Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopy Surgery for Advanced-Stage

article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-08 ⓘ

This retrospective cohort study compared perioperative outcomes between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis, analyzing factors such as blood loss, operating time, and complication rates.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background and Objectives: To determine perioperative outcome differences in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) versus conventional laparo-scopic surgery (CLS) for advanced-stage endometriosis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study at a minimally invasive gynecologic surgery center at 2 academically af-filiated, urban, nonprofit hospitals included all patients treated by either robotic-assisted or conventional laparo-scopic surgery for stage III or IV endometriosis (American Society for Reproductive Medicine criteria) between July 2009 and October 2012 by 1 surgeon experienced in both techniques. The main outcome measures were extent of surgery, estimated blood loss, operating room time, intra-operative and postoperative complications, and length of

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-10T10:44:01.662386+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK