The role of hysterosalpingography in modern gynaecological practice

Other OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-09 ⓘ

This commentary expresses doubt regarding the specific tubal relaxant effects of hyoscine butylbromide and glucagon, noting their broader smooth muscle actions rather than targeted benefits for gynaecological hysterosalpingography.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

In the article on “The role of hysterosalpingography in modern gynaecological practice”, Messrs Rajah, McHugo and Obhrai repeat a time honoured suggestion that a relaxant such as hyoscine butylbromide or glucagon can relax supposed tubal spasm. I have considerable doubt whether these agents have such a specific action. I understand that hyoscine is an anti-cholinergic agent which may induce relaxation of various smooth muscles including that of the Fallopian tubes and also the intestine, whereas the action of glucagon is largely that of producing relaxation of the intestine itself, and it is not considered to be an anti-cholinergic agent.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Hysterosalpingography Butylscopolammonium Bromide Butylscopolammonium Bromide Fallopian Tubes Fallopian Tubes Female Glucagon Glucagon Humans Hysterosalpingography

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

References (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:37.277143+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK