Evaluation and Learning with Multiple Inaccurate True Targets

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

In many real-world machine learning (ML) scenarios, obtaining accurate true targets (ATTs) for evaluation and learning is difficult, expensive, or fundamentally infeasible. This article proposes a unified scientific paradigm—evaluation and learning with multiple inaccurate true targets (MIATTs)—that addresses this challenge by integrating the fundamental principles of two recently proposed frameworks: Logical Assessment Formula (LAF) and Undefinable True Target Learning (UTTL). Both LAF and UTTL operate under a relaxed but shared assumption that the true target for a given ML task is not assumed to exist as a well-defined object in the real world, which motivates us to define MIATTs formally as a collection of weak yet partially informative targets, each capturing a different aspect of the underlying true target. Building on this foundation, we establish a systematic theoretical framework encompassing MIATT generation, model construction, metric formulation, and model optimization. The article offers a principled and practical alternative for ML scenarios marked by true target ambiguity, providing a viable path where conventional ATT-based methods prove inadequate or inapplicable.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00