Expression of Arabidopsis Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat

Expression of Arabidopsis Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Original Article Expression of Arabidopsis Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat Alia Anwar, Ke Wang, Jing Wang, Lei Shi, Lipu Du, Xingguo Ye This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Under Review Version 1 posted 3 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Key Message The drought and salt tolerances of wheat were enhanced by ectopic expression of the Arabidopsis ornithine aminotransferase (AtOAT) encoded gene. The OAT was confirmed to play a role in proline biosynthesis in wheat. Abstract Proline (Pro) accumulation is a common response to both abiotic and biotic stresses in plants. Ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) is pyridoxal-5-phosphate dependent enzyme involved in plant proline biosynthesis. During stress condition, proline is synthesized via glutamate and ornithine pathways. The OAT is the key enzyme in ornithine pathway. In this study, an OAT gene AtOAT from Arabidopsis was expressed in wheat for its functional characterization under drought, salinity and heat stress conditions. We found that the expression of AtOAT enhanced the drought and salt stress tolerances of wheat by increasing the proline content and peroxidase activity. In addition, it was confirmed that the expression of AtOAT also played a partial tolerance to heat stress in the transgenic wheat plants. Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that the transformation of AtOAT up-regulated the expression of the proline biosynthesis associated genes TaOAT , TaP5CS , and TaP5CR , and down-regulated that of the proline catabolism related gene TaP5CDH in the transgenic plants under stress conditions. Moreover, the genes involved in ornithine pathway (Orn- OAT -P5C/GSA- P5CR -Pro) were up-regulated along with the up-regulation of those genes involved in glutamate pathway (Glu- P5CS -P5C/GSA- P5CR -Pro). Therefore, we concluded that the expression of AtOAT enhanced wheat abiotic tolerance via modifying the proline biosynthesis by up-regulating the expression of the proline biosynthesis associated genes and down-regulating that of the proline catabolic gene under stresses condition. Plant Physiology and Morphology Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics abiotic stress tolerance ornithine aminotransferase ornithine pathway proline biosynthesis Triticum aestivum. Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Introduction The expansion of the global human population, which is a serious challenge for sustainably social development of the world, requires continuous increase in crop production. Among the cereal crops, wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is ranked the second in terms of total global production but the first in terms of the total cultivation area (FAO 2018). However, wheat productivity is heavily affected by abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, and heat (Abhinandan et al. 2018 ). To produce more foods, wheat has to be planted in some arid and salinize arable lands. Especially, global warming, drought and heat stresses, which have happened more frequently with increased intensity, impose a serious threat in wheat production (Liu et al. 2015 ). Thus, it is of importance to develop wheat varieties adapted to these abiotic stress conditions, and identification of more useful genes by genetic engineering approaches is helpful to this breeding objective. Plants under salinity and drought stresses have evolved a range of physiological and biochemical responses, such as accumulation of compatible osmolytes like proline (Pro) and the increased activity of antioxidant enzymes (Sarker and Oba 2018a , 2018b ; Sarker et al. 2018 ). Proline is the most important osmolyte in plants as a stress indicator because of its large water-solubility (162.3 g/100 ml H 2 O) and strong hydrating ability. It plays a crucial role in osmoregulation in algae, plants and animals by protection of enzyme and cellular structure (Delauney et al. 1993 ; Kishor et al. 1995 ; Schobert 1977 ; Solomon et al. 2006 ). It also serves as a scavenger of free radicals and energy source to regulate redox potential and maintain the nitrogen content (Alia and Saradhi 1991 ; Sarker and Oba 2018c , 2020 ). There exist two proline biosynthesis pathways in plants, namely glutamate (Glu) and ornithine (Orn) pathways, in front of biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Anwar et al. 2018 ; Delauney et al. 1993 ; Hare et al. 1999 ; Roosens et al. 1998 ; Yoshiba et al. 1997 ). In the glutamate pathway, glutamate is reduced into pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) by P5C synthase (P5CS). In addition, plants can synthesize proline via ornithine pathway, in which ornithine is firstly converted into P5C by OAT in mitochondria, and then P5C is either transformed into glutamate by P5C dehydrogenase (P5CDH) initiating glutamate pathway (Funck et al. 2008 ), or transferred to cytosol to produce proline by P5C reductase (P5CR) (Fig. S1) (Miller et al. 2009 ). The coordinated action of P5CDH and P5CR encoding genes determines the final use of P5C under stress condition (Rizzi et al. 2015 ). Proline catabolism occurs through sequential actions of proline dehydrogenase (ProDH) and P5C dehydrogenase (P5CDH), which convert P5C to glutamate (Szabados and Savoure 2010 ). Pyrroline-5-carboxylate is a common intermediate in both proline biosynthesis and catabolism pathways (Rizzi et al. 2015 ; Anwar et al. 2018 ). Many studies have clarified that proline accumulation is mainly controlled by up-regulation of the genes involved in proline biosynthesis pathway and down-regulation of the genes involved in proline catabolism pathway, when plants are exposed to different stresses (Yoshiba et al. 1997 ; Anwar et al. 2018 ). The OAT is the key enzyme in ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis. As a transaminase, this enzyme is involved in the conversion of ornithine into glutamate and glutamyl-5-semi-aldehyde (GSA). The biosynthesis of glutamate from ornithine is speculated as ornithine pathway, but the exact route of the ornithine pathway for proline biosynthesis is still unclear as an unknown exit route of P5C/GSA from mitochondria to cytosol is required (Stránská et al. 2008 ). The glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis is well known in plants, but the ornithine pathway is poorly understood. Similar to the glutamate pathway, the ornithine pathway has been found to play a significant role in multiple stress conditions (Hervieu et al. 1995 ; You et al. 2012 ; Anwar et al. 2018 ). Several studies have revealed the correlation between OAT and proline biosynthesis under abiotic stress conditions such as cold (Charest and Ton Phan 1990 ), salt (Roosens et al. 1998 ), dehydration (Hervieu et al. 1994 ), and ABA (Yang et al. 2000 ). Similar to P5CS, OAT is also a rate-limiting enzyme in proline biosynthesis (Roosens et al. 2002 ), except that OAT is not feedback inhibited by proline (Roosens et al. 1999 ). A positive role of OAT was also found in radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) plants under salt stress (Hervieu et al. 1995 ). Overexpression of an OAT encoding gene in tobacco ( Nicotiana tabaccum L.) increased proline content up to 3-fold higher in the transgenic plants than in the wild-type (WT) plants (Roosens et al. 2002 ). Similarly, overexpression of Arabidopsis OAT ( AtOAT ) in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) was reported to enhance its tolerances to salt and drought stresses by increasing proline content (Wu et al. 2003 ). Considering the important roles of AtOAT in the tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in other plants, it is necessary to investigate its functions and molecular mechanism in wheat for the improvement in environmental tolerances. At present, no study has been conducted on the functional characterization of AtOAT in wheat. In this study, we expressed AtOAT gene in wheat and analysed its effects on tolerance against salt, drought, and heat and also dissected the ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis in transgenic wheat plants. Our results will be helpful for further developing new wheat varieties with enhanced tolerance to various abiotic stresses. Materials And Methods Plant materials Two spring wheat varieties Fielder and Ningchun 4 used in this study were obtained from the National Crop Germplasm Bank of China at the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (ICS-CAAS). Relatively, Fielder is regarded as a drought sensitive genotype and Ningchun 4 as a moderately drought resistant genotype. Five wheat plants per pot (25 cm in diameter and 18 cm in height) were grown in a growth chamber with 45% humidity at 24°C under a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod cycle. Immature embryos 15 d post anthesis were collected from the two wheat varieties to be used for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation. A maize ( Zea mays L.) inbred line Zheng 58, which was kindly provided by Dr. Yongjun Liu at ICS-CAAS, was planted in a greenhouse as a pollen donor to produce stable transgenic lines via chromosome elimination. Plasmid construction and wheat transformation The full-length complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence of AtOAT (accession number: At5g46180) was amplified from seedlings of the Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia-0 using primers AtOAT-F and AtOAT-R (Table S1). After confirmation by sequencing, it was inserted onto an expression vector pWMB174 (Fig. S2), which contains two independent T-DNA regions, one carrying bar selectable marker under the control of CaMV35S promoter and Agrobacterium nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator, and the other carrying maize ubiquitin (ubi) promoter, a multiple cloning site (MCS) and the NOS terminator. The AtOAT gene was digested with S ma l and Spe 1 and inserted onto the digested pWMB174 with the same enzymes at the MCS under the control of ubi promoter to form a new recombination vector pWMB175 (Fig. 1a). The new vector was transformed into A. tumefaciens strain C58C1 by triparental mating ( Ditta et al. 1980 ) and further introduced into wheat immature embryos using the methods described previously (Ishida et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017). Q uick stix st rip detection Leaf segments of the putative transgenic wheat plants generated from Agrobacterium -mediated transformation were collected and detected by a QuickStix Kit (EnviroLogix, USA) for the selection marker existence of bar gene as described previously (Wang et al. 2017). All the putative transgenic plants were tested by this method and further confirmed by other methods. DNA extraction and PCR amplification Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the putative transgenic wheat plants using NuClean Plant Genomic DNA Kit (CWbio Inc., Beijing, China). The DNA pellet was dissolved in ddH 2 O and quantified to be used in PCR amplification as templates. The presence of the transgene was detected by specific primer AtOAT-F/AtOAT-R (Table S1), and PCR was carried out in a 15 µL reaction buffer containing 6 µl of sterile distilled water, 1 µL of template DNA (100-200 ng µL -1 ), 0.5 µL of each primer (10 µmol L -1 ), and 7.5 µL of 2× Taq Master Mix (CWbio Inc., Beijing, China). DNA amplification was run on an ABI Thermal Cycler (ProFlex PCR,Thermofisher Scientific) by the following steps: an initial denature at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 1 min and 30 sec, and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. The amplified AtOAT product was separated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized under ultraviolet light after Gene color II (Gene-Bio, Beijing, China) staining. Generation of stable homozygous transgenic wheat plants by chromosome elimination Twenty spikes from each T 1 transgenic lines derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4, respectively, were emasculated when they were fully emerged out of flag leaves. The emasculated spikes were pollinated with maize pollens and then treated by spraying 100 mg L -1 2,4-D solution once (1 ml for each spike) in the next two consecutive days. The haploid wheat embryos were rescued on a medium (1/2 MS medium, 30 g L -1 sucrose and 2.4 g L -1 gelrite, pH 5.8) at 21 d day after the pollination. The plantlets with healthy roots were directly treated by adding a freshly prepared colchicine solution containing colchicine 0.45 g L -1 , DMSO 20 mL L -1 , GA 3 100 mg L -1 and Tween 20 0.3 mL L -1 on the medium for 30 h. Finally, the treated plantlets were rinsed with water 3 times and transplanted into pots. Positive plants were selected by PCR analysis with the target gene specific primer using the same condition aforementioned. Chromosome preparation and fluorescence in situ hybridization Mature grains of the transgenic wheat plants were germinated on filter paper in a 25 °C growth chamber for 2 to 3 d, and roots of 2 cm in length were sampled. Root tips were cut and treated with nitrous oxide (NO) for 2 h prior to immersion in 90% glacial acetic acid solution for 5 min. Chromosome spreading was prepared by a previously described method (Guo et al. 2016). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed using vector pWMB1 75 as a probe, which was labelled with fluorescein-12-dUTP. Hybridization was performed following a previous published protocol (Guo et al. 2016), and the hybridization signals were observed under an Olympus BX-51 microscope with a Photometric SenSys Olympus DP70 CCD camera. Three stable transgenic lines from Fielder and Ningchun 4 each, which were confirmed by PCR and FISH, were selected for further functional investigation. Treatments of abiotic s tress es For drought stress treatment, seeds from the transgenic and the WT wheat plants were sown in a plastic box (80 cm × 50 cm × 15 cm in dimension) containing substrate peat moss by a completely randomized design, and three replicates were set up. Four-liter water was provided to each box every week after germination. At the tillering stage, irrigation was stopped and volumetric water content (VWC) in the pots was measured. When the VWC is below 5%, the survival rate was calculated following the method described previously (Rong et al. 2014). To identify the salt tolerance of the transgenic wheat plants, mature embryos of the AtOAT expressed wheat and the WT plants were entirely isolated, inoculated onto 1/2 MS medium containing 150 and 200 mM NaCl, and cultured at 25 °C for 30 d under light condition with an optical density of 100 μmol m -2 s -1 and a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark. Germination percentage was calculated after 8 d and survival rate and root and shoot lengths were investigated after 30 d. For heat stress treatment, five plants from each transgenic line and the WT were grown in a plastic box (35 cm × 25 cm × 8 cm in dimension) with three replicates. At the tillering stage, plants were treated in a heat chamber at 42 °C and samples were collected at different time regimes (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h) for analyzing relative expression profiles of the target gene and its associated genes. Measurements of p hysiological parameters under abiotic stresses To measure physiological parameters related to drought stress, plants were grown in a plastic box (80 cm × 50 cm × 15 cm in dimension) containing natural field soils and maintained in a glasshouse with 16 h light at 24 °C and 8 h dark at 16 °C. Four-liter water was provided to each box every week after germination. At the tillering stage, water was withheld for 21 d and leaf samples were collected at different time regimes (0-, 7-, 14- and 21-day) during the stress treatment. Free proline level was measured according to the previously described method (Zhang et al. 2009). Antioxidant enzymes were extracted from 0.1 g leaves with 1.8 ml phosphate buffer (PBS; 0.1 mol L -1 , pH 7.4) on ice, and the supernatant after centrifuge at 10,000 g for 10 min was directly used to measure peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities using corresponding detection kits (A084-1 and A007-1 Jiancheng, China). For the measurement of physiological parameters related to salt stress, 25 wheat plants were grown in a plastic box (20 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm in dimension) containing natural field soil and maintained in a glasshouse with the conditions aforementioned. At the tillering stage, plants were treated with 250 mM NaCl solution 5 times in 30 d (one time every six days) until the clear symptoms of stress were observed. Total chlorophyll content was measured by the previously described method (Sarker and Oba 2018c). Free proline content and antioxidant enzymes activities were measured as described aforementioned. RNA extraction and expression profile The expression level of the target gene in the stable transgenic wheat plants was determined by semi-quantitative PCR using its specific primer (Table S1). The semi-quantitative PCR amplification was run on an ABI thermal cycler (ProFlex PCR) in a reaction buffer (20 µL) containing 10 µL Taq master mix, 0.5 µM of each primer, and 400 ng of cDNA. The cycling conditions were started from an initial denature at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95 °C for 30 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 20 sec, and a final ending extension at 72 °C for 5 min. For analyzing the expression of AtOAT in the positive wheat seedlings, RNA was extracted from their roots and leaves. To determine the expression profiling of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism associated genes, total RNA was extracted from the leaves in the stressed transgenic wheat plants after NaCl treatment on medium for 30 d and after water-withholding stress for 15-18 d in soil using a TRIZOL reagent (TaKaRa, Japan). The cDNA was further synthesized using a cDNA synthesis kit (CWbio Inc., Beijing China) according to manufacturer’s protocol. To examine the role of At OAT in proline biosynthesis, the expression profiling of the genes involved in proline biosynthesis ( TaOAT , TaP5CS , and TaP5CR ) and catabolism ( TaP5CDH ) was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) with their specific primers (Table S1) in the stress treated transgenic wheat plants and the WT. The primers for TaOAT and TaP5CR were adopted from previous publications (Anwar et al. 2020, Dudziak et al. 2019). The sequences for TaP5CS1 and TaP5CDH were retrieved from plant ensemble genome database ( https://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Tools/Blast ) using Hordeum vulgare (accession # AF467539.1) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Accession # AY150430.1) as queries. Three alleles for TaP5CS1 (TraesCS1A02G357900, TraesCS1B02G374500, and TraesCS1D02G362700) and three alleles for TaP5CDH (TraesCS1A02G281400, TraesCS1B02G290600, and TraesCS1D02G280700) were retrieved and their specific primers were designed using primer premier 5 (Premier Biosoft, http://www.premierbiosoft.com/). The qRT-PCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Real-Time PCR System in a reaction buffer (20 µL) containing 10 µL 2× RealStar Green Fast Mixture with ROXII, 400 ng of cDNA, and 0.4 µM of each primer. The PCR samples were preheated at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 °C for 15 sec, 60 °C for 30 sec, 72 °C for 30 sec). The relative expression or mRNA level was calculated using the 2 -∆∆CT method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). A constitutively expressed wheat gene adenosine diphosphate ribosylation factor ( Ta ADP ) was used for the normalization of gene transcript level (Paolacci et al. 2009). Data were averaged from three biological replicates and statistical significance was calculated by IBM-SPSS statistic 20 at α < 0.05 using the Duncan’s multiple range test. Results Generation of homozygous transgenic wheat plants expressing AtOAT Haploid embryos from the cross between the transgenic wheat plants and maize were rescued with a frequency of 11% for Fielder and 8% for Ningchun 4 as receptors, respectively (Table S2). After chromosome doubling, 37 homozygous transgenic wheat plants expressing AtOAT , 24 for Fielder and 13 for Ningchun 4, were generated (Fig. S3). Seed setting percentages of homozygous plants derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4 were 50% and 40%, respectively. Cytological observation confirmed that the haploid plants induced by maize pollen before doubling had 21 chromosomes and the stable transgenic plants after doubling had 42 chromosomes (Fig. 1 b, c). Fluorescence in situ hybridization assay displayed that the T-DNA cassette containing AtOAT was integrated into the distal regions of one or two pairs of chromosomes in the stable transgenic wheat plants (Fig. 1 d). Results also indicated that AtOAT was inserted into wheat genome by one or two copies. Three independent lines OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3 from Fielder and the other three independent lines OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3 from Ningchun 4 were selected for the functional characterization of AtOAT gene in wheat further. Semi-quantitative PCR revealed that the AtOAT transgene was highly expressed in the homozygous transgenic wheat plants (Fig. 1 e, f). Transgenic wheat plants showed an enhanced salt tolerance under controlled condition On the 200 mM NaCl containing medium, mature embryos of the transgenic wheat plants derived from Ningchun 4 showed a higher germination percentage than those of the WT plants in which only a few mature embryos were germinated (Fig. S4a). Moreover, the transgenic plants derived from Ningchun 4 grew faster than the WT (Fig. 2 ), and the WT plants were severely affected as compared to the transgenic plants. After being cultured for 30 d on the NaCl containing medium, the survival rate of the WT plants (< 10%) was less than that of the transgenic plants (up to 40%) (Fig. 2 a, b). The transgenic plants derived from Fielder on the aforementioned salt containing medium showed a similar result on mature embryos germination percentage to that from the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic plants under the stress condition. But they did not grow well and displayed a stunted growth status in later growth stages (Data not shown). Thereby, these transgenic plants were tested on the medium containing 150 mM NaCl. Mature embryos of the three transgenic lines showed a higher germination rate in a similar manner as cultured on 200 mM NaCl containing medium (Fig. S4d). It was found that the transgenic plants grew much better than the WT. Especially, a higher survival rate ranging from 40–70% was observed in the transgenic plants compared to the WT (Fig. 2 e, f). The transgenic plants derived from both varieties exhibited longer and more secondary roots and longer shoots under the salt stress condition than the WT (Fig. S4b, c, e, f). It was revealed that AtOAT was highly expressed in the leaves and roots of the transgenic lines under the salt stress (Fig. 2 c, d, g, h). These results indicate that the expression of AtOAT enhances wheat tolerance to salt stress. Physiological analysis discovered that proline content, chlorophyll contents, POD and CAT activities were not significantly changed in the transgenic lines derived from both Fielder and Ningchun 4 and their wild types under normal condition (Fig. 3 ; Fig. S5, 6). In contrast, proline content was significantly enhanced in the transgenic lines as compared to the two wild types under salt stress condition (Fig. 3 b; Fig. S5b). Chlorophyll content was reduced under salt stress condition as compared to normal condition but it was relatively higher in the transgenic plants than that in the wild types (Fig. 3 c; Fig. S5c). The POD activity was slightly enhanced in the transgenic plants compared to the wild types under salt stress condition (Fig. 3 d; Fig. S5d). No difference in catalase activity between the transgenic lines derived from Ningchun 4 and the WT was observed under normal and salt stress conditions (Fig. S6a), while only one transgenic line derived from Fielder (OE-F2) showed an enhance catalase activity (Fig. S6b). Transgenic Wheat Plants Showed An Enhanced Drought Tolerance The transgenic lines and their two wild types of Fielder and Ningchun 4 were subjected to water withholding at the tillering stage (Fig. 4 ). After water withholding for 15 d, the WT Fielder’s growth was severely affected as compared to its corresponding transgenic lines (Fig. 4 a); while the WT Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines were less affected by the drought stress. After water recovery for 10 d, the survival rate was only 40% for Fielder and 77 to 93% for its transgenic lines; but there was no difference observed between the WT Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines (Fig. 4 a, c). Considering that Ningchun 4 is more drought-tolerant than Fielder, a prolonged drought period of 18 d was adapted for Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines. After water recovery for 10 d the survival rate was 68 to 75 % for the transgenic lines and 48.8% for the WT Ningchun 4 (Fig. 4 b, 4 e). These results indicate that the incorporation of AtOAT enhances the drought tolerance not only in the drought susceptible wheat variety Fielder but also in the drought-tolerant wheat variety Ningchun 4. Furthermore, the expression of AtOAT in the transgenic lines was significantly enhanced under drought condition as compared to the normal condition (Fig. 4 d, f). These results indicate that the enhancement of drought tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants is attributed to the expression of AtOAT . Under normal condition (0-day) there was no significant difference in proline content among the transgenic plants and their wild types except a slight increase in the two transgenic lines (OE-N1 and OE-N2) from Ningchun 4. Proline content was gradually enhanced with the duration of drought stress in the transgenic lines and their WT. A significant difference in proline content was observed between the transgenic lines and their WT at the three time points (7-, 14- and 21-day after water withholding) during the stress period and this difference was also obvious even after water recovery for a week (Fig. 5 a, b). In general, POD activity was increased during the drought stress and decreased after water recovery in the transgenic lines and their two wild types. A significant difference in POD activity was observed during the stress period and no difference was found after recovery between the transgenic plants and their wild types (Fig. 5 c, d). For the CAT activity, however, no significant difference was observed in the transgenic lines and their wild type Ningchun 4 at 0- and 7-day after water withholding, while a slight increase was observed at 14-day of drought stress. Afterwards, CAT activity was declined in all plants and no significant difference was observed at 21-day and after drought stress between the transgenic and the WT Ningchun 4 plants (Fig. S7a). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in the transgenic lines and their WT Fielder at 0-day, while one transgenic line (OE-F2) showed a slight enhanced CAT activity as compared to the WT Fielder at 7- and 14-day after water stress. Afterwards, a declined CAT activity was observed in all plants and no significant difference was found between the transgenic lines and Fielder at 21-day after water withholding (Fig. S7b). It is indicated that the expression of AtOAT not only regulated proline biosynthesis but also triggered antioxidant defense system to combat the water stress condition in wheat. Transgenic wheat plants showed a slight tolerance to heat shock stress After heat stress treatment 42°C for 36 h, the WT plants started wilting from 24 to 36 h after the stress, and the transgenic plants grew normally (Fig. 6 a, c). This indicates that the expression of AtOAT confers wheat with certain level of tolerance against heat stress. The qRT-PCR analysis displayed that the relative expression of AtOAT in the transgenic Ningchun 4 lines was significantly induced at 12 and 24 h and then reduced at 36 h after heat stress, and it was very low before heat stress; the relative expression of AtOAT in the transgenic Fielder lines was significantly induced at 12 and 24 h and peaked at 36 h after heat stress, and it was in a negligible level before heat stress (Fig. 6 b, d). These results indicate that the improvement of heat tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants could arise from the expression of AtOAT . Expression of proline metabolic genes in response to salt, drought and heat stresses The expression levels of the wheat endogenous genes involved in the proline biosynthesis, including TaOAT , TaP5CS1 , and TaP5CR , were enhanced in the Ningchun 4 transgenic lines as compared to the WT under drought and salt stresses. Similarly, the expression of proline catabolic gene TaP5CDH was down-regulated in the transgenic lines in comparison with the WT plants under drought and salt stresses (Fig. 7 ). Similar expression pattern was also observed in the Fielder transgenic lines (Fig. S8). The up-regulated expression of proline biosynthesis genes and down-regulated expression of proline catabolic genes caused an increased proline accumulation under drought and salt stresses in the transgenic wheat plants. Based on the expression results, it is concluded that glutamate pathway involved in the proline biosynthesis was active during drought and salt stresses as the expressions of TaP5CS1 and TaP5CR were up-regulated in the transgenic wheat plants. Meanwhile, the expression of endogenous TaOAT was also up-regulated in the transgenic plants, which infers that the ornithine pathway is also involved in proline accumulation due to stress conditions. Under heat stress, the expression levels of glutamate pathway of proline biosynthesis genes viz TaP5CS1 and TaP5CR were significantly enhanced in the transgenic plants as compared to the WT plants, but the expression of the key gene for ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis viz TaOAT remained unchanged (Fig. 7 , S8). Like the situation under drought and salt stresses, the expression of proline catabolic gene TaP5CDH was also down-regulated in the transgenic lines derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4 in comparison with their WT plants under heat stress (Fig. 7 , S8). Taken together, only the glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis was activated during heat stress. In general, it was concluded that the expression of AtOAT enhanced the abiotic stress tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants via up-regulating proline biosynthesis genes and down-regulating proline catabolism genes, which further leads to the accumulation of proline during stress conditions. Discussion It is widely accepted that plants adapt to abiotic stress conditions by accumulating proline (Liang et al. 2013 , Szabados and Savoure 2010 ). Normally, proline functions in protein biosynthesis via oxidation, and converts into glutamate for transamination or into ketoglutaric acid for Krebs cycle (Stewart and Hanson 1980). Under environmental stress condition, proline starts accumulation by increasing its biosynthesis and reducing its consumption (Yoshiba et al. 1997 ). Ornithine aminotransferase is thought to be involved in proline biosynthesis. Several studies have demonstrated the positive correlation of OAT and proline synthesis during stress condition. For example, AtOAT showed a positive correlation with salt tolerance and was found to be associated with proline biosynthesis (Roosens et al. 1998 ). In another study, it was proven that the expression of AtOAT provides an additional way for proline biosynthesis in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia through increasing OAT activity (Roosens et al. 2002 ). Similarly, the expression of AtOAT in rice increased proline content from 5 to 15-fold compared to the WT plants under salt and drought stress conditions (Wu et al. 2003 ). It was also demonstrated that the overexpression of OsOAT enhanced osmotic tolerance in the transgenic rice (You et al. 2012 ). Recently, overexpression of TaOAT-5BL was found to enhance the drought tolerance in the transgenic wheat by increase in proline content (Anwar et al. 2020 ). The present study showed that the expression of AtOAT enhanced proline content in the transgenic wheat lines under drought and salt stress conditions (Fig. 3 b, 5 a, b). Based on the current results and previous studies, it is concluded that AtOAT expression enhances drought and salt tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants via promoting proline accumulation. Oxidative stress interrupts plant normal cellular metabolism that leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including singlet oxygen (1O 2 ), hydroxyl radicals (OH•), hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ), alkoxyl radical (RO), and superoxide radical (O 2 •−), which mainly results in an enhancing electrons leakage (Chaves and Oliveira 2004 ; Foyer and Noctor 2012 ). Plants have evolved diverse mechanisms to keep the ROS homeostasis, such as antioxidant enzymes (POD and CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Hydrogen peroxide is decomposed by different peroxidases, such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and CAT (Asada 1999 ; Dat et al. 2000 ; Sarker and Oba 2018c ). The ROS produced in response to biotic or abiotic stress caused oxidative damage to plants. Plants detoxify the negative effect of ROS by initiating antioxidant defense system. The POD catalyses the reduction of H 2 O 2 using various electron donors, such as phenolic compounds, lignin precursors, auxin and secondary metabolites. Several studies reported an enhanced POD activity in response to drought and salinity in Arabidopsis (Jung et al. 2004), Ramonda serbica (Veljovic-Jovanovic et al. 2006 ), and Medicago sativa (Wang et al. 2009 ). In addition, an increased POD activity was tested in Quercus ilex and O. sativa under abiotic stresses by proteomic analysis (Echevarría-Zomeño et al. 2009 ; Raorane et al. 2015 ). Moreover, the expression of POD genes was found to be increased in Tamarix hispida under drought stress (Gao et al. 2010 ). In the present study, we found that POD activity was significantly increased in the transgenic wheat lines as compared to each WT under drought and salt stress conditions (Fig. 4 d, 6 c, d). These results are consistent with one of the previous studies which demonstrated that OsOAT overexpression led to higher POD activity in transgenic rice in comparison with the wild type (You et al. 2012 ). Generally, in our study the CAT activity was not significantly enhanced in Fielder and Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines as compared to each WT. But a slight increased CAT activity was observed at 14-day after water withholding in the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines as compared to the WT. No change on CAT activity was found in the Fielder derived transgenic lines and the WT and a slight increased CAT activity was only observed in the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines under this extend water stress, which might be due to the different drought sensitivity response of the two cultivars. A previous study demonstrated that the antioxidant defense capacity and enzymatic activities of POD, SOD, and CAT during abiotic stresses had genotype dependency (Abedi and Pakniyat 2010). Taking the above results together, we can infer that the increased POD activity might be considered as a key point for the decomposition of H 2 O 2 , especially under the fact of CAT inactivation. Furthermore, it is concluded that expression of AtOAT enhances wheat drought and salt tolerance not only by boosting proline biosynthesis but also by regulating antioxidant defense system. The stimulation of proline biosynthesis under salt and drought stress was associated with an increase in the expression of P5CS1 and P5CR (Hu et al. 1992 ; Yoshiba et al. 1995 ). Several studies have indicated that P5CS is the critical enzyme in proline biosynthesis during abiotic stress conditions (Savouré et al. 1995 ; Szoke et al. 1992 ). The proline accumulation via P5CS and P5CR is known as glutamate pathway (Szabados and Savoure, 2010 ). Glutamate pathway of proline biosynthesis is predominantly active during abiotic stress conditions. An increased expression of P5CS under osmotic stress was reported in wheat, barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.), tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.), switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum ), and Lepidium draba (Rana et al. 2016 ; Bandurska et al. 2017 ; Guan et al. 2019 ; Lopez-Galiano et al. 2019; Goharrizi et al. 2020 ). Our present study also reveals the activation of glutamate pathway in wheat under drought, salt and heat stresses as an increased expression of TaP5CS1 and TaP5CR was observed in AtOAT expressed transgenic plants. Proline accumulation is regulated by the transcription levels of P5CS and ProDH (Verbruggen and Hermans 2008). During stress conditions, the expression of ProDH and P5CDH is suppressed when the transcript of P5CS is induced (Hein et al. 2016 ; Anwar et al. 2018 ). In this study, expression of TaP5CDH is remarkably decreased when the expressions of proline biosynthesis associated genes ( TaP5CS1 and TaP5CR ) increased under drought, salt and heat stresses. Therefore, we can conclude that proline is accumulated in the stressed transgenic wheat plants through glutamate pathway. In addition to the glutamate pathway, proline can also be biosynthesized from ornithine through OAT and P5CR (Fig. S1) (Rizzi et al. 2015 ). This controversial pathway initiates in mitochondria where ornithine is converted to GSA/P5C by the action of OAT enzyme (Liang et al. 2013 ). Then, P5C, the product of OAT activity, is converted to glutamate by P5CDH and re-entered into glutamate pathway or is converted to proline by P5CR after transported from mitochondria to cytosol (Funck et al. 2008 ; Miller et al. 2009 ). The glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis is well understood in plants but the ornithine pathway is not dissected clearly. Nerveless, several indirect shreds of evidence have been reported on the existence of ornithine pathway associated with proline accumulation under stress conditions. The positive relation of OAT activity and proline accumulation was revealed in the NaCl treated radish cotyledons and detached rice leaves (Hervieu et al. 1994 ; Yang and Kao 1999 ). The transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtOAT showed increased salt and osmotic tolerances as their biomass and germination rates were significantly higher than the WT plants (Roosens et al. 2002 ). Additionally, it was found that exogenous application of ornithine increased OAT activity and proline accumulation in salt-stressed cashew plants (Da Rocha et al. 2012 ). Like Arabidopsis AtOAT , rice OsOAT was also found to have a key tolerant role to drought and other oxidative stresses as the overexpression of OsOAT enhanced the osmotic stress tolerance of the transgenic rice plants (You et al. 2012 ). Our study provides a direct evidence for activation of ornithine pathway as an increased expression level of TaOAT was detected in the transgenic wheat lines, which led to the conversion of ornithine into P5C. However, a reduced expression level of TaP5CDH indicated that P5C was not converted into glutamate. Instead, it was transported to cytosol from mitochondria and then reduced into proline by the action of P5CR (Fig. 7 , S8). Here, the important challenge is that how OAT-derived P5C is transported from mitochondria to cytosol (Fig. S1). There is an indirect evidence for the transportation of OAT-derived P5C from mitochondria to cytosol without any experimental confirmation (Da Rocha et al. 2012 ; Funck et al. 2010; Miller et al. 2009 ). The results obtained in our study are consistent with the findings by Da Roha et al. (2012) who demonstrated that the decreased expression of P5CDH and increased expression of OAT caused the accumulation of P5C in mitochondria and this OAT-derived P5C was moved to cytosol from mitochondria due to toxicity. In our present study, the increased expression of TaOAT and TaP5CR along with the decreased expression of TaP5CH in the transgenic wheat plants during drought and salt stress provided a clear evidence of activation of ornithine pathway. The unchanged expression of TaOAT indicated that ornithine pathway was not activated in the transgenic wheat plants under heat stress. We speculated that the ornithine pathway is also activated along with the glutamate pathway and plays a significant role in tolerance to drought and salt stresses in the transgenic wheat plants under the stress conditions. You et al. ( 2012 ) reported that the expression of OsOAT was highly induced in response to heat stress. In our study, the transgenic wheat plants just displayed a partial tolerance to heat stress. It might be the reason that only the glutamate pathway was activated in the transgenic wheat plants in front of heat stress. Homozygosity is tremendously required in transgenic wheat study that guarantees the stable incorporation and inheritance of transgene. Normally, it takes 2–3 years to produce homozygous transgenic seeds for further investigation (Passricha et al. 2016 ). Double haploid (DH) technology ensures the production of complete homozygous wheat lines in a single year making the selection process effective in the breeding (Hussain et al. 2013 ). Thus, doubled haploid technology may significantly reduce the time for producing homozygous transgenic plants. There are two major methods for producing wheat doubled haploids, which are known as androgenesis (anther culture and microspore culture) and gynogenesis (using wheat–maize hybridization). The chromosome elimination through wheat–maize hybridization is the most effective and widely used technique (Santra et al. 2017 ). In the present study, gynogenesis method was used to produce the homozygous transgenic lines. Thus, this method could help us to accelerate our transgenic wheat research by generating homozygous transgenic lines in a single generation. Conclusions The expression of Arabidopsis AtOAT encoding gene in wheat enhanced the tolerance of the transgenic plants to drought, salinity, and heat. The enhanced tolerance to the abiotic stresses in the transgenic plants was contributed to the increased proline accumulation and peroxidase activity. Further study indicated that the expression of the main genes associated with proline biosynthesis or catabolism. In addition to the main pathway of proline biosynthesis (e.g., P5CS and P5CR -Glu pathway), the alternative pathway, such as OAT and P5CR -ornithine pathway, played an important role in proline accumulation under drought and salinity stresses. However, the ornithine pathway is not activated during heat stress. We speculated that OAT-induced P5C was transported to cytosol from mitochondria and then reduced to proline by P5CR in the transgenic plants under the stress conditions. Declarations Funding This work was supported in parts by the grants from the Ministry of Agriculture of China (2016ZX08010004 and 2016ZX08009001), and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in China (2060302-2-19). Conflicts of interest/Competing interests N/A Availability of data and material N/A Acknowledgments We are grateful to Drs. Wujun Ma and Rongchang Yang from the School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Australia, for initiating the collaborative study on ornithine aminotransferase in wheat. We are thankful to Dr. Luoming Zhao from Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for his technical support in drought tolerant assay. Author contributions AA performed most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript. KW and LD conducted wheat transformation. JW detected the transgenic wheat plants by fluorescence in situ hybridization. LS did part of abiotic stress tolerance test of the transgenic wheat plants. XY conceived the study and revised the manuscript. References Abhinandan K, Skori L, Stanic M, Hickerson N M N, Jamshed M, Samuel M A (2018). Abiotic stress signaling in wheat - An inclusive overview of hormonal interactions during abiotic stress responses in wheat. Front Plant Sci 9: 734. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00734 Alia and Saradhi PP (1991). Proline accumulation under heavy metal stress. J Plant Physiol 138: 554-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80240-3 Anwar A, She M, Wang K, Riaz B, Ye X (2018). Biological roles of ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) in plant stress tolerance: present progress and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 19: 3681. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113681 Anwar A, She M, Wang K, Ye X (2020). Cloning and molecular characterization of Triticum aestivum ornithine amino transferase ( TaOAT ) encoding genes. BMC Plant Biol 20: 187-187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02396-2 Arnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in beta vulgaris . Plant Physiol 24: 1. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1. Asada K (1999). The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: Scvaenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 601-639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601 Bandurska H, Niedziela J, Pietrowska-Borek M, Nuc K, Chadzinikolau T, Radzikowska D (2017). Regulation of proline biosynthesis and resistance to drought stress in two barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes of different origin. Plant Physiol Biochem 118: 427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.006. Charest C, Ton Phan C (1990). Cold acclimation of wheat ( Triticum aestivum ): Properties of enzymes involved in proline metabolism. Physiol Plantarum 80: 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb04391.x Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55: 2365-2384. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh269 Da Rocha IMA, Vitorello VA, Silva JS, Ferreira-Silva SL, Viégas RA, Silva EN et al. (2012). Exogenous ornithine is an effective precursor and the δ-ornithine amino transferase pathway contributes to proline accumulation under high N recycling in salt-stressed cashew leaves. J Plant Physiol 169: 41-49. Dat J, Vandenabeele S, Vranova E, Van Montagu M, Inze D, van Breusegem F (2000). Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 779-795. doi: 10.1007/s000180050041 Delauney A, Hu C, Kishor P, Verma D (1993). Cloning of ornithine delta-aminotransferase cDNA from Vigna aconitifolia by trans-complementation in Escherichia coli and regulation of proline biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 268: 18673-18678. Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR (1980). Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 7347-7351. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.77.12.7347 Dudziak K, Zapalska M, Börner A, Szczerba H, Kowalczyk K, Nowak M et al. (2019) Analysis of wheat gene expression related to the oxidative stress response and signal transduction under short-term osmotic stress. Sci Rep 9: 2743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39154-w Echevarría-Zomeño S, Ariza D, Jorge I, Lenz C, Del Campo A, Jorrín J V, Navarro R M (2009). Changes in the protein profile of Quercus ilex leaves in response to drought stress and recovery. J Plant Physiol 166: 233-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.05.008 Foyer C H, Noctor G, (2012). Managing the cellular redox hub in photosynthetic organisms. Plant Cell Environ 35: 199-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02453.x Funck D, Stadelhofer B, Koch W (2008). Ornithine-delta-aminotransferase is essential for arginine catabolism but not for proline biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol 8: 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-40 Gao C, Wang Y, Liu G, Wang C, Jiang J, Yang C (2010). Cloning of ten peroxidase (POD) genes from Tamarix hispida and characterization of their responses to abiotic stress. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28: 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-009-0129-9. Goharrizi K J, Moosavi S S, Amirmahani F, Salehi F, Nazari M (2020). Assessment of changes in growth traits, oxidative stress parameters, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms in Lepidium draba plant under osmotic stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Protoplasma 257: 459-473. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01457-0. Guo X, Su H, Shi Q, Fu S, Wang J, Zhang X, Han F (2016). De novo centromere formation and centromeric sequence expansion in wheat and its wide hybrids. PloS Genet 12: e1005997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005997 Guan C, Huang YH, Cen HF, Cui X, Tian DY, Zhang YW (2019). Overexpression of the Lolium perenne L. delta1-pyrroline 5-carboxylate synthase (LpP5CS) gene results in morphological alterations and salinity tolerance in switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.). Plos One 14: e0219669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219669 Hare PD, Cress WA van Staden J (1999). Proline synthesis and degradation: a model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction. J Exp Bot 50: 413-434. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.333.413. Hein J A, Sherrard M E, Manfredi K P, Abebe T (2016). The fifth leaf and spike organs of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) display different physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol 16: 248. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0922-1. Hervieu F, Dily FL, Billard J P, Huault C (1994). Effects of water-stress on proline content and ornithine aminotransferase activity of radish cotyledons. Phytochemistry 37: 1227-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422 (00)90389-3 Hervieu F, Dily Fl, Huault C, Billard JP (1995). Contribution of ornithine aminotransferase to proline accumulation in NaCl‐treated radish cotyledons. Plant Cell Environ 182: 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00354.x Hu C, Delauney AJ, Verma D (1992). A bifunctional enzyme (delta 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase) catalyzes the first two steps in proline biosynthesis in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 9354-9358. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.89.19.9354 Hussain B, Khan MA, Ali Q, Shaukat S (2013). Double haploid production in wheat through microspore culture and wheat × maize crossing system: An overview. Int J Agron Vet Med Sci 6: 332-344. doi: 10.5455/ijavms.168. Ishida Y, Tsunashima, M, Hiei Y Komari T (2015). Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L .) transformation using immature embryos, in Agrobacterium Protocols. Springer, pp. 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1695-5_15 Jung S (2004). Variation in antioxidant metabolism of young and mature leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana subjected to drought. Plant Sci 166: 459-466. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.012 Kishor P, Hong Z, Miao G H, Hu C, Verma D (1995). Overexpression of [delta]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 108: 1387-1394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.4.1387 Liang X, Zhang L, Natarajan SK, Becker DF (2013). Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal 19: 998-1011. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.5074 Liu H, Sultan M A, Liu X L, Zhang J, Yu F and Zhao H X (2015). Physiological and comparative proteomic analysis reveals different drought responses in roots and leaves of drought-tolerant wild wheat ( Triticum boeoticum ). PloS One 10: e0121852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121852 Livak K J and Schmittgen T D (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 −ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402-408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262 Lopez Galiano M J, García Robles I, Gonzalez-Hernandez A I, Camanes G, Vicedo B, Real M D, Rausell C, (2019). Expression of miR159 is altered in tomato plants undergoing drought stress. Plants 8: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070201 Miller G, Honig A, Stein H, Suzuki N, Mittler R, Zilberstein A (2009). Unraveling delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate-proline cycle in plants by uncoupled expression of proline oxidation enzymes. J Biol Chem 284: 26482-26492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.009340 Paolacci AR, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E Ciaffi M (2009). Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR normalization in wheat. BMC Mol Biol 10: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-10-11 Passricha N, Saifi S, Khatodia S Tuteja N (2016). Assessing zygosity in progeny of transgenic plants: current methods and perspectives. J Biol Methods 3: 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.14440%2Fjbm.2016.114 Rana V, Ram S, Nehra K, Sharma I (2016). Expression of genes related to Naþ exclusion and proline accumulation in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes under salt stress. Cereal Res Commun 44: 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.44.2016.009 Raorane M L, Pabuayon I M, Varadarajan A R, Mutte S K, Kumar A, Treumann A, Kohli A (2015). Proteomic insights into the role of the large-effect QTL qDTY 12.1 for rice yield under drought. Mol Breed 35: 139. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0321-6 Rizzi Y, Monteoliva M, Fabro G, Grosso C, Laróvere L, Alvarez M (2015). P5CDH affects the pathways contributing to proline synthesis after ProDH activation by biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Front Plant Sci 6: 572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00572 Rong W, Qi L, Wang A, Ye X, Du L, Liang H, Zhang Z (2014). The ERF transcription factor TaERF3 promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J 12: 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12153 Roosens N H, Bitar F A, Loenders K, Angenon G, Jacobs M (2002). Overexpression of ornithine-δ-aminotransferase increases proline biosynthesis and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Mol Breed 9: 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026791932238 Roosens N H, Thu T T, Iskandar H M, Jacobs M (1998). Isolation of the ornithine-delta-aminotransferase cDNA and effect of salt stress on its expression in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Physiol 117: 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.1.263 Roosens N H, Willem R, Li Y, Verbruggen I, Biesemans M, Jacobs M (1999). Proline metabolism in the wild-type and in a salt-tolerant mutant of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia studied by13C-nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol 121: 1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1281 Santra M, Wang H, Seifert S, Haley S (2017). Doubled haploid laboratory protocol for wheat using wheat-maize wide hybridization. Methods Mol Biol 1679: 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7337-8_14 Sarker U, Islam M T, Oba S (2018). Salinity stress accelerates nutrients, dietary fiber, minerals, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in Amaranthus tricolor leaves. PloS One 13: e0206388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206388 Sarker U, Oba S (2018a). Augmentation of leaf color parameters, pigments, vitamins, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in selected Amaranthus tricolor under salinity stress. Sci Rep 8: 12349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30897-6. Sarker U, Oba S (2018b). Drought stress effects on growth, ROS markers, compatible solutes, phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity in Amaranthus tricolor . Appl Biochem Biotech 186: 999-1016. doi: 10.1007/s12010-018-2784-5. Sarker U, Oba S (2018c). Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of Amaranthus tricolor . Sci Rep 8: 16496-16496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34944-0 Sarker U, Oba S. (2020). The response of salinity stress-induced A. tricolor to growth, anatomy, physiology, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Front Plant Sci 11: 1354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.559876 Savouré A, Jaoua S, Hua XJ, Ardiles W, Van Montagu M, Verbruggen N (1995). Isolation, characterization, and chromosomal location of a gene encoding the Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 372: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00935-3 Schobert B (1977). Is there an osmotic regulatory mechanism in algae and higher plants? J Theor Biol 68: 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90224-7 Solomon A, Beer S, Waisel Y, Jones GG, Paleg L (2006). Effects of NaCl on the carboxylating activity of Rubisco from Tamarix jordanis in the presence and absence of proline-related compatible solutes. Physiol Plant 90: 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02211.x Stránská J, Kopečný D, Tylichová M, Snégaroff J, Šebela M (2008). Ornithine δ-aminotransferase: an enzyme implicated in salt tolerance in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav 3: 929-935. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6771 Szabados L, Savoure A (2010). Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009 Szoke A, Miao GH, Hong Z, Verma DPS (1992). Subcellular location of δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase in root/nodule and leaf of soybean. Plant Physiol 99: 1642-1649. https://dx.doi.org/10.1104%2Fpp.99.4.1642 Veljovic-Jovanovic S, Kukavica B, Stevanovic B, Navari-Izzo F (2006). Senescence-and drought-related changes in peroxidase and superoxide dismutase isoforms in leaves of Ramonda serbica . J Exp Bot 57: 1759-1768. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl007 Wang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Deng XP, Kwak SS (2009). Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem 47: 570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.009. Wang K, Liu H, Du L, Ye X (2017). Generation of marker-free transgenic hexaploid wheat via an Agrobacterium -mediated co-transformation strategy in commercial Chinese wheat varieties. Plant Biotech J 15: 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12660 Wu L, Fan Z, Guo L, Li Y, Zhang W, Qu LJ, Chen Z (2003). Over-expression of an Arabidopsis δ-OAT gene enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic rice. Chin Sci Bull 48: 2594-2600. https://doi.org/10.1360/03wc0218 Yang C W, Kao C H (1999). Importance of ornithine-δ-aminotransferase to proline accumulation caused by water stress in detached rice leaves. Plant Growth Regul 27: 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226732574 Yang C W, Wang J, Kao C (2000). The relation between accumulation of abscisic acid and proline in detached rice leaves. Biol Plant 43: 301-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002781016598 Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Katagiri T, Ueda H, Mizoguchi T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1995). Correlation between the induction of a gene for Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and the accumulation of proline in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Plant J 75: 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07050751.x Yoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1997). Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress . Plant Cell Physiol 38: 1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029093 You J, Hu H, Xiong L (2012). An ornithine δ-aminotransferase gene OsOAT confers drought and oxidative stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci 197: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.09.002 Zhang G, Chen M, Li L, Xu Z, Chen X, Guo J, Ma Y (2009). Overexpression of the soybean GmERF3 gene, an AP2/ERF type transcription factor for increased tolerances to salt, drought, and diseases in transgenic tobacco. J Exp Bot 60: 3781-3796. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp214 Supplementary Files SupplementaryfilePCR128.docx Supplementary data Table S1 Primers used in the study. Table S2 Induction of haploid embryos from the transgenic wheat plants by maize pollen. Fig. S1 Proline biosynthesis and catabolism pathway in plants. Green lines indicate the glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis. Red lines indicate the ornithine pathway for proline biosynthesis. Black lines indicate the proline catabolic pathway. Fig. S2 The map of the backbone vector pWMB174 used in this study to construct the expression vector containing AtOAT for wheat transformation. Fig. S3 Detection of the homozygous positive wheat plants by PCR amplification for AtOAT gene. a The homozygous positive plants derived from Fielder as a receptor. b The homozygous positive plants derived from Ningchun 4 as a receptor. WT, the negative control plant without AtOAT; P, the positive control expression vector plasmid used for Agrobacterium mediated wheat transformation. Fig. S4 Botanic traits of the transgenic wheat plants expressing AtOAT under salt stress. a Germination rate of the WT Ningchun 4 (NC) and its transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. b Root length of NC and its transgenic lines under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. c Shoot length of NC and its transgenic lines under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. d Germination rate of the WT Fielder (FC) and its transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) under 150 and 200 mM NaCI stress condition. (E) Root length of FC and its transgenic lines under 150 mM NaCI stress condition. (F) Shoot length of FC and its transgenic lines under 150 mM NaCI stress condition. Fig. S5 Physiological parameters of the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under salt stress. a Phenotypes of transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder (FC) after five times irrigation with 250 mM NaCI solution. b Free proline content in the transgenic lines and FC before and after salt stress. c Chlorophyll content in the transgenic lines and FC before and after salt stress. d Peroxidase activity in the transgenic lines and FC plants before and after salt stress. Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant difference between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. Fig. S6 Measurements of catalase activity in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT in response to salt stress. a Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Fielder (NC) after five times irrigation with 250 mM NaCI solution. b Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder (FC). Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. Fig. S7 Measurements of catalase activity in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT in response to drought stress. a Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Ningchun 4 (NC) under water stress for different time. b Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder. Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. Fig. S8. Relative expression of proline biosynthesis and catabolism associated genes in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under abiotic stress conditions. The red column represents the expression of proline biosynthesis related genes (TaP5CS1, TaP5CR, and TaOAT) and proline catabolism related gene TaP5CDH under drought stress condition. The orange column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under salt stress condition. Blue column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under heat stress condition. Data represent the average of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was calculated by IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. FC represents the WT Fielder. OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3 are the transgenic lines derived from FC. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Under Review Version 1 posted Reviewers invited by journal 31 Jan, 2021 Reviews received at journal 31 Jan, 2021 First submitted to journal 27 Jan, 2021 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-175437","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Original Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":9956038,"identity":"27675026-0a97-453a-95f7-62a46100d4e7","order_by":0,"name":"Alia Anwar","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Alia","middleName":"","lastName":"Anwar","suffix":""},{"id":9956039,"identity":"27746f99-9e13-40a0-be33-b5a022a2763b","order_by":1,"name":"Ke Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"CAAS ICS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ke","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":9956040,"identity":"344abb93-8030-4b27-a383-8c3caec83eb3","order_by":2,"name":"Jing Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"CAAS ICS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jing","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":9956041,"identity":"fcb80573-fe07-4ffd-a947-46987aac8f1d","order_by":3,"name":"Lei Shi","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"CAAS ICS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lei","middleName":"","lastName":"Shi","suffix":""},{"id":9956042,"identity":"ad24ce65-176f-4030-9d4f-5422062197de","order_by":4,"name":"Lipu Du","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"CAAS ICS: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences","correspondingAuthor":false,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lipu","middleName":"","lastName":"Du","suffix":""},{"id":9956043,"identity":"49c644ec-c2af-4611-ba0b-7a5f06e5eda6","order_by":5,"name":"Xingguo Ye","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6616-2753","institution":"Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences","correspondingAuthor":true,"submittingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Xingguo","middleName":"","lastName":"Ye","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2021-01-28 13:21:51","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":5637572,"identity":"d4a53df3-dc66-4c85-a771-1f9ae127a56c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:05:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":141230,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Generation and identification of stable transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT. a Schematic representation of expression vector pWMB175 containing AtOAT gene. b Haploid plants with 21 chromosomes. c Doubled haploid plants with 42 chromosomes. d Detection of the AtOAT gene integrated into wheat genome by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). I and II are the transgenic lines derived from Fielder (FC), and III and IV are the transgenic lines from Ningchun 4 (NC). Two hybridization signals indicated that AtOAT are integrated into wheat genome by one copy, and four hybridization signals indicated that AtOAT are integrated into wheat genome by two copies. The presence of the transgene is indicated by arrows. e Semi-quantitative PCR analysis of the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) from FC. f Semi-quantitative PCR analysis of the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) from NC.","description":"","filename":"Figure1.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/4b5e66584908e34d693643e0.jpg"},{"id":5637390,"identity":"b3319452-23e1-48da-a7ec-5e7465ea9450","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:02:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":138984,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Characterization of salt tolerance in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT in in vitro salts stress condition. a Salt tolerance test of the transgenic lines expressing AtOAT (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) derived from Ningchun 4 (NC). b Survival rate of the transgenic lines expressing AtOAT derived from NC after salts stress. c Relative expression of AtOAT in the leaves of transgenic lines derived from NC under salt stress. d Relative expression of AtOAT in the roots of transgenic lines derived from NC under salt stress. e Salt tolerance test of the transgenic lines expressing AtOAT (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) derived from Fielder (FC). f Survival rate of the transgenic lines expressing AtOAT derived from FC. g Relative expression of AtOAT in the leaves of the transgenic lines derived from FC. h Relative expression of AtOAT in the leaves of the transgenic lines derived from FC. For relative expression analysis, data from three biological replicates were averaged and analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.","description":"","filename":"Figure2.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/01b7f40e1199a9ca5a034086.jpg"},{"id":5637391,"identity":"03b0b2b5-2221-4531-8d49-61c2472c5674","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:02:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":136943,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Determination of related physiological parameters in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under salt stress. a Salt tolerant performance of the transgenic plants and their wild types after irrigating 250 mM salt solution for 5 times. b Free proline content of the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Ningchun 4 (NC) after the salt stress. c Chlorophyll content of the transgenic lines and their wild types after the salt stress. d Peroxidase (POD) activity in the transgenic lines and their wild types after the salt stress. The data were averaged from three replicates and analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.","description":"","filename":"Figure3.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/14d3b1c7cd204192da0e8108.jpg"},{"id":5637858,"identity":"aa36eb6e-f6ca-4af5-a019-8292fc2fe054","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:08:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":4,"title":"Figure 4","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":179785,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Characterization of drought tolerance in the transgenic wheat lines. a Drought tolerance test of the transgenic lines and their WT Fielder after water withholding for 15 d and water recovery for 10 d. b Drought tolerance test of the transgenic lines and their WT Ningchun 4 after water withholding for 18 d and water recovery for 10 d. c Survival rate of the transgenic lines and their WT Fielder after water stress for 15 d. d Relative expression of AtOAT in the transgenic lines and their WT Fielder under normal and drought stress conditions. e Survival rate of the transgenic lines and their WT Ningchun 4 after water stress for 18 d. f Relative expression of AtOAT in the transgenic lines and their WT Ningchun 4 under normal and drought conditions. The VMC represents the volumetric water content of the soil. Data of the qRT-PCR were averaged from three biological replicates and analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.","description":"","filename":"Figure4.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/bb2f533b1a0efd4a80dfe0a2.jpg"},{"id":5637573,"identity":"d4e3643e-0a5f-4b7f-b79c-a128065b8a83","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:05:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":5,"title":"Figure 5","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":123388,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Determination of related physiological parameters in the AtOAT transgenic wheat lines in response to drought stress. a Free proline content in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Ningchun 4 (NC) under water stress for different time. b Free proline content in the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder (FC) under water stress for different time. c POD activity in the transgenic lines and their WT NC under water stress for different time. d POD activity in the transgenic lines and their WT FC under water stress for different time. Five plants per replicate were analyzed and in total there were three replicates. A significance test was applied using IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.","description":"","filename":"Figure5.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/a29e20845f2ed1f91b5afd98.jpg"},{"id":5637857,"identity":"54ab3026-fc09-4c15-9be4-32a8d2a9c07c","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:08:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":6,"title":"Figure 6","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":14387301,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Characterization of heat stress tolerance in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT. a, c Heat tolerance test of the transgenic wheat lines and their WT Ningchun 4 (NC) and Fielder (FC). b, d Relative expression of AtOAT in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, OE-N3, OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT NC and FC under heat stress for different time. Data of the qRT-PCR from three biological replicates were averaged and analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.","description":"","filename":"Figure6.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/92511d985f6a53404a7dff40.jpg"},{"id":5637574,"identity":"de65c6f5-3e06-4635-a865-d79d5fd664c2","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:05:11","extension":"jpg","order_by":7,"title":"Figure 7","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":130801,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Relative expression profiling of related gene to proline biosynthesis and catabolism in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under abiotic stress conditions. The red column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis related genes TaP5CS, TaP5CR, and TaOAT, and the proline catabolism related gene TaP5CDH under drought stress condition. The orange column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under salt stress condition. Blue column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under heat stress condition. Data represent the average of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was calculated by IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. NC represents the WT Ningchun 4. OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3 are three transgenic lines derived from NC.","description":"","filename":"Figure7.jpg","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/4da7935dab523adedeabad8a.jpg"},{"id":15670933,"identity":"ed32729d-266d-40f8-8a5c-8ab1db4aef03","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-11-18 14:03:10","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1263405,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/48d920ea-bc9b-4ddd-b882-c32c027d5a7d.pdf"},{"id":5637392,"identity":"13029c12-67d5-4c4a-8ca3-e9e95c95cd2e","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2021-02-04 20:02:11","extension":"docx","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":2201540,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"Supplementary data\nTable S1 Primers used in the study.\nTable S2 Induction of haploid embryos from the transgenic wheat plants by maize pollen.\nFig. S1 Proline biosynthesis and catabolism pathway in plants. Green lines indicate the glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis. Red lines indicate the ornithine pathway for proline biosynthesis. Black lines indicate the proline catabolic pathway.\nFig. S2 The map of the backbone vector pWMB174 used in this study to construct the expression vector containing AtOAT for wheat transformation.\nFig. S3 Detection of the homozygous positive wheat plants by PCR amplification for AtOAT gene. a The homozygous positive plants derived from Fielder as a receptor. b The homozygous positive plants derived from Ningchun 4 as a receptor. WT, the negative control plant without AtOAT; P, the positive control expression vector plasmid used for Agrobacterium mediated wheat transformation.\nFig. S4 Botanic traits of the transgenic wheat plants expressing AtOAT under salt stress. a Germination rate of the WT Ningchun 4 (NC) and its transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. b Root length of NC and its transgenic lines under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. c Shoot length of NC and its transgenic lines under 200 mM NaCI stress condition. d Germination rate of the WT Fielder (FC) and its transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) under 150 and 200 mM NaCI stress condition. (E) Root length of FC and its transgenic lines under 150 mM NaCI stress condition. (F) Shoot length of FC and its transgenic lines under 150 mM NaCI stress condition.\nFig. S5 Physiological parameters of the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under salt stress. a Phenotypes of transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder (FC) after five times irrigation with 250 mM NaCI solution. b Free proline content in the transgenic lines and FC before and after salt stress. c Chlorophyll content in the transgenic lines and FC before and after salt stress. d Peroxidase activity in the transgenic lines and FC plants before and after salt stress. Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant difference between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.\nFig. S6 Measurements of catalase activity in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT in response to salt stress. a Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Fielder (NC) after five times irrigation with 250 mM NaCI solution. b Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder (FC). Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.\nFig. S7 Measurements of catalase activity in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT in response to drought stress. a Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3) and their WT Ningchun 4 (NC) under water stress for different time. b Catalase activity in the transgenic lines (OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3) and their WT Fielder. Data represent the average of three replicates and were analyzed with IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means.\nFig. S8. Relative expression of proline biosynthesis and catabolism associated genes in the transgenic wheat lines expressing AtOAT under abiotic stress conditions. The red column represents the expression of proline biosynthesis related genes (TaP5CS1, TaP5CR, and TaOAT) and proline catabolism related gene TaP5CDH under drought stress condition. The orange column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under salt stress condition. Blue column represents the expression profiles of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism related genes under heat stress condition. Data represent the average of three biological replicates. Statistical significance was calculated by IBM-SPSS statistic 20. Letters in bold represent significant differences between groups at α = 0.05. Bars indicate the standard errors of the means. FC represents the WT Fielder. OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3 are the transgenic lines derived from FC.","description":"","filename":"SupplementaryfilePCR128.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-175437/v1/d063b48b7553bd97f988632c.docx"}],"financialInterests":"","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003eExpression of \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe expansion of the global human population, which is a serious challenge for sustainably social development of the world, requires continuous increase in crop production. Among the cereal crops, wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e L.) is ranked the second in terms of total global production but the first in terms of the total cultivation area (FAO 2018). However, wheat productivity is heavily affected by abiotic stresses including drought, salinity, and heat (Abhinandan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). To produce more foods, wheat has to be planted in some arid and salinize arable lands. Especially, global warming, drought and heat stresses, which have happened more frequently with increased intensity, impose a serious threat in wheat production (Liu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, it is of importance to develop wheat varieties adapted to these abiotic stress conditions, and identification of more useful genes by genetic engineering approaches is helpful to this breeding objective.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlants under salinity and drought stresses have evolved a range of physiological and biochemical responses, such as accumulation of compatible osmolytes like proline (Pro) and the increased activity of antioxidant enzymes (Sarker and Oba \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018a\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR48\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018b\u003c/span\u003e; Sarker et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Proline is the most important osmolyte in plants as a stress indicator because of its large water-solubility (162.3 g/100 ml H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO) and strong hydrating ability. It plays a crucial role in osmoregulation in algae, plants and animals by protection of enzyme and cellular structure (Delauney et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e; Kishor et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Schobert \u003cspan citationid=\"CR52\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1977\u003c/span\u003e; Solomon et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR53\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e). It also serves as a scavenger of free radicals and energy source to regulate redox potential and maintain the nitrogen content (Alia and Saradhi \u003cspan citationid=\"CR2\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1991\u003c/span\u003e; Sarker and Oba \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018c\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR50\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). There exist two proline biosynthesis pathways in plants, namely glutamate (Glu) and ornithine (Orn) pathways, in front of biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Delauney et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1993\u003c/span\u003e; Hare et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e; Yoshiba et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). In the glutamate pathway, glutamate is reduced into pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) by P5C synthase (P5CS). In addition, plants can synthesize proline \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e ornithine pathway, in which ornithine is firstly converted into P5C by OAT in mitochondria, and then P5C is either transformed into glutamate by P5C dehydrogenase (P5CDH) initiating glutamate pathway (Funck et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e), or transferred to cytosol to produce proline by P5C reductase (P5CR) (Fig. S1) (Miller et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The coordinated action of P5CDH and P5CR encoding genes determines the final use of P5C under stress condition (Rizzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Proline catabolism occurs through sequential actions of proline dehydrogenase (ProDH) and P5C dehydrogenase (P5CDH), which convert P5C to glutamate (Szabados and Savoure \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Pyrroline-5-carboxylate is a common intermediate in both proline biosynthesis and catabolism pathways (Rizzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Many studies have clarified that proline accumulation is mainly controlled by up-regulation of the genes involved in proline biosynthesis pathway and down-regulation of the genes involved in proline catabolism pathway, when plants are exposed to different stresses (Yoshiba et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e; Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe OAT is the key enzyme in ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis. As a transaminase, this enzyme is involved in the conversion of ornithine into glutamate and glutamyl-5-semi-aldehyde (GSA). The biosynthesis of glutamate from ornithine is speculated as ornithine pathway, but the exact route of the ornithine pathway for proline biosynthesis is still unclear as an unknown exit route of P5C/GSA from mitochondria to cytosol is required (Str\u0026aacute;nsk\u0026aacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR54\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). The glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis is well known in plants, but the ornithine pathway is poorly understood. Similar to the glutamate pathway, the ornithine pathway has been found to play a significant role in multiple stress conditions (Hervieu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; You et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Several studies have revealed the correlation between OAT and proline biosynthesis under abiotic stress conditions such as cold (Charest and Ton Phan \u003cspan citationid=\"CR8\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1990\u003c/span\u003e), salt (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e), dehydration (Hervieu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e), and ABA (Yang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR62\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e). Similar to P5CS, OAT is also a rate-limiting enzyme in proline biosynthesis (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e), except that OAT is not feedback inhibited by proline (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR44\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e). A positive role of OAT was also found in radish (\u003cem\u003eRaphanus sativus\u003c/em\u003e L.) plants under salt stress (Hervieu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e). Overexpression of an OAT encoding gene in tobacco (\u003cem\u003eNicotiana tabaccum\u003c/em\u003e L.) increased proline content up to 3-fold higher in the transgenic plants than in the wild-type (WT) plants (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, overexpression of \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis OAT\u003c/em\u003e (\u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e) in rice (\u003cem\u003eOryza sativa\u003c/em\u003e L.) was reported to enhance its tolerances to salt and drought stresses by increasing proline content (Wu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsidering the important roles of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in the tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in other plants, it is necessary to investigate its functions and molecular mechanism in wheat for the improvement in environmental tolerances. At present, no study has been conducted on the functional characterization of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in wheat. In this study, we expressed \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e gene in wheat and analysed its effects on tolerance against salt, drought, and heat and also dissected the ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis in transgenic wheat plants. Our results will be helpful for further developing new wheat varieties with enhanced tolerance to various abiotic stresses.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Materials And Methods","content":"\u003ch2\u003ePlant materials\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwo spring wheat varieties Fielder and Ningchun 4 used in this study were obtained from the National Crop Germplasm Bank of China at the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (ICS-CAAS). Relatively, Fielder is regarded as a drought sensitive genotype and Ningchun 4 as a moderately drought resistant genotype. Five wheat plants per pot (25 cm in diameter and 18 cm in height) were grown in a growth chamber with 45% humidity at 24\u0026deg;C under a 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod cycle. Immature embryos 15 d post anthesis were collected from the two wheat varieties to be used for \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e-mediated transformation. A maize (\u003cem\u003eZea mays\u003c/em\u003e L.) inbred line Zheng 58, which was kindly provided by Dr. Yongjun Liu at ICS-CAAS, was planted in a greenhouse as a pollen donor to produce stable transgenic lines \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e chromosome elimination.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003ePlasmid construction and wheat transformation\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe full-length complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e (accession number: At5g46180) was amplified from seedlings of the \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis \u003c/em\u003eecotype Columbia-0 using primers AtOAT-F and AtOAT-R (Table S1). After confirmation by sequencing, it was inserted onto an expression vector \u003cem\u003epWMB174 \u003c/em\u003e(Fig. S2), which contains two independent T-DNA regions, one carrying \u003cem\u003ebar\u003c/em\u003e selectable marker under the control of \u003cem\u003eCaMV35S\u003c/em\u003e promoter and \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e nopaline synthase (NOS) terminator, and the other carrying maize ubiquitin (ubi) promoter, a multiple cloning site (MCS) and the NOS terminator. The \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e gene was digested with \u003cem\u003eS\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003ema\u003c/em\u003el and \u003cem\u003eSpe\u003c/em\u003e1 and inserted onto the digested \u003cem\u003epWMB174\u003c/em\u003e with the same enzymes at the MCS under the control of ubi promoter to form a new recombination vector \u003cem\u003epWMB175 \u003c/em\u003e(Fig. 1a). The new vector was transformed into \u003cem\u003eA. tumefaciens \u003c/em\u003estrain C58C1 by triparental mating (\u003ca href=\"#_ENREF_4\"\u003eDitta et al. 1980\u003c/a\u003e) and further introduced into wheat immature embryos using the methods described previously (Ishida et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eQ\u003cstrong\u003euick\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003estix st\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003erip\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e detection\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLeaf segments of the putative transgenic wheat plants generated from \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e-mediated transformation were collected and detected by a QuickStix Kit (EnviroLogix, USA) for the selection marker existence of \u003cem\u003ebar\u003c/em\u003e gene as described previously (Wang et al. 2017). All the putative transgenic plants were tested by this method and further confirmed by other methods.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eDNA extraction and PCR amplification\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGenomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the putative transgenic wheat plants using NuClean Plant Genomic DNA Kit (CWbio Inc., Beijing, China). The DNA pellet was dissolved in ddH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO and quantified to be used in PCR amplification as templates. The presence of the transgene was detected by specific primer AtOAT-F/AtOAT-R (Table S1), and PCR was carried out in a 15 \u0026micro;L reaction buffer containing 6 \u0026micro;l of sterile distilled water, 1 \u0026micro;L of template DNA (100-200 ng \u0026micro;L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e), 0.5 \u0026micro;L of each primer (10 \u0026micro;mol L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e), and 7.5 \u0026micro;L of 2\u0026times; Taq Master Mix (CWbio Inc., Beijing, China). DNA amplification was run on an ABI Thermal Cycler (ProFlex PCR,Thermofisher Scientific) by the following steps: an initial denature at 95 \u0026deg;C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec, 60 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec, 72 \u0026deg;C for 1 min and 30 sec, and a final extension at 72 \u0026deg;C for 8 min. The amplified \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e product was separated on a 1% agarose gel and visualized under ultraviolet light after Gene color II (Gene-Bio, Beijing, China) staining.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eGeneration of stable homozygous \u003cstrong\u003etransgenic wheat \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eplants\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e by chromosome elimination\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTwenty spikes from each T\u003csub\u003e1\u003c/sub\u003e transgenic lines derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4, respectively, were emasculated when they were fully emerged out of flag leaves. The emasculated spikes were pollinated with maize pollens and then treated by spraying 100 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003e2,4-D solution once (1 ml for each spike) in the next two consecutive days. The haploid wheat embryos were rescued on a medium (1/2 MS medium, 30 g L\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003esucrose and 2.4 g L\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003egelrite, pH 5.8) at 21 d day after the pollination. The plantlets with healthy roots were directly treated by adding a freshly prepared colchicine solution containing colchicine 0.45 g L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, DMSO 20 mL L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, GA\u003csub\u003e3\u003c/sub\u003e 100 mg L\u003csup\u003e-1 \u003c/sup\u003eand Tween 20 0.3 mL L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e on the medium for 30 h. Finally, the treated plantlets were rinsed with water 3 times and transplanted into pots. Positive plants were selected by PCR analysis with the target gene specific primer using the same condition aforementioned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eChromosome preparation and fluorescence \u003cstrong\u003ein situ\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e hybridization\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMature grains of the transgenic wheat plants were germinated on filter paper in a 25 \u0026deg;C growth chamber for 2 to 3 d, and roots of 2 cm in length were sampled. Root tips were cut and treated with nitrous oxide (NO) for 2 h prior to immersion in 90% glacial acetic acid solution for 5 min. Chromosome spreading was prepared by a previously described method (Guo et al. 2016). Fluorescence \u003cem\u003ein\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003esitu\u003c/em\u003e hybridization (FISH) was performed using vector \u003cem\u003epWMB1\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003e75\u003c/em\u003e as a probe, which was labelled with fluorescein-12-dUTP. Hybridization was performed following a previous published protocol (Guo et al. 2016), and the hybridization signals were observed under an Olympus BX-51 microscope with a Photometric SenSys Olympus DP70 CCD camera. Three stable transgenic lines from Fielder and Ningchun 4 each, which were confirmed by PCR and FISH, were selected for further functional investigation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eTreatments of abiotic \u003cstrong\u003es\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003etress\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ees\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor drought stress treatment, seeds from the transgenic and the WT wheat plants were sown in a plastic box (80 cm \u0026times; 50 cm \u0026times; 15 cm in dimension) containing substrate peat moss by a completely randomized design, and three replicates were set up. Four-liter water was provided to each box every week after germination. At the tillering stage, irrigation was stopped and volumetric water content (VWC) in the pots was measured. When the VWC is below 5%, the survival rate was calculated following the method described previously (Rong et al. 2014).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo identify the salt tolerance of the transgenic wheat plants, mature embryos of the \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e expressed wheat and the WT plants were entirely isolated, inoculated onto 1/2 MS medium containing 150 and 200 mM NaCl, and cultured at 25 \u0026deg;C for 30 d under light condition with an optical density of 100 \u0026mu;mol m\u003csup\u003e-2\u003c/sup\u003e s\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e and a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark. Germination percentage was calculated after 8 d and survival rate and root and shoot lengths were investigated after 30 d.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor heat stress treatment, five plants from each transgenic line and the WT were grown in a plastic box (35 cm \u0026times; 25 cm \u0026times; 8 cm in dimension) with three replicates. At the tillering stage, plants were treated in a heat chamber at 42 \u0026deg;C and samples were collected at different time regimes (0 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 36 h) for analyzing relative expression profiles of the target gene and its associated genes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eMeasurements\u003cstrong\u003eof p\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ehysiological parameters \u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eunder\u003c/strong\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e abiotic stresses\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo measure physiological parameters related to drought stress, plants were grown in a plastic box (80 cm \u0026times; 50 cm \u0026times; 15 cm in dimension) containing natural field soils and maintained in a glasshouse with 16 h light at 24 \u0026deg;C and 8 h dark at 16 \u0026deg;C. Four-liter water was provided to each box every week after germination. At the tillering stage, water was withheld for 21 d and leaf samples were collected at different time regimes (0-, 7-, 14- and 21-day) during the stress treatment. Free proline level was measured according to the previously described method (Zhang et al. 2009). Antioxidant enzymes were extracted from 0.1 g leaves with 1.8 ml phosphate buffer (PBS; 0.1 mol L\u003csup\u003e-1\u003c/sup\u003e, pH 7.4) on ice, and the supernatant after centrifuge at 10,000\u003cem\u003e g \u003c/em\u003efor 10 min was directly used to measure peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) activities using corresponding detection kits (A084-1 and A007-1 Jiancheng, China).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor the measurement of physiological parameters related to salt stress, 25 wheat plants were grown in a plastic box (20 cm \u0026times; 10 cm \u0026times; 10 cm in dimension) containing natural field soil and maintained in a glasshouse with the conditions aforementioned. At the tillering stage, plants were treated with 250 mM NaCl solution 5 times in 30 d (one time every six days) until the clear symptoms of stress were observed. Total chlorophyll content was measured by the previously described method (Sarker and Oba 2018c). Free proline content and antioxidant enzymes activities were measured as described aforementioned.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch2\u003eRNA extraction and expression profile\u003c/h2\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe expression level of the target gene in the stable transgenic wheat plants was determined by semi-quantitative PCR using its specific primer (Table S1). The semi-quantitative PCR amplification was run on an ABI thermal cycler (ProFlex PCR) in a reaction buffer (20 \u0026micro;L) containing 10 \u0026micro;L Taq master mix, 0.5 \u0026micro;M of each primer, and 400 ng of cDNA. The cycling conditions were started from an initial denature at 95 \u0026deg;C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec, 60 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec, 72 \u0026deg;C for 20 sec, and a final ending extension at 72 \u0026deg;C for 5 min.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFor analyzing the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in the positive wheat seedlings, RNA was extracted from their roots and leaves. To determine the expression profiling of the proline biosynthesis and catabolism associated genes, total RNA was extracted from the leaves in the stressed transgenic wheat plants after NaCl treatment on medium for 30 d and after water-withholding stress for 15-18 d in soil using a TRIZOL reagent (TaKaRa, Japan). The cDNA was further synthesized using a cDNA synthesis kit (CWbio Inc., Beijing China) according to manufacturer\u0026rsquo;s protocol.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eTo examine the role of \u003cem\u003eAt\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eOAT\u003c/em\u003e in proline biosynthesis, the expression profiling of the genes involved in proline biosynthesis (\u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e) and catabolism (\u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e) was determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) with their specific primers (Table S1) in the stress treated transgenic wheat plants and the WT. The primers for \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e were adopted from previous publications (Anwar et al. 2020, Dudziak et al. 2019). The sequences for \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1 \u003c/em\u003eand \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e were retrieved from plant ensemble genome database (\u003ca href=\"https://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Tools/Blast\"\u003ehttps://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Tools/Blast\u003c/a\u003e) using \u003cem\u003eHordeum vulgare\u003c/em\u003e (accession # AF467539.1) and \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e (Accession # AY150430.1) as queries. Three alleles for \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e (TraesCS1A02G357900, TraesCS1B02G374500, and TraesCS1D02G362700) and three alleles for \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e (TraesCS1A02G281400, TraesCS1B02G290600, and TraesCS1D02G280700) were retrieved and their specific primers were designed using primer premier 5 (Premier Biosoft, http://www.premierbiosoft.com/).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe qRT-PCR was performed on an Applied Biosystems\u0026trade; 7500 Real-Time PCR System in a reaction buffer (20 \u0026micro;L) containing 10 \u0026micro;L 2\u0026times; RealStar Green Fast Mixture with ROXII, 400 ng of cDNA, and 0.4 \u0026micro;M of each primer. The PCR samples were preheated at 95 \u0026deg;C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (95 \u0026deg;C for 15 sec, 60 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec, 72 \u0026deg;C for 30 sec). The relative expression or mRNA level was calculated using the 2\u003csup\u003e-∆∆CT\u003c/sup\u003e method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001). A constitutively expressed wheat gene adenosine diphosphate ribosylation factor (\u003cem\u003eTa\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003eADP\u003c/em\u003e) was used for the normalization of gene transcript level (Paolacci et al. 2009). Data were averaged from three biological replicates and statistical significance was calculated by IBM-SPSS statistic 20 at \u0026alpha; \u0026lt; 0.05 using the Duncan\u0026rsquo;s multiple range test.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Results","content":" \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eGeneration of homozygous transgenic wheat plants expressing\u003c/b\u003e \u003cspan type=\"BoldItalic\" class=\"BoldItalic\" name=\"Emphasis\"\u003eAtOAT\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHaploid embryos from the cross between the transgenic wheat plants and maize were rescued with a frequency of 11% for Fielder and 8% for Ningchun 4 as receptors, respectively (Table S2). After chromosome doubling, 37 homozygous transgenic wheat plants expressing \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e, 24 for Fielder and 13 for Ningchun 4, were generated (Fig. S3). Seed setting percentages of homozygous plants derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4 were 50% and 40%, respectively. Cytological observation confirmed that the haploid plants induced by maize pollen before doubling had 21 chromosomes and the stable transgenic plants after doubling had 42 chromosomes (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003eb, c). Fluorescence \u003cem\u003ein situ\u003c/em\u003e hybridization assay displayed that the T-DNA cassette containing \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e was integrated into the distal regions of one or two pairs of chromosomes in the stable transgenic wheat plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ed). Results also indicated that \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e was inserted into wheat genome by one or two copies. Three independent lines OE-F1, OE-F2, and OE-F3 from Fielder and the other three independent lines OE-N1, OE-N2, and OE-N3 from Ningchun 4 were selected for the functional characterization of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e gene in wheat further. Semi-quantitative PCR revealed that the \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e transgene was highly expressed in the homozygous transgenic wheat plants (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003ee, f).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eTransgenic wheat plants showed an enhanced salt tolerance under controlled condition\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOn the 200 mM NaCl containing medium, mature embryos of the transgenic wheat plants derived from Ningchun 4 showed a higher germination percentage than those of the WT plants in which only a few mature embryos were germinated (Fig. S4a). Moreover, the transgenic plants derived from Ningchun 4 grew faster than the WT (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e), and the WT plants were severely affected as compared to the transgenic plants. After being cultured for 30 d on the NaCl containing medium, the survival rate of the WT plants (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;10%) was less than that of the transgenic plants (up to 40%) (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ea, b).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe transgenic plants derived from Fielder on the aforementioned salt containing medium showed a similar result on mature embryos germination percentage to that from the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic plants under the stress condition. But they did not grow well and displayed a stunted growth status in later growth stages (Data not shown). Thereby, these transgenic plants were tested on the medium containing 150 mM NaCl. Mature embryos of the three transgenic lines showed a higher germination rate in a similar manner as cultured on 200 mM NaCl containing medium (Fig. S4d). It was found that the transgenic plants grew much better than the WT. Especially, a higher survival rate ranging from 40\u0026ndash;70% was observed in the transgenic plants compared to the WT (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ee, f). The transgenic plants derived from both varieties exhibited longer and more secondary roots and longer shoots under the salt stress condition than the WT (Fig. S4b, c, e, f). It was revealed that \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e was highly expressed in the leaves and roots of the transgenic lines under the salt stress (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003ec, d, g, h). These results indicate that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhances wheat tolerance to salt stress.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysiological analysis discovered that proline content, chlorophyll contents, POD and CAT activities were not significantly changed in the transgenic lines derived from both Fielder and Ningchun 4 and their wild types under normal condition (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e; Fig. S5, 6). In contrast, proline content was significantly enhanced in the transgenic lines as compared to the two wild types under salt stress condition (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb; Fig. S5b). Chlorophyll content was reduced under salt stress condition as compared to normal condition but it was relatively higher in the transgenic plants than that in the wild types (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ec; Fig. S5c). The POD activity was slightly enhanced in the transgenic plants compared to the wild types under salt stress condition (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003ed; Fig. S5d). No difference in catalase activity between the transgenic lines derived from Ningchun 4 and the WT was observed under normal and salt stress conditions (Fig. S6a), while only one transgenic line derived from Fielder (OE-F2) showed an enhance catalase activity (Fig. S6b).\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eTransgenic Wheat Plants Showed An Enhanced Drought Tolerance\u003c/h2\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eThe transgenic lines and their two wild types of Fielder and Ningchun 4 were subjected to water withholding at the tillering stage (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e). After water withholding for 15 d, the WT Fielder\u0026rsquo;s growth was severely affected as compared to its corresponding transgenic lines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea); while the WT Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines were less affected by the drought stress. After water recovery for 10 d, the survival rate was only 40% for Fielder and 77 to 93% for its transgenic lines; but there was no difference observed between the WT Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ea, c). Considering that Ningchun 4 is more drought-tolerant than Fielder, a prolonged drought period of 18 d was adapted for Ningchun 4 and its transgenic lines. After water recovery for 10 d the survival rate was 68 to 75 % for the transgenic lines and 48.8% for the WT Ningchun 4 (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003eb, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ee). These results indicate that the incorporation of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhances the drought tolerance not only in the drought susceptible wheat variety Fielder but also in the drought-tolerant wheat variety Ningchun 4. Furthermore, the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in the transgenic lines was significantly enhanced under drought condition as compared to the normal condition (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ed, f). These results indicate that the enhancement of drought tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants is attributed to the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnder normal condition (0-day) there was no significant difference in proline content among the transgenic plants and their wild types except a slight increase in the two transgenic lines (OE-N1 and OE-N2) from Ningchun 4. Proline content was gradually enhanced with the duration of drought stress in the transgenic lines and their WT. A significant difference in proline content was observed between the transgenic lines and their WT at the three time points (7-, 14- and 21-day after water withholding) during the stress period and this difference was also obvious even after water recovery for a week (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea, b). In general, POD activity was increased during the drought stress and decreased after water recovery in the transgenic lines and their two wild types. A significant difference in POD activity was observed during the stress period and no difference was found after recovery between the transgenic plants and their wild types (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ec, d). For the CAT activity, however, no significant difference was observed in the transgenic lines and their wild type Ningchun 4 at 0- and 7-day after water withholding, while a slight increase was observed at 14-day of drought stress. Afterwards, CAT activity was declined in all plants and no significant difference was observed at 21-day and after drought stress between the transgenic and the WT Ningchun 4 plants (Fig. S7a). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in the transgenic lines and their WT Fielder at 0-day, while one transgenic line (OE-F2) showed a slight enhanced CAT activity as compared to the WT Fielder at 7- and 14-day after water stress. Afterwards, a declined CAT activity was observed in all plants and no significant difference was found between the transgenic lines and Fielder at 21-day after water withholding (Fig. S7b). It is indicated that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e not only regulated proline biosynthesis but also triggered antioxidant defense system to combat the water stress condition in wheat.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eTransgenic wheat plants showed a slight tolerance to heat shock stress\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAfter heat stress treatment 42\u0026deg;C for 36 h, the WT plants started wilting from 24 to 36 h after the stress, and the transgenic plants grew normally (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ea, c). This indicates that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e confers wheat with certain level of tolerance against heat stress. The qRT-PCR analysis displayed that the relative expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in the transgenic Ningchun 4 lines was significantly induced at 12 and 24 h and then reduced at 36 h after heat stress, and it was very low before heat stress; the relative expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in the transgenic Fielder lines was significantly induced at 12 and 24 h and peaked at 36 h after heat stress, and it was in a negligible level before heat stress (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003eb, d). These results indicate that the improvement of heat tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants could arise from the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cb\u003eExpression of proline metabolic genes in response to salt, drought and heat stresses\u003c/b\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe expression levels of the wheat endogenous genes involved in the proline biosynthesis, including \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e, were enhanced in the Ningchun 4 transgenic lines as compared to the WT under drought and salt stresses. Similarly, the expression of proline catabolic gene \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e was down-regulated in the transgenic lines in comparison with the WT plants under drought and salt stresses (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e). Similar expression pattern was also observed in the Fielder transgenic lines (Fig. S8). The up-regulated expression of proline biosynthesis genes and down-regulated expression of proline catabolic genes caused an increased proline accumulation under drought and salt stresses in the transgenic wheat plants. Based on the expression results, it is concluded that glutamate pathway involved in the proline biosynthesis was active during drought and salt stresses as the expressions of \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e were up-regulated in the transgenic wheat plants. Meanwhile, the expression of endogenous \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e was also up-regulated in the transgenic plants, which infers that the ornithine pathway is also involved in proline accumulation due to stress conditions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnder heat stress, the expression levels of glutamate pathway of proline biosynthesis genes \u003cem\u003eviz TaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e were significantly enhanced in the transgenic plants as compared to the WT plants, but the expression of the key gene for ornithine pathway of proline biosynthesis \u003cem\u003eviz TaOAT\u003c/em\u003e remained unchanged (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, S8). Like the situation under drought and salt stresses, the expression of proline catabolic gene \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e was also down-regulated in the transgenic lines derived from Fielder and Ningchun 4 in comparison with their WT plants under heat stress (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, S8). Taken together, only the glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis was activated during heat stress. In general, it was concluded that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced the abiotic stress tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e up-regulating proline biosynthesis genes and down-regulating proline catabolism genes, which further leads to the accumulation of proline during stress conditions.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Discussion","content":" \u003cp\u003eIt is widely accepted that plants adapt to abiotic stress conditions by accumulating proline (Liang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e, Szabados and Savoure \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Normally, proline functions in protein biosynthesis \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e oxidation, and converts into glutamate for transamination or into ketoglutaric acid for Krebs cycle (Stewart and Hanson 1980). Under environmental stress condition, proline starts accumulation by increasing its biosynthesis and reducing its consumption (Yoshiba et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR64\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1997\u003c/span\u003e). Ornithine aminotransferase is thought to be involved in proline biosynthesis. Several studies have demonstrated the positive correlation of OAT and proline synthesis during stress condition. For example, \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e showed a positive correlation with salt tolerance and was found to be associated with proline biosynthesis (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR43\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1998\u003c/span\u003e). In another study, it was proven that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e provides an additional way for proline biosynthesis in \u003cem\u003eNicotiana plumbaginifolia\u003c/em\u003e through increasing OAT activity (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Similarly, the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e in rice increased proline content from 5 to 15-fold compared to the WT plants under salt and drought stress conditions (Wu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR60\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). It was also demonstrated that the overexpression of \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced osmotic tolerance in the transgenic rice (You et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Recently, overexpression of \u003cem\u003eTaOAT-5BL\u003c/em\u003e was found to enhance the drought tolerance in the transgenic wheat by increase in proline content (Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). The present study showed that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced proline content in the transgenic wheat lines under drought and salt stress conditions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003eb, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003ea, b). Based on the current results and previous studies, it is concluded that \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e expression enhances drought and salt tolerance in the transgenic wheat plants \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e promoting proline accumulation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOxidative stress interrupts plant normal cellular metabolism that leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including singlet oxygen (1O\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e), hydroxyl radicals (OH\u0026bull;), hydrogen peroxide (H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e), alkoxyl radical (RO), and superoxide radical (O\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e\u0026bull;\u0026minus;), which mainly results in an enhancing electrons leakage (Chaves and Oliveira \u003cspan citationid=\"CR9\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2004\u003c/span\u003e; Foyer and Noctor \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Plants have evolved diverse mechanisms to keep the ROS homeostasis, such as antioxidant enzymes (POD and CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Hydrogen peroxide is decomposed by different peroxidases, such as ascorbate peroxidase (APX), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and CAT (Asada \u003cspan citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e; Dat et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2000\u003c/span\u003e; Sarker and Oba \u003cspan citationid=\"CR49\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018c\u003c/span\u003e). The ROS produced in response to biotic or abiotic stress caused oxidative damage to plants. Plants detoxify the negative effect of ROS by initiating antioxidant defense system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe POD catalyses the reduction of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e using various electron donors, such as phenolic compounds, lignin precursors, auxin and secondary metabolites. Several studies reported an enhanced POD activity in response to drought and salinity in \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e (Jung et al. 2004), \u003cem\u003eRamonda serbica\u003c/em\u003e (Veljovic-Jovanovic et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e), and \u003cem\u003eMedicago sativa\u003c/em\u003e (Wang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR58\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). In addition, an increased POD activity was tested in \u003cem\u003eQuercus ilex\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eO. sativa\u003c/em\u003e under abiotic stresses by proteomic analysis (Echevarr\u0026iacute;a-Zome\u0026ntilde;o et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR15\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e; Raorane et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). Moreover, the expression of \u003cem\u003ePOD\u003c/em\u003e genes was found to be increased in \u003cem\u003eTamarix hispida\u003c/em\u003e under drought stress (Gao et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). In the present study, we found that POD activity was significantly increased in the transgenic wheat lines as compared to each WT under drought and salt stress conditions (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003ed, \u003cspan refid=\"Fig4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003ec, d). These results are consistent with one of the previous studies which demonstrated that \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e overexpression led to higher POD activity in transgenic rice in comparison with the wild type (You et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenerally, in our study the CAT activity was not significantly enhanced in Fielder and Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines as compared to each WT. But a slight increased CAT activity was observed at 14-day after water withholding in the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines as compared to the WT. No change on CAT activity was found in the Fielder derived transgenic lines and the WT and a slight increased CAT activity was only observed in the Ningchun 4 derived transgenic lines under this extend water stress, which might be due to the different drought sensitivity response of the two cultivars. A previous study demonstrated that the antioxidant defense capacity and enzymatic activities of POD, SOD, and CAT during abiotic stresses had genotype dependency (Abedi and Pakniyat 2010). Taking the above results together, we can infer that the increased POD activity might be considered as a key point for the decomposition of H\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e, especially under the fact of CAT inactivation. Furthermore, it is concluded that expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhances wheat drought and salt tolerance not only by boosting proline biosynthesis but also by regulating antioxidant defense system.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe stimulation of proline biosynthesis under salt and drought stress was associated with an increase in the expression of \u003cem\u003eP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP5CR\u003c/em\u003e (Hu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR26\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e; Yoshiba et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR63\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e). Several studies have indicated that P5CS is the critical enzyme in proline biosynthesis during abiotic stress conditions (Savour\u0026eacute; et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR51\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1995\u003c/span\u003e; Szoke et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR56\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1992\u003c/span\u003e). The proline accumulation \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e P5CS and P5CR is known as glutamate pathway (Szabados and Savoure, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2010\u003c/span\u003e). Glutamate pathway of proline biosynthesis is predominantly active during abiotic stress conditions. An increased expression of \u003cem\u003eP5CS\u003c/em\u003e under osmotic stress was reported in wheat, barley (\u003cem\u003eHordeum vulgare\u003c/em\u003e L.), tomato (\u003cem\u003eSolanum lycopersicum\u003c/em\u003e L.), switchgrass (\u003cem\u003ePanicum virgatum\u003c/em\u003e), and \u003cem\u003eLepidium draba\u003c/em\u003e (Rana et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR38\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Bandurska et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR7\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e; Guan et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e; Lopez-Galiano et al. 2019; Goharrizi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2020\u003c/span\u003e). Our present study also reveals the activation of glutamate pathway in wheat under drought, salt and heat stresses as an increased expression of \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e was observed in \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e expressed transgenic plants. Proline accumulation is regulated by the transcription levels of \u003cem\u003eP5CS\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eProDH\u003c/em\u003e (Verbruggen and Hermans 2008). During stress conditions, the expression of \u003cem\u003eProDH\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e is suppressed when the transcript of \u003cem\u003eP5CS\u003c/em\u003e is induced (Hein et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e; Anwar et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). In this study, expression of \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e is remarkably decreased when the expressions of proline biosynthesis associated genes (\u003cem\u003eTaP5CS1\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e) increased under drought, salt and heat stresses. Therefore, we can conclude that proline is accumulated in the stressed transgenic wheat plants through glutamate pathway.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn addition to the glutamate pathway, proline can also be biosynthesized from ornithine through OAT and P5CR (Fig. S1) (Rizzi et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e). This controversial pathway initiates in mitochondria where ornithine is converted to GSA/P5C by the action of OAT enzyme (Liang et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Then, P5C, the product of OAT activity, is converted to glutamate by P5CDH and re-entered into glutamate pathway or is converted to proline by P5CR after transported from mitochondria to cytosol (Funck et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e; Miller et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The glutamate pathway for proline biosynthesis is well understood in plants but the ornithine pathway is not dissected clearly. Nerveless, several indirect shreds of evidence have been reported on the existence of ornithine pathway associated with proline accumulation under stress conditions. The positive relation of OAT activity and proline accumulation was revealed in the NaCl treated radish cotyledons and detached rice leaves (Hervieu et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1994\u003c/span\u003e; Yang and Kao \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e). The transgenic \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e plants overexpressing \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e showed increased salt and osmotic tolerances as their biomass and germination rates were significantly higher than the WT plants (Roosens et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Additionally, it was found that exogenous application of ornithine increased OAT activity and proline accumulation in salt-stressed cashew plants (Da Rocha et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e). Like \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis AtOAT\u003c/em\u003e, rice \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e was also found to have a key tolerant role to drought and other oxidative stresses as the overexpression of \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced the osmotic stress tolerance of the transgenic rice plants (You et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOur study provides a direct evidence for activation of ornithine pathway as an increased expression level of \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e was detected in the transgenic wheat lines, which led to the conversion of ornithine into P5C. However, a reduced expression level of \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e indicated that P5C was not converted into glutamate. Instead, it was transported to cytosol from mitochondria and then reduced into proline by the action of P5CR (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig7\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e7\u003c/span\u003e, S8). Here, the important challenge is that how OAT-derived P5C is transported from mitochondria to cytosol (Fig. S1). There is an indirect evidence for the transportation of OAT-derived P5C from mitochondria to cytosol without any experimental confirmation (Da Rocha et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e; Funck et al. 2010; Miller et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). The results obtained in our study are consistent with the findings by Da Roha et al. (2012) who demonstrated that the decreased expression of \u003cem\u003eP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e and increased expression of \u003cem\u003eOAT\u003c/em\u003e caused the accumulation of P5C in mitochondria and this OAT-derived P5C was moved to cytosol from mitochondria due to toxicity. In our present study, the increased expression of \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e along with the decreased expression of \u003cem\u003eTaP5CH\u003c/em\u003e in the transgenic wheat plants during drought and salt stress provided a clear evidence of activation of ornithine pathway. The unchanged expression of \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e indicated that ornithine pathway was not activated in the transgenic wheat plants under heat stress. We speculated that the ornithine pathway is also activated along with the glutamate pathway and plays a significant role in tolerance to drought and salt stresses in the transgenic wheat plants under the stress conditions. You et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR65\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e) reported that the expression of \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e was highly induced in response to heat stress. In our study, the transgenic wheat plants just displayed a partial tolerance to heat stress. It might be the reason that only the glutamate pathway was activated in the transgenic wheat plants in front of heat stress.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHomozygosity is tremendously required in transgenic wheat study that guarantees the stable incorporation and inheritance of transgene. Normally, it takes 2\u0026ndash;3 years to produce homozygous transgenic seeds for further investigation (Passricha et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2016\u003c/span\u003e). Double haploid (DH) technology ensures the production of complete homozygous wheat lines in a single year making the selection process effective in the breeding (Hussain et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR27\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). Thus, doubled haploid technology may significantly reduce the time for producing homozygous transgenic plants. There are two major methods for producing wheat doubled haploids, which are known as androgenesis (anther culture and microspore culture) and gynogenesis (using wheat\u0026ndash;maize hybridization). The chromosome elimination through wheat\u0026ndash;maize hybridization is the most effective and widely used technique (Santra et al. \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2017\u003c/span\u003e). In the present study, gynogenesis method was used to produce the homozygous transgenic lines. Thus, this method could help us to accelerate our transgenic wheat research by generating homozygous transgenic lines in a single generation.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Conclusions","content":" \u003cp\u003eThe expression of \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis AtOAT\u003c/em\u003e encoding gene in wheat enhanced the tolerance of the transgenic plants to drought, salinity, and heat. The enhanced tolerance to the abiotic stresses in the transgenic plants was contributed to the increased proline accumulation and peroxidase activity. Further study indicated that the expression of the main genes associated with proline biosynthesis or catabolism. In addition to the main pathway of proline biosynthesis (e.g., \u003cem\u003eP5CS\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP5CR\u003c/em\u003e-Glu pathway), the alternative pathway, such as \u003cem\u003eOAT\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eP5CR\u003c/em\u003e-ornithine pathway, played an important role in proline accumulation under drought and salinity stresses. However, the ornithine pathway is not activated during heat stress. We speculated that OAT-induced P5C was transported to cytosol from mitochondria and then reduced to proline by P5CR in the transgenic plants under the stress conditions.\u003c/p\u003e "},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunding\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported in parts by the grants from the Ministry of Agriculture of China (2016ZX08010004 and 2016ZX08009001), and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences in China (2060302-2-19).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eConflicts of interest/Competing interests\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAvailability of data and material\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN/A\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAcknowledgments\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe are grateful to Drs. Wujun Ma and Rongchang Yang from the School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Australia, for initiating the collaborative study on ornithine aminotransferase in wheat. We are thankful to Dr. Luoming Zhao from Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for his technical support in drought tolerant assay.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAuthor contributions\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAA performed most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript. KW and LD conducted wheat transformation. JW detected the transgenic wheat plants by fluorescence \u003cem\u003ein\u003c/em\u003e\u003cem\u003esitu\u003c/em\u003e hybridization. LS did part of abiotic stress tolerance test of the transgenic wheat plants. XY conceived the study and revised the manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003cp\u003eAbhinandan K, Skori L, Stanic M, Hickerson N M N, Jamshed M, Samuel M A (2018). Abiotic stress signaling in wheat - An inclusive overview of hormonal interactions during abiotic stress responses in wheat. Front Plant Sci 9: 734. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00734\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlia and Saradhi PP (1991). Proline accumulation under heavy metal stress. J Plant Physiol 138: 554-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80240-3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnwar A, She M, Wang K, Riaz B, Ye X (2018). Biological roles of ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) in plant stress tolerance: present progress and future perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 19: 3681. doi: 10.3390/ijms19113681\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAnwar A, She M, Wang K, Ye X (2020). Cloning and molecular characterization of \u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e ornithine amino transferase (\u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e) encoding genes. BMC Plant Biol 20: 187-187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02396-2\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eArnon DI (1949). Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in \u003cem\u003ebeta vulgaris\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Physiol 24: 1. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAsada K (1999). The water-water cycle in chloroplasts: Scvaenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50: 601-639. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.601\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBandurska H, Niedziela J, Pietrowska-Borek M, Nuc K, Chadzinikolau T, Radzikowska D (2017). Regulation of proline biosynthesis and resistance to drought stress in two barley (\u003cem\u003eHordeum vulgare\u003c/em\u003e L.) genotypes of different origin. Plant Physiol Biochem 118: 427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.006.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCharest C, Ton Phan C (1990). Cold acclimation of wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum\u003c/em\u003e): Properties of enzymes involved in proline metabolism. Physiol Plantarum 80: 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1990.tb04391.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eChaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: Prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55: 2365-2384. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh269\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDa Rocha IMA, Vitorello VA, Silva JS, Ferreira-Silva SL, Vi\u0026eacute;gas RA, Silva EN et al. (2012). Exogenous ornithine is an effective precursor and the \u0026delta;-ornithine amino transferase pathway contributes to proline accumulation under high N recycling in salt-stressed cashew leaves. J Plant Physiol 169: 41-49.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDat J, Vandenabeele S, Vranova E, Van Montagu M, Inze D, van Breusegem F (2000). Dual action of the active oxygen species during plant stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 779-795. doi: 10.1007/s000180050041\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDelauney A, Hu C, Kishor P, Verma D (1993). Cloning of ornithine delta-aminotransferase cDNA from \u003cem\u003eVigna aconitifolia \u003c/em\u003eby trans-complementation in \u003cem\u003eEscherichia coli\u003c/em\u003e and regulation of proline biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 268: 18673-18678.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDitta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR (1980). Broad host range DNA cloning system for gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of \u003cem\u003eRhizobium meliloti\u003c/em\u003e. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77: 7347-7351. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.77.12.7347\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDudziak K, Zapalska M, B\u0026ouml;rner A, Szczerba H, Kowalczyk K, Nowak M et al. (2019) Analysis of wheat gene expression related to the oxidative stress response and signal transduction under short-term osmotic stress. Sci Rep 9: 2743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39154-w\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEchevarr\u0026iacute;a-Zome\u0026ntilde;o S, Ariza D, Jorge I, Lenz C, Del Campo A, Jorr\u0026iacute;n J V, Navarro R M (2009). Changes in the protein profile of \u003cem\u003eQuercus ilex\u003c/em\u003e leaves in response to drought stress and recovery. J Plant Physiol 166: 233-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.05.008\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFoyer C H, Noctor G, (2012). Managing the cellular redox hub in photosynthetic organisms. Plant Cell Environ 35: 199-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02453.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFunck D, Stadelhofer B, Koch W (2008). Ornithine-delta-aminotransferase is essential for arginine catabolism but not for proline biosynthesis. BMC Plant Biol 8: 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-8-40\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGao C, Wang Y, Liu G, Wang C, Jiang J, Yang C (2010). Cloning of ten peroxidase (POD) genes from \u003cem\u003eTamarix hispida\u003c/em\u003e and characterization of their responses to abiotic stress. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28: 77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-009-0129-9.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGoharrizi K J, Moosavi S S, Amirmahani F, Salehi F, Nazari M (2020). Assessment of changes in growth traits, oxidative stress parameters, and enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant defense mechanisms in \u003cem\u003eLepidium draba\u003c/em\u003e plant under osmotic stress induced by polyethylene glycol. Protoplasma 257: 459-473. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01457-0.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuo X, Su H, Shi Q, Fu S, Wang J, Zhang X, Han F (2016). De novo centromere formation and centromeric sequence expansion in wheat and its wide hybrids. PloS Genet 12: e1005997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005997\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGuan C, Huang YH, Cen HF, Cui X, Tian DY, Zhang YW (2019). Overexpression of the \u003cem\u003eLolium perenne\u003c/em\u003e L. delta1-pyrroline 5-carboxylate synthase (LpP5CS) gene results in morphological alterations and salinity tolerance in switchgrass (\u003cem\u003ePanicum virgatum\u003c/em\u003e L.). Plos One 14: e0219669. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219669\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHare PD, Cress WA van Staden J (1999). Proline synthesis and degradation: a model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction. J Exp Bot 50: 413-434. doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.333.413.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHein J A, Sherrard M E, Manfredi K P, Abebe T (2016). The fifth leaf and spike organs of barley (\u003cem\u003eHordeum vulgare \u003c/em\u003eL.) display different physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress. BMC Plant Biol 16: 248. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0922-1.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHervieu F, Dily FL, Billard J P, Huault C (1994). Effects of water-stress on proline content and ornithine aminotransferase activity of radish cotyledons. Phytochemistry 37: 1227-1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422 (00)90389-3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHervieu F, Dily Fl, Huault C, Billard JP (1995). Contribution of ornithine aminotransferase to proline accumulation in NaCl‐treated radish cotyledons. Plant Cell Environ 182: 205-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00354.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHu C, Delauney AJ, Verma D (1992). A bifunctional enzyme (delta 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase) catalyzes the first two steps in proline biosynthesis in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 9354-9358. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.89.19.9354\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHussain B, Khan MA, Ali Q, Shaukat S (2013). Double haploid production in wheat through microspore culture and wheat \u0026times; maize crossing system: An overview. Int J Agron Vet Med Sci 6: 332-344. doi: 10.5455/ijavms.168.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIshida Y, Tsunashima, M, Hiei Y Komari T (2015). Wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum aestivum L\u003c/em\u003e.) transformation using immature embryos, in \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e Protocols. Springer, pp. 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1695-5_15\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJung S (2004). Variation in antioxidant metabolism of young and mature leaves of \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e subjected to drought. Plant Sci 166: 459-466. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.10.012\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKishor P, Hong Z, Miao G H, Hu C, Verma D (1995). Overexpression of [delta]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol 108: 1387-1394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.4.1387\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiang X, Zhang L, Natarajan SK, Becker DF (2013). Proline mechanisms of stress survival. Antioxid. Redox Signal 19: 998-1011. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.5074\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLiu H, Sultan M A, Liu X L, Zhang J, Yu F and Zhao H X (2015). Physiological and comparative proteomic analysis reveals different drought responses in roots and leaves of drought-tolerant wild wheat (\u003cem\u003eTriticum boeoticum\u003c/em\u003e). PloS One 10: e0121852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121852\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLivak K J and Schmittgen T D (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026Delta;\u0026Delta;CT\u003c/sup\u003e method. Methods 25: 402-408. doi:10.1006/meth.2001.1262\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLopez Galiano M J, Garc\u0026iacute;a Robles I, Gonzalez-Hernandez A I, Camanes G, Vicedo B, Real M D, Rausell C, (2019). Expression of miR159 is altered in tomato plants undergoing drought stress. Plants 8: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070201\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMiller G, Honig A, Stein H, Suzuki N, Mittler R, Zilberstein A (2009). Unraveling delta1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate-proline cycle in plants by uncoupled expression of proline oxidation enzymes. J Biol Chem 284: 26482-26492. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.009340\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePaolacci AR, Tanzarella OA, Porceddu E Ciaffi M (2009). Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR normalization in wheat. BMC Mol Biol 10: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-10-11\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePassricha N, Saifi S, Khatodia S Tuteja N (2016). Assessing zygosity in progeny of transgenic plants: current methods and perspectives. J Biol Methods 3: 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.14440%2Fjbm.2016.114\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRana V, Ram S, Nehra K, Sharma I (2016). Expression of genes related to Na\u0026thorn; exclusion and proline accumulation in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes under salt stress. Cereal Res Commun 44: 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.44.2016.009\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRaorane M L, Pabuayon I M, Varadarajan A R, Mutte S K, Kumar A, Treumann A, Kohli A (2015). Proteomic insights into the role of the large-effect QTL qDTY 12.1 for rice yield under drought. Mol Breed 35: 139. doi: 10.1007/s11032-015-0321-6\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRizzi Y, Monteoliva M, Fabro G, Grosso C, Lar\u0026oacute;vere L, Alvarez M (2015). P5CDH affects the pathways contributing to proline synthesis after ProDH activation by biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Front Plant Sci 6: 572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00572\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRong W, Qi L, Wang A, Ye X, Du L, Liang H, Zhang Z (2014). The ERF transcription factor TaERF3 promotes tolerance to salt and drought stresses in wheat. Plant Biotechnol J 12: 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12153\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoosens N H, Bitar F A, Loenders K, Angenon G, Jacobs M (2002). Overexpression of ornithine-\u0026delta;-aminotransferase increases proline biosynthesis and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Mol Breed 9: 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026791932238\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoosens N H, Thu T T, Iskandar H M, Jacobs M (1998). Isolation of the ornithine-delta-aminotransferase cDNA and effect of salt stress on its expression in \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e. Plant Physiol 117: 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.1.263\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eRoosens N H, Willem R, Li Y, Verbruggen I, Biesemans M, Jacobs M (1999). Proline metabolism in the wild-type and in a salt-tolerant mutant of \u003cem\u003eNicotiana plumbaginifolia\u003c/em\u003e studied by13C-nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol 121: 1281-1290. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1281\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSantra M, Wang H, Seifert S, Haley S (2017). Doubled haploid laboratory protocol for wheat using wheat-maize wide hybridization. Methods Mol Biol 1679: 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7337-8_14\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarker U, Islam M T, Oba S (2018). Salinity stress accelerates nutrients, dietary fiber, minerals, phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in \u003cem\u003eAmaranthus tricolor\u003c/em\u003e leaves. PloS One 13: e0206388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206388\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarker U, Oba S (2018a). Augmentation of leaf color parameters, pigments, vitamins, phenolic acids, flavonoids and antioxidant activity in selected \u003cem\u003eAmaranthus tricolor\u003c/em\u003e under salinity stress. Sci Rep 8: 12349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30897-6.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarker U, Oba S (2018b). Drought stress effects on growth, ROS markers, compatible solutes, phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity in \u003cem\u003eAmaranthus tricolor\u003c/em\u003e. Appl Biochem Biotech 186: 999-1016. doi: 10.1007/s12010-018-2784-5.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarker U, Oba S (2018c). Catalase, superoxide dismutase and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes confer drought tolerance of \u003cem\u003eAmaranthus tricolor\u003c/em\u003e. Sci Rep 8: 16496-16496. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34944-0\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSarker U, Oba S. (2020). The response of salinity stress-induced \u003cem\u003eA. tricolor\u003c/em\u003e to growth, anatomy, physiology, non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants. Front Plant Sci 11: 1354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.559876\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSavour\u0026eacute; A, Jaoua S, Hua XJ, Ardiles W, Van Montagu M, Verbruggen N (1995). Isolation, characterization, and chromosomal location of a gene encoding the \u0026Delta;1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 372: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)00935-3\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSchobert B (1977). Is there an osmotic regulatory mechanism in algae and higher plants? J Theor Biol 68: 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(77)90224-7\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSolomon A, Beer S, Waisel Y, Jones GG, Paleg L (2006). Effects of NaCl on the carboxylating activity of Rubisco from \u003cem\u003eTamarix jordanis\u003c/em\u003e in the presence and absence of proline-related compatible solutes. Physiol Plant 90: 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02211.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStr\u0026aacute;nsk\u0026aacute; J, Kopečn\u0026yacute; D, Tylichov\u0026aacute; M, Sn\u0026eacute;garoff J, \u0026Scaron;ebela M (2008). Ornithine \u0026delta;-aminotransferase: an enzyme implicated in salt tolerance in higher plants. Plant Signal Behav 3: 929-935. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6771\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSzabados L, Savoure A (2010). Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci 15: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSzoke A, Miao GH, Hong Z, Verma DPS (1992). Subcellular location of \u0026delta;1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase in root/nodule and leaf of soybean. Plant Physiol 99: 1642-1649. https://dx.doi.org/10.1104%2Fpp.99.4.1642\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eVeljovic-Jovanovic S, Kukavica B, Stevanovic B, Navari-Izzo F (2006). Senescence-and drought-related changes in peroxidase and superoxide dismutase isoforms in leaves of \u003cem\u003eRamonda serbica\u003c/em\u003e. J Exp Bot 57: 1759-1768. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl007\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Deng XP, Kwak SS (2009). Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem 47: 570-577. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.02.009.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWang K, Liu H, Du L, Ye X (2017). Generation of marker-free transgenic hexaploid wheat via an \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e-mediated co-transformation strategy in commercial Chinese wheat varieties. Plant Biotech J 15: 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12660\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWu L, Fan Z, Guo L, Li Y, Zhang W, Qu LJ, Chen Z (2003). Over-expression of an \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e \u0026delta;-OAT gene enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic rice. Chin Sci Bull 48: 2594-2600. https://doi.org/10.1360/03wc0218\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYang C W, Kao C H (1999). Importance of ornithine-\u0026delta;-aminotransferase to proline accumulation caused by water stress in detached rice leaves. Plant Growth Regul 27: 191-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006226732574\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYang C W, Wang J, Kao C (2000). The relation between accumulation of abscisic acid and proline in detached rice leaves. Biol Plant 43: 301-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002781016598\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Katagiri T, Ueda H, Mizoguchi T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1995). Correlation between the induction of a gene for \u0026Delta;1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase and the accumulation of proline in \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis thaliana\u003c/em\u003e under osmotic stress. Plant J 75: 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.07050751.x\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYoshiba Y, Kiyosue T, Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1997). Regulation of levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under water stress\u003cem\u003e. \u003c/em\u003ePlant Cell Physiol 38: 1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029093\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eYou J, Hu H, Xiong L (2012). An ornithine \u0026delta;-aminotransferase gene \u003cem\u003eOsOAT\u003c/em\u003e confers drought and oxidative stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci 197: 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.09.002\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eZhang G, Chen M, Li L, Xu Z, Chen X, Guo J, Ma Y (2009). Overexpression of the soybean GmERF3 gene, an AP2/ERF type transcription factor for increased tolerances to salt, drought, and diseases in transgenic tobacco. J Exp Bot 60: 3781-3796. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp214\u003c/p\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"plant-cell-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pcre","sideBox":"Learn more about [Plant Cell Reports](https://www.springer.com/journal/299)","snPcode":"299","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/299/3","title":"Plant Cell Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false},"keywords":"abiotic stress tolerance, ornithine aminotransferase, ornithine pathway, proline biosynthesis, Triticum aestivum.","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003e\u003cem\u003eKey Message\u003c/em\u003e The drought and salt tolerances of wheat were enhanced by ectopic expression of the \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis\u003c/em\u003e ornithine aminotransferase (AtOAT) encoded gene. The OAT was confirmed to play a role in proline biosynthesis in wheat.\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAbstract \u003c/strong\u003eProline (Pro) accumulation is a common response to both abiotic and biotic stresses in plants. Ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) is pyridoxal-5-phosphate dependent enzyme involved in plant proline biosynthesis. During stress condition, proline is synthesized \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e glutamate and ornithine pathways. The OAT is the key enzyme in ornithine pathway. In this study, an OAT gene \u003cem\u003eAtOAT \u003c/em\u003efrom \u003cem\u003eArabidopsis \u003c/em\u003ewas expressed in wheat for its functional characterization under drought, salinity and heat stress conditions. We found that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced the drought and salt stress tolerances of wheat by increasing the proline content and peroxidase activity. In addition, it was confirmed that the expression of\u003cem\u003e AtOAT\u003c/em\u003e also played a partial tolerance to heat stress in the transgenic wheat plants. Moreover, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that the transformation of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT \u003c/em\u003eup-regulated the expression of the proline biosynthesis associated genes \u003cem\u003eTaOAT\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eTaP5CS\u003c/em\u003e,\u003cem\u003e \u003c/em\u003eand\u003cem\u003e TaP5CR\u003c/em\u003e, and down-regulated that of the proline catabolism related gene \u003cem\u003eTaP5CDH\u003c/em\u003e in the transgenic plants under stress conditions. Moreover, the genes involved in ornithine pathway (Orn-\u003cem\u003eOAT\u003c/em\u003e-P5C/GSA-\u003cem\u003eP5CR\u003c/em\u003e-Pro) were up-regulated along with the up-regulation of those genes involved in glutamate pathway (Glu-\u003cem\u003eP5CS\u003c/em\u003e-P5C/GSA-\u003cem\u003eP5CR\u003c/em\u003e-Pro). Therefore, we concluded that the expression of \u003cem\u003eAtOAT\u003c/em\u003e enhanced wheat abiotic tolerance \u003cem\u003evia\u003c/em\u003e modifying the proline biosynthesis by up-regulating the expression of the proline biosynthesis associated genes and down-regulating that of the proline catabolic gene under stresses condition.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Expression of Arabidopsis Ornithine Aminotransferase (AtOAT) Encoded Gene Enhances Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerances in Wheat","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2021-02-04 20:02:09","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-175437/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"reviewersInvited","content":"","date":"2021-02-01T00:00:00+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorInvitedReview","content":"","date":"2021-02-01T00:00:00+00:00","index":0,"fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"Plant Cell Reports","date":"2021-01-28T02:28:17+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"plant-cell-reports","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"pcre","sideBox":"Learn more about [Plant Cell Reports](https://www.springer.com/journal/299)","snPcode":"299","submissionUrl":"https://submission.nature.com/new-submission/299/3","title":"Plant Cell Reports","twitterHandle":"","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":true,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"Springer Hybrid","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":false}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"22829e18-8d17-497b-aa42-05ccecae1ec3","owner":[],"postedDate":"February 4th, 2021","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"under-review","subjectAreas":[{"id":2208727,"name":"Plant Physiology and Morphology"},{"id":2208728,"name":"Plant Molecular Biology and Genetics"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2021-04-15T12:45:29+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2021-02-04 20:02:09","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-175437","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-175437","identity":"rs-175437","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"WrCJVZZCHTDjtuVLN7oU0","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}