Multi-center Translational Trial of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRICS BASIC)

preprint OA: closed

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Basic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, while clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology. Methods Multi-center, multi-species, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary endpoint was good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary endpoints was infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Pre-enrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis were applied. Results The trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across seven laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared to controls, at 48 hours post-ischemia (55% versus 36%; OR 2.2, 95% CI [1.23–4.4], p=0.009). RIC was associated with a small reduction in infarct volume (standardized mean difference -0.38, 95% CI [−0.70, −0.05], p=0.024). Health monitoring indicated no major safety concerns, and post-operative analgesia requirements were lower in RIC-treated mice. Conclusions Surgically-induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity. Registration registered at preclinicaltrials.eu, identifier PCTE0000177.
Full text 2,128 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Basic science studies have reported remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) as neuroprotective in acute ischemic stroke, while clinical evidence remains conflicting. The TRICS BASIC study investigated the efficacy and safety of RIC in experimental ischemic stroke using a rigorous clinical trial methodology.

Methods

Multi-center, multi-species, parallel group, randomized, controlled, preclinical trial of transient femoral artery clipping to induce RIC in female and male rats and mice subjected to transient endovascular occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Animals were randomized to receive RIC, or sham surgery, after reperfusion. The primary endpoint was good functional outcome at 48 hours, assessed using a composite functional neuroscore. Secondary endpoints was infarct volume at 48 hours and safety, assessed using a standardized health report at 24 and 48 hours. Pre-enrollment harmonization, centralized monitoring, allocation concealment, blinded outcome assessment and intention-to-treat analysis were applied.

Results

The trial enrolled 164 rodents (82 mice and 82 rats) of both sexes (53% females), across seven laboratories. A greater proportion of RIC-treated rodents achieved a favorable functional outcome compared to controls, at 48 hours post-ischemia (55% versus 36%; OR 2.2, 95% CI [1.23–4.4], p=0.009). RIC was associated with a small reduction in infarct volume (standardized mean difference -0.38, 95% CI [−0.70, −0.05], p=0.024). Health monitoring indicated no major safety concerns, and post-operative analgesia requirements were lower in RIC-treated mice.

Conclusions

Surgically-induced RIC provided a modest but evident neuroprotective effect in experimental ischemic stroke, underscoring the potential of this strategy as an adjunctive treatment in stroke care. The findings of the TRICS BASIC study highlighted the importance of multicenter preclinical trials in addressing variability and enhancing translational validity. Registration registered at preclinicaltrials.eu, identifier PCTE0000177. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00