The risk factors and prognostic impact of different benign pathologic types of background endometrium surrounding endometrial polyps
This study identified genital tract infection, adenomyosis, hydrosalpinx, age, and BMI as risk factors for specific benign endometrial backgrounds surrounding polyps, which were also linked to higher polyp recurrence and abnormal bleeding.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective study evaluated 206 patients who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy with biopsies of the surrounding background endometrium, categorizing them into normal proliferative endometrium, polypoid hyperplastic endometrium (PHE), chronic endometritis (CE), and non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NEH). Using univariable comparisons and multivariable logistic regression, the authors identified independent risk factors for having EPs with a background of CE, including genital tract infection history, adenomyosis, and hydrosalpinx; they also found age and BMI associated with EPs with a background of NEH. During 12 months of follow-up, patients with PHE showed higher recurrence of EPs, and background endometrium types PHE, CE, and NEH were linked to poorer control of abnormal uterine bleeding. The study is limited by its retrospective design and a relatively short follow-up period. This paper is centrally about endometriosis/adenomyosis in the context of adenomyosis as an independent risk factor for endometrial polyps with chronic endometritis background, and it also reports adenomyosis explicitly within its prognostic risk-factor analysis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,075 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-09-13T06:08:19.851723+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine