Understanding different types of repeatability and intra-class correlation for an analysis of biological variation

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Repeatability (more generally known as intraclass correlation) represents an important quantity of interest in many scientific fields. It represents a metric for summarizing variance decomposition to identify sources of variation in an outcome of interest (e.g. organismal traits). The estimation of variance components is often achieved through linear mixed-effect models or their extension, generalized linear mixed-effect models. Here, we review variants of calculating repeatabilities from mixed-effects models for a variety of conditions and applications. We also recommend which variant might be appropriate under what conditions, focusing on behavioural biology/ecology examples. However, the decision is ultimately with the researcher, since it depends upon their research question, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution. We also highlight the importance of the scope of inference, which affects how repeatabilities are used and interpreted. We recommend transparent reporting of statistical results, including all variance components, which are the building blocks of repeatability. This review aims to assist empiricists in choosing an appropriate repeatability variant and interpretation concerning their questions and scope of inference.
Full text 1,981 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Repeatability (more generally known as intraclass correlation) represents an important quantity of interest in many scientific fields. It represents a metric for summarizing variance decomposition to identify sources of variation in an outcome of interest (e.g. organismal traits). The estimation of variance components is often achieved through linear mixed-effect models or their extension, generalized linear mixed-effect models. Here, we review variants of calculating repeatabilities from mixed-effects models for a variety of conditions and applications. We also recommend which variant might be appropriate under what conditions, focusing on behavioural biology/ecology examples. However, the decision is ultimately with the researcher, since it depends upon their research question, and there is no one-size-fits-all solution. We also highlight the importance of the scope of inference, which affects how repeatabilities are used and interpreted. We recommend transparent reporting of statistical results, including all variance components, which are the building blocks of repeatability. This review aims to assist empiricists in choosing an appropriate repeatability variant and interpretation concerning their questions and scope of inference. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X22D1R Subjects Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences

Keywords

variance partitioning coefficients, intra-class correlation, mixed-effects modelling, individual differences, repeatability, variance components Dates Published: 2025-04-05 15:51 Last Updated: 2025-04-05 15:51 License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Conflict of interest statement: None Data and Code Availability Statement: No data Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00