Peritoneal pockets and endometriosis. Confirmation of an important relationship, with further observations

The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1989 · vol. 34(4) , pp. 270–2 · PMID:2715987
Observational public-domain-us
View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-13 ⓘ

In 132 women with endometriosis, peritoneal pockets were found in nearly one-fifth of cases, suggesting that these invaginations and endometriosis likely share a separate codevelopmental factor rather than having a direct causal relationship.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Of 132 women with endometriosis, almost one-fifth had peritoneal pockets. Two-thirds of the structures had endometriosis either around the rim or inside. Since one-third of the pockets lacked endometriosis and fibrosis was not present as a possible cause, endometriosis does not seem to have been the likely primary cause. Rather, such peritoneal invaginations and endometriosis may be ontologically related to a separate codevelopmental factor.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Peritoneal Neoplasms Peritoneum Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Peritoneal Neoplasms Peritoneal Neoplasms Peritoneal Neoplasms Peritoneal Neoplasms Peritoneum Peritoneum Peritoneum

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-14T06:08:39.101224+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:17:51.490942+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine