Which hormonal management approach for women with premature ovarian insufficiency is best for bone?

In: OBG Management · 2020 · vol. 32(11) · doi:10.12788/obgm.0048 · W3118281623
article OA: bronze CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-08+body, 2026-08-02

Combined oral contraceptives or high-dose estrogen plus progesterone therapy increased bone mineral density in women with premature ovarian insufficiency, while low-dose therapy or no treatment led to declines.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,671 characters · extracted from oa-pdf · click to expand
Examining the EVIDENCE FAST TRACK mdedge.com/obgyn V ol. 32 No. 11 | November 2020 | OBG Management 17 Although HT is a mainstay of treatment for women with POI, it is uncertain which approach to HT is most effective in terms of bone mineral density Which hormonal management approach for women with premature ovarian insufficiency is best for bone? The use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) in 119 women with a mean age of 30.3 years who had premature ovarian insufficiency was associated with the most positive trends in bone mineral density (BMD). Bone density scans revealed that women who used COC or high-dose estrogen plus progesterone therapy (EPT) had increases in BMD at the lumbar spine, while women who used no treatment or low-dose EPT experienced declines in lumbar spine BMD. Carvalho Gazarra LB, Bonacordi CL, Yela DA, et al. Bone mass in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: a comparative study between hormone therapy and com- bined oral contraceptives. Menopause. 2020;27:1110-1116. EXPERT COMMENTARY Andrew M. Kaunitz, MD, is Professor and Associate Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medi- cine–Jacksonville; Medical Director and Director of Menopause and Gynecologic Ultrasound Ser - vices, UF Women’s Health Specialists at Emerson, Jacksonville. He serves on the OBG M anagement Board of Editors. P remature ovarian insufficiency (POI) refers to a condition in women in whom ovarian function ceases prior to age 40 years. Although hormone therapy (HT) is a mainstay of treatment for women with POI, it is uncertain which approach to HT is most effective in terms of bone mineral density (BMD). Investigators recently pub - lished their results of an observational study th at aimed to evaluate the use of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) for preserving BMD in women with POI. Details of the study At an academic center in Brazil, Carvalho Gazarra and colleagues identified women with POI who had undergone 2 or more BMD assessments performed 2 or more years apart. 1 HT regimens (all of which were taken continuously) employed the follow - ing: a COC with ethinyl estradiol (EE) 30 µg and le vonorgestrel; low-dose estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT , conjugated equine estrogen [CEE] 0.625 mg with medroxypro - gesterone acetate or estradiol 1.0 mg with nor ethindrone acetate); or high-dose estro - gen plus progestin (CEE 1.25 mg or estradiol 2.0 m g combined with the same progestins). Results. Among 119 evaluable women with POI (mean age, 30.3 years), the use of COC was associated with the most positive BMD trends. For women using COC or high-dose EPT , BMD at the lumbar spine increased. By contrast, BMD of the lumbar spine declined The author reports serving on the advisory boards of Pfizer (contraception) and Mithra, and that the Uni- versity of Florida has received clinical trial support from Mithra. doi: 10.12788/obgm.0048 Examining the EVIDENCE in women who used no treatment or low- dose EPT .1 Other studies’ take on dose, route of administration, and cost considerations Sequelae of POI include infertility, bother - some hot flashes, vaginal dryness, sexual dys- function, mood disorders, and an elevated risk of c ardiovascular disease, dementia, Parkin- son’s disease, and osteoporosis. Importantly, c linicians and patients need to understand that the results from the Women’s Health Ini- tiative studies do n ot apply to women with POI.2 Physiologic doses of HT (that is, doses higher than those used to treat menopausal symptoms in women with normal/spontane- ous menopause) are appropriate for women w ith POI, at least until they reach the normal age of menopause (51 to 52 years). A clinical trial conducted in Scotland in women with POI found that high-dose transdermal estrogen (application of one to two 0.1-mg estradiol patches) daily had an impact on BMD that was more positive than that of an oral contraceptive formulated with EE 30 µg. 3 Likewise, a trial in the United States found that, among oligo-amenorrheic athletes, a hormone replacement regimen using a 0.1-mg estradiol patch had a more positive impact on BMD than an oral contra- ceptive formulated with EE 30 µg. 4 Although Carvalho Gazarra and col - leagues acknowledged awareness of reports s uggesting the skeletal health benefits of high-dose estradiol patches, in the Brazilian public health system oral hormone therapy is less expensive and oral contraceptives are available at no charge. 1 ● WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE When replacing estrogen and progestin in young women who lack ovarian function, it is appropriate to use considerably higher doses than those used to treat bothersome vasomotor symptoms in women with normal/spontaneous menopause. From the per - spective of venous thromboembolism risk, the transdermal route of administration is safer than the oral route, 5 and the Scottish and US studies discussed here indicate that transdermal estradiol is an effective approach to maintaining skeletal health in young women without ovarian function. Accordingly, hormonal manage- ment with high-dose transdermal estradiol with a progestin (such as progesterone 200–300 mg at bedtime or medroxyprogesterone 5–10 mg daily) represents an appropriate strategy. In situations where transdermal estradiol plus oral progestin treatment is not covered by health insurance or acceptable to the patient, an oral estrogen-progestin contraceptive formulated with EE 30 or 35 µg will provide protection against bone loss. References 1. C arvalho Gazarra LB, Bonacordi CL, Yela DA, et al. Bone mass in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: a comparative study between hormone therapy and combined oral contraceptives. Menopause. 2020;27: 1110-1116. 2. J iang XD. Bone health and beyond in women with primary ovarian insufficiency: time to narrow the knowledge-action gap in care. Menopause. 2020;27:1101-1103. 3. Cr ofton PM, Evans N, Bath LE, et al. Physiological versus standard sex steroid replacement in young women with premature ovarian failure: effects on bone mass acquisition and turnover. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf ). 2010;73:707-714. 4. A ckerman KE, Singhal V , Baskaran C, et al. Oestrogen replacement improves bone mineral density in oligo- amenorrhoeic athletes: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53:229-236. 5. V inogradova Y, Coupland C, Hippisley-Cox J. Use of hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases. BMJ. 2019;364:k4810.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-pdf

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

References (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK