The Effect of AI Robot-Assisted Intergenerational Housework Activity on Young Children’s Competence in Household Chores | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article The Effect of AI Robot-Assisted Intergenerational Housework Activity on Young Children’s Competence in Household Chores Ching‑Fen Lee, Shain‑May Tang This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract This study investigated the effectiveness of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) robot-assisted instruction into “intergenerational household activity” programs conducted in parent–child centers, with the objective of enhancing young children’s competence in household chores. A one-group pretest–posttest design was employed. Participants comprised 50 parent–child dyads recruited from four parent–child centers in Taoyuan City. The intervention, lasting four weeks, consisted of weekly 30-minute sessions. Instructional content was structured into four researcher-designed units of “Intergenerational Household Chores,” supported by AI robot-assisted materials. Data were collected using the Young Children’s Household Chores Preferences and Abilities Questionnaire, administered pre- and post-intervention, supplemented with session-specific parental feedback forms. The findings indicated that AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities significantly improved young children’s competence in household chores, with particularly pronounced effects among children who initially demonstrated lower levels of competence. These results suggest that incorporating technological media into early childhood education programs can not only enhance children’s household task abilities but also strengthen parents’ skills and motivation in guiding children’s domestic participation. AI robot Intergenerational household activity Children’s competence in household chores‧Parent–child center Figures Figure 1 1 Introduction Early childhood constitutes a critical period of human development [ 1 ]. During this stage, engagement in household chores provides opportunities for children to acquire daily living skills, foster independence [ 2 ], and promote holistic growth [ 3 ]. For instance, activities such as tidying toys, assisting with laundry, or participating in gardening increase physical activity levels within the home [ 4 ], thereby contributing to children’s health and developmental outcomes [ 5 ]. Empirical evidence has demonstrated that chore participation facilitates advancements in linguistic, motor, cognitive, social, and executive functioning domains, with long-term benefits extending into later life stages [ 3 , 6 ]. Furthermore, household participation fosters children’s sense of responsibility, enhances socialization [ 4 , 5 ], and cultivates problem-solving skills [ 8 ]. Engagement in such activities also strengthens parent–child relationships [ 9 ] and contributes to children’s overall life satisfaction [ 10 ]. However, disparities exist in the types of chores children can competently perform. Lee and Tang [ 11 ] found that young children were generally more proficient in self-care tasks than in family-related chores. Their study highlighted that children’s health status influenced both parental attitudes toward chore participation and children’s task preferences, thereby shaping overall competence. These findings underscore the central role of parental involvement in supporting children’s participation in domestic tasks. From this perspective, the present study integrates an intergenerational program framework to emphasize the importance of parental engagement in household learning contexts. Children’s competence in household tasks is strongly associated with their motivation to participate and to learn such skills [ 11 ]. A pressing question, therefore, is how to design engaging and developmentally appropriate curricula that sustain children’s participation. With rapid technological advancement, artificial intelligence (AI) and related media have become increasingly embedded in daily life. Technological media not only play an informal educational role [ 12 ] but also function as essential tools for lifelong learning and community participation [ 13 ]. Although some studies caution that premature or excessive exposure to technology may adversely affect children’s neurodevelopment [ 14 , 15 ], other research highlights potential benefits, including facilitating knowledge exchange, promoting social interactions, and fostering innovation [ 16 ]. Specifically, digital and AI-based tools have been shown to stimulate children’s intrinsic motivation for learning [ 17 ], support multi-modal integration of knowledge, and improve overall learning outcomes [ 18 ]. For example, Adams [ 19 ] demonstrated that technology can enhance both cognitive and social competencies while also strengthening communication between educators and families. Similarly, Zhou et al. [ 20 ] reported that computer-assisted story creation improved expressive language skills among children with delayed development. The application of AI in early childhood education is theoretically supported by the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) [ 22 ]. CTML posits that learning occurs through dual processing channels constrained by limited cognitive resources, and highlights the principle of signaling, wherein verbal and pictorial cues guide learners’ attention to essential information. In the context of household tasks, AI robots can provide multimodal prompts that scaffold children’s understanding of critical steps and gestures. Furthermore, AI robots’ use of conversational and personalized communication fosters cognitive engagement and enhances motivation, which in turn sustains children’s persistence in task performance. Previous empirical research further corroborates these mechanisms. Lee and Tang [ 23 ], for example, demonstrated that the integration of AI robots in preschool settings significantly enhanced children’s competence in household chores, outperforming traditional teacher-led instruction in some domains. Intergenerational learning represents another important framework for situating AI robot-assisted activities. Studies suggest that AI robots’ user-friendly design, including appealing voices and appearances, not only engages children but also reduces older adults’ anxiety toward technology [ 24 ]. Research has shown that integrating robots into intergenerational activities alleviates depressive symptoms among older adults while simultaneously promoting children’s sensory integration abilities [ 24 ]. Despite these promising findings, the extent to which AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities improve young children’s chore competence remains underexplored. The present study therefore aims to investigate the potential of combining AI robot-assisted instruction with intergenerational household activities to promote children’s household competence. In addition, intergenerational participation is increasingly salient given the diversification of family structures [ 25 ]. In this study, “intergenerational” encompasses both parent–child and grandparent–grandchild interactions. Prior research indicates that intergenerational learning fosters mutual support, reciprocal knowledge exchange, and cooperative caregiving relationships [ 26 ]. Empirical evidence highlights that such programs benefit both generations: older adults experience improvements in psychological well-being, cognitive functioning, and self-confidence [ 27 , 28 ], while young children cultivate empathy, independence, and social competence [ 29 , 30 ]. In light of aging populations and declining fertility rates, governments have advocated for “intergenerational inclusion” in early childhood and community-based education programs. Parent–child centers, in particular, serve as crucial platforms for facilitating such exchanges. This study was conducted in parent–child centers in Taoyuan City, which, relative to other municipalities, has maintained higher birth rates in recent years. In alignment with Taiwan’s national childcare policy (“state-supported childcare before age six”), Taoyuan has established a robust network of parent–child centers that provide developmental support, parenting education, and safe spaces for family interaction. These centers emphasize both parent involvement and intergenerational co-learning, offering play-based curricula, family workshops, and community outreach programs. Against this policy and institutional backdrop, the present study examines the implementation of AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities in Taoyuan’s parent–child centers, with the objective of evaluating their impact on young children’s household chore competence. 2. Methods 2.1 Research Design This study employed a one-group pretest–posttest design to examine the effects of AI-robot–assisted instruction within intergenerational household activities conducted at parent–child centers. The primary aim was to evaluate improvements in young children’s competence in household chores as perceived by their caregivers. Participants’ performance was assessed at baseline (pretest) and following the intervention (posttest), thereby enabling the detection of changes attributable to the program (Table 1 ). The intervention was implemented over a four-week period, with weekly sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. Each session incorporated an AI-robot–assisted instructional component, integrated with intergenerational household activity themes. The Children’s Competence in Household Chores Scale was administered both prior to and after the intervention to evaluate differences in young children’s competence in household chores. Table 1 Experimental design for enhancing preschool children’s competence in household chores Group Pre-Test Intervention Post-Test Difference (Post–Pre) One-group design (n = 50) O1 X O2 O2 – O1 = Δ 2.2 Sample The study sample comprised 50 parent–child dyads recruited from four parent–child centers in Taoyuan City. Each dyad included one young child (aged 4–6 years) and one adult caregiver (parent or grandparent). Recruitment was conducted through centers hosting the “Intergenerational Household Chores” program (Table 2 ). Prior to data collection, the study protocol underwent review and approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Following approval, the research team provided detailed explanations to participating centers and families regarding the study’s objectives, procedures, anticipated outcomes, and ethical considerations. Written informed consent was obtained from both the centers and all participating families before the commencement of data collection. Table 2 Distribution of participating families across centers Parent–Child Center Number of Families OO Center 12 XX Center 15 ZZ Center 9 WW Center 14 Total 50 2.3 Data Collection Data collection focused on assessing children’s household participation abilities before and after the intervention. Questionnaires were administered to children’s primary caregivers, who were considered the most reliable reporters due to their daily interactions with the children. A non-anonymous format was adopted to ensure accurate matching between pretest and posttest responses. To ensure procedural clarity, the principal investigator conducted briefing sessions with directors of the participating centers. These sessions outlined the research objectives, activity content, and administrative responsibilities of the research team. The research team was responsible for conducting intervention activities, as well as administering and collecting questionnaires on-site. This process ensured transparency and obtained formal approval from each center prior to implementation. 2.4 Instruments The principal measurement instrument was adapted from the Children’s Preferences and Abilities in Household Chores Scale developed by Lee and Tang [ 23 ]. Items were revised to suit the study context and were subjected to expert review to establish content validity. The finalized instrument was used in both pre- and posttests. In addition, four activity-specific feedback forms were employed to assess children’s willingness to engage in household chores following each session. 2.4.1 Young Children’s Competence in Household Chores Survey The study variables and measurement approaches are summarized below: 1. Children’s Health Status Assessed using the item “child’s physical health condition” in the demographic section of the pretest questionnaire. Responses were rated on a five-point Likert scale (1 = very unhealthy, 5 = very healthy). Higher scores reflected better overall health. 2. Willingness to Participate in Household Chores Evaluated through caregiver-completed feedback forms after each of the four sessions. For example, following Session 1 ( It’s Mealtime ), caregivers rated the extent of improvement in the child’s willingness to participate in mealtime-related chores. Items were scored on a five-point Likert scale (1 = no improvement, 5 = great improvement). Scores were aggregated across sessions, with higher totals indicating stronger willingness to participate. 3. Pretest/Posttest Household Chore Competence Measured using 13 items covering common household tasks (e.g., putting toys away, folding clothes, setting the table, washing dishes, sorting garbage, sweeping, assisting family members). Each item was rated on a six-point scale (0 = never performed, 5 = independently completed). Higher scores indicated greater household participation competence. 4. Improvement in Household Chore Competence Calculated as the difference between pretest and posttest scores. Positive difference scores indicated gains in children’s competence, while lower or negative scores reflected limited or no improvement. 2.4.2 Application of AI Robots The AI robot Kebbi Air S , developed by Nuwa Robotics, was employed as an instructional tool (Fig. 1 ). This robot was selected due to its suitability for early childhood education and its advanced features for interactive engagement. Its functions include: Natural conversational interaction to support dynamic learning experiences. A user-friendly, highly scalable development environment with strong IoT integration. Comprehensive APIs, SDKs, and development tools enabling customized interactive content. Prior to the intervention, researchers were trained in the robot’s software and programming functions. Customized instructional scripts were developed to embed oral guidance, storytelling, and chore-related prompts into the sessions. Trial runs and adjustments ensured smooth implementation during the formal study. From May 2025, the program was implemented across four consecutive weeks. Each weekly session lasted 30 minutes and followed a structured theme (Table 3 ). The robot facilitated interaction by introducing household tasks, providing demonstrations, and prompting intergenerational storytelling and reflection. Table 3 Intergenerational household activities with Kebbi Air S Robot Session Theme 1 It’s Mealtime 2 I Can Clean the House 3 I Can Organize Clothes 4 I Am a Little Helper at Home 2.5 Research Ethics All researchers completed the Research Ethics Education Program administered by the Taiwan Academic Ethics Education Resource Center prior to implementation. The study was conducted in accordance with international ethical standards and national regulatory requirements. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) before data collection commenced. Informed consent was obtained from all participating caregivers and, in the case of minors, from their legal guardians. Participants were informed about the study’s aims, procedures, risks, and data usage. Confidentiality was strictly maintained; data were anonymized, securely stored, and restricted to research purposes. Photographs and video recordings of the sessions were collected only with explicit consent and stored on password-protected devices. In compliance with data management protocols, all files will be destroyed by December 31, 2030. Personal identifiers will not be disclosed in any publication or presentation of research findings. 3. Results 3.1 Paired-Sample t-Test Analysis To assess whether participation in AI-robot–assisted intergenerational household activities produced significant changes in young children’s household participation abilities, a paired-sample t -test was performed. Results indicated that the mean pretest score (M = 39.80, SD = 12.77) differed significantly from the mean posttest score (M = 44.76, SD = 12.40), t (49) = − 2.51, p < .05. These findings demonstrate that after four weeks of participation in AI-robot–assisted intergenerational activities, children’s household participation abilities significantly improved, suggesting the effectiveness of integrating technological support in intergenerational learning contexts (Table 4 ). Table 4 Results of paired-sample t -test for children’s household participation abilities Variable Pretest M Pretest SD Posttest M Posttest SD t p Children’s Household Participation Ability 39.80 12.77 44.76 12.40 –2.51 .015* p < .05. 3.2 Hierarchical Regression Analysis A hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to further investigate whether children’s health status, willingness to participate in chores, and initial household participation abilities moderated the effects of the AI-robot–assisted intervention. Improvement in children’s household abilities (posttest minus pretest scores) served as the dependent variable. Step 1 (Model 1) : Children’s health status exhibited a significant negative effect on improvement in household abilities (β = –.34, p < .05). This result indicates that children with poorer health conditions demonstrated greater gains in household abilities after the intervention. Step 2 (Model 2) : When willingness to participate in household chores was added as a predictor, results revealed a significant positive effect (β = .40, p < .01). This suggests that children with higher levels of willingness experienced greater improvement in household abilities following the intervention. Step 3 (Model 3) : After controlling for pretest scores of household participation abilities, results showed that initial competence exerted a significant negative effect on improvement (β = –.57, p < .001). This finding indicates that the intervention was especially effective for children who initially demonstrated lower household participation abilities, as they exhibited greater gains. Notably, in this model, the effects of children’s health status and willingness to participate—previously significant—were no longer statistically significant, highlighting the overriding influence of initial ability levels (Table 5 ) Table 5 Hierarchical regression analysis on the improvement in young children’s competence in household chores Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 β t VIF β t VIF β t VIF 1.Children’s Health Status − .34 -2.50* 1.00 − .33 -2.63* 1.00 − .19 -1.90 1.07 2.Willingness to Participate .40 3.19** 1.00 .45 4.63*** 1.01 3.Initial Household Ability (Pretest) − .57 -5.66*** 1.07 F(△F ) 6.25*(6.25) 8.81***(10.18) 20.42***(32.03) R2(R2 adjusted) .12(.10) .27(.24) .57(.54) ΔR2 .12* .16** .30*** * p < .05. ** p < .01. *** p < .001. 4. Discussion & Suggestions 4.1 Discussion 4.1.1 Significant Learning Effects of AI-Robot–Assisted Intergenerational household activities The results of this study demonstrate that AI-robot–assisted intergenerational household activities conducted in parent–child centers significantly enhanced young children’s household participation abilities. These findings align with prior research indicating that the integration of AI robots in preschool contexts can effectively improve children’s engagement in household tasks and related learning outcomes [ 23 ]. The use of technological media as an instructional tool appears to diversify children’s learning pathways, thereby reinforcing household competence. Furthermore, feedback from participants indicated that the AI robot’s interactive and dynamic features created a lively and enjoyable learning environment. The robot’s multimodal instructional style not only sustained children’s attention but also increased their motivation to engage in chores. Importantly, the joint involvement of grandparents and other family elders provided additional encouragement and emotional support, which further amplified children’s willingness to participate. Collectively, these findings underscore the pedagogical potential of technology-enhanced intergenerational learning activities in fostering children’s domestic skills. 4.1.2 Greater Effectiveness for Children with Lower Initial Competence Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the AI-robot–assisted activities were particularly effective for children who initially exhibited lower household competence. Prior to the intervention, discussions with parents highlighted a common recognition of the importance of involving children in household chores, yet also revealed a lack of effective strategies to facilitate such participation in daily family life. Through the structured activities, however, parents acquired practical skills for scaffolding children’s engagement in diverse household tasks. These findings not only validate the effectiveness of the intervention but also highlight important applied implications. Specifically, AI-robot–assisted intergenerational activities can serve as a valuable pedagogical model for parents, enabling them to develop concrete strategies for cultivating children’s household competence. This suggests that technology-supported programs may function as a catalyst for both children’s skill development and parents’ role in fostering learning within the family context. 4.2 Suggestions This study represents an initial attempt to explore the effects of AI-robot–assisted intergenerational household activities on young children’s participation in chores. While the findings are promising, several limitations should be acknowledged. The sample was restricted to four parent–child centers in Taoyuan City, which constrains the generalizability of results to broader populations. Future research should expand the sampling scope across diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts to validate and extend these findings. Additionally, subsequent studies could investigate potential variations in effectiveness based on the type of intergenerational participants (e.g., parent–child dyads versus grandparent–grandchild dyads) involved in the activities. Comparative studies across different early childhood education settings—such as preschools, parent–child centers, and other community-based institutions—would also contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how AI-robot–assisted instruction influences household participation learning. Moreover, although this study confirmed the positive role of AI robots in enhancing children’s chore competence, findings also reaffirmed the critical influence of parental involvement [ 11 ]. Some parents demonstrated insufficient skills in guiding and motivating children to engage in household tasks. This highlights the need for parenting education programs that explicitly integrate household-related learning into their curricula. Parent–child centers and family service agencies could incorporate workshops or training modules emphasizing the developmental benefits of chore participation, while simultaneously equipping parents with strategies to effectively scaffold such learning at home. In summary, the present study contributes to the growing body of literature on technology-assisted intergenerational learning by demonstrating the effectiveness of AI robots in promoting children’s household participation abilities. At the same time, it emphasizes the importance of expanding both research scope and parenting education initiatives to ensure the sustained integration of household learning in early childhood development programs. 4.3 Conclusion This study examined the effects of AI-robot–assisted intergenerational household activities on young children’s household participation abilities. Results demonstrated significant improvements after four weeks of intervention, particularly among children with initially lower levels of competence. These findings suggest that AI robots can serve as effective instructional tools by creating engaging, interactive learning environments that enhance children’s motivation and skill development, while also supporting parents in acquiring strategies to guide children’s household participation. Overall, this study highlights the potential of integrating AI technology into early childhood and family education programs. By combining intergenerational engagement with technological support, parent–child centers and similar institutions can strengthen children’s independence, responsibility, and collaboration within the family context. Future research should expand to larger and more diverse samples, as well as explore long-term impacts, to further validate the effectiveness of AI-robot–assisted learning in promoting young children’s household participation and intergenerational inclusion. Declarations Author Contribution Conceptualization, S.-M.T.; Methodology, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Software, C.-F.L.; Validation, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Formal Analysis, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Investigation, C.-F.L.; Resources, C.-F.L.; Data Curation, C.-F.L.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Writing-Review & Editing, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Validation, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Supervision, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Project administration, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Funding acquisition, C.-F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. References Wittkowski, A., Dowling, H., Smith, D.M.: Does engaging in a group-based intervention increase parental self-efficacy in parents of preschool children? A systematic review of the current literature. J. Child Fam. Stud. 25, 3173–3191 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0464-z Hilton, J.M., Haldeman, V.A.: Gender differences in the performance of household tasks by adults and children in single-parent and two-parent, two-earner families. J. Fam. Issues 12, 114–130 (1991) Rende, R.: Chores: Why they still matter and how to engage youth. Brown Univ. Child Adolesc. Behav. Lett. 37, 1–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbl.30545 Hossain, M.M., Abdulla, F., Hai, A., et al.: Exploring the prevalence, duration and determinants of participation in household chores among children aged 5–17 years in Bangladesh. Child Indic. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10051-z Lee, S.Y., Pang, B.W.J., Lau, L.K., Jabbar, K.A., Seah, W.T., Chen, K.K., et al.: Cross-sectional associations of housework with cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions in younger and older community-dwelling adults: The Yishun Study. BMJ Open 11, e052557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052557 Licardo, M., Gencel, I.E.: Teaching for the Future in Early Childhood Education. In: Licardo, M. (ed.) Teaching for the Future in Early Childhood Education (2023). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370124649 (accessed 20 Sept 2025) Dunn, L.: Validation of the CHORES: a measure of school-aged children's participation in household tasks. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 11, 179–190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/11038120410003673 Spitze, G., Ward, R.: Household labor in intergeneration households. J. Marriage Fam. 57, 355–361 (1995) Benin, M.H., Edwards, D.A.: Adolescents’ chores: The difference between dual- and single-earner families. J. Marriage Fam. 52, 361–373 (1990) White, E.M., DeBoer, M.D., Scharf, R.J.: Associations between household chores and childhood self-competency. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 40, 176–182 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000637 Lee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Young children’s housework participation in Taiwan: Serial multiple mediations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 15448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315448 Linebarger, D.L., Piotrowski, J.T.: TV as storyteller: How exposure to television narratives impacts at-risk preschoolers’ story knowledge and narrative skills. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 27, 47–69 (2009) Chen, R.S.: The influences of accessing opportunities on applied information technology-assisted learning performance for young children. J. Liberal Arts Soc. Sci. 8, 277–299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.29506/JLASS.201212.0001 Christakis, D.A., Garrison, M.M., Herrenkohl, T., Haggerty, K., Rivara, F.P., Zhou, C., Liekweg, K.: Modifying media content for preschool children: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 131, 431 (2013) Lee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Children’s health, parent-child activities, using digital devices, and social competence: Serial mediation. Health 15, 883–894 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2023.158058 Peou, C.: Cambodia’s broadcast TV: Promotion of consumerist desires. Asia Eur. J. 7, 417–431 (2009) Chiu, F.H., Chen, R.S., Chiu, C.C.: The survey study of early childhood educators’ attitudes toward applied digital media into instructions for young children. Early Child. Educ. 292, 48–59 (2008). https://doi.org/10.6367/ECE.200812.0048 Weinberger, N., Anderson, T., Schumacher, P.: Young children’s access and use of computers in family child care and child care centers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 183–190 (2009) Adams, M.J.: Technology for Developing Children’s Language and Literacy: Bringing Speech Recognition to the Classroom. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York (2011) Zhou, Z., et al.: Digital intervention in children with developmental language disorder (DLD): A systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 13, e59992 (2025). https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e59992 Wang, S.-M.: The concepts and reflections on integrating information education into early childhood education curriculum. Taiwan Educ. Rev. Mon. 7, 144–148 (2018) Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 31–48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005) Lee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Can AI robot teaching improve children’s performance in housework? A quasi-experimental study. Children 11, 1330 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/children11101330 Tsai, M.H., Lin, C.W.: A study on the effect of using intelligent robots to assist the intergenerational learning on improving the sensory integration of young children and the depression of the elderly. Curric. Instr. Q. 25, 23–52 (2022). https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202207_25(3 ).0002 Department of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior: Statistical bulletin of the Ministry of the Interior: Analysis of household numbers and types. Ministry of the Interior, Taipei (2024). Available online: https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat (accessed 20 Sept 2025) Meshel, D.S., McGlynn, R.P.: Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educ. Gerontol. 30, 457–479 (2004) Aday, R.H., Sims, C.R., McDuffie, W., Evans, E.: Changing children’s attitudes toward the elderly: The longitudinal effects of an intergenerational partners program. J. Res. Child. Educ. 10, 143–151 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/02568549609594897 Sánchez-Cazalla, V., Maraver-López, P., Muro-Culebras, A.: Impact of intergenerational programmes on older adults through a “Time after Time” event. Discov. Soc. Sci. Health 2, 58 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dssh.2025.100058 Lai, D.W.L.: Intergenerational engagement and challenges. J. Intergener. Relatsh. (2025). Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2023.2287229 Liu, H.Y., Lin, Y.P., Wu, Z.Y.: Together old and young: Intergenerational learning and its implications for intergenerational care. Taiwan J. Soc. Welf. 17, 99–143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.202112_17(2).03 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7723909","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":531485913,"identity":"47d942f9-3738-4d4b-9533-e8a94809ade0","order_by":0,"name":"Ching‑Fen Lee","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu County","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ching‑Fen","middleName":"","lastName":"Lee","suffix":""},{"id":531485916,"identity":"fcce8b32-7cb6-483e-86b2-379fa2d16c3f","order_by":1,"name":"Shain‑May Tang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"National Open University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shain‑May","middleName":"","lastName":"Tang","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-09-26 17:23:15","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":94049038,"identity":"8a5f238b-57f4-433e-bab2-cbcc59ad7ca2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:27:31","extension":"docx","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":164681,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"20250927TheEffectofAIRobotAssistedIntergenerationalhouseworkActivityonYoungChildrenscompetenceinHouseholdChores.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/6582dc9b19b536e0ae415aa6.docx"},{"id":94048048,"identity":"9342feb6-1c53-446d-8fd1-eab29a7cbdcf","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"json","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":4485,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"fb67ca31dbf5473abc5e6177874e92db.json","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/64fe2d0b8e9d03c9eb4b6b58.json"},{"id":94048052,"identity":"74ffc56c-6577-4e5a-8641-4ba653960752","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"xml","order_by":2,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":84607,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"fb67ca31dbf5473abc5e6177874e92db1enriched.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/7dc425102a49069a14b78cb7.xml"},{"id":94048053,"identity":"5217c0e3-78bf-422b-97a1-8de72c49336a","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"jpeg","order_by":3,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":389157,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.jpeg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/31254fe7d0e3381000c9c59e.jpeg"},{"id":94049040,"identity":"209f205e-fd66-4898-9d53-565ecd341530","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:27:31","extension":"png","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":102807,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"Onlinefloatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/e3dd1da03f1224c610d2de12.png"},{"id":94048050,"identity":"c4988cb1-a2e1-449d-b19d-b5ac962ef813","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"xml","order_by":5,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":82251,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"fb67ca31dbf5473abc5e6177874e92db1structuring.xml","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/5aff18f19d2a32dc9418d383.xml"},{"id":94048056,"identity":"f08f26c1-26f3-4b02-91fb-178e65c44bde","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"html","order_by":6,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"acdc-reference","size":94198,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"earlyproof.html","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/aaa844f2445102e22750ad55.html"},{"id":94048049,"identity":"e4cf3b1b-e7d5-47c0-9a94-63d19a35e155","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-10-21 23:19:31","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":206842,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eKebbi Air S Robot\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/4c6c639963357661f1bd6829.png"},{"id":99789808,"identity":"30b35a2c-f83c-40db-8f9c-f2bd482f4cbc","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-01-08 12:50:39","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1036163,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7723909/v1/63967002-34f5-4317-8caf-1ae80da7cf94.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"The Effect of AI Robot-Assisted Intergenerational Housework Activity on Young Children’s Competence in Household Chores","fulltext":[{"header":"1 Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eEarly childhood constitutes a critical period of human development [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e]. During this stage, engagement in household chores provides opportunities for children to acquire daily living skills, foster independence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e], and promote holistic growth [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. For instance, activities such as tidying toys, assisting with laundry, or participating in gardening increase physical activity levels within the home [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e], thereby contributing to children\u0026rsquo;s health and developmental outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Empirical evidence has demonstrated that chore participation facilitates advancements in linguistic, motor, cognitive, social, and executive functioning domains, with long-term benefits extending into later life stages [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e]. Furthermore, household participation fosters children\u0026rsquo;s sense of responsibility, enhances socialization [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e], and cultivates problem-solving skills [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e8\u003c/span\u003e]. Engagement in such activities also strengthens parent\u0026ndash;child relationships [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e9\u003c/span\u003e] and contributes to children\u0026rsquo;s overall life satisfaction [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eHowever, disparities exist in the types of chores children can competently perform. Lee and Tang [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e] found that young children were generally more proficient in self-care tasks than in family-related chores. Their study highlighted that children\u0026rsquo;s health status influenced both parental attitudes toward chore participation and children\u0026rsquo;s task preferences, thereby shaping overall competence. These findings underscore the central role of parental involvement in supporting children\u0026rsquo;s participation in domestic tasks. From this perspective, the present study integrates an intergenerational program framework to emphasize the importance of parental engagement in household learning contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eChildren\u0026rsquo;s competence in household tasks is strongly associated with their motivation to participate and to learn such skills [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. A pressing question, therefore, is how to design engaging and developmentally appropriate curricula that sustain children\u0026rsquo;s participation. With rapid technological advancement, artificial intelligence (AI) and related media have become increasingly embedded in daily life. Technological media not only play an informal educational role [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e] but also function as essential tools for lifelong learning and community participation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Although some studies caution that premature or excessive exposure to technology may adversely affect children\u0026rsquo;s neurodevelopment [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e15\u003c/span\u003e], other research highlights potential benefits, including facilitating knowledge exchange, promoting social interactions, and fostering innovation [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. Specifically, digital and AI-based tools have been shown to stimulate children\u0026rsquo;s intrinsic motivation for learning [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e], support multi-modal integration of knowledge, and improve overall learning outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e18\u003c/span\u003e]. For example, Adams [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e] demonstrated that technology can enhance both cognitive and social competencies while also strengthening communication between educators and families. Similarly, Zhou et al. [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e] reported that computer-assisted story creation improved expressive language skills among children with delayed development.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe application of AI in early childhood education is theoretically supported by the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML) [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. CTML posits that learning occurs through dual processing channels constrained by limited cognitive resources, and highlights the principle of signaling, wherein verbal and pictorial cues guide learners\u0026rsquo; attention to essential information. In the context of household tasks, AI robots can provide multimodal prompts that scaffold children\u0026rsquo;s understanding of critical steps and gestures. Furthermore, AI robots\u0026rsquo; use of conversational and personalized communication fosters cognitive engagement and enhances motivation, which in turn sustains children\u0026rsquo;s persistence in task performance. Previous empirical research further corroborates these mechanisms. Lee and Tang [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e], for example, demonstrated that the integration of AI robots in preschool settings significantly enhanced children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores, outperforming traditional teacher-led instruction in some domains.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntergenerational learning represents another important framework for situating AI robot-assisted activities. Studies suggest that AI robots\u0026rsquo; user-friendly design, including appealing voices and appearances, not only engages children but also reduces older adults\u0026rsquo; anxiety toward technology [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Research has shown that integrating robots into intergenerational activities alleviates depressive symptoms among older adults while simultaneously promoting children\u0026rsquo;s sensory integration abilities [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e]. Despite these promising findings, the extent to which AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities improve young children\u0026rsquo;s chore competence remains underexplored. The present study therefore aims to investigate the potential of combining AI robot-assisted instruction with intergenerational household activities to promote children\u0026rsquo;s household competence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn addition, intergenerational participation is increasingly salient given the diversification of family structures [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e]. In this study, \u0026ldquo;intergenerational\u0026rdquo; encompasses both parent\u0026ndash;child and grandparent\u0026ndash;grandchild interactions. Prior research indicates that intergenerational learning fosters mutual support, reciprocal knowledge exchange, and cooperative caregiving relationships [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e26\u003c/span\u003e]. Empirical evidence highlights that such programs benefit both generations: older adults experience improvements in psychological well-being, cognitive functioning, and self-confidence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e27\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e], while young children cultivate empathy, independence, and social competence [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e]. In light of aging populations and declining fertility rates, governments have advocated for \u0026ldquo;intergenerational inclusion\u0026rdquo; in early childhood and community-based education programs. Parent\u0026ndash;child centers, in particular, serve as crucial platforms for facilitating such exchanges.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study was conducted in parent\u0026ndash;child centers in Taoyuan City, which, relative to other municipalities, has maintained higher birth rates in recent years. In alignment with Taiwan\u0026rsquo;s national childcare policy (\u0026ldquo;state-supported childcare before age six\u0026rdquo;), Taoyuan has established a robust network of parent\u0026ndash;child centers that provide developmental support, parenting education, and safe spaces for family interaction. These centers emphasize both parent involvement and intergenerational co-learning, offering play-based curricula, family workshops, and community outreach programs. Against this policy and institutional backdrop, the present study examines the implementation of AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities in Taoyuan\u0026rsquo;s parent\u0026ndash;child centers, with the objective of evaluating their impact on young children\u0026rsquo;s household chore competence.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.1 Research Design\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study employed a one-group pretest\u0026ndash;posttest design to examine the effects of AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted instruction within intergenerational household activities conducted at parent\u0026ndash;child centers. The primary aim was to evaluate improvements in young children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores as perceived by their caregivers. Participants\u0026rsquo; performance was assessed at baseline (pretest) and following the intervention (posttest), thereby enabling the detection of changes attributable to the program (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe intervention was implemented over a four-week period, with weekly sessions lasting approximately 30 minutes. Each session incorporated an AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted instructional component, integrated with intergenerational household activity themes. The \u003cem\u003eChildren\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/em\u003e Competence in Household Chores \u003cem\u003eScale\u003c/em\u003e was administered both prior to and after the intervention to evaluate differences in young children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eExperimental design for enhancing preschool children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eGroup\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePre-Test\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntervention\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePost-Test\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDifference (Post\u0026ndash;Pre)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eOne-group design (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eO1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eX\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eO2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eO2 \u0026ndash; O1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;Δ\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.2 Sample\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study sample comprised 50 parent\u0026ndash;child dyads recruited from four parent\u0026ndash;child centers in Taoyuan City. Each dyad included one young child (aged 4\u0026ndash;6 years) and one adult caregiver (parent or grandparent). Recruitment was conducted through centers hosting the \u0026ldquo;Intergenerational Household Chores\u0026rdquo; program (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrior to data collection, the study protocol underwent review and approval by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Following approval, the research team provided detailed explanations to participating centers and families regarding the study\u0026rsquo;s objectives, procedures, anticipated outcomes, and ethical considerations. Written informed consent was obtained from both the centers and all participating families before the commencement of data collection.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eDistribution of participating families across centers\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eParent\u0026ndash;Child Center\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eNumber of Families\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eOO Center\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eXX Center\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e15\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eZZ Center\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e9\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eWW Center\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e14\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTotal\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e50\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.3 Data Collection\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eData collection focused on assessing children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities before and after the intervention. Questionnaires were administered to children\u0026rsquo;s primary caregivers, who were considered the most reliable reporters due to their daily interactions with the children. A non-anonymous format was adopted to ensure accurate matching between pretest and posttest responses.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e To ensure procedural clarity, the principal investigator conducted briefing sessions with directors of the participating centers. These sessions outlined the research objectives, activity content, and administrative responsibilities of the research team. The research team was responsible for conducting intervention activities, as well as administering and collecting questionnaires on-site. This process ensured transparency and obtained formal approval from each center prior to implementation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.4 Instruments\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe principal measurement instrument was adapted from the \u003cem\u003eChildren\u0026rsquo;s Preferences and Abilities in Household Chores Scale\u003c/em\u003e developed by Lee and Tang [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. Items were revised to suit the study context and were subjected to expert review to establish content validity. The finalized instrument was used in both pre- and posttests. In addition, four activity-specific feedback forms were employed to assess children\u0026rsquo;s willingness to engage in household chores following each session.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.4.1 Young Children\u0026rsquo;s Competence in Household Chores Survey\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe study variables and measurement approaches are summarized below:\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e1. Children’s Health Status\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssessed using the item \u0026ldquo;child\u0026rsquo;s physical health condition\u0026rdquo; in the demographic section of the pretest questionnaire. Responses were rated on a five-point Likert scale (1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;very unhealthy, 5\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;very healthy). Higher scores reflected better overall health.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e2. Willingness to Participate in Household Chores\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEvaluated through caregiver-completed feedback forms after each of the four sessions. For example, following Session 1 (\u003cem\u003eIt\u0026rsquo;s Mealtime\u003c/em\u003e), caregivers rated the extent of improvement in the child\u0026rsquo;s willingness to participate in mealtime-related chores. Items were scored on a five-point Likert scale (1\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;no improvement, 5\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;great improvement). Scores were aggregated across sessions, with higher totals indicating stronger willingness to participate.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e3. Pretest/Posttest Household Chore Competence\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMeasured using 13 items covering common household tasks (e.g., putting toys away, folding clothes, setting the table, washing dishes, sorting garbage, sweeping, assisting family members). Each item was rated on a six-point scale (0\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;never performed, 5\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;independently completed). Higher scores indicated greater household participation competence.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003e4. Improvement in Household Chore Competence\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCalculated as the difference between pretest and posttest scores. Positive difference scores indicated gains in children\u0026rsquo;s competence, while lower or negative scores reflected limited or no improvement.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"Heading\"\u003e2.4.2 Application of AI Robots\u003c/div\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe AI robot \u003cb\u003eKebbi Air S\u003c/b\u003e, developed by Nuwa Robotics, was employed as an instructional tool (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). This robot was selected due to its suitability for early childhood education and its advanced features for interactive engagement. Its functions include:\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003col\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eNatural conversational interaction to support dynamic learning experiences.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eA user-friendly, highly scalable development environment with strong IoT integration.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003eComprehensive APIs, SDKs, and development tools enabling customized interactive content.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePrior to the intervention, researchers were trained in the robot\u0026rsquo;s software and programming functions. Customized instructional scripts were developed to embed oral guidance, storytelling, and chore-related prompts into the sessions. Trial runs and adjustments ensured smooth implementation during the formal study.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFrom May 2025, the program was implemented across four consecutive weeks. Each weekly session lasted 30 minutes and followed a structured theme (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). The robot facilitated interaction by introducing household tasks, providing demonstrations, and prompting intergenerational storytelling and reflection.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntergenerational household activities with Kebbi Air S Robot\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eSession\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eTheme\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eIt\u0026rsquo;s Mealtime\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI Can Clean the House\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI Can Organize Clothes\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eI Am a Little Helper at Home\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e2.5 Research Ethics\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003e All researchers completed the Research Ethics Education Program administered by the Taiwan Academic Ethics Education Resource Center prior to implementation. The study was conducted in accordance with international ethical standards and national regulatory requirements. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) before data collection commenced.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eInformed consent\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cp\u003e was obtained from all participating caregivers and, in the case of minors, from their legal guardians. Participants were informed about the study\u0026rsquo;s aims, procedures, risks, and data usage. Confidentiality was strictly maintained; data were anonymized, securely stored, and restricted to research purposes. Photographs and video recordings of the sessions were collected only with explicit consent and stored on password-protected devices. In compliance with data management protocols, all files will be destroyed by December 31, 2030. Personal identifiers will not be disclosed in any publication or presentation of research findings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.1 Paired-Sample t-Test Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eTo assess whether participation in AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational household activities produced significant changes in young children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities, a paired-sample \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-test was performed. Results indicated that the mean pretest score (M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;39.80, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12.77) differed significantly from the mean posttest score (M\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;44.76, SD\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12.40), \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e (49) = \u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2.51, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.05.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese findings demonstrate that after four weeks of participation in AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational activities, children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities significantly improved, suggesting the effectiveness of integrating technological support in intergenerational learning contexts (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eResults of paired-sample \u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e-test for children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"7\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eVariable\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePretest M\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePretest SD\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePosttest M\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003ePosttest SD\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eChildren\u0026rsquo;s Household Participation Ability\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e39.80\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.77\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e44.76\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e12.40\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u0026ndash;2.51\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.015*\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.05.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec16\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e3.2 Hierarchical Regression Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eA hierarchical regression analysis was conducted to further investigate whether children\u0026rsquo;s health status, willingness to participate in chores, and initial household participation abilities moderated the effects of the AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intervention. Improvement in children\u0026rsquo;s household abilities (posttest minus pretest scores) served as the dependent variable.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStep 1 (Model 1)\u003c/b\u003e: Children\u0026rsquo;s health status exhibited a significant negative effect on improvement in household abilities (β = \u0026ndash;.34, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.05). This result indicates that children with poorer health conditions demonstrated greater gains in household abilities after the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStep 2 (Model 2)\u003c/b\u003e: When willingness to participate in household chores was added as a predictor, results revealed a significant positive effect (β\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;.40, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.01). This suggests that children with higher levels of willingness experienced greater improvement in household abilities following the intervention.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eStep 3 (Model 3)\u003c/b\u003e: After controlling for pretest scores of household participation abilities, results showed that initial competence exerted a significant negative effect on improvement (β = \u0026ndash;.57, \u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001). This finding indicates that the intervention was especially effective for children who initially demonstrated lower household participation abilities, as they exhibited greater gains. Notably, in this model, the effects of children\u0026rsquo;s health status and willingness to participate\u0026mdash;previously significant\u0026mdash;were no longer statistically significant, highlighting the overriding influence of initial ability levels (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ul\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e\u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eHierarchical regression analysis on the improvement in young children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/caption\u003e\u003ccolgroup cols=\"10\"\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c9\" colnum=\"9\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c10\" colnum=\"10\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cthead\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eVariables\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eModel 1\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eModel 2\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c10\" namest=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eModel 3\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/th\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/thead\u003e\u003ctbody\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eβ\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eVIF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eβ\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eVIF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eβ\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003et\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eVIF\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.Children\u0026rsquo;s Health Status\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;.34\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e-2.50*\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;.33\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e-2.63*\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;.19\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e-1.90\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.07\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e2.Willingness to Participate\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e.40\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e3.19**\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e.45\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e4.63***\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.01\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e3.Initial Household Ability (Pretest)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;.57\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c9\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003e-5.66***\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c10\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e1.07\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eF(△F )\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e6.25*(6.25)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e8.81***(10.18)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c10\" namest=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e20.42***(32.03)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eR2(R2 adjusted)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.12(.10)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.27(.24)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c10\" namest=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.57(.54)\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u003cp\u003eΔR2\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c4\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.12*\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c7\" namest=\"c5\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.16**\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c10\" namest=\"c8\"\u003e\u003cp\u003e.30***\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\u003c/tbody\u003e\u003c/colgroup\u003e\u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e*\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.05. **\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.01. ***\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;.001.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion \u0026 Suggestions","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.1 Discussion\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.1.1 Significant Learning Effects of AI-Robot\u0026ndash;Assisted Intergenerational household activities\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe results of this study demonstrate that AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational household activities conducted in parent\u0026ndash;child centers significantly enhanced young children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities. These findings align with prior research indicating that the integration of AI robots in preschool contexts can effectively improve children\u0026rsquo;s engagement in household tasks and related learning outcomes [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e]. The use of technological media as an instructional tool appears to diversify children\u0026rsquo;s learning pathways, thereby reinforcing household competence.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFurthermore, feedback from participants indicated that the AI robot\u0026rsquo;s interactive and dynamic features created a lively and enjoyable learning environment. The robot\u0026rsquo;s multimodal instructional style not only sustained children\u0026rsquo;s attention but also increased their motivation to engage in chores. Importantly, the joint involvement of grandparents and other family elders provided additional encouragement and emotional support, which further amplified children\u0026rsquo;s willingness to participate. Collectively, these findings underscore the pedagogical potential of technology-enhanced intergenerational learning activities in fostering children\u0026rsquo;s domestic skills.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section3\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.1.2 Greater Effectiveness for Children with Lower Initial Competence\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eHierarchical regression analyses revealed that the AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted activities were particularly effective for children who initially exhibited lower household competence. Prior to the intervention, discussions with parents highlighted a common recognition of the importance of involving children in household chores, yet also revealed a lack of effective strategies to facilitate such participation in daily family life. Through the structured activities, however, parents acquired practical skills for scaffolding children\u0026rsquo;s engagement in diverse household tasks.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThese findings not only validate the effectiveness of the intervention but also highlight important applied implications. Specifically, AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational activities can serve as a valuable pedagogical model for parents, enabling them to develop concrete strategies for cultivating children\u0026rsquo;s household competence. This suggests that technology-supported programs may function as a catalyst for both children\u0026rsquo;s skill development and parents\u0026rsquo; role in fostering learning within the family context.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.2 Suggestions\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study represents an initial attempt to explore the effects of AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational household activities on young children\u0026rsquo;s participation in chores. While the findings are promising, several limitations should be acknowledged. The sample was restricted to four parent\u0026ndash;child centers in Taoyuan City, which constrains the generalizability of results to broader populations. Future research should expand the sampling scope across diverse geographic and sociocultural contexts to validate and extend these findings.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAdditionally, subsequent studies could investigate potential variations in effectiveness based on the type of intergenerational participants (e.g., parent\u0026ndash;child dyads versus grandparent\u0026ndash;grandchild dyads) involved in the activities. Comparative studies across different early childhood education settings\u0026mdash;such as preschools, parent\u0026ndash;child centers, and other community-based institutions\u0026mdash;would also contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted instruction influences household participation learning.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eMoreover, although this study confirmed the positive role of AI robots in enhancing children\u0026rsquo;s chore competence, findings also reaffirmed the critical influence of parental involvement [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e]. Some parents demonstrated insufficient skills in guiding and motivating children to engage in household tasks. This highlights the need for parenting education programs that explicitly integrate household-related learning into their curricula. Parent\u0026ndash;child centers and family service agencies could incorporate workshops or training modules emphasizing the developmental benefits of chore participation, while simultaneously equipping parents with strategies to effectively scaffold such learning at home.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn summary, the present study contributes to the growing body of literature on technology-assisted intergenerational learning by demonstrating the effectiveness of AI robots in promoting children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities. At the same time, it emphasizes the importance of expanding both research scope and parenting education initiatives to ensure the sustained integration of household learning in early childhood development programs.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e\u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e\u003ch2\u003e4.3 Conclusion\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis study examined the effects of AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted intergenerational household activities on young children\u0026rsquo;s household participation abilities. Results demonstrated significant improvements after four weeks of intervention, particularly among children with initially lower levels of competence. These findings suggest that AI robots can serve as effective instructional tools by creating engaging, interactive learning environments that enhance children\u0026rsquo;s motivation and skill development, while also supporting parents in acquiring strategies to guide children\u0026rsquo;s household participation.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eOverall, this study highlights the potential of integrating AI technology into early childhood and family education programs. By combining intergenerational engagement with technological support, parent\u0026ndash;child centers and similar institutions can strengthen children\u0026rsquo;s independence, responsibility, and collaboration within the family context. Future research should expand to larger and more diverse samples, as well as explore long-term impacts, to further validate the effectiveness of AI-robot\u0026ndash;assisted learning in promoting young children\u0026rsquo;s household participation and intergenerational inclusion.\u003c/p\u003e\u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eConceptualization, S.-M.T.; Methodology, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Software, C.-F.L.; Validation, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Formal Analysis, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Investigation, C.-F.L.; Resources, C.-F.L.; Data Curation, C.-F.L.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Writing-Review \u0026amp; Editing, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Validation, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Supervision, S.-M.T. and C.-F.L.; Project administration, C.-F.L. and S.-M.T.; Funding acquisition, C.-F.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWittkowski, A., Dowling, H., Smith, D.M.: Does engaging in a group-based intervention increase parental self-efficacy in parents of preschool children? A systematic review of the current literature. J. Child Fam. Stud. 25, 3173\u0026ndash;3191 (2016). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0464-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s10826-016-0464-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHilton, J.M., Haldeman, V.A.: Gender differences in the performance of household tasks by adults and children in single-parent and two-parent, two-earner families. J. Fam. Issues 12, 114\u0026ndash;130 (1991)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRende, R.: Chores: Why they still matter and how to engage youth. Brown Univ. Child Adolesc. Behav. Lett. 37, 1\u0026ndash;4 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/cbl.30545\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1002/cbl.30545\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHossain, M.M., Abdulla, F., Hai, A., et al.: Exploring the prevalence, duration and determinants of participation in household chores among children aged 5\u0026ndash;17 years in Bangladesh. Child Indic. Res. (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-023-10051-z\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s12187-023-10051-z\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, S.Y., Pang, B.W.J., Lau, L.K., Jabbar, K.A., Seah, W.T., Chen, K.K., et al.: Cross-sectional associations of housework with cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions in younger and older community-dwelling adults: The Yishun Study. BMJ Open 11, e052557 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052557\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052557\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLicardo, M., Gencel, I.E.: Teaching for the Future in Early Childhood Education. In: Licardo, M. (ed.) Teaching for the Future in Early Childhood Education (2023). Available online: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/370124649\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370124649\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (accessed 20 Sept 2025)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDunn, L.: Validation of the CHORES: a measure of school-aged children's participation in household tasks. Scand. J. Occup. Ther. 11, 179\u0026ndash;190 (2004). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/11038120410003673\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/11038120410003673\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSpitze, G., Ward, R.: Household labor in intergeneration households. J. Marriage Fam. 57, 355\u0026ndash;361 (1995)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBenin, M.H., Edwards, D.A.: Adolescents\u0026rsquo; chores: The difference between dual- and single-earner families. J. Marriage Fam. 52, 361\u0026ndash;373 (1990)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWhite, E.M., DeBoer, M.D., Scharf, R.J.: Associations between household chores and childhood self-competency. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 40, 176\u0026ndash;182 (2019). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000637\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1097/DBP.0000000000000637\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Young children\u0026rsquo;s housework participation in Taiwan: Serial multiple mediations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 15448 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315448\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/ijerph192315448\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLinebarger, D.L., Piotrowski, J.T.: TV as storyteller: How exposure to television narratives impacts at-risk preschoolers\u0026rsquo; story knowledge and narrative skills. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 27, 47\u0026ndash;69 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen, R.S.: The influences of accessing opportunities on applied information technology-assisted learning performance for young children. J. Liberal Arts Soc. Sci. 8, 277\u0026ndash;299 (2012). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.29506/JLASS.201212.0001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.29506/JLASS.201212.0001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChristakis, D.A., Garrison, M.M., Herrenkohl, T., Haggerty, K., Rivara, F.P., Zhou, C., Liekweg, K.: Modifying media content for preschool children: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 131, 431 (2013)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Children\u0026rsquo;s health, parent-child activities, using digital devices, and social competence: Serial mediation. Health 15, 883\u0026ndash;894 (2023). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.4236/health.2023.158058\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.4236/health.2023.158058\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePeou, C.: Cambodia\u0026rsquo;s broadcast TV: Promotion of consumerist desires. Asia Eur. J. 7, 417\u0026ndash;431 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChiu, F.H., Chen, R.S., Chiu, C.C.: The survey study of early childhood educators\u0026rsquo; attitudes toward applied digital media into instructions for young children. Early Child. Educ. 292, 48\u0026ndash;59 (2008). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.6367/ECE.200812.0048\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.6367/ECE.200812.0048\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWeinberger, N., Anderson, T., Schumacher, P.: Young children\u0026rsquo;s access and use of computers in family child care and child care centers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25, 183\u0026ndash;190 (2009)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAdams, M.J.: Technology for Developing Children\u0026rsquo;s Language and Literacy: Bringing Speech Recognition to the Classroom. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, New York (2011)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhou, Z., et al.: Digital intervention in children with developmental language disorder (DLD): A systematic review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 13, e59992 (2025). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e59992\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://mhealth.jmir.org/2025/1/e59992\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang, S.-M.: The concepts and reflections on integrating information education into early childhood education curriculum. Taiwan Educ. Rev. Mon. 7, 144\u0026ndash;148 (2018)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMayer, R.E.: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, pp. 31\u0026ndash;48. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLee, C.F., Tang, S.M.: Can AI robot teaching improve children\u0026rsquo;s performance in housework? A quasi-experimental study. Children 11, 1330 (2024). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/children11101330\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/children11101330\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTsai, M.H., Lin, C.W.: A study on the effect of using intelligent robots to assist the intergenerational learning on improving the sensory integration of young children and the depression of the elderly. Curric. Instr. Q. 25, 23\u0026ndash;52 (2022). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202207_25(3\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.6384/CIQ.202207_25(3\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e).0002\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDepartment of Statistics, Ministry of the Interior: Statistical bulletin of the Ministry of the Interior: Analysis of household numbers and types. Ministry of the Interior, Taipei (2024). Available online: \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://www.moi.gov.tw/stat\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e (accessed 20 Sept 2025)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeshel, D.S., McGlynn, R.P.: Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educ. Gerontol. 30, 457\u0026ndash;479 (2004)\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAday, R.H., Sims, C.R., McDuffie, W., Evans, E.: Changing children\u0026rsquo;s attitudes toward the elderly: The longitudinal effects of an intergenerational partners program. J. Res. Child. Educ. 10, 143\u0026ndash;151 (1996). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/02568549609594897\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/02568549609594897\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eS\u0026aacute;nchez-Cazalla, V., Maraver-L\u0026oacute;pez, P., Muro-Culebras, A.: Impact of intergenerational programmes on older adults through a \u0026ldquo;Time after Time\u0026rdquo; event. Discov. Soc. Sci. Health 2, 58 (2025). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dssh.2025.100058\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.dssh.2025.100058\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLai, D.W.L.: Intergenerational engagement and challenges. J. Intergener. Relatsh. (2025). Advance online publication. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2023.2287229\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/15350770.2023.2287229\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu, H.Y., Lin, Y.P., Wu, Z.Y.: Together old and young: Intergenerational learning and its implications for intergenerational care. Taiwan J. Soc. Welf. 17, 99\u0026ndash;143 (2021). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.202112_17(2).03\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.6265/TJSW.202112_17(2).03\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"AI robot, Intergenerational household activity, Children’s competence in household chores‧Parent–child center","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eThis study investigated the effectiveness of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) robot-assisted instruction into \u0026ldquo;intergenerational household activity\u0026rdquo; programs conducted in parent\u0026ndash;child centers, with the objective of enhancing young children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores. A one-group pretest\u0026ndash;posttest design was employed. Participants comprised 50 parent\u0026ndash;child dyads recruited from four parent\u0026ndash;child centers in Taoyuan City. The intervention, lasting four weeks, consisted of weekly 30-minute sessions. Instructional content was structured into four researcher-designed units of \u0026ldquo;Intergenerational Household Chores,\u0026rdquo; supported by AI robot-assisted materials. Data were collected using the Young Children\u0026rsquo;s Household Chores Preferences and Abilities Questionnaire, administered pre- and post-intervention, supplemented with session-specific parental feedback forms. The findings indicated that AI robot-assisted intergenerational household activities significantly improved young children\u0026rsquo;s competence in household chores, with particularly pronounced effects among children who initially demonstrated lower levels of competence. These results suggest that incorporating technological media into early childhood education programs can not only enhance children\u0026rsquo;s household task abilities but also strengthen parents\u0026rsquo; skills and motivation in guiding children\u0026rsquo;s domestic participation.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"The Effect of AI Robot-Assisted Intergenerational Housework Activity on Young Children’s Competence in Household Chores","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-10-21 23:19:26","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7723909/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"
[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"3dfc87f0-441f-4cfb-9a92-265e78e83ede","owner":[],"postedDate":"October 21st, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-01-04T08:54:18+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-10-21 23:19:26","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7723909","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7723909","identity":"rs-7723909","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.