Beta oscillations support somatosensory temporal integration for body ownership

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The sense of body ownership, the perceptual experience of what belongs to one’s body, relies on the integration of self-related signals across multiple sensory modalities. Alpha oscillations modulate the temporal resolution of visuotactile integration for body ownership by constraining how visual and tactile signals from the body are temporally combined or segregated. However, body ownership can be supported and modulated in the absence of vision, for example during self-touch, raising the question of whether the same alpha-based temporal mechanism supports purely somatosensory integration. Here, we show that individual beta frequency (IBF), rather than alpha, predicts the temporal integration of tactile signals between the two hands in a somatic rubber hand illusion self-touch paradigm. IBF predicted the temporal window within which two tactile stimuli were judged as simultaneous and within which illusory self-touch body ownership was experienced. Moreover, while individual alpha frequency did not contribute to this purely somatosensory integration, IBF also did not predict the temporal resolution of visuotactile integration when visual body-related inputs were available. Together, these findings suggest a double dissociation in which frequency-specific oscillatory processes reflect the temporal integration of bodily signals in a modality-dependent manner: beta frequency emerges as the key correlate of somatosensory integration during self-touch, whereas alpha frequency governs visuotactile integration when vision is available.
Full text 1,641 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The sense of body ownership, the perceptual experience of what belongs to one’s body, relies on the integration of self-related signals across multiple sensory modalities. Alpha oscillations modulate the temporal resolution of visuotactile integration for body ownership by constraining how visual and tactile signals from the body are temporally combined or segregated. However, body ownership can be supported and modulated in the absence of vision, for example during self-touch, raising the question of whether the same alpha-based temporal mechanism supports purely somatosensory integration. Here, we show that individual beta frequency (IBF), rather than alpha, predicts the temporal integration of tactile signals between the two hands in a somatic rubber hand illusion self-touch paradigm. IBF predicted the temporal window within which two tactile stimuli were judged as simultaneous and within which illusory self-touch body ownership was experienced. Moreover, while individual alpha frequency did not contribute to this purely somatosensory integration, IBF also did not predict the temporal resolution of visuotactile integration when visual body-related inputs were available. Together, these findings suggest a double dissociation in which frequency-specific oscillatory processes reflect the temporal integration of bodily signals in a modality-dependent manner: beta frequency emerges as the key correlate of somatosensory integration during self-touch, whereas alpha frequency governs visuotactile integration when vision is available. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00