Distribution and Volume of Extrauterine Disease in Uterine Serous Carcinoma
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This paper examined the patterns and extent of disease spread outside the uterus in patients diagnosed with uterine serous carcinoma.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveMinimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the preferred technique for managing endometrial cancer. Given that uterine serous carcinoma (USC) has a predilection for multiquadrant peritoneal dissemination, our objective was to estimate the potential risk for overlooking occult peritoneal spread with the use of MIS.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective review was conducted of patients who underwent primary surgical staging for endometrial cancer via laparotomy between 1999 and 2008. Patterns of metastases were analyzed to estimate the potential risk for understaging via MIS.ResultsA total of 202 USC cases met inclusion criteria. Pelvic and para-aortic nodes were positive in 59 (36%) of 166 and 43 (31%) of 138, respectively. Stage IVb disease was diagnosed in 77 (38%) of 202 patients. The majority (86%, 66/77) harbored bulky and/or multisite macroscopic abdominal implants. Isolated microscopic peritoneal disease was present in 5 of 77 cases (6% of stage IV, 2% of the entire cohort) but, in all cases, was limited to the omentum; 6 of 77 cases (8% of stage IV, 3% of the cohort) harbored a single implant in the context of a negative omentum but, in all cases, were macroscopic (locations included the ileum, the diaphragm, and the base of the mesentery).ConclusionsFor providers who aim to remove all visible disease in patients with USC, the rate of extrauterine disease escaping detection using MIS is low (<3%) provided an omentectomy is performed together with staging.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (32)
- W113851492 via openalex
- W1965506742 via openalex
- W1985369660 via openalex
- W2001993572 via openalex
- W2007160797 via openalex
- W2019897392 via openalex
- W2026104727 via openalex
- W2030261565 via openalex
- W2031222466 via openalex
- W2052419352 via openalex
- W2058281373 via openalex
- W2058900572 via openalex
- W2063590884 via openalex
- W2065949107 via openalex
- W2068937544 via openalex
- W2069407993 via openalex
- W2070692747 via openalex
- W2074515379 via openalex
- W2089584720 via openalex
- W2092999618 via openalex
- W2095043891 via openalex
- W2101151910 via openalex
- W2109768496 via openalex
- W2111337733 via openalex
- W2113816338 via openalex
- W2124811039 via openalex
- W2130471897 via openalex
- W2158160318 via openalex
- W2163687756 via openalex
- W4237505649 via openalex
- W4252492590 via openalex
- W6674115770 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK