Psychische Operationsverarbeitung nach verschiedenen Formen der Hysterektomie
This study evaluated psychological processing after hysterectomy, finding significantly better self-esteem and reduced grief work at three months for the CASH technique compared to other methods.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated psychological processing and “stress response syndrome” after different hysterectomy techniques in 41 premenopausal, sexually active women with benign disease, assessed 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Women underwent vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopy-assisted, or pelviscopic intrafascial (CASH) hysterectomy, and outcomes were measured using a standardized, prospectively randomized questionnaire with a scoring system plus multiple psychological interviews and the 16-Personality Factor test to support data reliability. The CASH group showed significantly better personal self-image in five comparisons and significantly less grief work related to uterine loss in eight comparisons versus extrafascial techniques, while there were no significant differences among VH, AH, and LAVH. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00