Randomized control study on focused ultrasound and radiofrequency ablation in treatment of cervical inflammation related diseases

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy,safety,economy between focused ultrasound therapy and radiofreguency ablation(RFA)therapy in women with cervicitis related diseases.Methods A total of 200women with cervicitis related diseases were randomly divided into ultrasound group and RFA group.Postoperative efficacy,side effects and cost of clinical intervention for vaginal bleeding in two groups were observed.Results The total effective rate of cervieitis was 98.89%(89/90)in ultrasound group and 98.90%(90/91)in RFA group(χ20.001,P=0.99).The rate of vaginal bleeding needed clinical intervention was lower in ultrasound group(9/95,9.47%)than in RFA group(21/96,21.88%, χ2=5.55,P=0.02),and acute infection patients in ultrasound group(3/9,33.33%)were less than in RFA group(16/21,76.19%,P=0.04).Operation fees and examination fees had no significant difference between the two groups(Z=-0.02,-0.61,P0.05).Drug fees and total fees in ultrasound group were significant lower than those in RFA group(Z=-4.39,-3.87,all P0.05).Conclusion Focused ultrasound therapy has the same efficiency for cervicitis related diseases compared with radiofreguency ablation,but has higher security and economic advantages.