Reproductive surgery in infertility

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 6(10) , pp. 4549 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20174440 · W2758937325
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study evaluated diagnostic laparohysteroscopy in 80 infertility patients, finding it effective for diagnosing and treating correctable uterine, tubal, and pelvic abnormalities missed by other imaging methods.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This retrospective study evaluated the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in 80 infertile patients undergoing diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy at a single hospital between January and July 2017. Key findings were that 66.25% had normal hysteroscopy findings, while therapeutic procedures were performed for identifiable abnormalities including tubal cannulation for cornual block, uterine septum resection, adhesiolysis for Asherman’s syndrome, and removal of endometrial polyps and submucous fibroids; on laparoscopy, 68.75% had normal findings, with interventions such as ovarian drilling for PCOS, adhesiolysis for peritubal adhesions, fulguration of endometriosis, and salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx. The paper’s main limitation is that it assesses diagnostic/therapeutic findings during hystero-laparoscopy in this selected cohort and does not provide comparative outcomes versus bypassing these procedures or explicit statements about diagnostic accuracy. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is explicitly treated in the cohort via laparoscopic fulguration (reported in 6.25% of patients), though the paper’s main focus is the overall role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in infertility rather than endometriosis specifically.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: With recent improvements in the assisted reproductive technology (ART), there has been a growing tendency that bypasses diagnostic laparohysteroscopy and proceeds directly to ART. Therefore, the value of diagnostic laparohysteroscopy in current fertility practice is under debate. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for patients with infertility.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Safal Hospital, Nagpur from January 2017 to July 2017. 80 patients were selected for this study who had undergone diagnostic laparohysteroscopy for infertility.Results: In present study, out of 80 patients studied, 66.25% patients had normal hysteroscopy findings, in 10% of patients, tubal cannulation was done for cornual block, in 6.25% of patients, resection of uterine septum was done, adhesiolysis for asherman’s syndrome was done in 5% of patients, endometrial polyp was removed in 5% of patients, 2.5% patients had resection of submucous fibroid. In 5% patients, cervical dilatation for fibrosis was done in 5% of patients. 68.75% had normal laparoscopy findings, in 8.75% of patients, ovarian drilling for PCOS was done, adhesiolysis for peritubal adhesions was done in 6.25% patients, fulguration of endometriosis was done in 6.25% patients, salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx was done in 5% patients, aspiration of ovarian cyst was done in 2.5% patients.Conclusions: Diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic modality for certain significant and correctable abnormalities in pelvis, tubes and uterus which are missed by other imaging modalities.
Full text 5,119 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

With recent improvements in the assisted reproductive technology (ART), there has been a growing tendency that bypasses diagnostic laparohysteroscopy and proceeds directly to ART. Therefore, the value of diagnostic laparohysteroscopy in current fertility practice is under debate. In the present study, we evaluated the usefulness of diagnostic laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for patients with infertility.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at Safal Hospital, Nagpur from January 2017 to July 2017. 80 patients were selected for this study who had undergone diagnostic laparohysteroscopy for infertility.

Results

In present study, out of 80 patients studied, 66.25% patients had normal hysteroscopy findings, in 10% of patients, tubal cannulation was done for cornual block, in 6.25% of patients, resection of uterine septum was done, adhesiolysis for asherman’s syndrome was done in 5% of patients, endometrial polyp was removed in 5% of patients, 2.5% patients had resection of submucous fibroid. In 5% patients, cervical dilatation for fibrosis was done in 5% of patients. 68.75% had normal laparoscopy findings, in 8.75% of patients, ovarian drilling for PCOS was done, adhesiolysis for peritubal adhesions was done in 6.25% patients, fulguration of endometriosis was done in 6.25% patients, salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx was done in 5% patients, aspiration of ovarian cyst was done in 2.5% patients.

Conclusions

Diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy is an effective diagnostic and therapeutic modality for certain significant and correctable abnormalities in pelvis, tubes and uterus which are missed by other imaging modalities. Metrics

References

Vaid K, Mehra S, Verma M, Jain S, Sharma A, Bhaskaran S. Pan endoscopic approach hysterolaparoscopy as an initial procedure in selected infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):95-8. Bosteels J, Van Herendael B, Weyers S, D'Hooghe T. The position of diagnostic laparoscopy in current fertility practice. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(5):477-85. Erel CT, Senturk LM. Is laparoscopy necessary before assisted reproductive technology? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17(3):243-8. Adamson GD. The modern role of reproductive surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;54(4):710-9. Gordts S. New developments in reproductive surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;27(3):431-40. Tulandi T, Akkour K. Role of reproductive surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology, Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;26(6):747-55. Bettocchi S, Achilarre MT, Ceci O, Luigi S, Fertility-enhancing hysteroscopic surgery. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29(2):75-82. Carneiro MM. What is the role of hysteroscopic surgery in the management of female infertility? A review of literature. Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:105412. Wortman M. See-and-Treat hysteroscopy in the management of endometrial Polyps. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:177-84. Fatum M, Laufer N, Simon A. Investigation of the infertile couple: should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed after normal hysterosalpingography in treating infertility suspected to be of unknown origin?, Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):1-3 Tsuji I, Ami K, Miyazaki A, Hujinami N, Hoshiai H. Benefit of diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with unexplained infertility and normal hysterosalpingography findings. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009;219(1):39-42. Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak A, Ciebiera M, Baran A, Jakiel G. Effectiveness of laparoscopic surgeries in treating infertility related to endometriosis, Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(2):329-31. Nayak PK, Mahapatra PC, Mallick JJ, Swain S, Mitra S, Sahoo J. Role of diagnostic hystero-laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertility: A retrospective study of 300 patients, J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013;6(1):32-34. Kabadi YM, Harsha B. Hysterolaparoscopy in the evaluation and management of female infertility. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):478-81 Zhang E, Zhang Y, Fang L, Li Q, Gu J. Combined hysterolaparoscopy for the diagnosis of female infertility: a retrospective study of 132 patients in china. Mater Sociomed. 2014;26(3):156-7. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, Panayotidis C, Van Herendael B, Gomel V at al. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(1):1-11. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Carlo C, Minozzi S, Spinelli M, Pistotti V, Alviggi C et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22(4):479-96. Donnez J, Langerock S, Lecart C, Thomas K. Incidence of pathological factors not revealed by hysterosalpingography but disclosed by laparoscopy in 500 infertile women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1982;13(6):369-75. Fatnassi R, Kaabia O, Laadhari S, Briki R, Dimassi Z, Bibi M at al. Interest of laparoscopy in infertile couple with normal hysterosalpingography. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014;42(1):20-6.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK