Clinical Study on the Application of Biological Mesh and Synthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair

Clinical Study on the Application of Biological Mesh and Synthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Clinical Study on the Application of Biological Mesh and Synthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair Shuai Chang, Yao Zhao, Di Zhang, Shunle Li, Hongjun Zhai, Hong Ji This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Objective To study the effectiveness and safety of biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods Through a retrospective study, 200 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2019 to March 2022 were divided into two groups. The group repaired with acellular matrix biological mesh was set as the experimental group (100 cases), and the group repaired with polypropylene mesh was set as the control group (100 cases). The surgical method was laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay of the patients in the two groups were mainly compared, as well as the recurrence rate of hernia, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, seroma, foreign body sensation, chronic pain and other conditions. Results There were no significant differences in general data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and other aspects between the two groups of patients ( P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the recurrence rate of hernia, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, the incidence of seroma, the incidence of chronic pain and other aspects between the two groups of patients ( P > 0.05). The incidence of foreign body sensation after operation in the control group was higher than that in the experimental group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). Conclusion The acellular matrix biological mesh is safe and effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, and can reduce the incidence of postoperative foreign body sensation at the same time, providing a new choice for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Introduction Inguinal hernia is a common surgical disease. With the development of treatment strategies, reducing the use of permanent implanted meshes and avoiding the long-term effects of meshes on the body are the current development trends. More than 30 years ago, Lichtenstein reported the tension-free repair of inguinal hernia [1], which has since become the most widely used surgical procedure in the treatment of inguinal hernia [2]. As for the repair materials, polypropylene synthetic mesh is the most widely used in the tension-free repair of inguinal hernia at present. Its use has greatly reduced the recurrence rate after inguinal hernia surgery. However, its related complications, such as acute and chronic mesh infection, chronic pain, foreign body sensation in the inguinal region, erosion of adjacent organs, etc., have attracted more and more attention [3]. Biological mesh has become a new research hotspot in the field of hernia surgery due to its good tissue compatibility, anti-infective property and degradability [4]. The acellular tissue matrix of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) mesh is a new type of hernia repair material. At present, there are few literature reports on its repair effect, especially the effectiveness of it in the common surgical procedure TAPP for inguinal hernia has not been verified by high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies. Therefore, this study compared the clinical data of the application of acellular matrix biological mesh and polypropylene mesh in TAPP to verify the safety and effectiveness of the acellular matrix biological mesh, and provide a basis for the application of biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Materials and Methods Study population and design This study was reviewed by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. A total of 200 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2019 to March 2022 were divided into two groups. Among them, 100 patients were in the experimental group, using the acellular matrix biological mesh of porcine small intestinal submucosa (15×10 cm) produced by Shaanxi Bio Regenerative Medicine Co., Ltd., and the other 100 patients were in the control group, using the lightweight large-mesh 3D polypropylene mesh (Shanshi 15×9 cm) produced by Beijing Transeasy Medical Technology Co., Ltd., and all underwent TAPP surgery. Inclusion criteria: (1) meeting the diagnostic criteria of inguinal hernia, confirmed by B-ultrasound examination; (2) age ≥ 18 years old; (3) non-emergency surgery. Exclusion criteria: (1) recurrent hernia or incarcerated hernia; (2) history of abdominal surgery; (3) combined with malignant tumor, immune system diseases, potential infection; (4) combined with severe liver and kidney insufficiency; (5) coagulation dysfunction. Surgical technique TAPP procedure: All surgeries were performed by a skilled surgeon. Combined intravenous-inhalation general anesthesia was used, and the patient was placed in a head-low and foot-high position at an angle of 15°. A urinary catheter was inserted before the operation. Surgical process: (1) Placement of trocars: The pneumoperitoneum pressure was 12 mmHg. A 10 mm trocar was inserted above the umbilicus as an observation port, and a 30° laparoscope was inserted. Under direct vision, a 5 mm trocar was inserted on each side of the rectus abdominis muscle beside the umbilicus as an operating port; (2) Separation of the preperitoneal space: The peritoneum was incised 2 cm above the hernia ring, extending outward to the anterior superior iliac spine and inward not exceeding the medial umbilical fold. The preperitoneal space was dissected to expose the inferior epigastric vessels, pubic symphysis, iliopubic tract, pectineal ligament, etc. The hernia sac was dissected and pulled back, and the dissection was continued until the spermatic cord (or round ligament of the uterus) was denuded of the peritoneum. During the process, attention was paid to avoiding damage to the blood vessels; (3) Placement and fixation of the mesh: The mesh was placed into the abdominal cavity through the umbilical observation port and placed into the dissected preperitoneal space. The mesh completely covered the myopectineal orifice area. The mesh was fixed at 4–5 points with medical glue, including the pectineal ligament, conjoint tendon, etc. (Fig. 1 , 2 ); (4) Suture and closure of the peritoneum: The peritoneal fissure was continuously sutured with 3 − 0 absorbable suture or barbed suture to close the peritoneum. Observation index The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups were recorded respectively. The patients were followed up in the outpatient department at 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after the operation. The recurrence rate, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, seroma, and foreign body sensation were evaluated by physical examination and pelvic CT examination. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the postoperative pain of the patients in the two groups. Postoperative pain lasting for more than 3 months was defined as chronic pain. Statistical analysis SPSS 24.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. Count data were expressed as cases or percentages (%), and chi-square ( χ 2 ) test was performed; measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and t-test was performed for comparison between the two groups. Repeated variance test was used for comparison at different time points. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The patients in both the experimental group and the control group completed the surgery smoothly and the postoperative follow-up was also completed smoothly. There were no significant differences in general data such as age, gender, body mass index, and type of inguinal hernia between the two groups of patients (Table 1 ). There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay (Table 2 ). Within 3 years, there was no recurrence in both groups, and there was no infection of the incision and the mesh. There were no significant differences in the incidence of seroma and chronic pain between the two groups. The incidence of foreign body sensation after operation in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group ( P < 0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (Table 3 ). Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups Variables Gender Age (years) BMI Type of hernia male female (kg/m 2 ) Indirect Direct Femoral Control group(n = 100) 84 16 60.8 ± 7.8 23.39 ± 1.75 64 32 4 Experimental group(n = 100) 88 12 58.8 ± 7.6 22.96 ± 1.64 67 28 5 P -value 0.67 0.20 0.21 0.80 Table 2 Comparison of surgical situations between the two groups Variables Operation time /min Intraoperative blood loss /ml Postoperative hospital stay /d Control group(n = 100) 60.46 ± 9.72 6.58 ± 2.32 1.15 ± 0.14 Experimental group(n = 100) 61.42 ± 7.78 6.06 ± 2.31 1.18 ± 0.18 P -value 0.58 0.28 0.81 Table 3 Comparison of the incidence of complications between the two groups Variables Recurrence Infection Seroma Chronic pain Foreign body sensation Control group(n = 100) 0 0 8 3 10 Experimental group(n = 100) 0 0 10 2 2 P -value 0.62 1.00 0.03 Discussion For adult inguinal hernia, tension-free hernia repair is a recognized and effective surgical procedure. With the development of laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair, including laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP), has become the main surgical procedure for inguinal hernia, and the proportion is increasing rapidly [5–6]. Compared with the traditional open surgical method, laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less pain, quick recovery, and low wound infection rate [7–8]; in terms of the repair range, laparoscopic surgery can cover the entire myopectineal orifice. Compared with traditional surgery, theoretically, it can reduce the recurrence rate, and for the situation where there are two or more types of hernias on the same side at the same time, it can reduce the missed diagnosis rate. With the increasing application of laparoscopic surgery, the situation of contralateral occult hernia is gradually increasing in clinical practice. Bilateral hernia repair can be completed without increasing the number of puncture holes, which is another major advantage of laparoscopic surgery [9]. It is precisely because of these advantages that more and more hospitals and doctors are more inclined to choose laparoscopic surgery for patients who can tolerate it. At present, the main repair material for inguinal hernia repair is still the synthetic mesh, and the polypropylene mesh is the most common. Most artificial synthetic meshes strengthen the abdominal wall or repair the defect by inducing the host's foreign body reaction and generating dense scar tissue that wraps the mesh. While artificial synthetic meshes reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence, they also bring some complications, such as mesh infection, enteric fistula or bladder fistula caused by mesh erosion, local foreign body sensation, chronic pain [10]; due to the formation of local inflammatory reaction and scar tissue, the compliance of the abdominal wall will be reduced. For women who have not given birth, the synthetic mesh is not suitable. For unmarried and childless men, the possible vas deferens obstruction caused by the synthetic mesh should be considered. Although many reports believe that the impact of the synthetic mesh on fertility is unclear, the use of synthetic mesh for unmarried and childless men should be cautious [11–12]. The acellular tissue matrix mesh is the most widely used type of biological mesh at present. It is derived from animal tissues. The acellular technology is used to remove various cells contained in the tissues, and the extracellular matrix containing collagen and the three-dimensional framework are retained. The mechanism of tissue repair after implantation into the human body is "endogenous tissue regeneration": (1) After implantation, the matrix is rapidly revascularized, and circulating stem cells enter the damaged tissue; (2) Stem cells accumulate and adhere to the matrix in this area; (3) Gradually differentiate into specific tissue cells; (4) The newly differentiated cells regenerate new matrix for the regenerated tissue. This repair process will not form a large amount of scar tissue, and there is no permanent foreign body remaining in the body. Theoretically, it avoids the related complications caused by the inflammatory reaction, such as mesh infection, erosion, etc. The newly formed tissue has the same physiological function and strength as the healthy tissue. Based on the above characteristics, biological mesh is the main research direction of the next generation of hernia repair materials [13–14]. There are many types of biological meshes, among which porcine-derived materials and bovine-derived materials are the most common. The acellular tissue matrix material of porcine small intestinal submucosa has obvious advantages compared with materials such as acellular dermal matrix and collagen sponge: 1) It has good hydrophilicity, which is conducive to the infiltration of body fluids into the material and vascularization, and is conducive to the growth of cells into the interior of the material, promoting tissue repair; 2) It has high mechanical strength and can meet the needs of abdominal wall repair. A small number of foreign literature reports suggest that biological mesh can be applied in open hernia repair or laparoscopic hernia repair [15–16]. In recent years, with the development of domestic biological meshes and the decrease in price, the proportion of biological mesh application in inguinal hernia repair has gradually increased, and its actual effect needs to be proved by more clinical trials to provide data support for the clinical application of biological mesh. This study showed that the use of biological mesh in TAPP is safe and effective. During the 3-year follow-up period after the operation, compared with the synthetic mesh, there were no significant differences in the recurrence rate, seroma, mesh infection rate, chronic pain, etc., and the incidence of local foreign body sensation was lower, which is consistent with the degradable property of the biological mesh. As for the possible local erosion caused by the synthetic mesh, such as erosion of the intestine or bladder, leading to enteric fistula or bladder fistula, theoretically, it is impossible to occur with the biological mesh. Biological mesh can be well integrated into the body, providing a three-dimensional scaffold, and degrading after the growth of its own tissue. It has the required tensile strength and anti-infective ability, and has a very good application prospect. In the old view, biological mesh was only considered for special populations (such as those who have not given birth, patients with incarcerated hernia). With the decrease in the price of biological mesh, the proportion of biological mesh application in hernia repair for the general population has gradually increased. This requires large-scale patient studies, multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trials, and longer-term follow-up to verify its safety and effectiveness. In conclusion, the use of biological mesh in TAPP is safe and feasible. Without increasing the operation time and recurrence risk, the incidence of local foreign body sensation is lower. We will continue the follow-up observation in the future and further expand the sample size to further observe and summarize the long-term curative effect of the biological mesh. Declarations Ethical approval and consent to participate This study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi 'an Jiaotong University, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication All presentations of case reports have consent for publication. Data availability The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Competing interests All the authors declare no competing interests. Funding This work was supported by Natural science basic research project of Shaanxi Province（No.2023-JC-YB-637）. Authors' contributions Shuai Chang sorted out the data and wrote articles. Yao Zhao assisted in sorting out the data and carried out statistical analysis. Di Zhang, Shunle Li and Hongjun Zhai assisted in revising the first draft. Hong Ji participated in the design and guided the experiment. Acknowledgements We gratefully thank the staff members in the Department of General Surgery of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University for their suggestion and assistance. References Lichtenstein I L, Shulman A G, Amid P K, Montllor M M. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989; 157: 188-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6 Amid P K. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg. 2005; 29: 1046-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x Robinson T N, Clarke J H, Schoen J, Walsh M D. Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 1556-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0120-y Sun L, Chen J, Shen Y M, Chu C B. Application of biologic mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2017; 37: 1223-7. Wang M G, Shen Y M, Chen J. Discussion of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2016; 96: 1588-90. The Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Group of the Chinese Society of Surgery, the Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgeon Committee of the Chinese College of Surgeons. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment on the groin hernia(2024 edition). Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery. 2025; 24: 143-50. Liang G D, Xu Z, Yang Y B. Effects on the efficacy and postoperative complications in elderly patients with inguinal hernia using laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2019; 13: 589-92. Zhou X H, Rui H Q, Xu G Q, Wang R. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and Lichtenstein hernia repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2023; 17: 432-6. Feliu X, Claver A R, Besora P, Camps J, Fernández-Sallent E, Viñas X, Abad J M. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach?. Hernia. 2011; 15: 15-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0736-2 Attaar M, Forester B, Chirayil S, Su B, Wong H J, Kuchta K, Linn J, Denham W, Haggerty S, Ujiki M B. Mesh in Elective Hernia Repair: 10-Year Experience with over 6,000 Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 233: 51-62. Khodari M, Ouzzane A, Marcelli F, Yakoubi R, Mitchell V, Zerbib P, Rigot J-M. Azoospermia and a history of inguinal hernia repair in adult. Prog Urol. 2015; 25: 692-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.008 Shin D, Lipshultz L I, Goldstein M, Barmé G A, Fuchs E F, Nagler H M. Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 553-8. Köckerling F, Alam N N, Narang S K, Daniels I R, Smart N J. Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair - Review of the Literature. Front Surg. 2015; 2: 1-5. Chen S Y, Dai W G, Chen C Q. Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2018; 12: 90-3. Bochicchio G V, Jain A, Mcgonigal K, Turner D, Ilahi O, Reese S, Bochicchio K. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 751-7. Agresta F, Bedin N. Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: is there a place for biological mesh?. Hernia. 2008; 12: 609-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0390-0 Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-6501835","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":458803070,"identity":"4574720d-9d6e-4f0d-8f55-a7aee2b5682f","order_by":0,"name":"Shuai Chang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shuai","middleName":"","lastName":"Chang","suffix":""},{"id":458803071,"identity":"f13650ae-3390-4dd3-805b-973ccf16c074","order_by":1,"name":"Yao Zhao","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yao","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhao","suffix":""},{"id":458803072,"identity":"f62f04d6-d821-4d46-a682-e6704d55c052","order_by":2,"name":"Di Zhang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Di","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhang","suffix":""},{"id":458803073,"identity":"caed8dbd-0d20-438f-891d-0cec5910d94b","order_by":3,"name":"Shunle Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Shunle","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""},{"id":458803074,"identity":"c17ac347-7156-451e-ad84-32e704c4df39","order_by":4,"name":"Hongjun Zhai","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hongjun","middleName":"","lastName":"Zhai","suffix":""},{"id":458803075,"identity":"15cbea2e-7461-4125-95a4-4e28d638a457","order_by":5,"name":"Hong Ji","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Hong","middleName":"","lastName":"Ji","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-04-22 08:08:26","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":83282468,"identity":"43b9a510-a56b-4b3b-aebe-1f797450c0b9","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-22 10:38:11","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":396393,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePlacement of polypropylene patch\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6501835/v1/9a86642e392a84b1db892d15.png"},{"id":83282008,"identity":"e27eb594-d048-4871-8510-40486ffcb93b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-22 10:30:11","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":354261,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003ePlacement of Acellular matrix biological patch\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6501835/v1/14241e4731373d673752614e.png"},{"id":83626472,"identity":"e29ff338-4810-40ff-8841-c1f09e28c5a8","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-05-29 17:01:40","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1504409,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-6501835/v1/5e80d1ce-bd2d-4b83-b78a-5de2ff646e08.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Clinical Study on the Application of Biological Mesh and Synthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eInguinal hernia is a common surgical disease. With the development of treatment strategies, reducing the use of permanent implanted meshes and avoiding the long-term effects of meshes on the body are the current development trends. More than 30 years ago, Lichtenstein reported the tension-free repair of inguinal hernia [1], which has since become the most widely used surgical procedure in the treatment of inguinal hernia [2]. As for the repair materials, polypropylene synthetic mesh is the most widely used in the tension-free repair of inguinal hernia at present. Its use has greatly reduced the recurrence rate after inguinal hernia surgery. However, its related complications, such as acute and chronic mesh infection, chronic pain, foreign body sensation in the inguinal region, erosion of adjacent organs, etc., have attracted more and more attention [3]. Biological mesh has become a new research hotspot in the field of hernia surgery due to its good tissue compatibility, anti-infective property and degradability [4]. The acellular tissue matrix of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) mesh is a new type of hernia repair material. At present, there are few literature reports on its repair effect, especially the effectiveness of it in the common surgical procedure TAPP for inguinal hernia has not been verified by high-quality randomized controlled clinical studies. Therefore, this study compared the clinical data of the application of acellular matrix biological mesh and polypropylene mesh in TAPP to verify the safety and effectiveness of the acellular matrix biological mesh, and provide a basis for the application of biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec2\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStudy population and design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e This study was reviewed by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. A total of 200 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2019 to March 2022 were divided into two groups. Among them, 100 patients were in the experimental group, using the acellular matrix biological mesh of porcine small intestinal submucosa (15\u0026times;10 cm) produced by Shaanxi Bio Regenerative Medicine Co., Ltd., and the other 100 patients were in the control group, using the lightweight large-mesh 3D polypropylene mesh (Shanshi 15\u0026times;9 cm) produced by Beijing Transeasy Medical Technology Co., Ltd., and all underwent TAPP surgery. Inclusion criteria: (1) meeting the diagnostic criteria of inguinal hernia, confirmed by B-ultrasound examination; (2) age\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;18 years old; (3) non-emergency surgery. Exclusion criteria: (1) recurrent hernia or incarcerated hernia; (2) history of abdominal surgery; (3) combined with malignant tumor, immune system diseases, potential infection; (4) combined with severe liver and kidney insufficiency; (5) coagulation dysfunction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSurgical technique\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eTAPP procedure: All surgeries were performed by a skilled surgeon. Combined intravenous-inhalation general anesthesia was used, and the patient was placed in a head-low and foot-high position at an angle of 15\u0026deg;. A urinary catheter was inserted before the operation. Surgical process: (1) Placement of trocars: The pneumoperitoneum pressure was 12 mmHg. A 10 mm trocar was inserted above the umbilicus as an observation port, and a 30\u0026deg; laparoscope was inserted. Under direct vision, a 5 mm trocar was inserted on each side of the rectus abdominis muscle beside the umbilicus as an operating port; (2) Separation of the preperitoneal space: The peritoneum was incised 2 cm above the hernia ring, extending outward to the anterior superior iliac spine and inward not exceeding the medial umbilical fold. The preperitoneal space was dissected to expose the inferior epigastric vessels, pubic symphysis, iliopubic tract, pectineal ligament, etc. The hernia sac was dissected and pulled back, and the dissection was continued until the spermatic cord (or round ligament of the uterus) was denuded of the peritoneum. During the process, attention was paid to avoiding damage to the blood vessels; (3) Placement and fixation of the mesh: The mesh was placed into the abdominal cavity through the umbilical observation port and placed into the dissected preperitoneal space. The mesh completely covered the myopectineal orifice area. The mesh was fixed at 4\u0026ndash;5 points with medical glue, including the pectineal ligament, conjoint tendon, etc. (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e); (4) Suture and closure of the peritoneum: The peritoneal fissure was continuously sutured with 3\u0026thinsp;\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;0 absorbable suture or barbed suture to close the peritoneum.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eObservation index\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay of the two groups were recorded respectively. The patients were followed up in the outpatient department at 1, 3, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after the operation. The recurrence rate, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, seroma, and foreign body sensation were evaluated by physical examination and pelvic CT examination. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the postoperative pain of the patients in the two groups. Postoperative pain lasting for more than 3 months was defined as chronic pain.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eStatistical analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSPSS 24.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. Count data were expressed as cases or percentages (%), and chi-square (\u003cem\u003eχ\u003c/em\u003e\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e) test was performed; measurement data were expressed as mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;standard deviation, and t-test was performed for comparison between the two groups. Repeated variance test was used for comparison at different time points. A p-value of \u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05 was considered statistically significant.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe patients in both the experimental group and the control group completed the surgery smoothly and the postoperative follow-up was also completed smoothly. There were no significant differences in general data such as age, gender, body mass index, and type of inguinal hernia between the two groups of patients (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e). There were no significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative hospital stay (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). Within 3 years, there was no recurrence in both groups, and there was no infection of the incision and the mesh. There were no significant differences in the incidence of seroma and chronic pain between the two groups. The incidence of foreign body sensation after operation in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05), and the difference was statistically significant (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of general data between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGender\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\" morerows=\"1\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge (years)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBMI\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c8\" namest=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eType of hernia\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003emale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003efemale\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e(kg/m\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndirect\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDirect\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemoral\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e23.39\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.75\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e64\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperimental group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e88\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e58.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e22.96\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.64\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" nameend=\"c3\" namest=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.67\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.20\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.21\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"3\" nameend=\"c8\" namest=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of surgical situations between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eOperation time /min\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntraoperative blood loss /ml\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePostoperative hospital stay /d\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e60.46\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.72\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.58\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.32\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.14\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperimental group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e61.42\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.78\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.06\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.31\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.18\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.18\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.58\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.28\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.81\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eComparison of the incidence of complications between the two groups\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVariables\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecurrence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eInfection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeroma\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChronic pain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eForeign body sensation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExperimental group(n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;100)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e10\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e-value\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.62\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.03\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eFor adult inguinal hernia, tension-free hernia repair is a recognized and effective surgical procedure. With the development of laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic tension-free inguinal hernia repair, including laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP), has become the main surgical procedure for inguinal hernia, and the proportion is increasing rapidly [5\u0026ndash;6]. Compared with the traditional open surgical method, laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less pain, quick recovery, and low wound infection rate [7\u0026ndash;8]; in terms of the repair range, laparoscopic surgery can cover the entire myopectineal orifice. Compared with traditional surgery, theoretically, it can reduce the recurrence rate, and for the situation where there are two or more types of hernias on the same side at the same time, it can reduce the missed diagnosis rate. With the increasing application of laparoscopic surgery, the situation of contralateral occult hernia is gradually increasing in clinical practice. Bilateral hernia repair can be completed without increasing the number of puncture holes, which is another major advantage of laparoscopic surgery [9]. It is precisely because of these advantages that more and more hospitals and doctors are more inclined to choose laparoscopic surgery for patients who can tolerate it.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt present, the main repair material for inguinal hernia repair is still the synthetic mesh, and the polypropylene mesh is the most common. Most artificial synthetic meshes strengthen the abdominal wall or repair the defect by inducing the host's foreign body reaction and generating dense scar tissue that wraps the mesh. While artificial synthetic meshes reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence, they also bring some complications, such as mesh infection, enteric fistula or bladder fistula caused by mesh erosion, local foreign body sensation, chronic pain [10]; due to the formation of local inflammatory reaction and scar tissue, the compliance of the abdominal wall will be reduced. For women who have not given birth, the synthetic mesh is not suitable. For unmarried and childless men, the possible vas deferens obstruction caused by the synthetic mesh should be considered. Although many reports believe that the impact of the synthetic mesh on fertility is unclear, the use of synthetic mesh for unmarried and childless men should be cautious [11\u0026ndash;12].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe acellular tissue matrix mesh is the most widely used type of biological mesh at present. It is derived from animal tissues. The acellular technology is used to remove various cells contained in the tissues, and the extracellular matrix containing collagen and the three-dimensional framework are retained. The mechanism of tissue repair after implantation into the human body is \"endogenous tissue regeneration\": (1) After implantation, the matrix is rapidly revascularized, and circulating stem cells enter the damaged tissue; (2) Stem cells accumulate and adhere to the matrix in this area; (3) Gradually differentiate into specific tissue cells; (4) The newly differentiated cells regenerate new matrix for the regenerated tissue. This repair process will not form a large amount of scar tissue, and there is no permanent foreign body remaining in the body. Theoretically, it avoids the related complications caused by the inflammatory reaction, such as mesh infection, erosion, etc. The newly formed tissue has the same physiological function and strength as the healthy tissue. Based on the above characteristics, biological mesh is the main research direction of the next generation of hernia repair materials [13\u0026ndash;14].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThere are many types of biological meshes, among which porcine-derived materials and bovine-derived materials are the most common. The acellular tissue matrix material of porcine small intestinal submucosa has obvious advantages compared with materials such as acellular dermal matrix and collagen sponge: 1) It has good hydrophilicity, which is conducive to the infiltration of body fluids into the material and vascularization, and is conducive to the growth of cells into the interior of the material, promoting tissue repair; 2) It has high mechanical strength and can meet the needs of abdominal wall repair. A small number of foreign literature reports suggest that biological mesh can be applied in open hernia repair or laparoscopic hernia repair [15\u0026ndash;16]. In recent years, with the development of domestic biological meshes and the decrease in price, the proportion of biological mesh application in inguinal hernia repair has gradually increased, and its actual effect needs to be proved by more clinical trials to provide data support for the clinical application of biological mesh.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study showed that the use of biological mesh in TAPP is safe and effective. During the 3-year follow-up period after the operation, compared with the synthetic mesh, there were no significant differences in the recurrence rate, seroma, mesh infection rate, chronic pain, etc., and the incidence of local foreign body sensation was lower, which is consistent with the degradable property of the biological mesh. As for the possible local erosion caused by the synthetic mesh, such as erosion of the intestine or bladder, leading to enteric fistula or bladder fistula, theoretically, it is impossible to occur with the biological mesh.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBiological mesh can be well integrated into the body, providing a three-dimensional scaffold, and degrading after the growth of its own tissue. It has the required tensile strength and anti-infective ability, and has a very good application prospect. In the old view, biological mesh was only considered for special populations (such as those who have not given birth, patients with incarcerated hernia). With the decrease in the price of biological mesh, the proportion of biological mesh application in hernia repair for the general population has gradually increased. This requires large-scale patient studies, multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled trials, and longer-term follow-up to verify its safety and effectiveness.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn conclusion, the use of biological mesh in TAPP is safe and feasible. Without increasing the operation time and recurrence risk, the incidence of local foreign body sensation is lower. We will continue the follow-up observation in the future and further expand the sample size to further observe and summarize the long-term curative effect of the biological mesh.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical approval and consent to participate\u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi \u0026apos;an Jiaotong University, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll presentations of case reports have consent for publication.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eData availability\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll the authors declare no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e This work was supported by Natural science basic research project of Shaanxi Province（No.2023-JC-YB-637）.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthors\u0026apos; contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eShuai Chang sorted out the data and wrote articles. Yao Zhao assisted in sorting out the data and carried out statistical analysis. Di Zhang, Shunle Li and Hongjun Zhai assisted in revising the first draft. Hong Ji participated in the design and guided the experiment.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe gratefully thank the staff members in the Department of General Surgery of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi\u0026rsquo;an Jiaotong University for their suggestion and assistance.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLichtenstein I L, Shulman A G, Amid P K, Montllor M M. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989; 157: 188-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(89)90526-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmid P K. Groin hernia repair: open techniques. World J Surg. 2005; 29: 1046-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7967-x\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRobinson T N, Clarke J H, Schoen J, Walsh M D. Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. Surg Endosc. 2005; 19: 1556-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0120-y\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSun L, Chen J, Shen Y M, Chu C B. Application of biologic mesh in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery. 2017; 37: 1223-7.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang M G, Shen Y M, Chen J. Discussion of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for recurrent inguinal hernia. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2016; 96: 1588-90.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eThe Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery Group of the Chinese Society of Surgery, the Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgeon Committee of the Chinese College of Surgeons. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment on the groin hernia(2024 edition). Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery. 2025; 24: 143-50.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiang G D, Xu Z, Yang Y B. Effects on the efficacy and postoperative complications in elderly patients with inguinal hernia using laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2019; 13: 589-92.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eZhou X H, Rui H Q, Xu G Q, Wang R. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair and Lichtenstein hernia repair in the treatment of primary inguinal hernia. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2023; 17: 432-6.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFeliu X, Claver A R, Besora P, Camps J, Fern\u0026aacute;ndez-Sallent E, Vi\u0026ntilde;as X, Abad J M. Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach?. Hernia. 2011; 15: 15-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0736-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAttaar M, Forester B, Chirayil S, Su B, Wong H J, Kuchta K, Linn J, Denham W, Haggerty S, Ujiki M B. Mesh in Elective Hernia Repair: 10-Year Experience with over 6,000 Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2021; 233: 51-62. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKhodari M, Ouzzane A, Marcelli F, Yakoubi R, Mitchell V, Zerbib P, Rigot J-M. Azoospermia and a history of inguinal hernia repair in adult. Prog Urol. 2015; 25: 692-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2015.06.008\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShin D, Lipshultz L I, Goldstein M, Barm\u0026eacute; G A, Fuchs E F, Nagler H M. Herniorrhaphy with polypropylene mesh causing inguinal vasal obstruction: a preventable cause of obstructive azoospermia. Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 553-8. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eK\u0026ouml;ckerling F, Alam N N, Narang S K, Daniels I R, Smart N J. Biological Meshes for Inguinal Hernia Repair - Review of the Literature. Front Surg. 2015; 2: 1-5.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen S Y, Dai W G, Chen C Q. Progress of clinical application of biological patch in hernia and abdominal surgery. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2018; 12: 90-3.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBochicchio G V, Jain A, Mcgonigal K, Turner D, Ilahi O, Reese S, Bochicchio K. Biologic vs synthetic inguinal hernia repair: 1-year results of a randomized double-blinded trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 751-7. \u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAgresta F, Bedin N. Transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: is there a place for biological mesh?. Hernia. 2008; 12: 609-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0390-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eObjective\u003c/strong\u003e To study the effectiveness and safety of biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMethods\u003c/strong\u003e Through a retrospective study, 200 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2019 to March 2022 were divided into two groups. The group repaired with acellular matrix biological mesh was set as the experimental group (100 cases), and the group repaired with polypropylene mesh was set as the control group (100 cases). The surgical method was laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay of the patients in the two groups were mainly compared, as well as the recurrence rate of hernia, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, seroma, foreign body sensation, chronic pain and other conditions.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eResults\u003c/strong\u003e There were no significant differences in general data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay and other aspects between the two groups of patients (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026gt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the recurrence rate of hernia, the infection rate of the incision and the mesh, the incidence of seroma, the incidence of chronic pain and other aspects between the two groups of patients (\u003cem\u003eP \u003c/em\u003e\u0026gt; 0.05). The incidence of foreign body sensation after operation in the control group was higher than that in the experimental group, and the difference was statistically significant (\u003cem\u003eP\u003c/em\u003e \u0026lt; 0.05).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConclusion\u003c/strong\u003e The acellular matrix biological mesh is safe and effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, and can reduce the incidence of postoperative foreign body sensation at the same time, providing a new choice for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Clinical Study on the Application of Biological Mesh and Synthetic Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-05-22 10:30:06","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6501835/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"88a3dd33-f7f9-4061-a425-9f8f66fd5354","owner":[],"postedDate":"May 22nd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-07-24T13:08:32+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-05-22 10:30:06","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-6501835","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-6501835","identity":"rs-6501835","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}