Feasibility of a stepped-care intervention for those at clinical high risk for psychosis in the United States

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed feasibility of a stepped-care model for those at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHRp) within a coordinated specialty care clinic in the United States. Methods: Youth aged 12-30 completed a 12-month, three-step intervention where persistent or worsening symptoms received increasingly intensive treatment including Supportive Problem Solving, Cognitive Behavioral Case Management and a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor. Results: Of 32 CHR youth admitted to the clinic over 18 months, 12 were eligible for the study, ten consented, eight participated, and five completed. Major reasons for ineligibility were loss to follow-up during engagement, pressing comorbid concerns that required other specialty care, and medication preferences. Those who completed treatment showed clinically significant improvements in multiple domains and no worsening. Three discontinued due to medication needs (more intensive care, perceived side effects) with the remainder of the sample showing small-to-moderate and moderate-to-large effect sizes in social functioning, depression, and attenuated psychosis symptoms by 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: This preliminary study supports larger scale trials of stepped-care interventions for CHRp in the US, but also illuminates key features of the US healthcare system that must shape implementation. The stepped-care intervention appeared tolerable and feasible in those who engaged, but comorbid treatment needs in this heterogenous population, including medication needs/preferences, and disengagement during referral to psychosis specialty care precluded participation for many. Future studies will need to evaluate larger samples, account for needs and preferences for medication, and should place screening and early steps in general outpatient mental health services to evaluate real-world effectiveness.
Full text 3,108 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Aim This study assessed feasibility of a stepped-care model for those at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHRp) within a coordinated specialty care clinic in the United States. Methods Youth aged 12-30 completed a 12-month, three-step intervention where persistent or worsening symptoms received increasingly intensive treatment including Supportive Problem Solving, Cognitive Behavioral Case Management and a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor. Results Of 32 CHR youth admitted to the clinic over 18 months, 12 were eligible for the study, ten consented, eight participated, and five completed. Major reasons for ineligibility were loss to follow-up during engagement, pressing comorbid concerns that required other specialty care, and medication preferences. Those who completed treatment showed clinically significant improvements in multiple domains and no worsening. Three discontinued due to medication needs (more intensive care, perceived side effects) with the remainder of the sample showing small-to-moderate and moderate-to-large effect sizes in social functioning, depression, and attenuated psychosis symptoms by 12-month follow-up. Conclusions This preliminary study supports larger scale trials of stepped-care interventions for CHRp in the US, but also illuminates key features of the US healthcare system that must shape implementation. The stepped-care intervention appeared tolerable and feasible in those who engaged, but comorbid treatment needs in this heterogenous population, including medication needs/preferences, and disengagement during referral to psychosis specialty care precluded participation for many. Future studies will need to evaluate larger samples, account for needs and preferences for medication, and should place screening and early steps in general outpatient mental health services to evaluate real-world effectiveness. Supplementary Material File (beats ucd manuscript shapiro et al submission.docx) - Download - 1.14 MB Information & Authors Information Version history Peer review timeline Published Early Intervention in Psychiatry Version of Record6 Jan 2026Published Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Collection

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 330views 194downloads Citations Download citation Daniel Shapiro, Rebecca Grattan, Jill Laquidara, et al. Feasibility of a stepped-care intervention for those at clinical high risk for psychosis in the United States. Authorea. 07 June 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174929240.09143090/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174929240.09143090/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00