The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation

The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359" }, "headline": "The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French...", "datePublished": "2026-03-05T11:21:53", "dateModified": "2026-03-05T11:21:53", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ashraf Al-Rai" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Dina Imad" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Maya Khater" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background This study seeks to recommend amendments to the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, especially regarding the character assassination crime. The research mainly deals with the current legal framework's ambiguities by clarifying the legal terms and conceptual boundaries associated with this type of crime. The researchers point out that the law needs to be revised in order to include the current digital communicational channels which sometimes become the places of defamation that cause the loss of moral and reputation, thereby lighting the present ways of moral and reputational harm in the digital world. Methods The study adopts a desciptive approach to explore the concept of character assassination from the perspectives of law and theory. Furthermore, a legal analytical approach is employed in order to evaluate the applicable provisions of Jordanian law, especially Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law, through the interpretation of statutory language, the identification of gaps, and the assessment of its concordance with general principles of criminal law and international legal systems. Results The research findings indicate that Jordanian statutes have clearly acknowledged the concept of moral character assassination which is quite the opposite of the approaches taken in some other legal systems. Yet, the prevailing law still does not give a clear picture on the issue of criminal liability. Who can be considered a perpetrator of such crimes is one of the unclear areas in particular. In addition, the law's relevance to digital and internet-based interactions is still not crystal clear, thus leading to uncertainty as regards both enforcement and legal interpretation. Recommendations The research suggests amending the Jordanian Cybercrime Law, specifically Article 16, to make the law more certain and effective. It also recommends to add the word "moral" explicitly and to make the online and digital domains unambiguously referenced so that the law will be able to comprehend present-day reputational harm and adapt to current technological conditions. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359", "name": "The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination..." } } ] } Home Browse The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Al-Rai A, Imad D and Khater M. The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Ashraf Al-Rai https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8480-9686 1 , Dina Imad 2 , Maya Khater 3 Ashraf Al-Rai https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8480-9686 1 , Dina Imad 2 , Maya Khater 3 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 Author details Author details 1 Collage of Law, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 2 Collage of Law, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 3 Collage of Law, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Ashraf Al-Rai Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Dina Imad Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Maya Khater Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS Abstract Background This study seeks to recommend amendments to the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, especially regarding the character assassination crime. The research mainly deals with the current legal framework's ambiguities by clarifying the legal terms and conceptual boundaries associated with this type of crime. The researchers point out that the law needs to be revised in order to include the current digital communicational channels which sometimes become the places of defamation that cause the loss of moral and reputation, thereby lighting the present ways of moral and reputational harm in the digital world. Methods The study adopts a desciptive approach to explore the concept of character assassination from the perspectives of law and theory. Furthermore, a legal analytical approach is employed in order to evaluate the applicable provisions of Jordanian law, especially Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law, through the interpretation of statutory language, the identification of gaps, and the assessment of its concordance with general principles of criminal law and international legal systems. Results The research findings indicate that Jordanian statutes have clearly acknowledged the concept of moral character assassination which is quite the opposite of the approaches taken in some other legal systems. Yet, the prevailing law still does not give a clear picture on the issue of criminal liability. Who can be considered a perpetrator of such crimes is one of the unclear areas in particular. In addition, the law's relevance to digital and internet-based interactions is still not crystal clear, thus leading to uncertainty as regards both enforcement and legal interpretation. Recommendations The research suggests amending the Jordanian Cybercrime Law, specifically Article 16, to make the law more certain and effective. It also recommends to add the word "moral" explicitly and to make the online and digital domains unambiguously referenced so that the law will be able to comprehend present-day reputational harm and adapt to current technological conditions. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Digital Character Assassination; Criminal Jordanian law; French Legislation; Cybercrimes. Corresponding Author(s) Maya Khater ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Maya Khater Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2026 Al-Rai A et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Al-Rai A, Imad D and Khater M. The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 ) First published: 05 Mar 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 ) Latest published: 05 Mar 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 ) Introduction The Jordanian legislator has introduced a new crime under the Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, describing it as “character assassination,” which is in fact the “moral assassination of character”. However, there is still no precise definition given in the law. After a thorough examinations of legal texts in this regard, no clear and explicit definition of the term character assassination could be identified, except the mention of its being close to other types of offenses already existent in Jordanian legislation and in some other countries' laws including France. In this context, comparative laws often categorize character assassination as a part of defamation, libel, spreading false information and rumor collection. As a result, “character assassination” is viewed as a legally ambiguous offense par excellence, which lacks a precise meaning and definition. The term has a wide-ranging connotation, i.e., it refers to a person's moral level where reputations are injured. Such vagueness calls for a thorough study of the offense, its constituent parts, and its distinction from other crimes like defamation, libel, and the spreading of falsehoods that are under Article 15 of Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023. In addition to this, “character assassination” is an offense that is different in nature from the rest of the offenses in the Jordanian legal system, thus making it difficult to establish its material elements. In Article 16, the aforementioned statute gives the following definition: “The dissemination of information, the attributing, or the assigning of acts to a person unjustly that could be classed as character assassination through the use of information networks, information technology, information systems, websites, or social media platforms shall result in imprisonment of not less than three months or a fine of not less than 5,000 Jordanian dinars and not more than 20,000 Jordanian dinars, or both penalties”. On the other hand, the legal system in France regards moral character assassination as “moral defamation” while it still goes under the term “defamation” as per the penal code. The French Press Law of 1881 in its Article 29 defines defamation and libel as “every allegation or accusation that harms the honor or reputation of a person”. Public defamation has been subjected to punishment under Article 32 with fines and compensations for the party wronged among the penalties. The advent of the internet has brought about the challenge of digital defamation. France enacted the Online Hate Law of 2020 with the purpose of controlling the online abuses while the United Kingdom set the Defamation Act 2012 which became the main citation for defamation cases in England and Wales. Yet, defamation laws in Scotland and Northern Ireland are different but still in agreement on the essential principles. One of the main points against the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 is that it does not properly separate moral character assassination from offenses like defamation, libel, and slander; this can be seen in the definitions provided in Article 2. The matter is serious enough to require a detailed analysis, and the research advises the Jordanian legislator to amend the law by clearly distinguishing between the relevant offenses and eliminating any ambiguities with regard to the terms mentioned. Moreover, there is a need for a proper definition of the two related terms “rumor dissemination” and “spreading false or fake news”. The idea of “moral character assassination” was not recognized by early legal scholars, as it was more or less based on the exaggerated or partially true reports that were meant to portray a distorted picture of the target, which could be a person, a public figure, or an institution. Some define it as “death of a person's morality with the physical body still alive”, whereby a mental picture completely opposite to the person's reputation is created. For example, a person of integrity could be the victim of a financial scandal rumor, thus creating the impression of corruption and, consequently, the crime's impact would be greater. Defining the term “character assassination” is not only a theoretical problem but also a practical problem to solve in the legal field, especially in the digital era when information spreads very quickly. In this context, the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 is a landmark measure in overcoming contemporary challenges. Nevertheless, as already pointed out, the employment of ambiguous expressions such as “character assassination” might result in misunderstandings about the nature of offenses and create hurdles in the application of law. In legal systems, the use of accurate terms is of utmost importance since the lack of definitions can lead to different interpretations. Therefore, it is very necessary for the Jordanian legislator to improve the intelligibility of legal definitions and to, in particular, indicate the differences between different acts that damage reputation. The act of providing unambiguous definitions will not only ease the process of legal classification but also protect individuals and society, and mark out clear limits within the legal text. The investigation into character assassination has been done in terms of its legal definition and regulatory measures, which are discussed in two main parts, and finally, the conclusion is drawn along with suggestions based on the analysis of the legal provisions and their effectiveness in dealing with this offense. The issue to be investigated in this research is to assess the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 in terms of its capability to regulate the offense of character assassination, to provide a precise definition of the crime, and to make a clear the difference between character assassination and other crimes like defamation, libel, and slander, and the spreading of false information. Accordingly, the research raises the following fundamental questions: • What is the crime of character assassination? • What are the elements of the crime of character assassination? • What are the shortcomings of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law regarding the regulation of character assassination? • How does character assassination differ from defamation, libel, and the dissemination of false information? Methodology This study adopts a descriptive approach for the exploration of character assassination, its legal and theoretical basis, manifestations, and implications. The case of character assassination is approached through the descriptive method to understand its conceptual aspects and to distinguish it from the adjacent concepts of defamation and libel. Besides, the research takes a legal analytical pathway to assess the current provisions in Jordanian law regarding this type of crime and particularly Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law. The legal analytical method involves a meticulous interpretation of the statutory text, identifying the critical components of the offense, and considering the law's purpose that underlies the provision. It also investigates possible legislative gaps or ambiguities, evaluating the extent to which the provision conforms with the fundamental principles of criminal law, such as legality, proportionality, and legal certainty, and its alignment with comparative and international legal standards. Results 1. The crime of character assassination The Jordanian Penal Code does not offer a definition for the term “character assassination”, just like the French penal legislation, as pointed out in the study's introduction. This term became part of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 and is viewed as an “undefined” or ambiguous concept without any specific definition. Its use is generally for the purpose of representing the damage done to a person's ethical reputation. The concept of moral character assassination was not known to early jurists, as its roots lie in the dissemination of exaggerated or partially truthful information aimed at presenting a distorted and false image of the intended target, whether a natural or legal person ( Icks & Shiraev, 2014 ). Some define it as “killing a person morally while their body remains alive. This is achieved by creating a mental image that completely contradicts what the person is known for. For example, if a person is reputed for integrity, but rumors are spread accusing them of involvement in financial scandals, they become a victim of moral assassination, causing the public to view them as corrupt or immoral” ( Al-Amawi & Balas, 2024 ). A ruling by the Jordanian Court of Cassation stated: “In the context of character assassination, defamation, and distortion of the plaintiffs’ reputation after violating their dignity and personal and public freedoms, the defendant habitually spread false and fabricated rumors against the plaintiffs. They wrote, edited, and published materials in clear Arabic, which were false in substance, fabricated in form, and based on lies” ( AlOmran, Al-Rai, & Alhendi, 2024 ). “The defendant used written language as a tool for character assassination. The published materials and their style of presentation, including permitting their dissemination and using provocative language to attract attention, damaged the plaintiffs’ reputation, especially since internet readers tend to skim content. The allegations and claims made in these published materials were false and deliberately fabricated” ( Cassation Court, 2022 ). A thorough examination of a number of judicial decisions in Jordan reveals that the majority of such cases are related to the crimes of defamation of public authorities. In the latest ruling issued by the Ma'an Magistrates Court in the southern part of Jordan, it is pointed out that: “The act of falsely attributing information to a person, which is considered to be character assassination in violation of Article 16 of the amended Cybercrime Law, the court holds that the writings that the defendant is said to have done consist of all the elements of defamation, slander, and insult but at the same time do not fall under the newly delineated scope of character assassination in the amended Cybercrime Law. As a result, the court proclaims the defendant innocent of this crime, as one of the elements of defamation, slander, and insult is already involved” ( Magistrates Court , 2024 ). The distinction between defamation and character assassination is underscored by this ruling, which however does not provide a clear definition of the latter. The phrase “character assassination” is included in Article 4 of the Jordanian Integrity and Anti-Corruption Law No. 13 of 2016, which declares: The Commission aims to ensure adherence to the principles of national integrity and combat corruption through: − Strengthening values and behavioural codes in public administration. − Ensuring high-quality, transparent, and fair service delivery. − Ensuring public administration compliance with governance principles, equality, and merit-based opportunities. − Guaranteeing transparency in executive authority decisions and public access to information. − Enforcing laws with transparency, achieving justice and equality. − Providing a legal framework for holding decision-makers accountable. − Receiving and addressing complaints via the law. − Investigating financial and administrative corruption and taking legal action. − Prosecuting corruption and preventing offenders from travel or accessing funds. − Combating character assassination. The term is also found in Article 68 of the repealed Civil Service Regulation, where the ethical duties of public service staff were illuminated. Furthermore, it is amply cited in Article 13 concerning the Economic and Social Corporation for Military Retirees and Veterans Regulation No. 13 of 2016 and in the Human Resources Management in the Public Sector Regulation No. 33 of 2023. This indicates that character assassination, as intended by the legislator, is linked to corruption and public administration. We recommend revising Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 to define the legal meaning of this crime clearly and to remove ambiguity. We also agree with proposals to eliminate the inclusion of joint criminal participation in the previous provision, as it is already addressed in Article 27 of this law. Moreover, narrowing the gap between the minimum and maximum fines for character assassination penalties is advised ( Al-Shawabkeh, 2024 ). 