Laparoscopic Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Obese Women with Benign Diseases
article
OA: gold
CC0
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a challenging health problem in gynecologic surgery. Laparoscopic has the potential advantages than abdominal hysterectomy of being quicker, efficient with low estimated blood loss.Aim of the work: To compare the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions in obese patients. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients were submitted to history taking, clinical examination, Lab investigations, abdominal ultrasound and biopsy for suspicious pathology. Patients divided into two equal groups. The first for total laparoscopic hysterectomy and the second for trans-abdominal hysterectomy. Patients were followed for six months after surgery. Data collected include operative time, amount of blood loss, complications and duration of hospital stay. Results: BMI was significantly higher among open when compared to laparoscopic group (43.69±3.86 vs 34.5±4.02 respectively), and low parity and low cesarean deliveries were significantly increased in laparoscopic group. The highest indication of hysterectomy in laparoscopic group was adenomyosis (43.3%) followed by fibroid (30.0%), while in open group, the most common indication was fibroid (53.3%) followed by adenomyosis (26.7%). Operative time showed significant decrease in laparoscopic when compared to open hysterectomy groups (56.23±21.5 vs 78.87±8.22 minutes respectively) and blood loss was significantly decreased among laparoscopic group. Finally, the length of hospital stay was significantly decreased in laparoscopic when compared to open groups (the median was 10 versus 24 hours respectively). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is superior to abdominal hysterectomy in obese females with benign conditions in terms of safety and efficacy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (27)
- W116326842 via openalex
- W1534348407 via openalex
- W1547650229 via openalex
- W1974215211 via openalex
- W1985984020 via openalex
- W1993790913 via openalex
- W1994072792 via openalex
- W2036429336 via openalex
- W2046419229 via openalex
- W2053807041 via openalex
- W2080005735 via openalex
- W2082787441 via openalex
- W2093431342 via openalex
- W2094888889 via openalex
- W2101726195 via openalex
- W2123187220 via openalex
- W2144707892 via openalex
- W2150112979 via openalex
- W2182271449 via openalex
- W2329304068 via openalex
- W2395500614 via openalex
- W2413298480 via openalex
- W2418653698 via openalex
- W2771983507 via openalex
- W2902996777 via openalex
- W2905289080 via openalex
- W2932927177 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK