Message Quality and Audience Characteristics Shape Evaluation and Impact of Real-World Social Media Climate Communication

preprint OA: gold CC-BY-4.0
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract To improve climate communication, it is crucial to understand how different audiences respond to pro-climate messages, particularly in information environments where accurate information competes with climate-contrarian disinformation. Here, we analyze responses to real-world climate change information and their downstream consequences for climate change concern and information search behavior. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered a diverse set of real-world pro-climate messages from the social media platform Twitter/X. These pro-climate messages were evaluated on several dimensions by a representative sample of the UK population ( N = 503). Message evaluations from conservative and liberal participants showed substantial covariation, pointing to an overall consensus on the ranking of the persuasive and informative qualities of the messages. Specification curve analysis, in addition, revealed robust main effects on individual differences on message evaluation. Coupling the data with results from a large cross-cultural experiment ( N = 2,226), showed that collective message evaluations shared strong commonalities across nations. These evaluations, in turn, predicted shifts in climate concern and climate information search behavior, with more positively evaluated messages decreasing the likelihood of subsequent engagement with climate-contrarian disinformation. Alongside the empirical data, we release the ClimateChirp database containing validated pro-climate stimuli for future climate communication research. Despite individual differences in responses to climate communication, we found an overall consensus on aggregate ratings across audience groups, which were associated with shifts in concern and behavior after message exposure.
Full text 12,798 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Message Quality and Audience Characteristics Shape Evaluation and Impact of Real-World Social Media Climate Communication | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Message Quality and Audience Characteristics Shape Evaluation and Impact of Real-World Social Media Climate Communication Zahra Rahmani Azad, Tobia Spampatti, Ulf J.J. Hahnel This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract To improve climate communication, it is crucial to understand how different audiences respond to pro-climate messages, particularly in information environments where accurate information competes with climate-contrarian disinformation. Here, we analyze responses to real-world climate change information and their downstream consequences for climate change concern and information search behavior. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered a diverse set of real-world pro-climate messages from the social media platform Twitter/X. These pro-climate messages were evaluated on several dimensions by a representative sample of the UK population ( N = 503). Message evaluations from conservative and liberal participants showed substantial covariation, pointing to an overall consensus on the ranking of the persuasive and informative qualities of the messages. Specification curve analysis, in addition, revealed robust main effects on individual differences on message evaluation. Coupling the data with results from a large cross-cultural experiment ( N = 2,226), showed that collective message evaluations shared strong commonalities across nations. These evaluations, in turn, predicted shifts in climate concern and climate information search behavior, with more positively evaluated messages decreasing the likelihood of subsequent engagement with climate-contrarian disinformation. Alongside the empirical data, we release the ClimateChirp database containing validated pro-climate stimuli for future climate communication research. Despite individual differences in responses to climate communication, we found an overall consensus on aggregate ratings across audience groups, which were associated with shifts in concern and behavior after message exposure. Psychology Environmental Policy climate communication cross-cultural research science communication social media Full Text Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Supplementary Files SupplementalMaterialClimateCommunicationanonymous.pdf Supplementary Information Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-8280655","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":555339323,"identity":"2510fd4f-916b-4cd7-8f56-a172b29b87d9","order_by":0,"name":"Zahra Rahmani Azad","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-972X","institution":"University of Basel","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Zahra","middleName":"Rahmani","lastName":"Azad","suffix":""},{"id":555338135,"identity":"266b38b2-42fd-4217-b927-73aac9675f0f","order_by":1,"name":"Tobia Spampatti","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-6494","institution":"","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Tobia","middleName":"","lastName":"Spampatti","suffix":""},{"id":555338136,"identity":"49a0db19-be2b-496c-ab50-b0e9f3a5c291","order_by":2,"name":"Ulf J.J. Hahnel","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-5899","institution":"University of Lüneburg","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ulf","middleName":"J.J.","lastName":"Hahnel","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-12-04 15:00:02","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":97670357,"identity":"69df8b7a-8a76-492d-baa1-2a2558f971f5","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-08 09:30:25","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":610593,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"MessageQualityPreprintrahmaniEtAl.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8280655/v1_covered_3ff28099-dd3b-4ae7-861a-4aa9806de294.pdf"},{"id":97504175,"identity":"ba768971-982a-4811-9803-2d0a394fb214","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-12-05 07:17:53","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":851117,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eSupplementary Information\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"SupplementalMaterialClimateCommunicationanonymous.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-8280655/v1/8849371a17fdb4847c9c040a.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eMessage Quality and Audience Characteristics Shape Evaluation and Impact of Real-World Social Media Climate Communication\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[{"identity":"0da20f9f-bc22-4c76-9e01-56bde4473e87","identifier":"10.13039/501100001711","name":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","awardNumber":"PCEFPI_203283","order_by":0}],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"Swiss National Science Foundation","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":true,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"climate communication, cross-cultural research, science communication, social media","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eTo improve climate communication, it is crucial to understand how different audiences respond to pro-climate messages, particularly in information environments where accurate information competes with climate-contrarian disinformation. Here, we analyze responses to real-world climate change information and their downstream consequences for climate change concern and information search behavior. Using computational social science techniques, we gathered a diverse set of real-world pro-climate messages from the social media platform Twitter/X. These pro-climate messages were evaluated on several dimensions by a representative sample of the UK population (\u003cem\u003eN\u003c/em\u003e = 503). Message evaluations from conservative and liberal participants showed substantial covariation, pointing to an overall consensus on the ranking of the persuasive and informative qualities of the messages. Specification curve analysis, in addition, revealed robust main effects on individual differences on message evaluation. Coupling the data with results from a large cross-cultural experiment (\u003cem\u003eN \u003c/em\u003e= 2,226), showed that collective message evaluations shared strong commonalities across nations. These evaluations, in turn, predicted shifts in climate concern and climate information search behavior, with more positively evaluated messages decreasing the likelihood of subsequent engagement with climate-contrarian disinformation. Alongside the empirical data, we release the \u003cem\u003eClimateChirp\u003c/em\u003e database containing validated pro-climate stimuli for future climate communication research. Despite individual differences in responses to climate communication, we found an overall consensus on aggregate ratings across audience groups, which were associated with shifts in concern and behavior after message exposure.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Message Quality and Audience Characteristics Shape Evaluation and Impact of Real-World Social Media Climate Communication","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-12-05 07:17:48","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-8280655/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"67332218-bf5f-4795-a22f-cb704d6a59bd","owner":[],"postedDate":"December 5th, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":59105428,"name":"Psychology"},{"id":59105429,"name":"Environmental Policy"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-12-05T07:17:48+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-12-05 07:17:48","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-8280655","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-8280655","identity":"rs-8280655","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0