Percent inhibition was calculated as described above. The working range of the two ELISA assays were determined by calculating detection limit/sensitivity (i.e., lowest IP-10 level that can be quantified and discriminated from background) and upper limit of quantification (highest IP-10 level that can be quantified with reliability) as previously described [ 11 , 23 , 24 ]. Lower limit of detection was determined as the value (ng/mL) calculated by adding two times the standard deviation from a series of blanks to the mean OD value of blank wells and interpolated from the standard curve. For upper limit of quantification, three times the standard deviation of the highest point in straight part of the standard curve was subtracted from the mean and interpolated from the standard curve. The comparison between IP-10 levels in PPDb minus medium-stimulated WBS in M. bovis naïve and M. bovis positive groups was computed by Mann-Whitney U test. Flow data were analysed using FlowJo v10.8 (BD Life Sciences) above, and the groups compared using paired T test. Statistical analysis and plots were generated using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Results Confirmation of expression of recombinant Fc-bovIP-10 It was essential to generate large quantities of recombinant bovIP-10 (rbovIP-10) for mouse immunisations to facilitate mAb production. Recombinant bovIP-10 was produced from a vector which enabled bovIP-10 to be expressed as a fusion construct with an Fc tag for enhanced immunogenicity and ease of subsequent purification. The predicted molecular weight by Expasy Compute pI/Mw tool (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/) using protein sequence of Fc-bovIP-10 was 38 kDa. To confirm the molecular weight and identity, SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry (MS) was performed. A band was detected at approximately 38kDa by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Fig. S1, left panel). The sequence view of the MS results is shown in Fig. S1, (right panel). The blue bars show MS/MS spectra mapping to the peptide sequence. PEAKS studio software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.) analysis showed 86% sequence coverage for bovIP-10 and 34 out of 53 peptide sequences (–log10 p score 527) uniquely mapping to bovIP-10, confirming the identity. Mice responded specifically to immunisation with rbovIP-10 Standard hybridoma technology was used to generate mAbs against bovIP-10. Mice (n=3) were immunised with Fc tagged rbovIP-10 and their sera were tested by indirect ELISA to confirm the production of bovIP-10 specific antibodies. Screening was carried out against Fc-tagged rbovIP-10 or Fc control on day 1 (before immunisation) and on days 29 and 46 post immunisation (Fig. 1). All three mice showed no reactivity against bovIP-10 or Fc control prior to immunisation. Post immunisation, by day 29, low levels of binding against both bovIP-10 and Fc control were detected in all 3 mice. By day 46, very strong binding responses against rbovIP-10 were detected from mice #1 and #2 but not for mouse #3. Since mouse #2 showed the highest binding against rbovIP-10, it was selected for further steps of mAb generation. Generation of bovIP-10 specific mAbs The splenocytes from mouse #2 were fused Sp2/0-Ag14 cells and cultured in fusion media for 10 days. Neat supernatants (from multiclonal hybridomas at this stage) were screened for reactivity to Fc-bovIP-10 and Fc control by indirect ELISA. Positive (sera from immunised mice) and negative (buffer only, secondary antibody only and cell culture media only) controls were included. Eight multiclonal samples were shown to contain antibodies that were specific for Fc-bovIP-10, but no reactivity to the Fc control (Fig. 2, left panel). Fold change refers to the enhanced Fc-bovIP-10 reactivity (measured by OD value) of hybridoma supernatants compared to the secondary antibody only control well. Based on their specific reactivity against Fc-bovIP10 and growth of the cells in culture, two multiclonal hybridomas i.e., 5G2 and 7G9 were taken forward and single cell sorting was performed. The single cells were cultured for 10 days, followed by indirect ELISA screening to identify wells/candidates specific for Fc-bovIP-10, and not against the Fc tag. Finally, 13 candidates were identified and their bovIP-10 specific reactivity was confirmed upon screening the neat supernatants against commercially available purified IP-10, without the Fc tag (Bio-Rad) (Fig. 2, right panel). These clones were further cultured to generate monoclonal hybridoma cell lines. The first five mAb supernatants were selected for purification and isotyping – all of them were found to be mouse IgG1. All anti-bovIP-10mAs recognised the same epitopes of IP-10 In order to develop an ELISA, a pair of mAb were needed. These mAbs would need to recognise different epitopes, leading to enhanced sensitivity of the assays. In order to determine suitability of mAb as pairs for ELISA, five mAbs were selected and biotinylated and cross-blocking was compared using biotinylated and non-biotin versions. A competition ELISA was set up to assess the inhibition of the binding of biotinylated mAbs by a 100-fold excess of the purified mAbs. Percentage inhibition was calculated and shown in Table 1. The results show that there was a very large degree of blocking, with each mAb blocking the ability of the other mAb to bind to IP-10. The remaining eight mAb also showed blocking effect when tested in a blocking assay and paired with biotinylated 7C2 (data not shown). This suggests that all mAbs bind to the same dominant epitope(s) of IP-10. 7C2 mAb based ELISA showed an enhanced detection range Since all of the tested mAbs recognised the same epitope of IP-10, it was not possible to select a pair for the development of a sandwich ELISA. As an alternative approach, mAb 7C2 was selected for further assessment as a capture mAb for ELISA. This was paired with a commercially available biotinylated pAb (Kingfisher Biotech) to develop a sandwich ELISA. As shown in Fig. 3, the 7C2 mAb based ELISA, and the commercial Kingfisher ELISA enabled detection of rbovIP-10. The working range of both assays was determined by defining the detection limit/sensitivity (minimum IP-10 level that can be detected and discriminated from the background) and upper limit of quantification (maximum IP-10 level that can be reliably detected). The Kingfisher ELISA was found to be more sensitive i.e., 0.2 ng/mL compared to the assay using mAb 7C2 (sensitivity of 0.6 ng/mL). The 7C2 assay was found to be more sensitive than a commercial assay from Bio-Rad, which we have previously used [11]. Moreover, the 7C2 mAb based assay had greater linear range with accurate detection in the linear part of the standard curve of up to 5.4 ng/mL compared to the Kingfisher ELISA (3.6 ng/mL), although concentrations higher than this can be detected by both assays. 7C2 mAb ELISA detected IP-10 from M. bovis naïve and infected animal cohorts The ELISA based on use of 7C2 as a capture mAb with a pAb detection antibody was utilised to measure IP-10 levels in samples obtained from field animal cohorts (Fig. 4) to confirm that natural IP-10 can be detected. The samples tested were from M. bovis naïve animals (n = 14), and from cattle that were confirmed infected with M. bovis by culture (n = 17). Statistically significant higher levels of PPDb specific IP-10 were observed in the M. bovis infected animals (p<0.0001) compared to the M. bovis naïve group (median group IP-10 concentrations of 15.8 ng/ml and 1.1 ng/ml respectively). This suggests that the 7C2 mAb based IP-10 ELISA assay is suitable for application in a clinically relevant sample matrix, and further confirms the differential potential of PPDb specific IP-10 for detection of M. bovis infection. Intracellular staining of bovine PBMC with AF647 labelled anti-bovIP-10 (7C2) mAb showed expression of IP-10 in response to mitogen stimulation The ability of the 7C2 mAb to detect intracytoplasmic IP-10 was assessed. Bovine PBMCs were stimulated with ConA and PWM, and intracytoplasmic IP-10 was detected with AF647 labelled 7C2. Stimulation with either ConA or PWM induced significant expression of IP-10 by PBMCs. Fig. 5 shows representative plots of intracellular IP-10 staining from one animal (top panel for isotype controls and bottom panel for IP-10 staining). On average 0.49 ± 0.04% of the control, unstimulated, PBMCs expressed intracellular IP-10 and the proportions increased to 4.01 ± 0.60 % after ConA and to 4.66 ± 0.67 % after PWM stimulation respectively. Discussion The development of bovIP-10 mAbs was pursued in light of evidence that measurement of IP-10 can provide added diagnostic value when combined with IFN-γ for bTB detection. Being a major pro-inflammatory cytokine, IP-10 is involved in recruiting T cells to the site of inflammation i.e., the granuloma. Compared to control tissues, significantly upregulated IP-10 mRNA expression was reported in the granulomas of lymph node tissues of cattle experimentally infected with M. bovis [25]. Although a preliminary study did not support the potential of IP-10 protein levels as a biomarker for bTB [26]; Parsons et al., reported strong correlation between antigen specific release of IP-10 and IFN-γ, and PPDb stimulated IP-10 levels could differentiate skin test/IGRA positive and skin test/IGRA negative cattle with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97% [27]. Additionally, determining IP-10 along with IFN-γ in plasma samples from blood stimulated with PPDb and defined TB antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, Rv3615c and TB7.7), was shown to identify additional confirmed TB positive animals in comparison to skin test and IGRA alone in cattle [14], and African buffaloes [13] respectively. Therefore, development of sensitive and specific detection platforms that could determine bovIP-10 is urgently needed. An essential pre-requisite to achieve this is having a consistent access to homogenous, well characterized bovIP-10 mAbs; fuelling the rationale for this study. Novel mAbs for bovIP-10 detection were successfully developed and their use in ELISA and flow cytometric applications was explored. All of the tested mAbs appeared to bind to the same or closely related epitope of IP-10. A potential explanation of this can be the small size of bovIP-10; resulting in a dominant B cell epitope and hence most generated mAbs showing a preferential epitope binding specificity. While self-inhibition among mAb candidates post hybridoma selection has been observed in other studies [21, 22, 28]; it is usual that mAb pairs can be identified enabling development of sandwich ELISAs. However, here it was not possible to use mAb pairs and further studies used a biotin labelled pAb alongside the mAb to develop a sandwich ELISA. Compared to polyclonal antisera, utilizing mAbs is reported to increase the overall accuracy, efficiency and specificity of ELISAs [29]. Although the 7C2 mAb based assay developed here was slightly less sensitive than the Kingfisher pAb based assay [14], it did show an enhanced linear range. This is important to allow simple quantification of bovIP-10 in a range of samples with varying levels of cytokine with high accuracy. In general, a broader quantification range offers benefits: more accuracy (as the extra dilution steps can be avoided); more applicability and reliability (testing samples where the concentrations can be unexpected, leading to fewer repeat assays) and a simplified analysis (in absence of a dilution factor to account for). Analysis of WBS from M. bovis infected and naive control animals using the 7C2 ELISA confirmed the previously reported IP-10 potential for bTB diagnosis [11-14] and demonstrated the suitability of the 7C2 mAb based ELISA in detecting native IP-10 in a diagnostically relevant matrix. Intracytoplasmic expression of IP-10 was detected using the 7C2 mAb: this was significantly enhanced following mitogen stimulation of bovine PBMCs compared to controls. Further studies to examine expression of IP-10 in PBMC from M. bovis infected animals in multiparametric flow cytometric analyses would provide insight into the cell types that produce IP-10. This would allow conclusions to be drawn about the functional role that IP-10 may play in bTB infection. Their availability provides an opportunity to advance our understanding of bovIP-10 and its kinetics in health and disease. Only one mAb (7C2) was studied here in detail. Future experiments could include more comprehensive characterization of this, and other mAb candidates, including cross reactivity testing for detection of IP-10 in other species. Further assessment of the mAb in LFAs would also be of benefit. To conclude, the novel bovIP-10 mAbs panel and the applications described herein provide an opportunity and tools that be employed to delve deep into understanding of the kinetics of bovIP-10 in health and disease. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate: All mice were housed at the Bioresearch & Veterinary Service Facility at the Roslin Institute. Bovine blood samples for mAb testing were taken by venepuncture from the jugular vein of female cattle aged approximately 6 months. These were housed at the University of Edinburgh’s Langhill Farm. Blood samples for measurement of antigen specific IP-10 were also taken from cattle that were bTB reactors (n = 17). These were farm animals that had failed a recent bovine TB surveillance skin test and were re-housed at the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) Weybridge site and were found to be culture positive for M. bovis . All experimental protocols were carried out under the authority of a UK Home Office Project Licence under the regulations of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 with approval from The Roslin Institute’s Local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) or APHA’s AWERB as appropriate. The results are reported in line with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) Guidelines [19]. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Availability of data and materials: The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Funding: HK was awarded a joint PhD studentship from College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh and Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The Immunological Toolbox is supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BB/CCG2270/1). ID, IM, JCH, and ZW were funded by BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme funding (BBS/E/RL/230002B and BBS/E/D/20002174). The work carried out at APHA was funded by the GB bovine TB research budget (grant SE3334) held and administered centrally by Defra on behalf of England, Scotland and Wales. Authors' contributions: ZW, HK and JCH conceived the study. HK, MC, ID, IM and ZW carried out the work to generate and test the antibodies described using bovine samples, and analysed the data. HK and ZW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgements: We gratefully acknowledge the staff at the Bioresearch & Veterinary Service Facility and at Langhill Farm, University of Edinburgh for their highly skill expertise and assistance with animal experimentation. The authors would also like to thank APHA staff from the Animal Science Unit for their dedication to the welfare of the animals housed at APHA. References Lei J, Yin X, Shang H, Jiang Y (2019) IP-10 is highly involved in HIV infection, Cytokine. 115:97–103 Karimabad MN, Kounis NG, Hassanshahi G, Hassanshahi F, Mplani V, Koniari I, Hung M-Y, Nadimi AE (2021) The involvement of CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and its related chemokines in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and in the COVID-19 vaccination: A narrative review. Vaccines 9:1224 Lloyd AR, Oppenheim JJ, Kelvin DJ, Taub DD (1950) Chemokines regulate T cell adherence to recombinant adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix proteins, Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: (1996) 156:932–938 Wang X, Yue T-L, Ohlstein EH, Sung C-P, Feuerstein GZ (1996) Interferon-inducible protein-10 involves vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 271:24286–24293 Kanda N, Watanabe S (2002) Histamine inhibits the production of interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa in human squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. J Invest dermatology 119:1411–1419 Qiu X, Tang Y, Yue Y, Zeng Y, Li W, Qu Y, Mu D (2019) Accuracy of interferon-γ-induced protein 10 for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:667–672 Ruhwald M, Aabye MG, Ravn P (2012) IP-10 release assays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection: current status and future directions, Expert review of molecular diagnostics. 12:175–187 Rubbo P-A, Nagot N, Le Moing V, Brabet M, Bourdin A, Nogué E, Bolloré K, Vendrell J-P, Van De Perre P, Tuaillon E (2012) Multicytokine detection improves latent tuberculosis diagnosis in health care workers. J Clin Microbiol 50:1711–1717 Zhang W (2019) IP-10 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98:e15977 van Hooij A, Fat EMTK, de Jong D, Khatun M, Soren S, Chowdhury AS, Roy JC, Alam K, Kim J-P, Richardus JH (2021) Prototype multi-biomarker test for point-of-care leprosy diagnostics. Iscience. 24 Khalid H, van Hooij A, Connelley TK, Geluk A, Hope JC (2022) Protein levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines as biomarkers of Mycobacterium bovis infection and BCG vaccination in cattle, Pathogens. 11:738 Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Rabideau MM, Jones GJ, Kanipe C, Vordermeier HM, Waters WR (2020) Biomarkers of cell-mediated immunity to bovine tuberculosis, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 220:109988 Bernitz N, Kerr TJ, Goosen WJ, Clarke C, Higgitt R, Roos EO, Cooper DV, Warren RM, van Helden PD, Parsons SD (2019) Parallel measurement of IFN-γ and IP-10 in QuantiFERON®-TB Gold (QFT) plasma improves the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer), Preventive veterinary medicine. 169:104700 Coad M, Doyle M, Steinbach S, Gormley E, Vordermeier M, Jones G (2019) Simultaneous measurement of antigen-induced CXCL10 and IFN-γ enhances test sensitivity for bovine TB detection in cattle, Veterinary microbiology. 230:1–6 Khalid H, Pierneef L, Van Hooij A, Zhou Z, De Jong D, Kon Fat T, Connelley E, Hope TK, Corstjens JC, Geluk PL (2023) Development of lateral flow assays to detect host proteins in cattle for improved diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Front Veterinary Sci 10:1193332 Parray HA, Shukla S, Samal S, Shrivastava T, Ahmed S, Sharma C, Kumar R (2020) Hybridoma technology a versatile method for isolation of monoclonal antibodies, its applicability across species, limitations, advancement and future perspectives, International immunopharmacology. 85:106639 Mitra S, Tomar PC (2021) Hybridoma technology; advancements, clinical significance, and future aspects. J Genetic Eng Biotechnol 19:1–12 Köhler G, Milstein C (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, nature. 256:495–497 Percie du Sert N, Ahluwalia HV, Alam A, Avey S, Baker MT, Browne M, Clark WJ, Cuthill A, Dirnagl IC, Emerson U, Garner M, Holgate P, Howells ST, Karp DW, Lazic NA, Lidster SE, MacCallum K, Macleod CJ, Pearl M, Petersen EJ, Rawle OH, Reynolds F, Rooney P, Sena K, Silberberg ES, Steckler SD, Wurbel T (2020) The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 18:e3000410 Goosen WJ, Cooper D, Miller MA, van Helden PD, Parsons SD (2015) IP-10 is a sensitive biomarker of antigen recognition in whole-blood stimulation assays used for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer), Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 22:974–978 Mohseni SR, Golsaz-Shirazi F, Hosseini M, Khoshnoodi J, Bahadori T, Judaki MA, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Shokri F (2019) Characterization of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Recognizing Prostate Specific Antigen: Implication for Design of a Sandwich ELISA. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 11:72 Manirarora JN, Walker KE, Patil V, Renukaradhya GJ, LaBresh J, Sullivan Y, Francis O, Lunney JK (2022) Development and characterization of new monoclonal antibodies against porcine interleukin-17A and interferon-gamma. Front Immunol 13:786396 Abcam Glossary of terms for ELISA [on line] https://www.abcam.com/kits/elisa-terms-glossary Rajna M, Irena Z, Optimization Validation and Standardization of ELISA, in: Gyula M. (Ed.), Norovirus, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2020, pp. Ch. 2 Aranday-Cortes E, Bull N, Villarreal‐Ramos B, Gough J, Hicks D, Ortiz‐Peláez A, Vordermeier H, Salguero F (2013) Upregulation of IL‐17 A, CXCL 9 and CXCL 10 in Early‐Stage Granulomas Induced by M ycobacterium bovis in Cattle, Transboundary and emerging diseases. 60:525–537 Waters W, Thacker T, Nonnecke B, Palmer M, Schiller I, Oesch B, Vordermeier H, Silva E, Estes D (2012) Evaluation of gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-induced protein 10 responses for detection of cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis: comparisons to IFN-γ responses, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 19:346–351 Parsons SD, McGill K, Doyle MB, Goosen WJ, Van Helden PD, Gormley E (2016) Antigen-specific IP-10 release is a sensitive biomarker of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. PLoS ONE 11:e0155440 Hailstock T, Dai C, Aquino J, Walker KE, Chick S, Manirarora JN, Suresh R, Patil V, Renukaradhya GJ, Sullivan YB (2024) Production and characterization of anti-porcine CXCL10 monoclonal antibodies, Cytokine. 174:156449 Cao Y, Li K, Xing X, Zhu G, Fu Y, Bao H, Bai X, Sun P, Li P, Zhang J (2022) Development and validation of a competitive ELISA based on bovine monoclonal antibodies for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A. J Clin Microbiol 60:e02142–e02121 Tables Table 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section. Supplementary Files Table1.docx floatimage7.jpeg Supplementary Fig. S1. Confirmation of molecular weight and identity of Fc-bovIP-10. SDS-PAGE (left) showing a band at 38kDa for Fc-bovIP-10 (lane 1) and molecular weight marker (lane 2). MS (right): the blue lines depict MS/MS spectra mapping to the peptide sequence. PEAKS studio software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.) analysis showed 86% sequence coverage for bovIP-10 and 34 out of 53 peptide sequences (–log10 p score 527) uniquely mapping to bovIP-10, confirming the identity. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Major Revision 12 May, 2025 Reviewers agreed at journal 07 Apr, 2025 Reviewers invited by journal 27 Mar, 2025 Editor invited by journal 25 Mar, 2025 Editor assigned by journal 25 Mar, 2025 First submitted to journal 25 Mar, 2025 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6304513","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":434692104,"identity":"54f7f1b5-3537-40c4-9ac4-7b743d38d63d","order_by":0,"name":"Hamza Khalid","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hamza","middleName":"","lastName":"Khalid","suffix":""},{"id":434692105,"identity":"cfdda6af-30b5-4de4-a027-9e4ae58d6251","order_by":1,"name":"Michael Coad","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Animal and Plant Health Agency","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Michael","middleName":"","lastName":"Coad","suffix":""},{"id":434692106,"identity":"62fcfb7a-9981-41e7-879b-59e7ac675f45","order_by":2,"name":"Inga Dry","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Inga","middleName":"","lastName":"Dry","suffix":""},{"id":434692107,"identity":"0e978b06-caa9-4c52-9f5f-764f6a793ec1","order_by":3,"name":"Catherine McGuinnes","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Catherine","middleName":"","lastName":"McGuinnes","suffix":""},{"id":434692108,"identity":"ec3b92a2-f790-407f-b4e3-0f1f0d598e02","order_by":4,"name":"Lindsey Waddell","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lindsey","middleName":"","lastName":"Waddell","suffix":""},{"id":434692109,"identity":"2ef56ab9-8956-43a2-a479-85e7be641d72","order_by":5,"name":"Jayne C Hope","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jayne","middleName":"C","lastName":"Hope","suffix":""},{"id":434692110,"identity":"d858e253-ec90-49b2-8fbd-418e9e32d6f4","order_by":6,"name":"Zhiguang Wu","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9131-730X","institution":"The University of Edinburgh The Roslin Institute","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zhiguang","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-03-25 13:57:06","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":80567204,"identity":"a0cd79d9-a286-4fb7-b3d1-c8d5d647cae7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:20:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":216216,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eThe bovIP-10-specific immune responses from mice immunized with recombinant Fc-bovIP-10.\u003c/em\u003e Following a pre-immunisation test bleed, mice (n=3) were given a total of four immunisations with 50 µg Fc-bovIP-10 protein. Post-immunisation sera were collected following second and third immunisation. Reactivity of the sera (diluted 1 in 1000 in PBS) against Fc-rbovIP-10 and Fc control was tested by indirect ELISA. Fold change refers to the enhanced bovIP-10 reactivity (measured by OD value) of hybridoma supernatants compared to the secondary antibody only control well. Averages of two technical replicates were used.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/db1468a6b3fe2569846c3dae.jpeg"},{"id":80567208,"identity":"d0004ac5-0282-4470-9765-73b37b74b271","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:20:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":110462,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIdentification of hybridomas secreting bovine IP-10 specific antibodies.\u003c/em\u003e ELISA screening of multiclonal hybridomas (left panel): plates were coated with Fc-bovIP-10 or Fc control protein. Eight multi-clonal candidates were identified specific to Fc-bovIP-10, with no reactivity against Fc. Two multiclonal hybridomas (5G2 and 7G9) were single cell sorted, cultured and re-screened to identify their specific reactivity against bovIP-10. Thirteen monoclonal hybridomas (right) were identified. Positive (sera from immunised mice diluted 1 in 1000) and negative (buffer only, secondary antibody only and media only) controls were included. Fold change refers to the enhanced bovIP-10 reactivity (measured by OD value) of hybridoma supernatants compared to the secondary antibody only control well.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/2225123003c8f251eb28baef.jpeg"},{"id":80567825,"identity":"1e8a29cc-1f2a-4ece-b7e5-510f680ecc0d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:28:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":161004,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAssessment of mAb 7C2 for detection of IP-10 by ELISA.\u003c/em\u003e Commercial pAb based Kingfisher ELISA (left) and the assay incorporating 7C2 mAb (right) were tested with rbovIP-10 standard curve in triplicates. Shown are average OD450 minus OD550 values on y-axis, IP-10 concentration in ng/mL on x-axis and the black squares show points on the standard curve.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/e421dc37e668448d8259e8a1.jpeg"},{"id":80567205,"identity":"abe977f1-c1b1-4770-914e-0138a8508a94","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:20:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":129344,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDetection of antigen-specific IP-10 in bovine samples by ELISA.\u003c/em\u003e The 7C2 mAb based ELISA was evaluated using samples from \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e naïve (n=14) and culture positive (n=17) cohorts. Unstimulated (medium) and PPDb WBS samples were tested. PPDb minus medium levels of IP-10 are shown on y-axis for the two test groups. The results indicated a significantly elevated IP-10 in culture positive group. \u003csup\u003e****\u003c/sup\u003e p \u0026lt; 0.001 (Mann Whitney U test).\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage4.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/fb868596b4597c16ffde8d40.jpeg"},{"id":80567213,"identity":"2c7d5e2d-bed2-413f-ac0e-acb6671a9a02","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:20:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":464812,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIntracellular detection of bovine IP-10 in bovine PBMCs\u003c/em\u003e. Frozen PBMCs were cultured overnight before stimulation with mitogens (ConA and PWM). Control cells were left unstimulated. GolgiStop protein transport inhibitor was added for the final 4 hours. After Zombie yellow viability staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized before intracellular staining with AF647 labelled anti-bovIP-10 7C2 mAb. Live, single cells were gated (top panel) and analysed using FlowJo software. Middle panel from one representative experiment shows isotype control staining (mouse IgG1k-AF647) while the bottom panel shows IP-10 staining. The graph on the right shows the percentage of IP-10\u003csup\u003e+\u003c/sup\u003e cells in control and stimulated cells.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage5.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/03e5ef7e8951e5c445b303d9.jpeg"},{"id":80568860,"identity":"dac7dfbc-9a0a-4b31-86e3-94b96e5185d4","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:44:09","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1831260,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/8ead68fb-75cd-4d3c-b862-28c473d36a2e.pdf"},{"id":80567210,"identity":"57100c78-5143-42aa-bbcb-eb6b86c7c331","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:20:08","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":13775,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Table1.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/890e093c23b069a973c5caaa.docx"},{"id":80567824,"identity":"35ff69f7-7b3b-4ca2-8bb3-5d7bd9083d90","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-04-14 18:28:08","extension":"jpeg","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":432001,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eSupplementary Fig. S1. Confirmation of molecular weight and identity of Fc-bovIP-10. \u003c/em\u003eSDS-PAGE (left) showing a band at 38kDa for Fc-bovIP-10 (lane 1) and molecular weight marker (lane 2). MS (right): the blue lines depict MS/MS spectra mapping to the peptide sequence. PEAKS studio software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.) analysis showed 86% sequence coverage for bovIP-10 and 34 out of 53 peptide sequences (–log10 p score 527) uniquely mapping to bovIP-10, confirming the identity.\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage7.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6304513/v1/5b1dfbf9e5e86ec541441446.jpeg"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine IP-10","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eInterferon gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10), also known as C-X-C chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) is a low molecular weight (10kDa) inflammatory cytokine. IP-10 binds to the receptor CXCR3 to exert its biological functions. CXCR3 is a seven transmembrane G protein coupled receptor, found on the surface of Th1 lymphocytes and NK cells, among other cell types. IP-10 is produced by various cell types including monocytes, T lymphocytes, NK cells, endothelial and stromal cells [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. IP-10 has major role in driving the migration of immune cells towards the site of inflammation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e]. Other biological functions of IP-10 include, but are not limited to, facilitation of T cell adhesion to endothelial cells, modulating the development and function of T cells, and augmenting NK-cell mediated cytolysis by facilitating the discharge of NK cell cytotoxic granules [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR4\" citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIP-10 has been widely reported as diagnostic biomarker of high relevance for human tuberculosis (TB) [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR7 CR8 CR9\" citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e]. Similarly, detection of IP-10 was shown to have promise when measured alongside IFN-γ for the detection of \u003cem\u003eMycobacterium bovis\u003c/em\u003e infection in cattle and buffalo [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR12 CR13\" citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite being a crucial and discriminant biomarker there are no monoclonal antibodies (mAbs available for use in assays to detect bovine IP-10. The current available assays utilise polyclonal antibodies (pAbs); we have previously described their use in ELISA and a user friendly lateral flow assay (LFA) format [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e] to detect IP-10 in cattle infected with \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e, the causative agent of bovine TB (bTB). However, these assays presented respective challenges of high background and an overall reduced signal compared to LFAs developed using mAbs for IFN-γ and IL-2 [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. We reasoned that the use of mAbs would circumvent these challenges and provide opportunities to produce stable reagents of high quality and quantity enabling further characterisation of IP-10 as a diagnostic marker of bTB and its role in other diseases [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHere, we describe the generation of novel mAbs to detect bovIP-10 using hybridoma technology [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. The ability of these mAbs to detect recombinant and native bovIP-10 from bTB was tested in both ELISA and flow cytometric assays.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAnimals and Ethical Statement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll mice were housed at the Bioresearch \u0026amp; Veterinary Service Facility at the Roslin Institute (BVS-Ros facility) at the University of Edinburgh.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBovine blood samples for mAb testing were taken by venepuncture from the jugular vein of female cattle aged approximately 6 months. These were housed at the University of Edinburgh\u0026rsquo;s Langhill Farm. Blood samples for measurement of antigen specific IP-10 were also taken from cattle that were bTB reactors (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;17). These were farm animals that had failed a recent bovine TB surveillance skin test and were re-housed at the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) Weybridge site and were found to be culture positive for \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e. All experimental protocols were carried out under the authority of a UK Home Office Project Licence under the regulations of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 with approval from The Roslin Institute\u0026rsquo;s Local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) or APHA\u0026rsquo;s AWERB as appropriate. The results are reported in line with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) Guidelines [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdditional bovine blood samples (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;14) were obtained from bTB-free herds in Scotland as part of routine veterinary surveillance. The blood samples were stimulated with PPDb or left unstimulated for 24h and processed for collection of whole blood supernatants (WBS) as described previously [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e]. WBS were diluted 1 in 5 in assay buffer (0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.05% Tween-20 (Merck, Gillingham, UK) in PBS) for testing [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eExpression and purification of recombinant bovine IP-10 (rbovIP-10)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe sequence corresponding to mature protein of bovIP-10 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_001046551.2) with a BsiWI restriction site at the 5\u0026rsquo; end and a NheI restriction site at the 3\u0026rsquo; end was synthesised (IDT) and cloned into the expression vector pFUSEN-hG1Fc (InvivoGen, San Diego, USA) using the complementary restriction sites BsiWI and NheI. The resulting plasmid (pFUSEN-bovIP10) was transformed into \u003cem\u003eE\u003c/em\u003e. \u003cem\u003ecoli\u003c/em\u003e DH5α chemically competent cells according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life technologies LTD, Paisley, UK). A Zeocin resistant transformant was selected and the plasmid was sequenced by Sanger sequencing (LightRun Tube services, Eurofins, Ebersberg, Germany) to confirm the open reading frame (ORF). Plasmids for transfection were prepared using EndoFree plasmid kit (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK). Recombinant Fc-IP-10 was expressed using Expi293\u0026trade; Expression System Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol and purified by using a HiTrap Protein G HP antibody purification column (Cytiva, Fisher Scientific; Loughborough, UK) as per manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instruction. Molecular weight was determined by Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). One Mini-PROTEAN\u0026reg; TGX\u0026trade; Precast Gel (4\u0026ndash;15%, Bio-Rad, Watford, UK) was mounted into the electrode assembly, lowered into the Mini tank of Mini-PROTEAN Tetra system (Bio-Rad), and the tank filled with 1\u0026times; Tris/glycine/SDS running buffer (Bio-Rad). Loading sample was prepared by mixing equal volumes of the purified bovIP-10 (10 \u0026micro;g) and 2\u0026times;Leammli buffer (Bio-Rad) with 5.0 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (Sigma-Aldrich) and then heated at 95\u0026deg;C for 5 min. Precision Plus Protein Dual Colour Standard (Bio-Rad) was loaded in the next well. Gel electrophoresis was carried out at a constant voltage of 120 V for 45 minutes. The gel was stained with InstantBlue\u0026trade; protein stain (CBS Scientific, Bracknell, UK) for 1 h to visualise the protein. The wet gel was then scanned with an EPSON scanner to generate a digital image. Protein identity was assessed by mass spectrometry (MS), carried out by the Proteomics and Metabolomics Facility at RI, University of Edinburgh.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eDevelopment of anti-bovine IP-10 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImmunisation of mice\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThree BALB/C strain mice (Charles River Laboratories, UK) were immunized with Fc-bovIP-10 fusion protein for generation of anti-bovIP-10 antibodies. All mice were pre-bled on day 1 (pre-immunisation) from the tail vein to collect blood for serum. On day 4, 29 and 46 each mouse was immunised by subcutaneous injection of 50 \u0026micro;g purified Fc-bovIP-10 which was emulsified with TiterMax\u0026reg; Gold Adjuvant (Merck). On day 29 and 50 post-immunisation, the mice were bled from the tail vein for serum. Blood was centrifuged at 1000 \u003cem\u003ex g\u003c/em\u003e for 10 minutes, serum was collected and stored at -20\u0026deg;C. A final boost was performed on day 68 by intraperitoneal (ip) injection of 50 \u0026micro;g purified Fc-bovIP-10 without adjuvant. Mice were sacrificed on day 72 for spleen removal.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eEvaluation of immune response in sera from immunised mice by ELISA\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e96 well ELISA plates were coated with 50 \u0026micro;L of Fc-IP-10 or human IgG Fc at 1.0 \u0026micro;g/ml, in Carbonate-Bicarbonate Buffer (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated overnight at 4\u0026deg;C. The following day, plates were washed with PBS-0.05% Tween (PBST) and blocked using 0.1% Casein (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 1 hr at RT. Following three washes with PBST, 50 \u0026micro;l of sera (1/1000 diluted in PBS) from pre- and post-immunisations was added and incubated for 1 hour at RT. After a further three washes with PBST, horse anti-mouse IgG-Horseradish-Peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody (1/5000, Cell Signaling Technology, Dellaertweg, The Netherlands) was added and incubated for 1 hour at RT. Following a final three PBST washes, 3,3',5,5'-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate (1-Step\u0026trade; TMB ELISA Substrate Solutions; Thermo Scientific) was used to visualise peroxidase activity. After 10\u0026ndash;20 min, 2M H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eSO\u003csub\u003e4\u003c/sub\u003e was used to stop the reaction. Optical density (OD450-OD550) was measured by a Multiskan Ascent spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and analysed using Microsoft Excel. Fold change i.e., reactivity of the sera against Fc-rbovIP-10 and Fc control, measured by OD value, relative to the secondary antibody only control wells was calculated. Results for binding of serum antibodies to IP-10 were compared with binding to human Fc.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFusion of immunised mouse spleen cells with partner cells, SP2.0/Ag-14\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTwo days before fusion, mouse thymocytes were grown on flat-bottomed 96-well plates in fusion media [complete media (RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% HI-FBS, 1mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 \u0026micro;g/ml streptomycin) plus HAT Supplement (Thermo Fisher Scientific); Hybridoma Fusion and Cloning Supplement (HFCS) (Merck); and 2.0 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-6 (BioLegend, London, UK)] as feeder cells at 37\u0026deg;C, 5% CO2.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpleens from the three mice were collected and flushed several times with serum free RPMI media containing RPMI-1640 (Sigma Aldrich) and 10 mM Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using a needle and syringe until the tissue appeared pale and empty of cells. Media containing flushed single cells was collected, passed through a 100 \u0026micro;M cell strainer and centrifuged at 400 \u003cem\u003ex g\u003c/em\u003e for 5 minutes. The cell pellet was then resuspended in 5 ml serum-free RPMI media and total cells were counted using Trypan Blue exclusion. Prior to counting the cells, cell suspension (100 \u0026micro;l) was mixed with 900 \u0026micro;l of red blood cell lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature to lyse red blood cells. Cells from mice #1 and #3 were cryopreserved in freezing media [90% FBS/10% DMSO (Merck)] and stored at -155\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC, while mouse #2 splenocytes were used for fusion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFusion partner Sp2/0-Ag14 mouse myeloma cells were maintained in complete media including DMEM medium (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% HI-FBS (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 \u0026micro;g/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37\u0026deg;C and 5% CO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e. Cells were selected in 20 \u0026micro;g/ml 8-Azaguanine (Sigma-Aldrich) for at least one week prior to fusion. One day before fusion, cultured SP2/0 cells were split to ensure that cells were in the exponential phase of growth at the time of fusion.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the day of fusion, Sp2/0-Ag14 cells were harvested, counted and mixed with splenocytes at a ratio of 1:5. The combined cells were centrifuged at 400 \u003cem\u003ex g\u003c/em\u003e for 5 minutes. After removal of supernatant, the cell pellet was slowly resuspended in 1 ml pre-warmed Polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) (Merck) over 1 minute with continuous stirring, followed by a further 1.5 minutes of continuous stirring. PEG was gradually diluted out using 2 ml RPMI-1640, 10mM Glutamax added over 2 minutes, and a further 8 ml over an additional 2\u0026ndash;3 minutes. Cells were left to incubate undisturbed for 20 minutes at RT. The fused cells were pelleted as before, and resuspended in fusion media. Cell density was adjusted to 1\u0026times;10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/ml and the cell suspension (100 \u0026micro;l/well), including unfused spleen cells as a control, was plated out into the above plates with mouse thymocytes as feeder cells (0.5-1.0 x 10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/well) and cultured in the 37\u0026deg;C, 5% CO2 incubator.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eSelection of positive hybridomas and cloning of monoclonal hybridoma\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe cells were re-fed after 5 days growth by replacing 150 \u0026micro;l of media from each well with 200 \u0026micro;l of fusion media. After 10 days culture, an indirect ELISA was carried out to identify positive hybridomas specific to bovIP-10 by screening against the immunogen Fc-bovIP-10, recombinant bovIP-10 (Bio-Rad) and human IgG1-Fc tag (Roslin Toolbox) to exclude hybridomas that reacted against the Fc tag. All positive clones were switched to hybridoma HT media [complete media plus HT Supplement (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 6 ng/ml recombinant mouse IL-6] followed by expansion into 24 well plates, 6 well and T-25 tissue culture flasks upon reaching confluence. At this stage, the hybridomas represent multiclonal cell lines. These were cryopreserved in freezing media and stored at -155\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe two best wells of multiclonal hybridomas, specific to bovIP-10 and with minimum binding to IgG-Fc, were single-cell sorted (BD FACS Aria III by the Bioimaging facility at RI) into 96 well plates with pre-grown thymocytes as feeder cells (0.5-1.0 x 10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/well). The cells were cultured at 37\u0026deg;C and 5% CO2, media replenished after 5\u0026ndash;7 days. The supernatants from these single clones (which originated from single cell sorted hybridomas) were screened by ELISA on day 10 of culture. Cells from the wells that gave the highest ELISA readings i.e., specific reactivity to Fc-bovIP-10, and not against the Fc control, were passaged and grown up in 24-well plates. Upon confluence, the supernatants were confirmed for their bovIP-10 reactivity by an indirect ELISA using commercially available, purified IP-10, without the Fc label (Bio-Rad). The cells were also frozen at this stage, as described for the multiclonal stage, and mAb candidates were cultured for further expansion.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePurification, isotyping and labelling of mAbs\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAntibody was purified from centrifuged, filter-sterilised cell culture supernatant (harvested from five of the expanded clones) using a 1 ml HiTrap Protein G HP antibody purification column (Cytiva) as per manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. Briefly, samples were passed through the column by use of a peristaltic pump at a speed of 1.0 ml/min. Purified mAb was eluted using elution buffer (0.1 M Glycine buffer, pH2.7; Sigma-Aldrich) and neutralised with neutralising buffer (Tris-HCl, pH9.0; Sigma-Aldrich). Fractions containing purified mAb, as measured by Nanodrop spectrophotometer, were collected, pooled and buffer-exchanged to PBS using an Amicon\u0026reg; Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Unit (Merck). Concentrations of purified mAbs were measured using Nanodrop and these were stored at -20\u0026deg;C. The purified mAbs were isotyped using IsoStrip\u0026trade; Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Isotyping Kit (Merck), and aliquots were biotinylated using the One-Step Antibody Biotinylation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Surrey, UK) according to the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions. Antibodies were also labelled with an Alexa Fluor\u0026trade; 647 (AF647) Antibody Labeling Kit (Molecular Probe; Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s instructions for use in intracellular staining. Similarly, isotype control mAb (purified mouse IgG1k, BioLegend) was labelled with AF647.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAntibody blocking assay\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn order to develop a sandwich ELISA for detection of IP-10 using the newly generated mAb, it was essential to identify a pair of mAb that can be used for capture and detection. In order to do this, cross-recognition of IP-10 in a blocking assay was carried out: ELISA plates were coated with rbovIP-10 at 25 ng/well in 50 \u0026micro;l of Carbonate-Bicarbonate Buffer and placed overnight at 4\u0026deg;C. The following day, the plates were washed with PBS-0.05% Tween (PBST) thrice and blocked for 1 hour using 0.1% casein in PBS-Tween (100 \u0026micro;l per well). After washing, purified anti-bovIP-10 mAbs were incubated in duplicates for 1 hour in 100-fold excess (25 \u0026micro;g in 0.1% casein) to enable complete binding to all epitopes on bovIP-10. The plates were washed and the subsequent binding of biotin-labelled anti-bovIP-10 mAbs (0.25 \u0026micro;g in 0.1% casein, 50 \u0026micro;l per well for 1 hour) was determined in a checker-board fashion with Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase conjugate (SAv-HRP, diluted 1 in 5000 with 0.1% casein, 50 \u0026micro;l per well for 45 minutes) (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Following a final three PBST washes, the next steps were performed as described above. Positive controls were the wells that only received biotin labelled mAbs only (i.e., no 100-fold excess purified mAbs were added and hence no blocking). Complete negative controls (buffer only) were also included. Percentage of inhibition was calculated relative to the positive control wells by the following formula, as described by other groups [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e].\u003cdiv id=\"Equa\" class=\"Equation\"\u003e\u003cdiv format=\"TEX\" class=\"mathdisplay\" id=\"FileID_Equa\" name=\"EquationSource\"\u003e\n$$\\:\\text{P}\\text{e}\\text{r}\\text{c}\\text{e}\\text{n}\\text{t}\\:\\text{i}\\text{n}\\text{h}\\text{i}\\text{b}\\text{i}\\text{t}\\text{i}\\text{o}\\text{n}=\\frac{Average\\:OD-\\:OD\\:of\\:biotin\\:labelled\\:mAb\\:only\\:controls}{OD\\:of\\:the\\:biotin\\:labelled\\:mAb\\:only\\:controls}\\:x\\:100$$\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eDevelopment and evaluation of 7C2 mAb based sandwich ELISA\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eAll of the mAbs tested above were found to bind to the same epitope(s) and therefore could not be used as a pair (or pairs) for sandwich ELISA development. To enable further development, one mAb (7C2) was randomly selected and used as a capture antibody. This mAb was paired with a commercially available (Kingfisher Biotech, St Paul, MN, USA) pAb antibody used as a detection antibody. These were tested for detection of rBovIP-10 initially and compared with an ELISA using both capture and detection pAb from Kingfisher Biotech (as described by Goosen \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e., [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e]). The assay was used to detect recombinant bovIP-10 (Kingfisher Biotech). For the development of an assay with the 7C2 mAb, the following modifications were made to the protocol described by Goosen \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e: (i) the capture antibody (7C2) was used at a concentration of 10 \u0026micro;g/mL; (ii) the detection antibody (polyclonal anti-IP-10, Kingfisher Biotech, St Paul, MN, USA) was used at 0.2 \u0026micro;g/ml and (iii) a standard curve of recombinant bovine IP-10 (Kingfisher Biotech) ranging from 0\u0026ndash;25 ng was used. Optical density (OD\u003csub\u003e450\u003c/sub\u003e-OD\u003csub\u003e550\u003c/sub\u003e) was measured as described above. The IP-10 ELISAs were compared using rbovIP-10 standard curves and quantification range of both assays determined as described above.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eIntracytoplasmic IP-10 staining\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003ePBMCs were separated from heparinized whole blood based on gradient centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Serumwerk, Stemcell Technologies, Cambridge, UK). Briefly, blood was diluted 1:1 with PBS and overlaid on Lymphoprep and centrifuged for 40 minutes at 1200 \u0026times; \u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e at RT with brake off. PBMCs were separated from the interface, PBS was added to 50 ml and centrifuged at 400 x \u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e for 10 minutes at 4\u0026deg;C. Live PBMCs were counted using Trypan blue exclusion, frozen in freezing media and stored at -155\u003csup\u003eo\u003c/sup\u003eC. Frozen PBMCs from three individual calves were recovered from \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;150\u0026deg;C freezer and washed with warm complete RPMI media [RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10% HI-FBS (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 mM Glutamax, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 \u0026micro;g/ml streptomycin (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific)]. Viable cells were counted using a haemocytometer using trypan blue exclusion. Cells were seeded at 1.0 x 10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells/ml and stimulated with: either 5.0 \u0026micro;g/ml Concanavalin A (ConA) (Sigma-Aldrich), 2.5 \u0026micro;g/ml Pokeweed Mitogen (PWM) (Sigma-Aldrich) or left unstimulated. After 20 hours, cells were treated with BD GolgiStop\u0026trade; (BD Biosciences, Becton Dickinson, Wokingham, UK) and cultured for a further 4 hours. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation, washed and 2x10\u003csup\u003e6\u003c/sup\u003e cells were added to wells of a 96 well plate. The cells were pelleted at 350 x \u003cem\u003eg\u003c/em\u003e for 2 minutes and washed with PBS twice. Cells were then incubated in the dark with Zombie Yellow (1/1000) (BioLegend) at RT for 15 minutes. Cells were washed with PBS and resuspended with 100 \u0026micro;L per well of fixation/permeabilization solution (BD Biosciences) for 20 minutes at 4\u0026deg;C. Cells were then washed twice in 1\u0026times; BD Perm/Wash\u0026trade; buffer (BD Biosciences) and thoroughly resuspended with 50 \u0026micro;L of BD Perm/Wash\u0026trade; buffer containing AF647 labelled 7C2 mAb and isotype control (mouse IgG1k-AF647, clone MOPC-21, BioLegend). Staining was carried out at 4\u0026deg;C for 30 minutes in the dark. Then, cells were washed twice with 1\u0026times; BD Perm/Wash\u0026trade; buffer and resuspended in Staining Buffer (5% normal goat serum (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBS) prior to flow cytometric analysis with a BD LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 50,000 cells were collected per sample. The flow cytometry results were analysed using FlowJo\u0026trade; v10.8 Software (BD Life Sciences). Cells were first gated on Side Scatter Area (SSC-A) and Forward Scatter Area (FSC-A) to discriminate cell debris from the cell population. Dead cells were excluded by staining with Zombie Yellow, a viability dye that selectively penetrates cells with compromised membranes. Doublets and aggregates were discriminated based on signal processing by comparing Forward Scatter Area (FSC-A) and Forward Scatter Height (FSC-H). This ensured that only live and single cells were included in the subsequent analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eData Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eELISA data were analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Software, Redmond, WA). Percent inhibition was calculated as described above. The working range of the two ELISA assays were determined by calculating detection limit/sensitivity (i.e., lowest IP-10 level that can be quantified and discriminated from background) and upper limit of quantification (highest IP-10 level that can be quantified with reliability) as previously described [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Lower limit of detection was determined as the value (ng/mL) calculated by adding two times the standard deviation from a series of blanks to the mean OD value of blank wells and interpolated from the standard curve. For upper limit of quantification, three times the standard deviation of the highest point in straight part of the standard curve was subtracted from the mean and interpolated from the standard curve. The comparison between IP-10 levels in PPDb minus medium-stimulated WBS in \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e na\u0026iuml;ve and \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e positive groups was computed by Mann-Whitney U test. Flow data were analysed using FlowJo v10.8 (BD Life Sciences) above, and the groups compared using paired T test. Statistical analysis and plots were generated using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eConfirmation of expression of recombinant Fc-bovIP-10\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIt was essential to generate large quantities of recombinant bovIP-10 (rbovIP-10) for mouse immunisations to facilitate mAb production. Recombinant bovIP-10 was produced from a vector which enabled bovIP-10 to be expressed as a fusion construct with an Fc tag for enhanced immunogenicity and ease of subsequent purification. The predicted molecular weight by Expasy Compute pI/Mw tool (https://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/) using protein sequence of Fc-bovIP-10 was 38 kDa. To confirm the molecular weight and identity, SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry (MS) was performed. \u0026nbsp;A band was detected at approximately 38kDa by SDS-PAGE (Supplementary Fig. S1, left panel). The sequence view of the MS results is shown in Fig. S1, (right panel). The blue bars show MS/MS spectra mapping to the peptide sequence. PEAKS studio software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.) analysis showed 86% sequence coverage for bovIP-10 and 34 out of 53 peptide sequences (\u0026ndash;log10 p score 527) uniquely mapping to bovIP-10, confirming the identity.\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eMice responded specifically to immunisation with rbovIP-10\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStandard hybridoma technology was used to generate mAbs against bovIP-10. Mice (n=3) were immunised with Fc tagged rbovIP-10 and their sera were tested by indirect ELISA to confirm the production of bovIP-10 specific antibodies. Screening was carried out against Fc-tagged rbovIP-10 or Fc control on day 1 (before immunisation) and on days 29 and 46 post immunisation (Fig. 1). All three mice showed no reactivity against bovIP-10 or Fc control prior to immunisation. Post immunisation, by day 29, low levels of binding against both bovIP-10 and Fc control were detected in all 3 mice. By day 46, very strong binding responses against rbovIP-10 were detected from mice #1 and #2 but not for mouse #3. Since mouse #2 showed the highest binding against rbovIP-10, it was selected for further steps of mAb generation.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eGeneration of bovIP-10 specific mAbs\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe splenocytes from mouse #2 were fused\u0026nbsp;Sp2/0-Ag14 cells\u0026nbsp;and cultured in fusion media for 10 days. Neat supernatants (from multiclonal hybridomas at this stage) were screened for reactivity to Fc-bovIP-10 and Fc control by indirect ELISA. Positive (sera from immunised mice) and negative (buffer only, secondary antibody only and cell culture media only) controls were included. Eight multiclonal samples were shown to contain antibodies that were specific for Fc-bovIP-10, but no reactivity to the Fc control (Fig. 2, left panel).\u0026nbsp;Fold change refers to the enhanced Fc-bovIP-10 reactivity (measured by OD value) of hybridoma supernatants compared to the secondary antibody only control well.\u0026nbsp;Based on their specific reactivity against Fc-bovIP10 and growth of the cells in culture, two multiclonal hybridomas i.e., 5G2 and 7G9 were taken forward and single cell sorting was performed. The single cells were cultured for 10 days, followed by indirect ELISA screening to identify wells/candidates specific for Fc-bovIP-10, and not against the Fc tag. Finally, 13 candidates were identified and their bovIP-10 specific reactivity was confirmed upon screening the neat supernatants against commercially available purified IP-10, without the Fc tag (Bio-Rad) (Fig. \u0026nbsp;2, right panel). These clones were further cultured to generate monoclonal hybridoma cell lines. The first five mAb supernatants were selected for purification and isotyping \u0026ndash; all of them were found to be mouse IgG1.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAll anti-bovIP-10mAs recognised the same epitopes of IP-10\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIn order to develop an ELISA, a pair of mAb were needed. These mAbs would need to recognise different epitopes, leading to enhanced sensitivity of the assays. In order to determine suitability of mAb as pairs for ELISA, five mAbs were selected and biotinylated and cross-blocking was compared using biotinylated and non-biotin versions. A competition ELISA was set up to assess the inhibition of the binding of biotinylated mAbs by a 100-fold excess of the purified mAbs. Percentage inhibition was calculated and shown in Table 1. The results show that there was a very large degree of blocking, with each mAb blocking the ability of the other mAb to bind to IP-10. The remaining eight mAb also showed blocking effect when tested in a blocking assay and paired with biotinylated 7C2 (data not shown). This suggests that all mAbs bind to the same dominant epitope(s) of IP-10.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e7C2 mAb based ELISA showed an enhanced detection range\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSince all of the tested mAbs recognised the same epitope of IP-10, it was not possible to select a pair for the development of a sandwich ELISA. As an alternative approach, mAb 7C2 was selected for further assessment as a capture mAb for ELISA. This was paired with a commercially available biotinylated pAb (Kingfisher\u0026nbsp;Biotech) to develop a sandwich ELISA. As shown in Fig. 3, the 7C2 mAb based ELISA, and the commercial Kingfisher ELISA enabled detection of rbovIP-10. The working range of both assays was determined by defining the detection limit/sensitivity (minimum IP-10 level that can be detected and discriminated from the background) and upper limit of quantification (maximum IP-10 level that can be reliably detected). The Kingfisher ELISA was found to be more sensitive i.e., 0.2 ng/mL compared to the assay using mAb 7C2 (sensitivity of 0.6 ng/mL). The 7C2 assay was found to be more sensitive than a commercial assay from Bio-Rad, which we have previously used [11]. Moreover, the 7C2 mAb based assay had greater linear range with accurate detection in the linear part of the standard curve of up to 5.4 ng/mL compared to the Kingfisher ELISA (3.6\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eng/mL), although concentrations higher than this can be detected by both assays.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e7C2 mAb ELISA detected IP-10 from M. bovis na\u0026iuml;ve and infected animal cohorts\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe ELISA based on use of 7C2 as a capture mAb with a pAb detection antibody was utilised to measure IP-10 levels in samples obtained from field animal cohorts (Fig. 4) to confirm that natural IP-10 can be detected. The samples tested were from \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e na\u0026iuml;ve animals (n = 14), and from cattle that were confirmed infected with \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e by culture (n = 17). Statistically significant higher levels of PPDb specific IP-10 were observed in the \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e infected animals (p\u0026lt;0.0001) compared to the \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e na\u0026iuml;ve group (median group IP-10 concentrations of 15.8 ng/ml and 1.1 ng/ml respectively). This suggests that the 7C2 mAb based IP-10 ELISA assay is suitable for application in a clinically relevant sample matrix, and further confirms the differential potential of PPDb specific IP-10 for detection of \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e infection.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eIntracellular staining of bovine PBMC with AF647 labelled anti-bovIP-10 (7C2) mAb showed expression of IP-10 in response to mitogen stimulation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe ability of the 7C2 mAb to detect intracytoplasmic IP-10 was assessed. Bovine PBMCs were stimulated with ConA and PWM, and intracytoplasmic IP-10 was detected with AF647 labelled 7C2. Stimulation with either ConA or PWM induced significant expression of IP-10 by PBMCs. Fig. 5 shows representative plots of intracellular IP-10 staining from one animal (top panel for isotype controls and bottom panel for IP-10 staining). On average 0.49 \u0026plusmn; 0.04% of the control, unstimulated, PBMCs expressed intracellular IP-10 and the proportions increased to 4.01 \u0026plusmn; 0.60 % after ConA and to 4.66 \u0026plusmn; 0.67 % after PWM stimulation respectively.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe development of bovIP-10 mAbs was pursued in light of evidence that measurement of IP-10 can provide added diagnostic value when combined with IFN-\u0026gamma; for bTB detection. Being a major pro-inflammatory cytokine, IP-10 is involved in recruiting T cells to the site of inflammation i.e., the granuloma. Compared to control tissues, significantly upregulated IP-10 mRNA expression was reported in the granulomas of lymph node tissues of cattle experimentally infected with \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e [25]. Although a preliminary study did not support the potential of IP-10 protein levels as a biomarker for bTB [26]; Parsons \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e reported strong correlation between antigen specific release of IP-10 and IFN-\u0026gamma;, and PPDb stimulated IP-10 levels could differentiate skin test/IGRA positive and skin test/IGRA negative cattle with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97% [27]. Additionally, determining IP-10 along with IFN-\u0026gamma; in plasma samples from blood stimulated with PPDb and defined TB antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, Rv3615c and TB7.7), was shown to identify additional confirmed TB positive animals in comparison to skin test and IGRA alone in cattle [14], and African buffaloes [13] respectively. Therefore, development of sensitive and specific detection platforms that could determine bovIP-10 is urgently needed. An essential pre-requisite to achieve this is having a consistent access to homogenous, well characterized bovIP-10 mAbs; fuelling the rationale for this study. Novel mAbs for bovIP-10 detection were successfully developed and their use in ELISA and flow cytometric applications was explored.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll of the tested mAbs appeared to bind to the same or closely related epitope of IP-10. A potential explanation of this can be the small size of bovIP-10; resulting in a dominant B cell epitope and hence most generated mAbs showing a preferential epitope binding specificity. While self-inhibition among mAb candidates post hybridoma selection has been observed in other studies [21, 22, 28]; it is usual that mAb pairs can be identified enabling development of sandwich ELISAs. However, here it was not possible to use mAb pairs and further studies used a biotin labelled pAb alongside the mAb to develop a sandwich ELISA. Compared to polyclonal antisera, utilizing mAbs is reported to increase the overall accuracy, efficiency and specificity of ELISAs [29]. Although the 7C2 mAb based assay developed here was slightly less sensitive than the Kingfisher pAb based assay [14], it did show an enhanced linear range. This is important to allow simple quantification of bovIP-10 in a range of samples with varying levels of cytokine with high accuracy. In general, a broader quantification range offers benefits: more accuracy (as the extra dilution steps can be avoided); more applicability and reliability (testing samples where the concentrations can be unexpected, leading to fewer repeat assays) and a simplified analysis (in absence of a dilution factor to account for). Analysis of WBS from \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e infected and naive control animals using the 7C2 ELISA confirmed the previously reported IP-10 potential for bTB diagnosis [11-14] and demonstrated the suitability of the 7C2 mAb based ELISA in detecting native IP-10 in a diagnostically relevant matrix.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntracytoplasmic expression of IP-10 was detected using the 7C2 mAb: this was significantly enhanced following mitogen stimulation of bovine PBMCs compared to controls. Further studies to examine expression of IP-10 in PBMC from \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e infected animals in multiparametric flow cytometric analyses would provide insight into the cell types that produce IP-10. This would allow conclusions to be drawn about the functional role that IP-10 may play in bTB infection. Their availability provides an opportunity to advance our understanding of bovIP-10 and its kinetics in health and disease.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOnly one mAb (7C2) was studied here in detail. Future experiments could include more comprehensive characterization of this, and other mAb candidates, including cross reactivity testing for detection of IP-10 in other species. Further assessment of the mAb in LFAs would also be of benefit. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo conclude, the novel bovIP-10 mAbs panel and the applications described herein provide an opportunity and tools that be employed to delve deep into understanding of the kinetics of bovIP-10 in health and disease.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll mice were housed at the Bioresearch \u0026amp; Veterinary Service Facility at the Roslin Institute. \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBovine blood samples for mAb testing were taken by venepuncture from the jugular vein of female cattle aged approximately 6 months. These were housed at the University of Edinburgh\u0026rsquo;s Langhill Farm. Blood samples for measurement of antigen specific IP-10 were also taken from cattle that were bTB reactors (n = 17). These were farm animals that had failed a recent bovine TB surveillance skin test and were re-housed at the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) Weybridge site and were found to be culture positive for \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e. All experimental protocols were carried out under the authority of a UK Home Office Project Licence under the regulations of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 with approval from The Roslin Institute\u0026rsquo;s Local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board (AWERB) or APHA\u0026rsquo;s AWERB as appropriate.\u0026nbsp;The results are reported in line with the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) Guidelines [19].\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and materials:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding:\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHK was awarded a joint PhD studentship from College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh and Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. The Immunological Toolbox is supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BB/CCG2270/1). ID, IM, JCH, and ZW were funded by BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme funding (BBS/E/RL/230002B and BBS/E/D/20002174). The work carried out at APHA was funded by the GB bovine TB research budget (grant SE3334) held and administered centrally by Defra on behalf of England, Scotland and Wales.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch4\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions:\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h4\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZW, HK and JCH conceived the study. HK, MC, ID, IM and ZW carried out the work to generate and test the antibodies described using bovine samples, and analysed the data. HK and ZW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements:\u003c/strong\u003e We gratefully acknowledge the staff at the Bioresearch \u0026amp; Veterinary Service Facility and at Langhill Farm, University of Edinburgh for their highly skill expertise and assistance with animal experimentation. The authors would also like to thank APHA staff from the Animal Science Unit for their dedication to the welfare of the animals housed at APHA.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLei J, Yin X, Shang H, Jiang Y (2019) IP-10 is highly involved in HIV infection, Cytokine. 115:97\u0026ndash;103\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKarimabad MN, Kounis NG, Hassanshahi G, Hassanshahi F, Mplani V, Koniari I, Hung M-Y, Nadimi AE (2021) The involvement of CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and its related chemokines in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and in the COVID-19 vaccination: A narrative review. Vaccines 9:1224\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLloyd AR, Oppenheim JJ, Kelvin DJ, Taub DD (1950) Chemokines regulate T cell adherence to recombinant adhesion molecules and extracellular matrix proteins, Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md.: (1996) 156:932\u0026ndash;938\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang X, Yue T-L, Ohlstein EH, Sung C-P, Feuerstein GZ (1996) Interferon-inducible protein-10 involves vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and inflammatory response. J Biol Chem 271:24286\u0026ndash;24293\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKanda N, Watanabe S (2002) Histamine inhibits the production of interferon-induced protein of 10 kDa in human squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. J Invest dermatology 119:1411\u0026ndash;1419\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQiu X, Tang Y, Yue Y, Zeng Y, Li W, Qu Y, Mu D (2019) Accuracy of interferon-γ-induced protein 10 for diagnosing latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 25:667\u0026ndash;672\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRuhwald M, Aabye MG, Ravn P (2012) IP-10 release assays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis infection: current status and future directions, Expert review of molecular diagnostics. 12:175\u0026ndash;187\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRubbo P-A, Nagot N, Le Moing V, Brabet M, Bourdin A, Nogu\u0026eacute; E, Bollor\u0026eacute; K, Vendrell J-P, Van De Perre P, Tuaillon E (2012) Multicytokine detection improves latent tuberculosis diagnosis in health care workers. J Clin Microbiol 50:1711\u0026ndash;1717\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang W (2019) IP-10 for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98:e15977\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003evan Hooij A, Fat EMTK, de Jong D, Khatun M, Soren S, Chowdhury AS, Roy JC, Alam K, Kim J-P, Richardus JH (2021) Prototype multi-biomarker test for point-of-care leprosy diagnostics. Iscience. 24\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhalid H, van Hooij A, Connelley TK, Geluk A, Hope JC (2022) Protein levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines as biomarkers of Mycobacterium bovis infection and BCG vaccination in cattle, Pathogens. 11:738\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePalmer MV, Thacker TC, Rabideau MM, Jones GJ, Kanipe C, Vordermeier HM, Waters WR (2020) Biomarkers of cell-mediated immunity to bovine tuberculosis, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 220:109988\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBernitz N, Kerr TJ, Goosen WJ, Clarke C, Higgitt R, Roos EO, Cooper DV, Warren RM, van Helden PD, Parsons SD (2019) Parallel measurement of IFN-γ and IP-10 in QuantiFERON\u0026reg;-TB Gold (QFT) plasma improves the detection of Mycobacterium bovis infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer), Preventive veterinary medicine. 169:104700\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCoad M, Doyle M, Steinbach S, Gormley E, Vordermeier M, Jones G (2019) Simultaneous measurement of antigen-induced CXCL10 and IFN-γ enhances test sensitivity for bovine TB detection in cattle, Veterinary microbiology. 230:1\u0026ndash;6\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKhalid H, Pierneef L, Van Hooij A, Zhou Z, De Jong D, Kon Fat T, Connelley E, Hope TK, Corstjens JC, Geluk PL (2023) Development of lateral flow assays to detect host proteins in cattle for improved diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Front Veterinary Sci 10:1193332\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParray HA, Shukla S, Samal S, Shrivastava T, Ahmed S, Sharma C, Kumar R (2020) Hybridoma technology a versatile method for isolation of monoclonal antibodies, its applicability across species, limitations, advancement and future perspectives, International immunopharmacology. 85:106639\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMitra S, Tomar PC (2021) Hybridoma technology; advancements, clinical significance, and future aspects. J Genetic Eng Biotechnol 19:1\u0026ndash;12\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eK\u0026ouml;hler G, Milstein C (1975) Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity, nature. 256:495\u0026ndash;497\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePercie du Sert N, Ahluwalia HV, Alam A, Avey S, Baker MT, Browne M, Clark WJ, Cuthill A, Dirnagl IC, Emerson U, Garner M, Holgate P, Howells ST, Karp DW, Lazic NA, Lidster SE, MacCallum K, Macleod CJ, Pearl M, Petersen EJ, Rawle OH, Reynolds F, Rooney P, Sena K, Silberberg ES, Steckler SD, Wurbel T (2020) The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 18:e3000410\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGoosen WJ, Cooper D, Miller MA, van Helden PD, Parsons SD (2015) IP-10 is a sensitive biomarker of antigen recognition in whole-blood stimulation assays used for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer), Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 22:974\u0026ndash;978\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMohseni SR, Golsaz-Shirazi F, Hosseini M, Khoshnoodi J, Bahadori T, Judaki MA, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Shokri F (2019) Characterization of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Recognizing Prostate Specific Antigen: Implication for Design of a Sandwich ELISA. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 11:72\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eManirarora JN, Walker KE, Patil V, Renukaradhya GJ, LaBresh J, Sullivan Y, Francis O, Lunney JK (2022) Development and characterization of new monoclonal antibodies against porcine interleukin-17A and interferon-gamma. Front Immunol 13:786396\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbcam Glossary of terms for ELISA [on line] \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.abcam.com/kits/elisa-terms-glossary\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.abcam.com/kits/elisa-terms-glossary\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRajna M, Irena Z, Optimization Validation and Standardization of ELISA, in: Gyula M. (Ed.), Norovirus, IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2020, pp. Ch. 2\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAranday-Cortes E, Bull N, Villarreal‐Ramos B, Gough J, Hicks D, Ortiz‐Pel\u0026aacute;ez A, Vordermeier H, Salguero F (2013) Upregulation of IL‐17 A, CXCL 9 and CXCL 10 in Early‐Stage Granulomas Induced by M ycobacterium bovis in Cattle, Transboundary and emerging diseases. 60:525\u0026ndash;537\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWaters W, Thacker T, Nonnecke B, Palmer M, Schiller I, Oesch B, Vordermeier H, Silva E, Estes D (2012) Evaluation of gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-induced protein 10 responses for detection of cattle infected with Mycobacterium bovis: comparisons to IFN-γ responses, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 19:346\u0026ndash;351\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eParsons SD, McGill K, Doyle MB, Goosen WJ, Van Helden PD, Gormley E (2016) Antigen-specific IP-10 release is a sensitive biomarker of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle. PLoS ONE 11:e0155440\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHailstock T, Dai C, Aquino J, Walker KE, Chick S, Manirarora JN, Suresh R, Patil V, Renukaradhya GJ, Sullivan YB (2024) Production and characterization of anti-porcine CXCL10 monoclonal antibodies, Cytokine. 174:156449\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCao Y, Li K, Xing X, Zhu G, Fu Y, Bao H, Bai X, Sun P, Li P, Zhang J (2022) Development and validation of a competitive ELISA based on bovine monoclonal antibodies for the detection of neutralizing antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus serotype A. J Clin Microbiol 60:e02142\u0026ndash;e02121\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cp\u003eTable 1 is available in the Supplementary Files section.\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-veterinary-research","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Veterinary Research](http://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"12917","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12917/3?","title":"BMC Veterinary Research","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"IP-10, intracellular staining, hybridoma technology, monoclonal antibody, bovine tuberculosis","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eResearch on chemokines in cattle is hampered by the relative lack of reagents. Bovine IP-10 is an important inflammatory chemokine and a promising diagnostic biomarker for an economically important disease (bovine tuberculosis) caused by infection of cattle with \u003cem\u003eMycobacterium bovis\u003c/em\u003e. Currently no monoclonal antibodies are available for bovine IP-10. The goal of this study was to generate novel mAbs for detection of bovine IP-10 using recombinant hybridoma technology. Five mAbs were developed and cross clone inhibition analyses showed a high degree of self-inhibition among the mAbs. One mAb (7C2) was used in conjugation with a commercial polyclonal antibody to develop a sandwich ELISA. Upon testing with recombinant bovine IP-10, this ELISA showed an enhanced linear range compared to the currently available polyclonal antibody-based ELISA. The ELISA using 7C2 was shown to detect native antigen-specific bovine IP-10 in samples from \u003cem\u003eM. bovis\u003c/em\u003e infected animals. The 7C2 mAb could also detect intracytoplasmic IP-10. These novel mAbs will be useful in elucidating roles for IP-10 in bovine immune studies in health, disease and vaccination contexts.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Development and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific for bovine IP-10","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-04-14 18:20:04","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6304513/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Major Revision","date":"2025-05-13T02:44:29+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewerAgreed","content":"","date":"2025-04-07T14:40:30+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2025-03-27T08:22:16+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvited","content":"BMC Veterinary Research","date":"2025-03-25T15:30:56+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2025-03-25T14:39:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Veterinary Research","date":"2025-03-25T09:53:23+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-veterinary-research","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Veterinary Research](http://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"12917","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/12917/3?","title":"BMC Veterinary Research","twitterHandle":"@BMC_series","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"stoa","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"e1878506-b649-42ea-969d-0ec63907c6c8","owner":[],"postedDate":"April 14th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-05-27T14:04:44+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-04-14 18:20:04","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6304513","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6304513","identity":"rs-6304513","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}