2. The material element of the crime of character assassination The material element of this crime lies in deliberately, and without justification, spreading, attributing, or ascribing actions to the victim that could lead to character assassination. Linguistically, the term “spread” is defined as “to mention or propagate something,” such as the phrase: “This is widespread news” meaning it has reached everyone and become common knowledge. The term “attribute” means to assign or relate something to someone, as in saying, “Person A attributed the statement to Person B” meaning they related it to them. In the same respect, Article 16 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law explicitly states: "Anyone who deliberately spreads, attributes, or ascribes false actions to another person, or contributes to such behaviour through information networks, technology, information systems, websites, or social media platforms, intending to assassinate their character, shall be punished with imprisonment for no less than three months or a fine of no less than 5,000 dinars and no more than 20,000 dinars, or both penalties.” The repetition of terms such as “spread” and “attribute” in the legal text is superfluous and unnecessary. The legislator could unify the terminology to improve the legal drafting, using terms like “spread” to describe disseminating information contributing to character assassination. The statute that mostly governs defamation in France is the one dated July 29, 1881, which is related to press freedom. To constitute defamation, the act of harming or damaging someone's honor or reputation through publicizing or making statements or writings has to be proved as a material element of the crime. Such expressions can be written, oral, or be made known through the media or the internet. The public and the private defamation are the two categories that the French courts set apart, with the latter being restricted to a limited group of people, such as family, friends, and colleagues ( de Lamy, 2010 ). Internet use in Jordan has become widespread and hence cyber crimes have increased tremendously. The statistics provided by the Cybercrime Unit of the Public Security Directorate indicate that the number of cyber crimes recorded in Jordan increased from 1,320 in 2013 to 16,027 in 2022, over a twelve-fold increase ( Maghaireh, 2024 ). Trends of this nature have been seen globally which have led to the conclusion of a cyber world that is under various threats, including the possibility of terrorist activities ( M. H. Khater, 2023 ). Some legal scholars are of the opinion that only when the acts constituting the material element of the crime of character assassination will be committed repetitively can the crime be said to exist ( Capra et al., 2018 ). This interpretation originates from the fact that the legislator used the term “acts” in the plural rather than "an act" in the singular. We reject this interpretation, however. By saying “acts” the legislator is referring to the whole collection of prior factors ( Al-Rai, 2025 ). Consequently, the material element of the crime is established whether the offense is committed through a single act, such as attribution or accusation against the victim, or through multiple acts. 3. The mental element of the crime of character assassination The psychological aspect of the offense consists of criminal intent, which is a necessary requirement for the actor to purposefully perform an act that is targeted at exterminating the victim's character in a morally wrong way. The intent has to be present even if no harm is eventually done to the victim. The emphasis is placed on the action itself and not the damage caused, if the offender was by all means aware of the wrongful act, intended it, and knew it was illegal ( Awan, 2025 ). This is to say that the criminals are using the internet and other similar platforms unrightfully with complete understanding of the negative effects of their actions on people and society in general ( Khater, 2024a ). The act must stem from the perpetrator's free and deliberate will. If the perpetrator refrains from completing the act or makes an unintended mistake, the crime is not established. However, the burden of proving such intent falls on the defendant, which can be challenging. Accordingly, the mental element requires two main aspects: − Awareness: Understanding the defamatory nature of the actions and the terms used. − Will: The deliberate intent to utter or publish these statements, knowing they will harm the victim's reputation. The French law considers the mental element to consist of both the intent to harm the reputation or dignity of the person affected and the awareness of the defendant that their actions are defamatory. The defendant must also intend to communicate them to others. Public defamation is subjected to more severe penalties than private defamation, with fines up to €45,000 and possible imprisonment in case of racially or religiously biased statements ( de Lamy, 2010 ). The material and mental elements of character assassination have been examined, and legal regulation of this crime requires a more in-depth consideration, which will be subject to research in the second section of this study ( Al-Rai, 2025 ). 4. The legal regulation of character assassination crime The crime of character assassination in the Jordanian law has given rise to a number of problems, especially because of its likeness to other offenses in the Jordanian law, particularly the recent Cybercrime Law which has addressed libel, slander, and defamation expressly. Some laws in regard to electronic libel and slander use the word “defamation” which is derived from the Arabic word “ shahara ” meaning to publicize or expose, which in turn implies becoming famous or widely known ( Ma’louf, 2005 ). In terms of definition, defamation is described as “the act of attributing certain material to the victim that causes hatred and contempt from others” ( Al-Zoubi, 2023 ). The Jordanian Cybercrime Law explicitly addresses defamation in Article 20 Para A: “Based on a complaint, anyone who uses an information network, information technology, information system, website, or social media platform to publish a recording, image, or video of something a person is keen to keep private, intending to defame, harm, or gain any benefit from doing so, even if obtained lawfully, shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than three months and a fine ranging between twenty thousand (20,000) dinars and forty thousand (40,000) dinars.” According to Paragraph (B) of the same Article: “Anyone who uses an information network, information technology, information system, website, or social media platform to alter, modify, or edit a recording, image, scene, or video of something a person is keen to keep private, intending to defame, harm, or gain any benefit from doing so, shall be punished by imprisonment for no less than two years and a fine ranging between twenty-five thousand (25,000) dinars and fifty thousand (50,000) dinars.” In order to delve deep into the complexities of character assassination as a crime, we first have to look at the differences between this crime and other offenses specified in the Cybercrime Law in the first subsection. The second subsection will make suggestions for improving the legal regulation of character assassination crimes, and then we will wrap up with a collection of findings and recommendations. 5. Conceptual issues and legal distinctions between character assassination, libel and slander crimes The distinction between moral character assassination, libel and slander crimes exists within the framework of Jordanian criminal legislation, where the Jordanian Cybercrime Law distinguishes between these concepts despite the fact that it does not provide a definition for moral character assassination. This is in stark contrast to other jurisdictions where such distinctions are not made, as moral character assassination, libel and slander are often considered more or less the same under a number of criminal legislations. However, the Jordanian legislator has defined libel and slander crimes explicitly in the Jordanian Penal Code No. 16 of 1960 and its amendments, as it will be detailed later. Among the most common offenses related to the internet are crimes of libel and slander, and their misuse of technology is the main reason for this. The most important among them is the fact that the internet has countless places like social media, blogs, and websites where people can easily post harmful or offensive information. Consequently, the very nature of crime allows such information to be very rapidly and cheaply distributed to a large audience. Furthermore, it is sometimes the case that offenders are allowed to stay completely anonymous on the internet and this surely gives them the extra freedom of committing such crimes. The situation becomes more complicated by the unceasing monitoring and tracing activities of online content and the huge volume of information and data created every day. Thus, it becomes imperative to resort to the provisions provided in the Cybercrime Law in order to control these crimes. It is noteworthy that even in States ranked as the top in the freedom of speech and expression category—like the US, Europe, and Australia—are applying very strict laws against defamation (which in many jurisdictions integrates libel and slander). Nevertheless, it should be noted that there is a wide difference between expressing an opinion that is in the public interest and the committing of a defamation crime ( Budiartha et al., 2018 ). Both electronic libel and slander crimes involve material and moral elements, which will be discussed in two branches before delving into the exceptions to the use of libelous and slanderous expressions under the provisions of the Jordanian Penal Code in a third branch. 6. The material element of electronic defamation and insult crimes Some scholas define defamation as attributing a specific matter to a person— even in the context of doubt or inquiry — in a way that would harm their honor and dignity or expose them to public hatred and contempt, whether or not the matter constitutes a punishable crime ( Heriyanto et al., 2024 ). This indicates that the material element of the crime of defamation is fulfilled when the perpetrator attributes a specific or defined matter to the victim, causing them to be subjected to public hatred, contempt, and harm to their dignity, honor, and reputation. Thus, electronic defamation is established through the act of attribution to the victim via electronic means, whether the perpetrator fabricated the claims themselves or merely repeated claims they had heard from others ( Al-Mashaqbeh, 2025 ). This is evident in paragraph (a) of Article 15 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, which states: “Anyone who intentionally sends, re-sends, or publishes data or information via the internet, information technology, information systems, websites, or social media platforms that contain false news targeting national security, social peace, defamation, insult, or slander shall be penalized”. Here, it is not required to explicitly mention the victim’s name; it suffices to provide indications pointing to the victim, as explicitly stated in the Jordanian Penal Code ( Al-Rai, AlOmran, & Al Ansari, 2025 ), which serves as the general legal framework. For example, the Zarqa First Instance Court, in its appellate capacity, ruled: "Upon reviewing the case documents and evidence presented by the prosecution to prove the defendant's alleged crime, our court finds, based on the complainant's testimony (…), that they stated: He conducted a live broadcast on Facebook, cursing and insulting us, and posted on his Facebook page.’ However, upon reviewing the expert report which transcribed the recordings, there is no indication that the complainant was the target of the broadcast, as her name or description was not explicitly mentioned, nor were there any clues or signs suggesting the complainant was the subject of the post. Therefore, the defendant must be declared not responsible for the allegations" ( Decision No. 802 of 2024 , 2024 ). The material element is thus fulfilled through the acts of sending, re-sending, or publishing any kind of content, whether data—which refers to raw facts and figures that lack independent meaning without context, such as numbers, letters, symbols, or qualitative values ( Laudon and Laudon, 2019 )—or information, which refers to processed or interpreted data that becomes meaningful and actionable, revealing relationships and insights when organized properly ( Stair, R., & Reynolds, 2020 ). Defamation may also target a legal entity. Paragraph (b) of Article 15 of the law states: “Crimes mentioned in paragraph (a) of this article shall be prosecuted by the Public Prosecution without the need for a complaint or personal claim if directed against any state authority, official body, or public administration”. Therefore, three conditions must be met to establish the material element of the crime of electronic defamation: − Attribution of a matter: Assigning blame or insult to the victim. − Specificity of the attributed matter: The content must consist of precise and defined expressions. − Use of an electronic medium: The act of attribution must be carried out via electronic means, such as a computer, website, information system, or artificial intelligence platform. The swift progression of technology and the digital world are behind the fact that these instances are not the only ones among many. If a defamation action is aimed at a legal entity that stands for a state power, a government body, or a public administrative unit, then the offender might be taken to court without the necessity of a formal complaint or personal claim. This shows the Jordanian legislator's rigorous method of preventing and punishing defamatory statements and ludicrous accusations against public institutions. Meanwhile, an insult does imply the same as the defamation but in a wider and less specific way. The same principles that govern the material element in defamation are also applicable to insult, thus, avoiding repetition. 7. The mental element in the electronic defamation and insult crimes In order to catch the offender of electronic defamation or insult, it is necessary to the perpetrator's intention that the act would be computed as a crime, and along with that, their knowledge of the action and the possibility of its consequences to the victim's reputation, distress, and even the turning of the public opinion against him/her and subjecting him/her to hatred and contempt. This is clearly illustrated in paragraph (a) of Article 15 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023 which says: “Anyone who intentionally sends, re-sends or publishes data or information through the internet, information technology, information systems, websites or social media platforms that contain false news affecting national security, social peace, defamation, insult or contempt shall be punished”. 8. Components of criminal intent − Awareness: The offender has to know the meaning and implications of the words or expressions they use and that these may hurt the victim's honor, dignity, or reputation or expose the victim to public contempt and hatred. This knowledge holds true in the same manner whether the victim is a natural person or a corporation. The knowledge in question must be real, not assumed. The offender has to be fully aware of the character of their acts, among which is that the statements imputed to the victim are disparaging, injurious to the victim's dignity, or likely to make the victim subject to hatred or contempt ( Child & Hunt, 2022 ). − Intent: The intention of the offender must be to express or spread such statements, which would then lead to the desired result of making the victim publically hated or scorned. This is true whether the victim suffers any harm or not. It is the offence itself that is the basis of the crime’s establishment, and not the consequent damage. One scenario is that the perpetrator might claim that the victim made certain defamatory or insulting statements and would thus make the victim the target of disdain or contempt of a particular group of people—this could be a small circle or a larger audience. However, the victim's case could be such that the perpetrator's statements bear no truth, the victim is well-known in the city he belongs to, is part of the family or tribe, and as such, their audience recognizes the perpetrator's statements as false. In such a case, the victim might not suffer any actual harm. Nonetheless, the perpetrator is still liable for the act of defamation or insult, as the law considers the act itself and not its consequences ( Child & Hunt, 2022 ). In our opinion, there is a mistake in the drafting of this article. The Penal Code, which is the general legal framework, treats defamation, insult, and contempt as separate offenses and provides for different penalties according to the crimes, whereas the article in question regards them as one single offense and applies the same punishment for all three. When applied to insult, the principles regarding the mental element in the crime of defamation equally apply to the crime of insult. To avoid repetition, we will not elaborate further. 9. Exceptions to the use of defamatory and insulting statements While the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, under Article 15, prohibits the use, transmission, retransmission, or publication of defamatory, insulting, or contemptuous statements through information networks, technology, systems, websites, or social media platforms. Such prohibitions ultimately aim to protect freedom of expression, preserving human dignity and maintaining social harmony ( Khater, 2024b ). However, there are exceptions outlined in the Jordanian Penal Code, which serves as the general legislative framework. These exceptions, provided for specific cases, include: − Public Interest Criticism: Defamatory or insulting statements may be permissible if they are true and serve the public interest. For such criticism to be lawful, certain conditions must be met: • The facts must be accurate. • The language used must be appropriate and proportionate. • The subject must provide societal value or benefit. − Official Publications: Defamatory or insulting statements are exempt from criminal liability if they are included in: • Government or parliamentary publications. • Official documents or records, in accordance with Article 198(2) of the Penal Code. − Disciplinary Contexts: Statements directed at individuals subject to military or police discipline are permissible if: • They pertain to the individual's conduct as part of such discipline. • They are made by a superior officer with authority to comment on such matters. − Judicial Proceedings: Statements made during judicial proceedings, whether by the judiciary, lawyers, or witnesses, are exempt provided: • The publication is not prohibited by the court. • The trial is not confidential to ensure it does not interfere with the investigation process. The Amman Court of First Instance, in a case bearing the number 2243 of the year 2002, had the example of a case where a journalist was not found liable of defamation. The court's justification was that the content that was published touched upon issues of public concern related to government financial and administrative irregularities that had already been questioned in the parliament and reported by the media. The complainant was not the article's target but was mentioned in their official capacity, thus the act was not a criminal one. − Parliamentary Announcements: Defamatory or insulting statements made as part of accurate information disclosed in parliamentary sessions are exempt. − Reproduction of Published Material: If a defamatory or insulting content represents an accurate reproduction, summary, or excerpt of material previously published and exempt from liability, its publication is also exempt. 10. Constitutional protection and legal boundaries The Jordanian Constitution guarantees every citizen the right to express their opinion through speech, writing, images, or other means. The state is obligated to protect this right, provided the expression adheres to legal provisions. This underscores the balance between protecting individual rights and maintaining lawful boundaries for freedom of expression. In cases where defamatory or insulting language falls within these exceptions, such publications are not deemed criminal under the Penal Code. However, any use of such expressions must strictly comply with the conditions outlined in law to avoid abuse and ensure alignment with constitutional guarantees. 11. Proposed solutions for regulating the legal framework of moral character assassination crimes The Jordanian Cybercrime Law has a lot of shortcomings in regulating crimes like digital character assassination through various platforms, social media, and modern media. It is clear that this crime is still so to say “unclear” to the Jordanian legal system. It overlaps with other crimes that are defined in laws such as the Penal Code, the Press and Publications Law, the Jordanian Journalists' Syndicate Law, and other acts related to the dissemination of information through digital channels ( Al-Zoubi, 2023 ). To address these shortcomings, especially those related to digital platforms and modern media, we propose several measures to regulate moral character assassination crimes in Jordanian legislation, as follows: − Clarifying the Term “Moral Character Assassination” in Cybercrime Law This can be done through amending the provisions of the Cybercrime Law to explicitly define and delineate the legal concept of moral character assassination. It is also recommended that the legislator provides a comprehensive and precise legal definition to ensure clarity and consistent application. − Establishing Specific Penal Provisions for Media Platforms A special penal framework tailored for media platforms shall be introduced to achieve two primary goals: • Promote freedom of opinion and expression by prohibiting the imprisonment of journalists and reducing financial penalties. • Raise awareness among media professionals about the repercussions of moral character assassination crimes and the importance of refraining from actions that harm reputations. This measure is especially significant given that many journalists and media professionals lack adequate legal knowledge in the field of journalism and media. − Updating and Revising Legal Provisions The current laws are to be evaluated in order to provide strong protection for the people from harm to their reputation. Also, a precise separation between the crimes of moral character assassination and the similar acts like defamation, slander, and contempt will be drawn. − Public Awareness Campaigns The use of public awareness campaigns is really important in making the public understand the distinctions between moral character assassination and some related offenses, but at the same time they are setting the limits that distinguish this crime from legitimate opinion, criticism, and freedom of expression. − Training Programs for Journalists and Media Professionals Defamation and moral character assassination impact the media and the public, so legal and ethical issues should be clarified in training programs for journalists and media professionals. These programs would not only support the implementation of the Cybercrime Law but also protect the right to free opinion and expression as stated in Article 15 of the Jordanian Constitution. This article guarantees that every Jordanian can express his/her views without fear, provided the expression is within the law's bounds. The Jordanian law can more effectively regulate moral character assassination offenses through introducing these measures, thus also making the protection of personal reputations as an aspect of the freedom of expression right. The focus of these crimes is usually the media and press. One has to consider that the issue does not stem from the media institution's structure; rather it is the question of who is the publisher that poses the problem, a journalist or an activist on digital platforms. If the person is a journalist and commits the offense using their digital platform, such as Facebook, Twitter, or any other platform, then he or she will face the penalties based on the “Press and Publications Law” instead of the general legal rules. However, some criminal law scholars argue that there is no need for a specific legal provision criminalizing these actions, as they are already covered by general laws, such as the “Criminal Code” and the “Jordanian Cybercrime Law”. On the other hand, some believe that only the provisions of the “Press and Publications Law” should apply to journalists and media professionals, regardless of the media institution they work for, with emphasis on financial penalties and the exclusion of custodial sentences. Here, a journalist is defined as a “member of the Jordanian Press Syndicate” as outlined in the definition of a journalist in the Jordanian Press Syndicate Law and the “Press and Publications Law”. In cases where the perpetrator is not registered with the Jordanian Press Syndicate, which serves as the regulatory body for the profession, the provisions of Article 18 of the Syndicate Law may apply. This article stipulates that: "A. Non-journalists, or journalists not specified in Article 9 of this law, are prohibited from sending correspondence to foreign newspapers or advertising themselves as journalists or using any phrase that implies such a role. Advertising, publishing, and distribution offices are also prohibited from adding any words or phrases to their titles, brochures, or advertisements that imply this role, unless they are licensed to publish press publications. B. The Syndicate shall issue press cards in accordance with its records. C. Any person who violates the provisions of paragraph (A) above shall be punished by a fine not less than two hundred dinars and not more than five hundred dinars, or imprisonment for a period not less than one month and not more than three months, or both penalties, along with an order to remove the violation. The penalty shall be doubled in case of repeat offenses." The researchers believe that amending the “Press and Publications Law” to include all actions related to the journalist’s duties and imposing financial penalties for violations strengthens press freedom on one hand, and ensures journalists are subject to the “Press and Publications Law”, which is a special law for the journalistic and media profession, on the other hand. This should apply to journalists in the legal sense. In the case of non-membership in the Syndicate, general laws should be applied, such as the “Criminal Code” the “Cybercrime Law” the Telecommunications Law, and any law that criminalizes such actions, as they would then fall outside the scope of crimes related to media and press, regardless of the form, whether traditional or non-traditional media. Conclusion This study has addressed the legal regulation of the crime of defamation of personality through modern media and digital platforms in Jordanian criminal legislation, compared to French legislation. It has analyzed both the Penal Code and the Cybercrime Law and has reached several conclusions and recommendations in this field. Jordanian law has the uniqueness of dealing with the crime of defamation of personality in the Cybercrime Law of Jordan. Nevertheless, the lawmaker has not at all pointed out who the doer is and has not given an outright mention of whether the crime is restricted to digital platforms, social media, or modern media in general. On the other hand, the Jordanian Legislature, as usual, has not given a clear-cut definition of the crime. However, the French legislation has the opposite view: it is more elaborate and structured offering unambiguous definitions of defamation, slander, insults, and emotional distress, thus underlining the relative obscurity and the absence of conceptual clarity in the Jordanian legal system. The paper recommends changing Article 16 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law to indicate without any doubt the party who is responsible for the crime of defamation of personality. Besides that, the study urges the Jordanian legislator to make an open statutory definition of this crime in the Cybercrime Law and to use the word “moral” in order to make it clear that the intention behind the crime is moral defamation and not physical harm thus preventing any confusion especially in translation. The study lastly advocates for borrowing the French legislative style while making amendments to the relevant sections of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law or the Jordanian Penal Code. Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study, as the research is based on doctrinal legal analysis of legislation, case law, and secondary legal sources. Acknowledgements The author would like to thank all those who contributed, directly or indirectly, to the completion of this research. References Al-Amawi A, Balas H: Digital character assassination in the Jordanian law. Multidisciplinary Reviews. 2024; 7 (11): 2024273. Publisher Full Text Al-Mashaqbeh YA: Legislative Framework Regulating Digital Media in Jordan and Arab Countries: a Study on the Legal Dimensions. Lex Localis. 2025; 23 (10): 1–20. Al-Rai AF, AlOmran NM, Al Ansari MAJ: The crime of digital promotion of terrorism through digital platforms and new media: A comparative study of Jordanian and Emirati laws. International Journal of Electronic Governance. 2025; 17 (4): 453–467. Publisher Full Text Al-Rai AF: Indecent assault via technology under Jordanian Criminal Act: A comparative study. Dirasat: Shari’a and Law Sciences. 2025; 53 (3): Article 11598. Publisher Full Text Al-Shawabkeh B: Criminalization of character assassination through electronic means. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. 2024; 12 (1): 17–18. Al-Zoubi M: Crimes of Electronic Defamation, Libel, and Slander under Jordanian Cybercrimes Law. International Review of Law. 2023; 12 (1): 267–284. Publisher Full Text Maghaireh AM: Cybercrime Laws in Jordan and Freedom of Expression: A Critical Examination of the Electronic Crimes Act 2023. Int. J. Cyber Criminol. 2024; 18 (1). AlOmran NM, Al-Rai A, Alhendi NI: Freedom of expression and criminal liability for journalists under Jordanian legislation. Constitutional Review. 2024; 10 (1): 115–135. Publisher Full Text Awan OM: A Legal Analysis of Crime: Mens Rea, Actus Reus, and the Requirement of Concurrence.2025. Publisher Full Text Capra DJ, Richter LL, Capra DJ, et al. : FLASH : The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History Character Assassination : Amending Federal Rule of Evidence 404 (B) to Protect Criminal Defendants.2018; 404 . Cassation Court: 2022. (2022). Child JJ, Hunt A: Beyond the Present-Fault Paradigm: Expanding Mens rea Definitions in the General Part. Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 2022; 42 (2): 438–467. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text Decision No. 802 of 2024: 2024. de Lamy B : Dérives et évolution du principe de la légalité en droit pénal français : contribution à l’étude des sources du droit pénal français. Les Cahiers de Droit. 2010; 50 (3–4): 585–609. Publisher Full Text Heriyanto H, Saputra TE, Ichsan N, et al. : The Effectiveness of The Settlement of Alleged Criminal Offences of Insult or Defamation Through Electronic Media with Restorative Justice at The Investigation Stage. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education. 2024; 3 (2): 212–220. Publisher Full Text Icks M, Shiraev E: Character Assassination throughout the Ages. Palgrave Macmillan US; 2014. Publisher Full Text Khater M: Electronic intellectual terrorism and the Islamic efforts to combat it. Islam. Q. 2024a; 86 (1): 59–82. Khater M: Insulting Religions from the Perspective of International Law: A Descriptive and Analytical Study. International Journal of Islamic Thought. 2024b; 25 . Publisher Full Text Khater MH: International Perspective on Securing Cyberspace Against Terrorist Acts. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development. 2023; 15 (1): 1–11. Publisher Full Text Laudon KC, Laudon JP: Management information systems: Managing the digital firm. Pearson; 16th ed.2019. Magistrates Court: 2024. Ma’louf L: Al-Munjid in the language. Dar Al-Mashriq; 41st ed.2005. Nyoman Putu Budiartha I, Widyantara IMM, Nuarta IN: Criminal Act Of Contempt Through Electronic Information Media. International Journal of Sosiological Jurisprudence. 2018; 1 (2): 82–86. Publisher Full Text Stair R, Reynolds G: Principles of information systems. Cengage Learning; 13th ed.2020. Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Collage of Law, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 2 Collage of Law, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates 3 Collage of Law, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Ashraf Al-Rai Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Dina Imad Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Maya Khater Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (1) version 1 Published: 05 Mar 2026, 15:359 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 Copyright © 2026 Al-Rai A et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Al-Rai A, Imad D and Khater M. The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177079.1 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Abu Issa H. Reviewer Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465805 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465805 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 16 Mar 2026 Hamza Abu Issa , Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465805 This article addresses a relevant and timely issue in Jordanian cybercrime law by examining the legal regulation of “character assassination” under Article 16 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, with comparative reference to French legislation. The manuscript ... Continue reading READ ALL This article addresses a relevant and timely issue in Jordanian cybercrime law by examining the legal regulation of “character assassination” under Article 16 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, with comparative reference to French legislation. The manuscript aims to clarify the concept of the offence, distinguish it from related offences such as defamation, libel, slander, and false information, and propose legislative reforms. The topic has clear academic merit, and the doctrinal legal approach adopted by the authors is appropriate for the subject. The article also identifies a genuine legislative ambiguity in the Jordanian provision and reaches conclusions that are generally consistent with the legal analysis presented. At the same time, the manuscript is only partly clear and accurate in its present form. It would benefit from language editing, clearer and more consistent terminology, and a more precise presentation of some comparative references and legal authorities. In addition, although the article states that it uses descriptive and legal analytical methods, the methodology section remains somewhat general. The paper would be strengthened if the authors explained more clearly the legal materials examined, the basis for selecting French law as the comparator, and the criteria used in conducting the comparison. These issues do not undermine the overall value of the study, but they should be addressed to improve clarity, transparency, and precision. No statistical analysis is involved, and no conventional dataset is required for this type of doctrinal legal research. However, the article would still benefit from a clearer identification of the principal legal sources underlying the analysis. In order to justify full approval, the authors should revise the language, standardize the terminology, strengthen the precision of the comparative discussion, expand the methodology section, and provide fuller citations for the main legal authorities relied upon. Subject to these revisions, the article can make a useful contribution to the study of cybercrime and reputational harm in Jordanian criminal law. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No source data required Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Tarawneh H, Issa H: Character Assassination via Information Technology Media: A New Crime. 203-208 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Criminal Law I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Abu Issa H. Reviewer Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465805 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465805 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Ehjelah AM. Reviewer Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465809 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465809 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 16 Mar 2026 Abdullah M Ehjelah , Yarmouk University, Irbid, Irbid Governorate, Jordan Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465809 Abstract of the Article The manuscript presents an interesting and relevant study in its field. The authors address an important research question and provide a clear overview of the topic supported by relevant literature. The objectives of the study ... Continue reading READ ALL Abstract of the Article The manuscript presents an interesting and relevant study in its field. The authors address an important research question and provide a clear overview of the topic supported by relevant literature. The objectives of the study are well defined, and the structure of the manuscript allows the reader to follow the research process and findings effectively. Comments on the Evaluation Criteria Clarity and presentation of the work: The article is clearly written and well organized. The introduction provides sufficient background and appropriately cites relevant and recent literature. Overall, the presentation of the research is coherent and understandable. Study design and technical soundness: The study design appears appropriate for addressing the research objectives. The methodology used is suitable and reflects good scientific practice. Methods and analysis details: The authors provide sufficient methodological details to allow other researchers to understand and potentially replicate the study. The description of the procedures and analytical steps is generally clear. Availability of source data: The results presented in the manuscript are adequately supported by the data described. The level of information provided allows readers to understand how the conclusions were reached. Conclusions: The conclusions are supported by the results and are consistent with the aims of the study. The discussion appropriately relates the findings to the broader literature. Overall Recommendation Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field. The study is well conducted, clearly presented, and provides meaningful insights. I recommend acceptance of the article after minor editorial review if required. - The researcher provides a distinguished scientific treatment of a timely and important topic in Jordanian legislation, namely the crime of character assassination as stipulated in Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023. The researcher successfully highlights the legal problem associated with the absence of a precise definition of this term in the statutory text, offering a clear analysis of the surrounding legal context and its relation to closely related offenses such as defamation, libel, and the dissemination of false information. This approach demonstrates the researcher’s ability to critically read and analyze legal texts, helping to clarify legislative ambiguities and identify potential practical challenges arising from this crime. The study is also distinguished by its use of a comparative analytical method. The researcher effectively employs comparisons with other legal systems, particularly the French legal framework, to illustrate how reputation-related offenses are addressed in other jurisdictions. This approach adds significant scholarly value to the research and deepens the legal understanding of character assassination in the contemporary digital environment, especially in light of the challenges posed by the rapid spread of information through the internet and social media platforms. The value of this research is further evident in the constructive critical analysis it provides of Jordanian legislation. The researcher does not merely present the statutory texts but evaluates them and identifies possible shortcomings, offering well-grounded recommendations to clarify legal concepts and distinguish between overlapping offenses that harm reputation. These observations and recommendations can contribute to the development of the legislative framework, enhance clarity in statutory texts, improve judicial application, and protect individual rights and societal interests. This reflects the researcher’s diligence and significant scholarly contribution to the field. However, to further enhance the study’s value and completeness, it would be beneficial for the researcher to address the following questions: Is a personal claim or complaint from the victim required to initiate criminal proceedings against the perpetrator of the crime of character assassination? Does the criminal law equate the penalty for character assassination with the penalties prescribed for defamation and libel committed via information networks? Is it legally conceivable for the crime of character assassination to be committed against a legal entity, or is its scope limited to natural persons only? What is the legal meaning of the terms used in Article 16, such as “spread,” “attributed,” and “assigned deliberately,” and how do they differ in legal significance? In the researcher’s opinion, is there a need to enact a separate legal provision specifically criminalizing character assassination, given the existence of clear and comprehensive provisions addressing defamation, libel, and insults committed via information networks? Is it legally conceivable to allow installment payments for the financial penalty imposed for character assassination if confirmed by a final court judgment? Is it possible to replace the custodial penalty prescribed for character assassination with a community-based alternative under Jordanian criminal law? It is recommended to enrich the reference list with recent and up-to-date sources relevant to the field of the study to strengthen the research and support the findings. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Criminal Law, Cybercrime Law I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Ehjelah AM. Reviewer Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465809 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465809 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 05 Mar 2026 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 1 05 Mar 26 read read Abdullah M Ehjelah , Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan Hamza Abu Issa , Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Abu Issa H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 16 Mar 2026 | for Version 1 Hamza Abu Issa , Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan 0 Views copyright © 2026 Abu Issa H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This article addresses a relevant and timely issue in Jordanian cybercrime law by examining the legal regulation of “character assassination” under Article 16 of the Jordanian Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, with comparative reference to French legislation. The manuscript aims to clarify the concept of the offence, distinguish it from related offences such as defamation, libel, slander, and false information, and propose legislative reforms. The topic has clear academic merit, and the doctrinal legal approach adopted by the authors is appropriate for the subject. The article also identifies a genuine legislative ambiguity in the Jordanian provision and reaches conclusions that are generally consistent with the legal analysis presented. At the same time, the manuscript is only partly clear and accurate in its present form. It would benefit from language editing, clearer and more consistent terminology, and a more precise presentation of some comparative references and legal authorities. In addition, although the article states that it uses descriptive and legal analytical methods, the methodology section remains somewhat general. The paper would be strengthened if the authors explained more clearly the legal materials examined, the basis for selecting French law as the comparator, and the criteria used in conducting the comparison. These issues do not undermine the overall value of the study, but they should be addressed to improve clarity, transparency, and precision. No statistical analysis is involved, and no conventional dataset is required for this type of doctrinal legal research. However, the article would still benefit from a clearer identification of the principal legal sources underlying the analysis. In order to justify full approval, the authors should revise the language, standardize the terminology, strengthen the precision of the comparative discussion, expand the methodology section, and provide fuller citations for the main legal authorities relied upon. Subject to these revisions, the article can make a useful contribution to the study of cybercrime and reputational harm in Jordanian criminal law. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Partly Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Partly If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Not applicable Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? No source data required Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes References 1. Tarawneh H, Issa H: Character Assassination via Information Technology Media: A New Crime. 203-208 Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Criminal Law I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Abu Issa H. Peer Review Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465805) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465805 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2026 Ehjelah A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 16 Mar 2026 | for Version 1 Abdullah M Ehjelah , Yarmouk University, Irbid, Irbid Governorate, Jordan 0 Views copyright © 2026 Ehjelah A. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Abstract of the Article The manuscript presents an interesting and relevant study in its field. The authors address an important research question and provide a clear overview of the topic supported by relevant literature. The objectives of the study are well defined, and the structure of the manuscript allows the reader to follow the research process and findings effectively. Comments on the Evaluation Criteria Clarity and presentation of the work: The article is clearly written and well organized. The introduction provides sufficient background and appropriately cites relevant and recent literature. Overall, the presentation of the research is coherent and understandable. Study design and technical soundness: The study design appears appropriate for addressing the research objectives. The methodology used is suitable and reflects good scientific practice. Methods and analysis details: The authors provide sufficient methodological details to allow other researchers to understand and potentially replicate the study. The description of the procedures and analytical steps is generally clear. Availability of source data: The results presented in the manuscript are adequately supported by the data described. The level of information provided allows readers to understand how the conclusions were reached. Conclusions: The conclusions are supported by the results and are consistent with the aims of the study. The discussion appropriately relates the findings to the broader literature. Overall Recommendation Overall, this manuscript represents a valuable contribution to the field. The study is well conducted, clearly presented, and provides meaningful insights. I recommend acceptance of the article after minor editorial review if required. - The researcher provides a distinguished scientific treatment of a timely and important topic in Jordanian legislation, namely the crime of character assassination as stipulated in Article 16 of the Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023. The researcher successfully highlights the legal problem associated with the absence of a precise definition of this term in the statutory text, offering a clear analysis of the surrounding legal context and its relation to closely related offenses such as defamation, libel, and the dissemination of false information. This approach demonstrates the researcher’s ability to critically read and analyze legal texts, helping to clarify legislative ambiguities and identify potential practical challenges arising from this crime. The study is also distinguished by its use of a comparative analytical method. The researcher effectively employs comparisons with other legal systems, particularly the French legal framework, to illustrate how reputation-related offenses are addressed in other jurisdictions. This approach adds significant scholarly value to the research and deepens the legal understanding of character assassination in the contemporary digital environment, especially in light of the challenges posed by the rapid spread of information through the internet and social media platforms. The value of this research is further evident in the constructive critical analysis it provides of Jordanian legislation. The researcher does not merely present the statutory texts but evaluates them and identifies possible shortcomings, offering well-grounded recommendations to clarify legal concepts and distinguish between overlapping offenses that harm reputation. These observations and recommendations can contribute to the development of the legislative framework, enhance clarity in statutory texts, improve judicial application, and protect individual rights and societal interests. This reflects the researcher’s diligence and significant scholarly contribution to the field. However, to further enhance the study’s value and completeness, it would be beneficial for the researcher to address the following questions: Is a personal claim or complaint from the victim required to initiate criminal proceedings against the perpetrator of the crime of character assassination? Does the criminal law equate the penalty for character assassination with the penalties prescribed for defamation and libel committed via information networks? Is it legally conceivable for the crime of character assassination to be committed against a legal entity, or is its scope limited to natural persons only? What is the legal meaning of the terms used in Article 16, such as “spread,” “attributed,” and “assigned deliberately,” and how do they differ in legal significance? In the researcher’s opinion, is there a need to enact a separate legal provision specifically criminalizing character assassination, given the existence of clear and comprehensive provisions addressing defamation, libel, and insults committed via information networks? Is it legally conceivable to allow installment payments for the financial penalty imposed for character assassination if confirmed by a final court judgment? Is it possible to replace the custodial penalty prescribed for character assassination with a community-based alternative under Jordanian criminal law? It is recommended to enrich the reference list with recent and up-to-date sources relevant to the field of the study to strengthen the research and support the findings. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required. Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Criminal Law, Cybercrime Law I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Ehjelah AM. Peer Review Report For: The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination under the Jordanian and French Legislation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2026, 15 :359 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.195235.r465809) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1#referee-response-465809 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Al-Rai A et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359", templates : { twitter : "The Legal Regulation of Cybercrimes related to Character Assassination.... Al-Rai A et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/15-359/v1" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/177079/195235") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "195235"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "465811": 0, "465810": 0, "465809": 8, "465808": 0, "465807": 0, "465806": 0, "465805": 17, "465804": 0, "465803": 0, "465802": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "c447b752-5dd1-4dd0-a386-8c4e530b69f4"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });