The expanding spectrum of robotic gynecologic surgery: A review

Mohamed A. Bedaiwy, Jessica Volsky, Samith Sandadi, Amanda N. Fader
In: Middle East Fertility Society Journal · 2011 · vol. 17(2) , pp. 70–78 · doi:10.1016/j.mefs.2011.11.002 · W2034383648
review OA: diamond CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This review examines the integration of robotic technology in gynecologic surgery for benign and malignant conditions, highlighting potential benefits over laparoscopy alongside current technological limitations.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgical approaches in gynecology have evolved considerably in the last 30 years. The integration of robotic technology represents significant progression along the continuum of minimally invasive operative techniques in gynecology utilized to treat both benign and malignant conditions. Robotic systems have the potential to convert surgical procedures that we presently perform by laparotomy to laparoscopy and are currently utilized in the fields of reproductive endocrinology and fertility, gynecologic oncology and female pelvic medicine/reconstructive surgery. Robotic-assisted procedures may help overcome some of the cited limitations associated with standard laparoscopy, including longer operative times, counterintuitive and limited instrument maneuverability, and lack of formal training and/or a steep learning curve. However, a critical appraisal of robotic systems is essential due to technological limitations. These limitations include a system that is bulky and costly to maintain and does not give haptic feedback, uncertainty about the long-term outcomes following robotic surgery, and the need for a greater number of larger incisions when compared to standard laparoscopy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (49)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK