EEG Foundation Model Improves Online Directional Motor Imagery Brain-computer Interface Control

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Brain-Computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a link between neural signals and external computation, enabling control of devices for the purposes of restoring function to motor-affected individuals and enhancing capabilities of a wider set of populations. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a high temporal resolution for dynamic and potential real-time feedback for non-invasive systems. However, its practical efficacy remains limited due to low spatial resolution and poor signal-to-noise ratio, leading to insufficient decoding accuracy and unintuitive control paradigms that hinder reliable user interaction. In this study, we present a framework for an online EEG foundation model by creating a custom foundation model through spectrogram reconstruction of compact temporal windows and online constraints during pretraining. We evaluate the performance of the model in a challenging control paradigm of single-arm, directional motor imagery with dynamic movements for guided and free movement cursor control tasks. Our foundation model approach achieved a final average accuracy of 51.3% during a goal-oriented guided control task. This represents a 15.8% increase over a conventional deep learning framework and a 26.3% increase above chance level, evaluated in a cohort of 11 human participants. During the free movement task, the foundation model invoked a higher rate of completion and lower completion times. Furthermore, the custom EEG foundation model demonstrated superior adaptability from same-session finetuning and indicated an enhanced capability to assist subject learning. These findings highlight the potential of EEG foundation models to support more robust and intuitive non-invasive BCI systems, providing a promising modelling framework for future BCI development.
Full text 1,872 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Brain-Computer interfaces (BCIs) offer a link between neural signals and external computation, enabling control of devices for the purposes of restoring function to motor-affected individuals and enhancing capabilities of a wider set of populations. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers a high temporal resolution for dynamic and potential real-time feedback for non-invasive systems. However, its practical efficacy remains limited due to low spatial resolution and poor signal-to-noise ratio, leading to insufficient decoding accuracy and unintuitive control paradigms that hinder reliable user interaction. In this study, we present a framework for an online EEG foundation model by creating a custom foundation model through spectrogram reconstruction of compact temporal windows and online constraints during pretraining. We evaluate the performance of the model in a challenging control paradigm of single-arm, directional motor imagery with dynamic movements for guided and free movement cursor control tasks. Our foundation model approach achieved a final average accuracy of 51.3% during a goal-oriented guided control task. This represents a 15.8% increase over a conventional deep learning framework and a 26.3% increase above chance level, evaluated in a cohort of 11 human participants. During the free movement task, the foundation model invoked a higher rate of completion and lower completion times. Furthermore, the custom EEG foundation model demonstrated superior adaptability from same-session finetuning and indicated an enhanced capability to assist subject learning. These findings highlight the potential of EEG foundation models to support more robust and intuitive non-invasive BCI systems, providing a promising modelling framework for future BCI development. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00