Joint models reveal human subcortical underpinnings of choice and learning behaviour

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Decision making and learning processes together enable adaptive goal-oriented behaviour. Animal studies demonstrated the importance of subcortical regions in these cognitive processes, but the human subcortical contributions remain poorly characterised. Here, we study choice and learning processes in the human subcor-tex, using a tailored ultra-high field 7 T fMRI imaging protocol combined with joint models. Joint models provide unbiased estimates of brain-behaviour rela-tions by simultaneously including behavioural and neural data at the participant and group level. Results demonstrate relations between subcortical regions and the adjustment of decision urgency. Value-related BOLD differences were found with opposite BOLD polarity in different parts of the striatum. Multiple sub-cortical regions showed BOLD signatures of reward prediction error processing, but contrary to expectations, these did not include the dopaminergic midbrain. Combined, this study characterises the human subcortical contributions to choice and learning, and demonstrates the feasibility and value of joint modelling in facilitating our understanding of brain-behaviour relationships.
Full text 1,260 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Decision making and learning processes together enable adaptive goal-oriented behaviour. Animal studies demonstrated the importance of subcortical regions in these cognitive processes, but the human subcortical contributions remain poorly characterised. Here, we study choice and learning processes in the human subcor-tex, using a tailored ultra-high field 7 T fMRI imaging protocol combined with joint models. Joint models provide unbiased estimates of brain-behaviour rela-tions by simultaneously including behavioural and neural data at the participant and group level. Results demonstrate relations between subcortical regions and the adjustment of decision urgency. Value-related BOLD differences were found with opposite BOLD polarity in different parts of the striatum. Multiple sub-cortical regions showed BOLD signatures of reward prediction error processing, but contrary to expectations, these did not include the dopaminergic midbrain. Combined, this study characterises the human subcortical contributions to choice and learning, and demonstrates the feasibility and value of joint modelling in facilitating our understanding of brain-behaviour relationships. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00