DamageFormer: a damage-aware multimodal deep learning framework for DNA lesion identification from nanopore sequencing
DamageFormer, a multimodal deep learning framework, accurately detects and localizes DNA lesions from nanopore sequencing data by integrating sequence context with raw signal information using a damage-aware foundation model.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This paper studies a multimodal deep learning approach, DamageFormer, for detecting and localizing DNA lesions at nucleotide resolution from native nanopore sequencing, integrating raw ionic current signals with nucleotide sequence context. The authors develop LesionBERT, a damage-aware foundation model built on DNABERT-2 with lesion-focused reconstruction objectives, and fuse it with a neural signal model using an adaptive gating mechanism trained with combined prediction, localization, and contrastive alignment losses. On an oxidative DNA damage benchmark with paired sequence and signal data, DamageFormer reports AUROC 0.99997 for lesion detection and a mean absolute localization error of 0.00439, outperforming prior baselines, and also generalizes to chemically distinct guanine lesions not seen during training. The paper does not explicitly discuss any limitation such as dataset size or clinical applicability beyond describing benchmark performance and transfer to unseen damage types. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,538 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 3 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00