Abstract
ABSTRACT Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages have a high disease burden. Due to increasing medical imaging, new technological solutions for assisting in image interpretation are warranted. We developed a deep learning (DL) solution for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection from head CT scans. The DL solution included four base convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which were trained using 300 head CT scans. A metamodel was trained on top of the four base CNNs, and simple post processing steps were applied to improve the solution’s accuracy. The solution performance was evaluated using a retrospective dataset of consecutive emergency head CTs imaged in ten different emergency rooms. 7797 head CT scans were included in the validation dataset and 118 CT scans presented with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The trained metamodel together with a simple rule-based post-processing step showed 89.8% sensitivity and 89.5% specificity for hemorrhage detection at the case-level. The solution detected all 78 spontaneous hemorrhage cases imaged presumably or confirmedly within 12 hours from the symptom onset and identified five hemorrhages missed in the initial on-call reports. By using a limited amount of training data, a meta-learning approach and a simple rule-based post-processing step, clinicians can develop high-accuracy deep learning solutions for clinical imaging diagnostics.
Full text
3,588 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
ABSTRACT
Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages have a high disease burden. Due to increasing medical imaging, new technological solutions for assisting in image interpretation are warranted. We developed a deep learning (DL) solution for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage detection from head CT scans. The DL solution included four base convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which were trained using 300 head CT scans. A metamodel was trained on top of the four base CNNs, and simple post processing steps were applied to improve the solution’s accuracy. The solution performance was evaluated using a retrospective dataset of consecutive emergency head CTs imaged in ten different emergency rooms. 7797 head CT scans were included in the validation dataset and 118 CT scans presented with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage. The trained metamodel together with a simple rule-based post-processing step showed 89.8% sensitivity and 89.5% specificity for hemorrhage detection at the case-level. The solution detected all 78 spontaneous hemorrhage cases imaged presumably or confirmedly within 12 hours from the symptom onset and identified five hemorrhages missed in the initial on-call reports. By using a limited amount of training data, a meta-learning approach and a simple rule-based post-processing step, clinicians can develop high-accuracy deep learning solutions for clinical imaging diagnostics.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
JT has received research grants from Maire Taponen foundation and HUS neurocenter. The study project was supported by a grant from the State Research Funds (Helsinki University Hospital). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board of Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) approved the study and granted a waiver for acquiring informed consents (HUS/365/2017; HUS/163/2019; HUS/190/2021). According to the Finnish legislation, no ethics committee approval is needed for retrospective studies using registry or archive data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
This manuscript includes substantial revisions and modifications compared to the previous version.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.