Abstract
2. Abstract Experiential learning is the pedagogic foundation of practical laboratory education. This process of learning though experience enables students to develop a deeper understanding of the theoretical material as well as valuable real-world skills. However, there is often a disconnect between the authentic, real-world context of performing laboratory skills; and the method of instruction within higher education. This study developed two student laboratory manuals; one which followed a traditionally linear “week by week” format, and another which took inspiration from a publication format and listed the protocols in a distinct “methods” section. The effect the change of layout had on student learning was assessed through analysis of student summative assessment and interaction with the online learning environment. Additionally, the effect student confidence and perceived technical skills development was assessed through a student survey. The differences in layout resulted in no significant differences in student assessment performance but did result in higher levels of engagement with the online learning environment. The student survey reported an increase in technical confidence (21%) and skill (31%) with the authentic “methods” section layout changes compared to the traditional format. The increase in student engagement, confidence, and perceived skill shows that experiential learning does benefit from placing the information in an authentic context.
Full text
1,532 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Full text loading...
Abstract
Experiential learning is the pedagogic foundation of practical laboratory education. This process of learning though experience enables students to develop a deeper understanding of the theoretical material as well as valuable real-world skills. However, there is often a disconnect between the authentic, real-world context of performing laboratory skills; and the method of instruction within higher education. This study developed two student laboratory manuals; one which followed a traditionally linear “week by week” format, and another which took inspiration from a publication format and listed the protocols in a distinct “methods” section. The effect the change of layout had on student learning was assessed through analysis of student summative assessment and interaction with the online learning environment. Additionally, the effect student confidence and perceived technical skills development was assessed through a student survey. The differences in layout resulted in no significant differences in student assessment performance but did result in higher levels of engagement with the online learning environment. The student survey reported an increase in technical confidence (21%) and skill (31%) with the authentic “methods” section layout changes compared to the traditional format. The increase in student engagement, confidence, and perceived skill shows that experiential learning does benefit from placing the information in an authentic context.
- Received:
- Version Posted:
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.