Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Paris Polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Their Correlation with Polyphyllin Content

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Background Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis (PPY) is commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine formulas and folk families. Nearly more than 100 chemical substances with medicinal values have been reported in PPY, among which steroidal saponins are the main active components of PPY. Due to its long growth cycle, the resource of PPY becomes too scarce, and the current production capacity of PPY is still far from meeting the market demand. Numerous studies have shown that endophytic bacteria not only promote the production of secondary metabolites in the host plant, but also certain endophytes themselves can produce the same secondary metabolites as the host. However, little is known about the endophytic bacteria associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and tissues. In order to compare the endophytic bacterial communities associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and plant tissues, the endophytic bacteria from roots, stems, and leaves of PPY collected from five locations were isolated, and the diversity, richness, and homogeneity of bacterial communities were analyzed, and the dominant genera correlation with polyphyllin content was further investigated. Results A total of 268 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated and identified from PPY. The experimental results showed that the isolates belonged to 5 phyla, 7 classes, 14 orders and 39 genera of bacteria, of which the optimal order was Bacillariophyta and the optimal genera were Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Agrobacterium. In general, the differences in the distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were characterized by the highest diversity and richness index of endophytic bacterial communities in QS and the highest evenness index in FY. The diversity, richness and evenness of bacterial communities in terms of tissue state showed a hierarchical pattern of root > stem > leaf. The three optimal genera were positively correlated with polyphyllin content. Conclusion The distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were influenced by tissue type and habitat. In addition, three endophytic bacteria (Pseudomonas, Bacllius and Agrobacterium) were positively correlated with the content of polyphylins, and could be used as potential candidates for producing bioactive compounds.
Full text 105,435 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Paris Polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Their Correlation with Polyphyllin Content | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Paris Polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Their Correlation with Polyphyllin Content Qing Shu, Yuying Wu, Liping RUAN, Lin Jin, Jing Wang, An zhong Peng, and 1 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Published Journal Publication published 26 Feb, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Microbiology → Version 1 posted 4 You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Background Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis (PPY) is commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine formulas and folk families. Nearly more than 100 chemical substances with medicinal values have been reported in PPY, among which steroidal saponins are the main active components of PPY. Due to its long growth cycle, the resource of PPY becomes too scarce, and the current production capacity of PPY is still far from meeting the market demand. Numerous studies have shown that endophytic bacteria not only promote the production of secondary metabolites in the host plant, but also certain endophytes themselves can produce the same secondary metabolites as the host. However, little is known about the endophytic bacteria associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and tissues. In order to compare the endophytic bacterial communities associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and plant tissues, the endophytic bacteria from roots, stems, and leaves of PPY collected from five locations were isolated, and the diversity, richness, and homogeneity of bacterial communities were analyzed, and the dominant genera correlation with polyphyllin content was further investigated. Results A total of 268 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated and identified from PPY. The experimental results showed that the isolates belonged to 5 phyla, 7 classes, 14 orders and 39 genera of bacteria, of which the optimal order was Bacillariophyta and the optimal genera were Bacillus , Pseudomonas and Agrobacterium . In general, the differences in the distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were characterized by the highest diversity and richness index of endophytic bacterial communities in QS and the highest evenness index in FY. The diversity, richness and evenness of bacterial communities in terms of tissue state showed a hierarchical pattern of root > stem > leaf. The three optimal genera were positively correlated with polyphyllin content. Conclusion The distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were influenced by tissue type and habitat. In addition, three endophytic bacteria ( Pseudomonas , Bacllius and Agrobacterium ) were positively correlated with the content of polyphylins, and could be used as potential candidates for producing bioactive compounds. Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis Polyphyllin Plant endophytes Diversity Geographic conditions Tissues Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 1. Introduction Paris polyphylla Smith var. yunnanensis (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz.(PPY) is a perennial herb belonging to the genus (Paris) of the lily family (Linnaeus), which has a long history of medicinal use in Yunnan, and has been included in the successive editions of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The dried rhizomes of PPY serve as a potent medicinal agent, renowned for their efficacy in clearing heat and detoxification, eliminating swelling and relieving pain, cooling the liver and calming the alarm. Steroidal saponins of PPY are widely regarded as the main active ingredients [ 1 – 3 ]. PPY is not only a commonly used drug in traditional Chinese medicine formulas and folk families, but also the main raw materials utilized in over forty types of proprietary Chinese medicines, such as Yunnan Baiyao series, Gongxuining capsule, JiDeSheng snake tablet, and LouLian capsule [ 4 , 5 ]. Modern studies have also found that PPY possesses multiple pharmacological properties, including anti-tumor, immunomodulatory, anti-virus eliminate inflammation, hemostatic, and vascular regulation effects [ 6 – 10 ]. The utilization of PPY wild resources has caused a serious resource crisis due to its high demand for medicinal herbs, the long cycle of regeneration and the indiscriminate exploitation for more than 30 years. Artificial cultivation is one of the most effective ways to solve the problem of endangered medicinal plant resources, but the quality of PPY herbs from different origins varies greatly [ 11 , 12 ]. At present, a large number of studies on the quality of PPY have been conducted at home and abroad, yet the outcomes of these investigations are still in a nascent phase, lacking definitive conclusions. Therefore, it is imperative to study the influencing factors of the PPY quality. Endophytes are microorganisms that reside in the tissues or cellular interstitial spaces of healthy plants during some or all stages of their life cycle and do not cause any visible plant diseases [ 13 ]. Recent studies have demonstrated that endophytes in medicinal plants are closely related to the quality of herbs [ 14 – 16 ]. In addition, the type of plant tissue and geographical location significantly impact the distribution patterns and diversity of endophytes [ 17 – 19 ]. In this work, a microbial pure culture method based on 16S/18SrDNA sequencing technology was employed to isolate and characterize endophytic bacteria of PPY from different origins. Meanwhile, the contents of saponins in PPY from different origins were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The distribution and diversity of endophytic bacteria across different geographical locations and PPY tissues were explored, and the correlation between endophytic bacterial diversity and steroidal saponin content was also elucidated. 2. Material and Methods 2.1 Reagents and herbal medicine samples Reference standards (≥ 98%) including Polyphyllin Ⅰ(PPⅠ), Polyphyllin Ⅱ(PPⅡ), Polyphyllin Ⅵ(PPⅥ), Polyphyllin Ⅶ (PPⅦ)were purchased from the National Institutes for Good and Drug Control (Beijing, China), Polyphyllin H(PPH), Polyphyllin Ⅲ(PPⅢ)and Polyphyllin Ⅴ (PPⅤ)were purchased from Shanghai Jinsui Bio-Technology Co., ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were purchased from Tedia (Ohio, USA). Deionized water was prepared by a Mili-Q system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA). The other reagents obtained were analytical grade. The plant samples of PPY were collected from five different localities in Yunnan, namely Yunlong Guanping (GP), Jianchuan Yangcen (YC), Eryuan Niujie (NJ), Eryuan Qisheng (QS) and Dali Fengyi (FY). The information of the samples is shown in Table S1 . 2.2 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography 0.5 g dry powdered samples were weighed accurately, extracted with 4 mL ethanol (75%, v/v), and under ultrasonic treatment for 60 min. The ethanol mixture solution was filtered, and the residue was extracted again by the same procedure. The filtrate was diluted to 10 mL with ethanol. The sample was filtered by a 0.22 µm microporous membrane. Standard stock solutions were further prepared with methanol at different concentrations as follows: 0.236 mg/mL for PPⅦ, 0.238 mg/mL for PPH, 0.240 mg/mL for PPⅥ, 0.650 mg/mL for PPⅡ, 0.736 mg/mL for PPⅢ, 0.660 mg/mL for PPⅠ, and 0.248 mg/mL for PPⅤ. All of these solutions were stored at 4°C prior to use. An Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 µm), thermostat-controlled at 30°C, was used for the chromatographic separations, and the gradient elution of wat (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min was employed as follows: 0 ~ 39 min (20% ~ 44% B), 39 ~ 52 min (44% ~ 60% B), 52 ~ 60 min (60% ~ 20% B). The injection volume was 10 µL, and the detection wavelength was set at 203 nm for steroidal saponins. 2.3 Method Validation Standard stock solutions were diluted to appropriate concentrations with ethanol for the construction of calibration curves. Six standard solutions were injected into the chromatographic system at 1 µL, 2 µL, 4 µL, 6 µL, 8 µL and 12 µL, respectively. Meanwhile, the calibration curves of PPⅦ, PPH, PPⅥ, PPⅡ, PPⅢ, PPI and PPV were constructed by plotting the peak area versus the content (µg). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were also examined in terms of signal-to-noise ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The precision of the method was evaluated by analyzing the standard solutions. The experiment was repeated six times on the same day. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the peak area of each standard was calculated, separately. To investigate the stability of the sample solutions, a solution prepared from PPY rhizome was stored at room temperature and analyzed for 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12h and 24 h. The recovery test was performed by spiking known concentration levels of the mixture standard solution into known amounts of samples. 2.4 Endophyte Isolation The sediment and other impurities on the appearance of PPY samples were washed, the root of PPY was sonicated (if the volume was large, it can be cut into small pieces, the contamination of the incision should be avoided), and rinsed under running water for three times. The surface of PPY sample was sterilized with alcohol (75%, v/v) and HgCl 2 (0.2%, wt.) solution, immersed for 0.5 ~ 1.0 min and 15 ~ 20 min, respectively, and then rinsed with sterile water until the sterile water rinsed was free of microorganisms growth[ 20 ]. The sterilized PPY samples were chopped, and 5.0 g PPY was grinded until homogeneous, and 5.0 mL sterile water was added for mixing to obtain the PPY suspension. The concentration of the sample suspension was diluted to 10 − 1 , 10 − 2 and 10 − 3 g/mL by the multiplicative dilution method. 200 µL diluted suspension was aspirated, spread evenly on the R 2 A agar medium, and then incubated at 28 ± 2°C for 2 ~ 4 days in bacteriological incubator. The bacterial colonies (pure colonies) were picked and streaked on the fresh nutrient agar for the selection of clone. The isolated strains were stored in cryopreservation tube containing glycerol at -80°C. 2.5 DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing Genomic DNA was extracted using a Rapid bacterial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the isolates using 27F and 1492R primer sets [ 21 ]. The PCR amplification was performed in a 25 µL reaction system containing 2 µL DNA template, 1 µL of each primer, 8.5 µL ddH 2 O, and 12.5 µL 2×Taq PCR Master Mix (Sangon, Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China). The PCR products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified with a DiaSpin PCR Product Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China). The purified PCR products were sequenced in the forward and reverse directions using the same PCR primer pairs at a commercial sequencing provider (Sangon Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China). 2.6 Data Analysis Relative frequency (RF) refers to the ratio of the number of endophytic bacterium strains to the total number of isolated strains. Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') and Simpson diversity index (D) were used to analyze the biodiversity of endophytic fungi. Pielou homogeneity index (J) was used to study the homogeneity of the species distribution in different parts of the same species, and the species richness was assessed by calculating Margalet index (R). Determination of dominant colonies: species were considered dominant if P i > 1/S, where P i was the relative abundance of species (i) and S was the total number of species present in the community. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 to investigate the correlation between polyphyllin content of PPY and the dominant taxa (genus level) among the five provenances. 3. Results 3.1 Validation of method Figure 1 displays the chromatogram of seven standards obtained through HPLC. The regression equation and linear ranges of seven analytes were determined using the developed HPLC method. The results showed that the test solution was well separated from the impurities and without interference. The correlation coefficient values (r 2 ) indicated appropriate correlations between the investigated compound concentration and their peak area within the test ranges. As presented in Table S2, all R 2 values obtained using linear regression analysis were greater than 0.99. The average peak areas of PPⅦ, PPH, PPⅥ, PPⅡ, PPⅢ, PPI, and PPV were 141.85, 179.63, 107.75, 321.20, 263.43, 257.55, 229.15, and the relative standard deviations were 0.66%, 0.53%, 0.98%, 0.86%, 0.85%, 0.65%, and 0.70%, respectively. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of precision for seven compounds was less than 2%. The RSD values for repeatability and stability of the compounds were all less than 2%, suggesting the high repeatability and stability of the method used. The average recovery was in the range of 98.34 ~ 99.34% with RSD varying from 0.08–0.25% (Table S3), indicating that the method used was accurate and reproducible for quantifying the seven steroidal saponins present in PPY samples. 3.2 Structure and distribution of endophytic bacterial flora in PPY A total of 268 culturable endophytic bacteria were successfully isolated from PPY tissues sourced from five distinct origins. Notably, the majority of these bacteria remained sterile under the specified culture conditions. The sequences generated were checked and assembled using SeqMan Pro v.11 (DNAStar Lasergene, Madison, WI, USA), and then subjected to BLASTn searches in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) GenBank nucleotide database, and the approximate phylogenetic affiliation of the isolates was located. The identification and classification of the thirty-nine taxa is presented in Table S4. Among the isolated bacteria, 165 specimens (comprising 61.57% of the total) were classified as Proteobacteria, while 80 specimens (accounting for 29.85% of the total) belonged to the Firmicutes phylum. Most of them were assigned to 14 orders within 7 classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacilli, Actinobacteria, Flavobacteria, Acidobacteria). The main order is Bacillales, and the main genera are Bacillus and Pseudomonas (Fig. 2 ). 3.3 Differences in Endophytic bacteria Between Field Sites and PPY Tissues The highest number of endophytic bacterial isolates were collected from GP (73), followed by QS (62), NJ (47), FY (47), and YC (39). The differences in the distribution of endophytic bacteria were observed across the above-mentioned five sites. At the genus level, Bacillus emerged as the dominant genus in GP, YC, and FY, accounting for 34.25%, 48.71%, and 29.78% of the RF, respectively. In contrast, Agrobacterium was the predominant genus in NJ, comprising 25.53% of the RF, while Luteibacter was the dominant genus in QS, with an RF of 11.29%. The endophytic bacteria exhibited site-specificity at the species level, where Pseudomonas poae was prevalent in both roots and leaves, whereas Sphingomonas taxi was commonly associated with stems and leaves (Fig. 3 ). As presented in Table 1 , the differences in endophytic bacterial diversity (H' and D), evenness (J) and richness (R) were observed across different sites. The bacterial species diversity at YC exhibited the lowest values (H' = 2.5156, D = 0.9123), and the bacterial species evenness at NJ was the lowest (J = 0.8841). Additionally, the lowest bacterial richness (R = 4.3673) was observed at YC. Table 1 Species richness, evenness and diversity indices of endophytic bacteria isolated from PPY at different sites sites Shannon’s diversity index (H′) Simpson’s diversity index (D) Pielou evenness index(J) Margalet richness index (R) Guanping 3.1179 0.9581 0.8917 7.4584 Yangcen 2.5156 0.9123 0.8879 4.3673 Niujie 2.7326 0.9184 0.8840 5.4543 Qisheng 3.2799 0.9619 0.9310 7.9959 Fengyi 2.9697 0.9501 0.9471 5.7141 The roots of PPY exhibited the highest number of endophytic bacterial isolates, with a total of 73 distinct strains identified, whereas the stems displayed the lowest number of such isolates, comprising merely 55 strains. Besides, the diversity (H' and D) and richness (R) of endophytic bacteria showed significant differences in different tissues (Table 2 ). The roots possessed the greatest bacterial species diversity (H' = 3.8631), whereas the leaves exhibited the lowest (H' = 2.8445). Conversely, according to the Simpson's index (D), the stems exhibited the highest bacterial species diversity (D = 0.9691), and the roots displayed the lowest diversity (D = 0.9492). The assessment of bacterial species richness (R) revealed that the roots possessed the highest level (R = 11.5562), whereas the leaves exhibited the lowest richness (R = 6.1206). Table 2 Indices of endophytic bacteria species richness, evenness, and diversity isolated from different PPY tissues sites Shannon’s diversity index (H′) Simpson’s diversity index (D) Pielou evenness index(J) Margalet richness index (R) Root 3.8631 0.9492 0.9640 11.5562 Stem 3.3256 0.9691 0.9431 8.2349 Leaf 2.8445 0.9555 0.8447 6.1206 3.4 Correlation between endophytic bacterial communities and steroidal saponin content The total contents of PPⅠ, PPⅡ and PPⅦ in PPY samples sourced from five distinct origins varied between 1.0917 and 1.8656%, all of which conformed to the specifications outlined in the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Notably, the concentrations of PPⅠ, PPⅡ and PPⅦ in the YC and FY samples surpassed the stipulated standards by a margin of 2.5 to 3.1 times. The content of PPIII in the PPY derived from Guanping exhibited a significant increase ( p < 0.05) or a highly significant elevation ( p < 0.01) compared with those sourced from other origins. Besides, it was the sole origin in which PPV was detectable, with a concentration of 0.1070% (Table S5). The analysis of Pearson's correlation coefficient was conducted using SPSS software to assess the relationship between the dominant flora and steroidal saponins present in PPY samples originating from five distinct locations. The results are shown in Table 3 . A highly significant positive correlation was observed between Bacllius and the total content of PPⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅶ ( p < 0.01). The Pseudomonas displayed a strong positive correlation with the total content of PPⅠ, Ⅱ, and Ⅶ ( p < 0.05). Additionally, the Agrobacterium had high-positive correlation with the accumulation of PPH content ( p < 0.05). Table 3 Correlation analysis between endophytic bacteria and polyphyllin contents genus PPⅠ PPⅡ PPⅢ PPⅥ PPⅦ PPH PPⅠ+Ⅱ+Ⅶ Bacllius 0.798 0.739 0.388 -0.198 0.275 -0.582 0.974 ** Agrobacterium -0.643 -0.799 -0.651 0.680 -0.064 0.885 * -0.851 Pseudomonas 0.703 0.705 0.582 0.093 0.433 -0.380 0.935 * Note: * means p < 0.05, ** means p < 0.01 4. Discussion In this study, the diversity of endophytic bacteria in three PPY tissues from five different origins was documented. A total of 268 bacterial isolates were obtained and identified. The experimental results indicated that the isolates belonged to 5 bacterial phyla, 7 classes, 14 orders, and 39 genera. The distribution of endophytic bacteria varied across different locations, which may be attributed to the influence of both biotic and abiotic factors on endophytic bacterial communities. These factors ultimately determine their species composition, community structure, diversity, and functionality [ 22 ]. It has been found that environmental factors not only impact the distribution of medicinal plants, but also dictate the species composition of bacterial and endophytic fungi [ 23 , 24 ], and the composition of plant microbial communities is associated with the host species, living environment, plant genetics, and various tissue states [ 25 – 28 ]. The experimental results were consistent with the previous reports on PPY and various host plant species, the distribution of endophytic bacteria in the three tissues varied considerably and the diversity exhibited a gradient of root > stem > leaf, which was in agreement with the former report [ 29 ]. It is noteworthy that we adopted a culture-dependent isolation method. Due to the inability of laboratory conditions to fully simulate natural environments, some microorganisms exhibit "unculturability", which may lead to the omission of endophytic bacteria in the analysis, thereby causing deviations in the results of geographical and organizational analysis. PPY is used in different pharmaceutical systems for the treatment of several diseases. According to reports, nearly 100 plant chemicals with medicinal value have been discovered in PPY, among which steroidal saponin and polyphyllin are the key compounds. However, the current production of resorcylic acid saponins is far from meeting market demand. Many studies have shown that endophytic bacteria can increase the production of polyphyllin by regulating the expression of relevant genes in PPY [ 30 , 31 ]. The experimental results revealed that three endophytic bacterial genera were associated with the polyphyllin content in PPY. Specifically, Pseudomonas and Bacllius were significantly and positively correlated with the total content of PP I, II and VII, respectively, while Agrobacterium showed a strong positive correlation with the content of PPH. Research has found that inoculation with three potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB) ( Bacillus thuringiensis , B. polymyxa , and Paenibacillus amylolyticus ) can increase the content of Pseudo-protodiosgenin and diosgenin H [ 32 ]. Bacillus cereus LgD2 may effectively promote the accumulation of polyphyllin by regulating key downstream genes in biosynthetic pathways [ 31 ]. However, considering that endophytes enhance the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants by a variety of factors, they not only can directly promote the production of metabolites in the host plant but also synthesize the same secondary metabolites as the host, and secrete biologically active secondary metabolites that can improve the tolerance of the host plant to biotic stresses and regulate the expression of related genes in the host [ 33 , 34 ]. Therefore, comprehensive and in-depth studies are required to elucidate the mechanistic relationships between these endophytes and polyphyllin. 5. Conclusions The distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were influenced by tissue type and habitat. In addition, three endophytic bacteria ( Pseudomonas, Bacllius and Agrobacterium ) were positively correlated with the content of polyphylins, and could be used as potential candidates for producing bioactive compounds. This work will facilitate the development of an alternative method for the production of secondary metabolites from endophytes. It is imperative to pay more attention to the interaction between medicinal plants and microorganisms, and enhance research efforts to elucidate the interaction mechanisms, so as to make better use of endophytic resources, and provide theoretical guidance for high-quality and high-yield medicinal plants. Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Author details 1 Yunnan Key Laboratory of Screening and Research on Anti-pathogenic Plant Resources from West Yunnan, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China. 2 College of Pharmacy, Dali University, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China. 3 Lijiang People’s Hospital, Lijing 674100, Yunnan, China. Funding This work was supported by “the Expert Workstation of Jiang Yong Yunnan Province (202305AF150048), the Central Government Guidance Fund for Local Scientific and Technological Development(202407AB110009)and 2024 Expert grassroots scientific research workstation in Yunnan Province. Author Contribution QS: guided the completion of this experiment, completed the first draft paper, and made revisions. PZ and LH: guided the experimental methods and thesis writing. RL and GS: performed experiments, recorded data, and data analysis. LJ and WY: data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Acknowledgement This work was supported by “the Expert Workstation of Jiang Yong Yunnan Province (202305AF150048), the Central Government Guidance Fund for Local Scientific and Technological Development(202407AB110009)and 2024 Expert grassroots scientific research workstation in Yunnan Province. Availability of data and materials The data were obtained by the authors. References Ding YG, Zhao YL, Zhang J, Zuo ZT, Zhang QZ, Wang YZ. The traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties of Paris L. (Liliaceae): A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;278:114293. 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114293 . Man S, Zhang X, Xie L, Zhou Y, Wang G, Hao R, Gao W. A new insight into material basis of rhizoma Paridis saponins in alleviating pain. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;323:117642. 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117642 . Qin XJ, Yu MY, Ni W, Yan H, Chen CX, Cheng YC, et al. Steroidal saponins from stems and leaves of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Phytochemistry. 2016;121:20–9. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.008 . Lan PX, He P, Yang J, Zhou GH, Chen XJ, Wei TY, et al. High-throughput sequencing reveals the presence of novel and known viruses in diseased Paris yunnanensis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1045750. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1045750 . Zhang T, Liu H, Liu XT, Xu DR, Chen XQ, Wang Q. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of steroidal saponins in crude extracts from Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis and P. polyphylla var. chinensis by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;51(1):114–24. 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.08.020 . Cong Y, Liu X, Kang L, Yu Z, Zhao Z, Li J, et al. Pennogenin tetraglycoside stimulates secretion-dependent activation of rat platelets: evidence for critical roles of adenosine diphosphate receptor signal pathways. Thromb Res. 2012;129(5):e209–16. 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.001 . Jing S, Wang Y, Li X, Man S, Gao W. Chemical constituents and antitumor activity from Paris polyphylla Smith var. yunnanensis. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(6):660–6. 10.1080/14786419.2016.1219861 . Li L, Zhang J, Cheng W, Di F, Wang C, An Q. Saponins of Paris polyphylla for the Improvement of Acne: Anti-Inflammatory, Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Immunomodulatory Effects. Molecules. 2024;29(8). 10.3390/molecules29081793 . Liu Z, Li N, Gao W, Man S, Yin S, Liu C. Comparative study on hemostatic, cytotoxic and hemolytic activities of different species of Paris L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142(3):789–94. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.065 . Wang G, Liu Y, Wang Y, Gao W. Effect of Rhizoma Paridis saponin on the pain behavior in a mouse model of cancer pain. RSC Adv. 2018;8(31):17060–72. 10.1039/c8ra00797g . Yang Y, Jin H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang Y. Quantitative evaluation and discrimination of wild Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz from three regions of Yunnan Province using UHPLC-UV-MS and UV spectroscopy couple with partial least squares discriminant analysis. J Nat Med. 2017;71(1):148 – 57; 10.1007/s11418-016-1044-7 Yang Y, Zhang J, Jin H, Zhang J, Wang Y. Quantitative Analysis in Combination with Fingerprint Technology and Chemometric Analysis Applied for Evaluating Six Species of Wild Paris Using UHPLC-UV-MS. J Anal Methods Chem. 2016;2016:3182796. 10.1155/2016/3182796 . Mushtaq S, Shafiq M, Tariq MR, Sami A, Nawaz-Ul-Rehman MS, Bhatti MHT, et al. Interaction between bacterial endophytes and host plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1092105. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1092105 . Hou QZ, Chen DW, Wang YP, Ehmet N, Ma J, Sun K. Analysis of endophyte diversity of two Gentiana plants species and the association with secondary metabolite. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):90. 10.1186/s12866-022-02510-4 . Ju M, Zhang Q, Wang R, Yan S, Li Z, Li P, Gu P. Correlation in endophytic fungi community diversity and bioactive compounds of Sophora alopecuroides. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:955647. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.955647 . Pang B, Yin D, Zhai Y, He A, Qiu L, Liu Q, et al. Diversity of endophytic fungal community in Huperzia serrata from different ecological areas and their correlation with Hup A content. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):191. 10.1186/s12866-022-02605-y . Cui XX, Wang L, Fang HY, Zheng YG, Su CY. The cultivable endophytic fungal community of Scutellaria baicalensis: diversity and relevance to flavonoid production by the host. Plant Signal Behav. 2022;17(1):2068834. 10.1080/15592324.2022.2068834 . Jahromi MS, Azizi A, Soltani J. Diversity and Spatiotemporal Distribution of Fungal Endophytes Associated with Salvia multicaulis. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78(4):1432–47. 10.1007/s00284-021-02430-y . Zhao R, Zheng S, Hu Y, Li H, Chen Y, Chun Z. Endophytic bacterial diversity of the medicinal orchid Dendrobium nobile. South Afr J Bot. 2023a;158:90–7. 10.1016/j.sajb.2023.04.050 . Lu J, Wang J, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Qin L, Zhu B. Diversity of Culturable Endophytic Fungi in Crocus sativus and Their Correlation with Crocin Content. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80(2):73. 10.1007/s00284-023-03177-4 . Dorsch M, Lane D, Stackebrandt E. Towards a phylogeny of the genus Vibrio based on 16S rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42(1):58–63. 10.1099/00207713-42-1-58 . Walitang DI, Kim CG, Kim K, Kang Y, Kim YK, Sa T. The influence of host genotype and salt stress on the seed endophytic community of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):51. 10.1186/s12870-018-1261-1 . Ma L, Liu L, Lu Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, et al. When microclimates meet soil microbes: Temperature controls soil microbial diversity along an elevational gradient in subtropical forests. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022;166. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108566 . Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Jia X, Han L, Liu L, Ren K, et al. Soil characteristics and microbial community structure on along elevation gradient in a Pinus armandii forest of the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag. 2022;503. 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119793 . Christian N, Sullivan C, Visser ND, Clay K. Plant Host and Geographic Location Drive Endophyte Community Composition in the Face of Perturbation. Microb Ecol. 2016;72(3):621–32. 10.1007/s00248-016-0804-y . Kandel SL, Joubert PM, Doty SL. Bacterial Endophyte Colonization and Distribution within Plants. Microorganisms. 2017;5(4). 10.3390/microorganisms5040077 . Liu TH, Zhou Y, Tao WC, Liu Y, Zhang XM, Tian SZ. Bacterial Diversity in Roots, Stems, and Leaves of Chinese Medicinal Plant Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69(1):91–7. 10.33073/pjm-2020-012 . Rezki S, Campion C, Simoneau P, Jacques M-A, Shade A, Barret M. Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities within and across successive plant generations. Plant Soil. 2018;422(1–2):67–79. 10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2 . Wu W, Chen W, Liu S, Wu J, Zhu Y, Qin L, Zhu B. Beneficial Relationships Between Endophytic Bacteria and Medicinal Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:646146. 10.3389/fpls.2021.646146 . Chen Y, Yu D, Huo J, Huang N, Zhang M, Du X. Studies on biotransformation mechanism of Fusarium sp. C39 to enhance saponin content of Paridis Rhizoma. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:992318. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.992318 . Zhang Q, Chang S, Yang Y, Xi C, Dong Y, Liu L, et al. Endophyte-inoculated rhizomes of Paris polyphylla improve polyphyllin biosynthesis and yield: a transcriptomic analysis of the underlying mechanism. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1261140. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261140 . Zhao SX, Deng QS, Jiang CY, Wu QS, Xue YB, Li GL, et al. Inoculation with Potassium Solubilizing Bacteria and Its Effect on the Medicinal Characteristics of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Agriculture-Basel. 2023b;13(1). 10.3390/agriculture13010021 . Jia M, Chen L, Xin HL, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, Han T, Qin LP. A Friendly Relationship between Endophytic Fungi and Medicinal Plants: A Systematic Review. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:906. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906 . Venieraki A, Dimou M, Katinakis P. Endophytic fungi residing in medicinal plants have the ability to produce the same or similar pharmacologically active secondary metabolites as their hosts. Hellenic Plant Prot J. 2017;10(2):51–66. 10.1515/hppj-2017-0006 . Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Supplementary Files supplementaryfile.docx Cite Share Download PDF Status: Published Journal Publication published 26 Feb, 2025 Read the published version in BMC Microbiology → Version 1 posted Editorial decision: Revision requested 14 Nov, 2024 Editor assigned by journal 07 Nov, 2024 Submission checks completed at journal 07 Nov, 2024 First submitted to journal 04 Nov, 2024 You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-5386035","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":378305923,"identity":"a89cc3b1-3341-4462-b502-a15c2f622c0a","order_by":0,"name":"Qing Shu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Qing","middleName":"","lastName":"Shu","suffix":""},{"id":378305924,"identity":"c313f4ef-b7d8-4cf3-9d9e-4f4ab48ecb75","order_by":1,"name":"Yuying Wu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Yuying","middleName":"","lastName":"Wu","suffix":""},{"id":378305925,"identity":"6b05febf-0a95-44da-b208-68c7d7a5e366","order_by":2,"name":"Liping RUAN","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Liping","middleName":"","lastName":"RUAN","suffix":""},{"id":378305927,"identity":"9c861534-a6ea-4c3e-b2ad-f6a20ac2a274","order_by":3,"name":"Lin Jin","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Lijiang People’s Hospital","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Lin","middleName":"","lastName":"Jin","suffix":""},{"id":378305931,"identity":"92b7a90c-37e7-4c54-8700-bf7386f47a55","order_by":4,"name":"Jing Wang","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Jing","middleName":"","lastName":"Wang","suffix":""},{"id":378305933,"identity":"22b2154b-d4df-4f78-b421-4d79ac293782","order_by":5,"name":"An zhong Peng","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"An","middleName":"zhong","lastName":"Peng","suffix":""},{"id":378305936,"identity":"975f24ec-56f7-4355-855a-ef5724e4674d","order_by":6,"name":"Haifeng Li","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Dali university","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Haifeng","middleName":"","lastName":"Li","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-11-04 08:08:22","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[{"content":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03814-x","type":"published","date":"2025-02-26T15:57:10+00:00"}],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":69831527,"identity":"564f367a-e98c-4874-a70c-c1ba75d5f3f7","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-25 15:39:09","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":167220,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eThe HPLC reference substances of PPY\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5386035/v1/8130f2dadbebeda7cfa6a5a4.png"},{"id":69830165,"identity":"3d975f9e-b71e-468b-ba02-6adcc7ecee25","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-25 15:31:09","extension":"png","order_by":2,"title":"Figure 2","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":1252046,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eRelative frequency (RF) of bacterial groups (\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e genera, \u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e orders) across PPY host tissues and different sites (GP Guanping, YC, Yangcen, NJ, Niujie, QS, Qisheng, FY, Fengyi)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage2.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5386035/v1/18639027bb3567afe14e32f0.png"},{"id":69831529,"identity":"555cb245-3d4a-48a8-9032-3c95af35149b","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-25 15:39:09","extension":"png","order_by":3,"title":"Figure 3","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":441304,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eWayne diagram of endophytic bacterial strain distribution in PPY(\u003cstrong\u003ea\u003c/strong\u003e sites, \u003cstrong\u003eb\u003c/strong\u003e tissues)\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"floatimage3.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5386035/v1/1f322b589d7239754225072e.png"},{"id":77622379,"identity":"9ae8d963-3f11-4574-bc6e-129e740fb579","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-03-03 16:05:16","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":2716223,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5386035/v1/b3d61baf-cee6-44ed-9ba0-f41d018c0f2a.pdf"},{"id":69830167,"identity":"7d0c2efb-1047-4398-b8d1-f71431d6bd63","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-11-25 15:31:09","extension":"docx","order_by":4,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"supplement","size":44497,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"supplementaryfile.docx","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-5386035/v1/061e08a21d5525d9f3119b90.docx"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Paris Polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Their Correlation with Polyphyllin Content","fulltext":[{"header":"1. Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eParis polyphylla\u003c/em\u003e Smith var. \u003cem\u003eyunnanensis\u003c/em\u003e (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz.(PPY) is a perennial herb belonging to the genus (Paris) of the lily family (Linnaeus), which has a long history of medicinal use in Yunnan, and has been included in the successive editions of Chinese Pharmacopoeia. The dried rhizomes of PPY serve as a potent medicinal agent, renowned for their efficacy in clearing heat and detoxification, eliminating swelling and relieving pain, cooling the liver and calming the alarm. Steroidal saponins of PPY are widely regarded as the main active ingredients [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR2\" citationid=\"CR1\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e]. PPY is not only a commonly used drug in traditional Chinese medicine formulas and folk families, but also the main raw materials utilized in over forty types of proprietary Chinese medicines, such as Yunnan Baiyao series, Gongxuining capsule, JiDeSheng snake tablet, and LouLian capsule [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR5\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e]. Modern studies have also found that PPY possesses multiple pharmacological properties, including anti-tumor, immunomodulatory, anti-virus eliminate inflammation, hemostatic, and vascular regulation effects [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR7 CR8 CR9\" citationid=\"CR6\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e10\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe utilization of PPY wild resources has caused a serious resource crisis due to its high demand for medicinal herbs, the long cycle of regeneration and the indiscriminate exploitation for more than 30 years. Artificial cultivation is one of the most effective ways to solve the problem of endangered medicinal plant resources, but the quality of PPY herbs from different origins varies greatly [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR11\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e11\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR12\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e12\u003c/span\u003e]. At present, a large number of studies on the quality of PPY have been conducted at home and abroad, yet the outcomes of these investigations are still in a nascent phase, lacking definitive conclusions. Therefore, it is imperative to study the influencing factors of the PPY quality.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEndophytes are microorganisms that reside in the tissues or cellular interstitial spaces of healthy plants during some or all stages of their life cycle and do not cause any visible plant diseases [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e13\u003c/span\u003e]. Recent studies have demonstrated that endophytes in medicinal plants are closely related to the quality of herbs [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR15\" citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e14\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e16\u003c/span\u003e]. In addition, the type of plant tissue and geographical location significantly impact the distribution patterns and diversity of endophytes [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR18\" citationid=\"CR17\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e17\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e19\u003c/span\u003e]. In this work, a microbial pure culture method based on 16S/18SrDNA sequencing technology was employed to isolate and characterize endophytic bacteria of PPY from different origins. Meanwhile, the contents of saponins in PPY from different origins were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The distribution and diversity of endophytic bacteria across different geographical locations and PPY tissues were explored, and the correlation between endophytic bacterial diversity and steroidal saponin content was also elucidated.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"2. Material and Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.1 Reagents and herbal medicine samples\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eReference standards (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;98%) including Polyphyllin Ⅰ(PPⅠ), Polyphyllin Ⅱ(PPⅡ), Polyphyllin Ⅵ(PPⅥ), Polyphyllin Ⅶ (PPⅦ)were purchased from the National Institutes for Good and Drug Control (Beijing, China), Polyphyllin H(PPH), Polyphyllin Ⅲ(PPⅢ)and Polyphyllin Ⅴ (PPⅤ)were purchased from Shanghai Jinsui Bio-Technology Co., ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methanol and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were purchased from Tedia (Ohio, USA). Deionized water was prepared by a Mili-Q system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA). The other reagents obtained were analytical grade. The plant samples of PPY were collected from five different localities in Yunnan, namely Yunlong Guanping (GP), Jianchuan Yangcen (YC), Eryuan Niujie (NJ), Eryuan Qisheng (QS) and Dali Fengyi (FY). The information of the samples is shown in Table \u003cspan refid=\"MOESM1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003eS1\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.2 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.5 g dry powdered samples were weighed accurately, extracted with 4 mL ethanol (75%, v/v), and under ultrasonic treatment for 60 min. The ethanol mixture solution was filtered, and the residue was extracted again by the same procedure. The filtrate was diluted to 10 mL with ethanol. The sample was filtered by a 0.22 \u0026micro;m microporous membrane. Standard stock solutions were further prepared with methanol at different concentrations as follows: 0.236 mg/mL for PPⅦ, 0.238 mg/mL for PPH, 0.240 mg/mL for PPⅥ, 0.650 mg/mL for PPⅡ, 0.736 mg/mL for PPⅢ, 0.660 mg/mL for PPⅠ, and 0.248 mg/mL for PPⅤ. All of these solutions were stored at 4\u0026deg;C prior to use.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAn Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm \u0026times; 150 mm, 5 \u0026micro;m), thermostat-controlled at 30\u0026deg;C, was used for the chromatographic separations, and the gradient elution of wat (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min was employed as follows: 0\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;39 min (20% ~ 44% B), 39\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;52 min (44% ~ 60% B), 52\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;60 min (60% ~ 20% B). The injection volume was 10 \u0026micro;L, and the detection wavelength was set at 203 nm for steroidal saponins.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec5\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.3 Method Validation\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eStandard stock solutions were diluted to appropriate concentrations with ethanol for the construction of calibration curves. Six standard solutions were injected into the chromatographic system at 1 \u0026micro;L, 2 \u0026micro;L, 4 \u0026micro;L, 6 \u0026micro;L, 8 \u0026micro;L and 12 \u0026micro;L, respectively. Meanwhile, the calibration curves of PPⅦ, PPH, PPⅥ, PPⅡ, PPⅢ, PPI and PPV were constructed by plotting the peak area versus the content (\u0026micro;g). The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were also examined in terms of signal-to-noise ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The precision of the method was evaluated by analyzing the standard solutions. The experiment was repeated six times on the same day. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the peak area of each standard was calculated, separately. To investigate the stability of the sample solutions, a solution prepared from PPY rhizome was stored at room temperature and analyzed for 0 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h, 12h and 24 h. The recovery test was performed by spiking known concentration levels of the mixture standard solution into known amounts of samples.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec6\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003e2.4 Endophyte Isolation\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sediment and other impurities on the appearance of PPY samples were washed, the root of PPY was sonicated (if the volume was large, it can be cut into small pieces, the contamination of the incision should be avoided), and rinsed under running water for three times. The surface of PPY sample was sterilized with alcohol (75%, v/v) and HgCl\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003e (0.2%, wt.) solution, immersed for 0.5\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;1.0 min and 15\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;20 min, respectively, and then rinsed with sterile water until the sterile water rinsed was free of microorganisms growth[\u003cspan citationid=\"CR20\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e20\u003c/span\u003e].\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sterilized PPY samples were chopped, and 5.0 g PPY was grinded until homogeneous, and 5.0 mL sterile water was added for mixing to obtain the PPY suspension. The concentration of the sample suspension was diluted to 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;1\u003c/sup\u003e, 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;2\u003c/sup\u003e and 10\u003csup\u003e\u0026minus;\u0026thinsp;3\u003c/sup\u003e g/mL by the multiplicative dilution method. 200 \u0026micro;L diluted suspension was aspirated, spread evenly on the R\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eA agar medium, and then incubated at 28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2\u0026deg;C for 2\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;4 days in bacteriological incubator. The bacterial colonies (pure colonies) were picked and streaked on the fresh nutrient agar for the selection of clone. The isolated strains were stored in cryopreservation tube containing glycerol at -80\u0026deg;C.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec7\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.5 DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eGenomic DNA was extracted using a Rapid bacterial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the isolates using 27F and 1492R primer sets [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e21\u003c/span\u003e]. The PCR amplification was performed in a 25 \u0026micro;L reaction system containing 2 \u0026micro;L DNA template, 1 \u0026micro;L of each primer, 8.5 \u0026micro;L ddH\u003csub\u003e2\u003c/sub\u003eO, and 12.5 \u0026micro;L 2\u0026times;Taq PCR Master Mix (Sangon, Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China). The PCR products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified with a DiaSpin PCR Product Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China). The purified PCR products were sequenced in the forward and reverse directions using the same PCR primer pairs at a commercial sequencing provider (Sangon Biotech Company, Limited, Shanghai, China).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec8\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e2.6 Data Analysis\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelative frequency (RF) refers to the ratio of the number of endophytic bacterium strains to the total number of isolated strains. Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') and Simpson diversity index (D) were used to analyze the biodiversity of endophytic fungi. Pielou homogeneity index (J) was used to study the homogeneity of the species distribution in different parts of the same species, and the species richness was assessed by calculating Margalet index (R). Determination of dominant colonies: species were considered dominant if P\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e \u0026gt; 1/S, where P\u003csub\u003ei\u003c/sub\u003e was the relative abundance of species (i) and S was the total number of species present in the community. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 to investigate the correlation between polyphyllin content of PPY and the dominant taxa (genus level) among the five provenances.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"3. Results","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec10\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e\u003cem\u003e3.1 Validation of method\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFigure\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e displays the chromatogram of seven standards obtained through HPLC. The regression equation and linear ranges of seven analytes were determined using the developed HPLC method. The results showed that the test solution was well separated from the impurities and without interference. The correlation coefficient values (r\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e) indicated appropriate correlations between the investigated compound concentration and their peak area within the test ranges. As presented in Table S2, all R\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e values obtained using linear regression analysis were greater than 0.99. The average peak areas of PPⅦ, PPH, PPⅥ, PPⅡ, PPⅢ, PPI, and PPV were 141.85, 179.63, 107.75, 321.20, 263.43, 257.55, 229.15, and the relative standard deviations were 0.66%, 0.53%, 0.98%, 0.86%, 0.85%, 0.65%, and 0.70%, respectively.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relative standard deviation (RSD) of precision for seven compounds was less than 2%. The RSD values for repeatability and stability of the compounds were all less than 2%, suggesting the high repeatability and stability of the method used. The average recovery was in the range of 98.34\u0026thinsp;~\u0026thinsp;99.34% with RSD varying from 0.08\u0026ndash;0.25% (Table S3), indicating that the method used was accurate and reproducible for quantifying the seven steroidal saponins present in PPY samples.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec11\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.2 Structure and distribution of endophytic bacterial flora in PPY\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 268 culturable endophytic bacteria were successfully isolated from PPY tissues sourced from five distinct origins. Notably, the majority of these bacteria remained sterile under the specified culture conditions. The sequences generated were checked and assembled using SeqMan Pro v.11 (DNAStar Lasergene, Madison, WI, USA), and then subjected to BLASTn searches in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) GenBank nucleotide database, and the approximate phylogenetic affiliation of the isolates was located. The identification and classification of the thirty-nine taxa is presented in Table S4. Among the isolated bacteria, 165 specimens (comprising 61.57% of the total) were classified as Proteobacteria, while 80 specimens (accounting for 29.85% of the total) belonged to the Firmicutes phylum. Most of them were assigned to 14 orders within 7 classes (Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacilli, Actinobacteria, Flavobacteria, Acidobacteria). The main order is Bacillales, and the main genera are \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.3 Differences in Endophytic bacteria Between Field Sites and PPY Tissues\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe highest number of endophytic bacterial isolates were collected from GP (73), followed by QS (62), NJ (47), FY (47), and YC (39). The differences in the distribution of endophytic bacteria were observed across the above-mentioned five sites. At the genus level, \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e emerged as the dominant genus in GP, YC, and FY, accounting for 34.25%, 48.71%, and 29.78% of the RF, respectively. In contrast, \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e was the predominant genus in NJ, comprising 25.53% of the RF, while \u003cem\u003eLuteibacter\u003c/em\u003e was the dominant genus in QS, with an RF of 11.29%. The endophytic bacteria exhibited site-specificity at the species level, where \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas poae\u003c/em\u003e was prevalent in both roots and leaves, whereas \u003cem\u003eSphingomonas taxi\u003c/em\u003e was commonly associated with stems and leaves (Fig.\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Fig3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e). As presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab1\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e1\u003c/span\u003e, the differences in endophytic bacterial diversity (H' and D), evenness (J) and richness (R) were observed across different sites. The bacterial species diversity at YC exhibited the lowest values (H' = 2.5156, D\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.9123), and the bacterial species evenness at NJ was the lowest (J\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.8841). Additionally, the lowest bacterial richness (R\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;4.3673) was observed at YC.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpecies richness, evenness and diversity indices of endophytic bacteria isolated from PPY at different sites\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esites\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShannon\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ediversity index (H\u0026prime;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimpson\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ediversity index\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(D)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePielou\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eevenness index(J)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMargalet\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003erichness index\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(R)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGuanping\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.1179\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9581\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8917\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.4584\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eYangcen\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.5156\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9123\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8879\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.3673\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNiujie\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.7326\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9184\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8840\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.4543\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQisheng\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.2799\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9619\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9310\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.9959\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFengyi\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.9697\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9501\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9471\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7141\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe roots of PPY exhibited the highest number of endophytic bacterial isolates, with a total of 73 distinct strains identified, whereas the stems displayed the lowest number of such isolates, comprising merely 55 strains. Besides, the diversity (H' and D) and richness (R) of endophytic bacteria showed significant differences in different tissues (Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab2\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e2\u003c/span\u003e). The roots possessed the greatest bacterial species diversity (H' = 3.8631), whereas the leaves exhibited the lowest (H' = 2.8445). Conversely, according to the Simpson's index (D), the stems exhibited the highest bacterial species diversity (D\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.9691), and the roots displayed the lowest diversity (D\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.9492). The assessment of bacterial species richness (R) revealed that the roots possessed the highest level (R\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;11.5562), whereas the leaves exhibited the lowest richness (R\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;6.1206).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndices of endophytic bacteria species richness, evenness, and diversity isolated from different PPY tissues\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003esites\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShannon\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ediversity index (H\u0026prime;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSimpson\u0026rsquo;s\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ediversity index\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(D)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePielou\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eevenness index(J)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMargalet\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003erichness index\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e(R)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eRoot\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.8631\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9492\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9640\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.5562\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStem\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.3256\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9691\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9431\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.2349\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLeaf\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.8445\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.9555\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.8447\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1206\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003e3.4 Correlation between endophytic bacterial communities and steroidal saponin content\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe total contents of PPⅠ, PPⅡ and PPⅦ in PPY samples sourced from five distinct origins varied between 1.0917 and 1.8656%, all of which conformed to the specifications outlined in the 2020 edition of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Notably, the concentrations of PPⅠ, PPⅡ and PPⅦ in the YC and FY samples surpassed the stipulated standards by a margin of 2.5 to 3.1 times. The content of PPIII in the PPY derived from Guanping exhibited a significant increase (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05) or a highly significant elevation (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01) compared with those sourced from other origins. Besides, it was the sole origin in which PPV was detectable, with a concentration of 0.1070% (Table S5). The analysis of Pearson's correlation coefficient was conducted using SPSS software to assess the relationship between the dominant flora and steroidal saponins present in PPY samples originating from five distinct locations. The results are shown in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab3\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e3\u003c/span\u003e. A highly significant positive correlation was observed between \u003cem\u003eBacllius\u003c/em\u003e and the total content of PPⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅶ (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01). The \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e displayed a strong positive correlation with the total content of PPⅠ, Ⅱ, and Ⅶ (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05). Additionally, the \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e had high-positive correlation with the accumulation of PPH content (\u003cem\u003ep\u003c/em\u003e\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCorrelation analysis between endophytic bacteria and polyphyllin contents\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"8\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c7\" colnum=\"7\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c8\" colnum=\"8\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003egenus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅠ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅡ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅢ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅥ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅦ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPH\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPⅠ+Ⅱ+Ⅶ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eBacllius\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.798\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.739\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.388\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.198\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.275\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.582\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.974\u003csup\u003e**\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.643\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.799\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.651\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.680\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.064\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.885\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.851\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.703\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.705\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.582\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.093\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.433\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c7\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e-0.380\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c8\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.935\u003csup\u003e*\u003c/sup\u003e\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"8\"\u003eNote: * means p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.05, ** means p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.01\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"4. Discussion","content":"\u003cp\u003eIn this study, the diversity of endophytic bacteria in three PPY tissues from five different origins was documented. A total of 268 bacterial isolates were obtained and identified. The experimental results indicated that the isolates belonged to 5 bacterial phyla, 7 classes, 14 orders, and 39 genera. The distribution of endophytic bacteria varied across different locations, which may be attributed to the influence of both biotic and abiotic factors on endophytic bacterial communities. These factors ultimately determine their species composition, community structure, diversity, and functionality [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e22\u003c/span\u003e]. It has been found that environmental factors not only impact the distribution of medicinal plants, but also dictate the species composition of bacterial and endophytic fungi [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR23\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e23\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e24\u003c/span\u003e], and the composition of plant microbial communities is associated with the host species, living environment, plant genetics, and various tissue states [\u003cspan additionalcitationids=\"CR26 CR27\" citationid=\"CR25\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e25\u003c/span\u003e\u0026ndash;\u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e28\u003c/span\u003e]. The experimental results were consistent with the previous reports on PPY and various host plant species, the distribution of endophytic bacteria in the three tissues varied considerably and the diversity exhibited a gradient of root\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;stem\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;leaf, which was in agreement with the former report [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR29\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e29\u003c/span\u003e]. It is noteworthy that we adopted a culture-dependent isolation method. Due to the inability of laboratory conditions to fully simulate natural environments, some microorganisms exhibit \"unculturability\", which may lead to the omission of endophytic bacteria in the analysis, thereby causing deviations in the results of geographical and organizational analysis.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePPY is used in different pharmaceutical systems for the treatment of several diseases. According to reports, nearly 100 plant chemicals with medicinal value have been discovered in PPY, among which steroidal saponin and polyphyllin are the key compounds. However, the current production of resorcylic acid saponins is far from meeting market demand. Many studies have shown that endophytic bacteria can increase the production of polyphyllin by regulating the expression of relevant genes in PPY [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e30\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. The experimental results revealed that three endophytic bacterial genera were associated with the polyphyllin content in PPY. Specifically, \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eBacllius\u003c/em\u003e were significantly and positively correlated with the total content of PP I, II and VII, respectively, while \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e showed a strong positive correlation with the content of PPH. Research has found that inoculation with three potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB) (\u003cem\u003eBacillus thuringiensis\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eB. polymyxa\u003c/em\u003e, and \u003cem\u003ePaenibacillus amylolyticus\u003c/em\u003e) can increase the content of Pseudo-protodiosgenin and diosgenin H [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e32\u003c/span\u003e]. \u003cem\u003eBacillus cereus\u003c/em\u003e LgD2 may effectively promote the accumulation of polyphyllin by regulating key downstream genes in biosynthetic pathways [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR31\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e31\u003c/span\u003e]. However, considering that endophytes enhance the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants by a variety of factors, they not only can directly promote the production of metabolites in the host plant but also synthesize the same secondary metabolites as the host, and secrete biologically active secondary metabolites that can improve the tolerance of the host plant to biotic stresses and regulate the expression of related genes in the host [\u003cspan citationid=\"CR33\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e33\u003c/span\u003e, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e34\u003c/span\u003e]. Therefore, comprehensive and in-depth studies are required to elucidate the mechanistic relationships between these endophytes and polyphyllin.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"5. Conclusions","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were influenced by tissue type and habitat. In addition, three endophytic bacteria (\u003cem\u003ePseudomonas, Bacllius\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e) were positively correlated with the content of polyphylins, and could be used as potential candidates for producing bioactive compounds. This work will facilitate the development of an alternative method for the production of secondary metabolites from endophytes. It is imperative to pay more attention to the interaction between medicinal plants and microorganisms, and enhance research efforts to elucidate the interaction mechanisms, so as to make better use of endophytic resources, and provide theoretical guidance for high-quality and high-yield medicinal plants.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":" \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eEthics approval and consent to participate\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eConsent for publication\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eNot applicable.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cstrong\u003eCompeting interests\u003c/strong\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e \u003ch2\u003eAuthor details\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003csup\u003e1\u003c/sup\u003e Yunnan Key Laboratory of Screening and Research on Anti-pathogenic Plant Resources from West Yunnan, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China. \u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003eCollege of Pharmacy, Dali University, Dali 671000, Yunnan, China. \u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e Lijiang People\u0026rsquo;s Hospital, Lijing 674100, Yunnan, China.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eFunding\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by \u0026ldquo;the Expert Workstation of Jiang Yong Yunnan Province (202305AF150048), the Central Government Guidance Fund for Local Scientific and Technological Development(202407AB110009)and 2024 Expert grassroots scientific research workstation in Yunnan Province.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAuthor Contribution\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eQS: guided the completion of this experiment, completed the first draft paper, and made revisions. PZ and LH: guided the experimental methods and thesis writing. RL and GS: performed experiments, recorded data, and data analysis. LJ and WY: data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAcknowledgement\u003c/h2\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis work was supported by \u0026ldquo;the Expert Workstation of Jiang Yong Yunnan Province (202305AF150048), the Central Government Guidance Fund for Local Scientific and Technological Development(202407AB110009)and 2024 Expert grassroots scientific research workstation in Yunnan Province.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eAvailability of data and materials\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe data were obtained by the authors.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDing YG, Zhao YL, Zhang J, Zuo ZT, Zhang QZ, Wang YZ. The traditional uses, phytochemistry, and pharmacological properties of Paris L. (Liliaceae): A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;278:114293. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jep.2021.114293\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jep.2021.114293\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMan S, Zhang X, Xie L, Zhou Y, Wang G, Hao R, Gao W. A new insight into material basis of rhizoma Paridis saponins in alleviating pain. J Ethnopharmacol. 2024;323:117642. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jep.2023.117642\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jep.2023.117642\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQin XJ, Yu MY, Ni W, Yan H, Chen CX, Cheng YC, et al. Steroidal saponins from stems and leaves of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Phytochemistry. 2016;121:20\u0026ndash;9. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.008\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.10.008\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLan PX, He P, Yang J, Zhou GH, Chen XJ, Wei TY, et al. High-throughput sequencing reveals the presence of novel and known viruses in diseased Paris yunnanensis. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:1045750. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2022.1045750\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2022.1045750\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang T, Liu H, Liu XT, Xu DR, Chen XQ, Wang Q. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of steroidal saponins in crude extracts from Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis and P. polyphylla var. chinensis by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;51(1):114\u0026ndash;24. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jpba.2009.08.020\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jpba.2009.08.020\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCong Y, Liu X, Kang L, Yu Z, Zhao Z, Li J, et al. Pennogenin tetraglycoside stimulates secretion-dependent activation of rat platelets: evidence for critical roles of adenosine diphosphate receptor signal pathways. Thromb Res. 2012;129(5):e209\u0026ndash;16. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.001\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.001\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJing S, Wang Y, Li X, Man S, Gao W. Chemical constituents and antitumor activity from Paris polyphylla Smith var. yunnanensis. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(6):660\u0026ndash;6. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/14786419.2016.1219861\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/14786419.2016.1219861\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLi L, Zhang J, Cheng W, Di F, Wang C, An Q. Saponins of Paris polyphylla for the Improvement of Acne: Anti-Inflammatory, Antibacterial, Antioxidant and Immunomodulatory Effects. Molecules. 2024;29(8). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/molecules29081793\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/molecules29081793\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu Z, Li N, Gao W, Man S, Yin S, Liu C. Comparative study on hemostatic, cytotoxic and hemolytic activities of different species of Paris L. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;142(3):789\u0026ndash;94. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.065\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.jep.2012.05.065\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang G, Liu Y, Wang Y, Gao W. Effect of Rhizoma Paridis saponin on the pain behavior in a mouse model of cancer pain. RSC Adv. 2018;8(31):17060\u0026ndash;72. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1039/c8ra00797g\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1039/c8ra00797g\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang Y, Jin H, Zhang J, Zhang J, Wang Y. Quantitative evaluation and discrimination of wild Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis (Franch.) Hand.-Mazz from three regions of Yunnan Province using UHPLC-UV-MS and UV spectroscopy couple with partial least squares discriminant analysis. J Nat Med. 2017;71(1):148\u0026thinsp;\u0026ndash;\u0026thinsp;57; \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11418-016-1044-7\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11418-016-1044-7\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eYang Y, Zhang J, Jin H, Zhang J, Wang Y. Quantitative Analysis in Combination with Fingerprint Technology and Chemometric Analysis Applied for Evaluating Six Species of Wild Paris Using UHPLC-UV-MS. J Anal Methods Chem. 2016;2016:3182796. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1155/2016/3182796\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1155/2016/3182796\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMushtaq S, Shafiq M, Tariq MR, Sami A, Nawaz-Ul-Rehman MS, Bhatti MHT, et al. Interaction between bacterial endophytes and host plants. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1092105. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2022.1092105\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2022.1092105\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eHou QZ, Chen DW, Wang YP, Ehmet N, Ma J, Sun K. Analysis of endophyte diversity of two Gentiana plants species and the association with secondary metabolite. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):90. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12866-022-02510-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12866-022-02510-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJu M, Zhang Q, Wang R, Yan S, Li Z, Li P, Gu P. Correlation in endophytic fungi community diversity and bioactive compounds of Sophora alopecuroides. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:955647. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2022.955647\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2022.955647\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePang B, Yin D, Zhai Y, He A, Qiu L, Liu Q, et al. Diversity of endophytic fungal community in Huperzia serrata from different ecological areas and their correlation with Hup A content. BMC Microbiol. 2022;22(1):191. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12866-022-02605-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12866-022-02605-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCui XX, Wang L, Fang HY, Zheng YG, Su CY. The cultivable endophytic fungal community of Scutellaria baicalensis: diversity and relevance to flavonoid production by the host. Plant Signal Behav. 2022;17(1):2068834. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1080/15592324.2022.2068834\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1080/15592324.2022.2068834\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJahromi MS, Azizi A, Soltani J. Diversity and Spatiotemporal Distribution of Fungal Endophytes Associated with Salvia multicaulis. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78(4):1432\u0026ndash;47. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00284-021-02430-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00284-021-02430-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao R, Zheng S, Hu Y, Li H, Chen Y, Chun Z. Endophytic bacterial diversity of the medicinal orchid Dendrobium nobile. South Afr J Bot. 2023a;158:90\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.sajb.2023.04.050\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.sajb.2023.04.050\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLu J, Wang J, Zhang J, Zhu Y, Qin L, Zhu B. Diversity of Culturable Endophytic Fungi in Crocus sativus and Their Correlation with Crocin Content. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80(2):73. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00284-023-03177-4\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00284-023-03177-4\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDorsch M, Lane D, Stackebrandt E. Towards a phylogeny of the genus Vibrio based on 16S rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42(1):58\u0026ndash;63. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1099/00207713-42-1-58\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1099/00207713-42-1-58\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWalitang DI, Kim CG, Kim K, Kang Y, Kim YK, Sa T. The influence of host genotype and salt stress on the seed endophytic community of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant rice cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):51. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1186/s12870-018-1261-1\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1186/s12870-018-1261-1\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMa L, Liu L, Lu Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, et al. When microclimates meet soil microbes: Temperature controls soil microbial diversity along an elevational gradient in subtropical forests. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022;166. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108566\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108566\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao Y, Zhou Y, Jia X, Han L, Liu L, Ren K, et al. Soil characteristics and microbial community structure on along elevation gradient in a Pinus armandii forest of the Qinling Mountains, China. For Ecol Manag. 2022;503. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119793\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119793\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChristian N, Sullivan C, Visser ND, Clay K. Plant Host and Geographic Location Drive Endophyte Community Composition in the Face of Perturbation. Microb Ecol. 2016;72(3):621\u0026ndash;32. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s00248-016-0804-y\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s00248-016-0804-y\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKandel SL, Joubert PM, Doty SL. Bacterial Endophyte Colonization and Distribution within Plants. Microorganisms. 2017;5(4). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/microorganisms5040077\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/microorganisms5040077\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eLiu TH, Zhou Y, Tao WC, Liu Y, Zhang XM, Tian SZ. Bacterial Diversity in Roots, Stems, and Leaves of Chinese Medicinal Plant Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69(1):91\u0026ndash;7. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.33073/pjm-2020-012\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.33073/pjm-2020-012\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRezki S, Campion C, Simoneau P, Jacques M-A, Shade A, Barret M. Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities within and across successive plant generations. Plant Soil. 2018;422(1\u0026ndash;2):67\u0026ndash;79. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWu W, Chen W, Liu S, Wu J, Zhu Y, Qin L, Zhu B. Beneficial Relationships Between Endophytic Bacteria and Medicinal Plants. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:646146. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fpls.2021.646146\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fpls.2021.646146\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eChen Y, Yu D, Huo J, Huang N, Zhang M, Du X. Studies on biotransformation mechanism of Fusarium sp. C39 to enhance saponin content of Paridis Rhizoma. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:992318. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2022.992318\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2022.992318\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhang Q, Chang S, Yang Y, Xi C, Dong Y, Liu L, et al. Endophyte-inoculated rhizomes of Paris polyphylla improve polyphyllin biosynthesis and yield: a transcriptomic analysis of the underlying mechanism. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1261140. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261140\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2023.1261140\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZhao SX, Deng QS, Jiang CY, Wu QS, Xue YB, Li GL, et al. Inoculation with Potassium Solubilizing Bacteria and Its Effect on the Medicinal Characteristics of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis. Agriculture-Basel. 2023b;13(1). \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3390/agriculture13010021\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3390/agriculture13010021\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eJia M, Chen L, Xin HL, Zheng CJ, Rahman K, Han T, Qin LP. A Friendly Relationship between Endophytic Fungi and Medicinal Plants: A Systematic Review. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:906. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.3389/fmicb.2016.00906\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eVenieraki A, Dimou M, Katinakis P. Endophytic fungi residing in medicinal plants have the ability to produce the same or similar pharmacologically active secondary metabolites as their hosts. Hellenic Plant Prot J. 2017;10(2):51\u0026ndash;66. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003e10.1515/hppj-2017-0006\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1515/hppj-2017-0006\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":false,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":true,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-microbiology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"mcro","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Microbiology](http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/mcro","title":"BMC Microbiology","twitterHandle":"#bmcmicrobiology","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis, Polyphyllin, Plant endophytes, Diversity, Geographic conditions, Tissues","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003ch2\u003eBackground\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cem\u003eParis polyphylla\u003c/em\u003e var. \u003cem\u003eyunnanensis\u003c/em\u003e (PPY) is commonly used in traditional Chinese medicine formulas and folk families. Nearly more than 100 chemical substances with medicinal values have been reported in PPY, among which steroidal saponins are the main active components of PPY. Due to its long growth cycle, the resource of PPY becomes too scarce, and the current production capacity of PPY is still far from meeting the market demand. Numerous studies have shown that endophytic bacteria not only promote the production of secondary metabolites in the host plant, but also certain endophytes themselves can produce the same secondary metabolites as the host. However, little is known about the endophytic bacteria associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and tissues. In order to compare the endophytic bacterial communities associated with PPY in different geographic conditions and plant tissues, the endophytic bacteria from roots, stems, and leaves of PPY collected from five locations were isolated, and the diversity, richness, and homogeneity of bacterial communities were analyzed, and the dominant genera correlation with polyphyllin content was further investigated.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eResults\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA total of 268 endophytic bacterial strains were isolated and identified from PPY. The experimental results showed that the isolates belonged to 5 phyla, 7 classes, 14 orders and 39 genera of bacteria, of which the optimal order was Bacillariophyta and the optimal genera were \u003cem\u003eBacillus\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e. In general, the differences in the distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were characterized by the highest diversity and richness index of endophytic bacterial communities in QS and the highest evenness index in FY. The diversity, richness and evenness of bacterial communities in terms of tissue state showed a hierarchical pattern of root\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;stem\u0026thinsp;\u0026gt;\u0026thinsp;leaf. The three optimal genera were positively correlated with polyphyllin content.\u003c/p\u003e\u003ch2\u003eConclusion\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe distribution pattern and diversity of endophytic bacteria in PPY were influenced by tissue type and habitat. In addition, three endophytic bacteria (\u003cem\u003ePseudomonas\u003c/em\u003e, \u003cem\u003eBacllius\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eAgrobacterium\u003c/em\u003e) were positively correlated with the content of polyphylins, and could be used as potential candidates for producing bioactive compounds.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Diversity of Endophytic Bacteria in Paris Polyphylla var. yunnanensis and Their Correlation with Polyphyllin Content","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-11-25 15:31:04","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-5386035/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0},{"type":"decision","content":"Revision requested","date":"2024-11-14T20:49:53+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"editorAssigned","content":"","date":"2024-11-07T11:30:12+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"checksComplete","content":"","date":"2024-11-07T11:29:49+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""},{"type":"submitted","content":"BMC Microbiology","date":"2024-11-04T07:59:31+00:00","index":"","fulltext":""}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"bmc-microbiology","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":false,"externalIdentity":"mcro","sideBox":"Learn more about [BMC Microbiology](http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com/)","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"https://www.editorialmanager.com/mcro","title":"BMC Microbiology","twitterHandle":"#bmcmicrobiology","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"em","reportingPortfolio":"BMC Series","inReviewEnabled":true,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"faebcec7-5606-49b9-9c15-8348c256c50f","owner":[],"postedDate":"November 25th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"published-in-journal","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2025-03-03T15:59:48+00:00","versionOfRecord":{"articleIdentity":"rs-5386035","link":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03814-x","journal":{"identity":"bmc-microbiology","isVorOnly":false,"title":"BMC Microbiology"},"publishedOn":"2025-02-26 15:57:10","publishedOnDateReadable":"February 26th, 2025"},"versionCreatedAt":"2024-11-25 15:31:04","video":"","vorDoi":"10.1186/s12866-025-03814-x","vorDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03814-x","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-5386035","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-5386035","identity":"rs-5386035","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00