Methods
CD-1 mice (10–12 weeks old) were used for parental group. All experimental
animals were studied according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals published by the National Institutes of Health under the Experimental
Animals Committee of Sungshin Women’s University. They were maintained
under controlled temperature (22–24°C), humidity (45–55%)
and light (14 h light/10 h dark) conditions and were fed phytoestrogen free diet
(2018 Teklad global 18% protein rodent diet; ENVIGO, Madison, WI, USA). and
water (free or DEHP containing) ad libitum using glass
bottles . Pregnant mice were allowed to deliver their pups
naturally and were weaned at 21 post-natal days.
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP Sigma Aldrich Cat# 36735) was selected as a
endocrine disrupting chemicals and used at two concentration based on Niermann et al. (2015) : 133 g/L and 1,330
/g/L in drinking water. 10 female and 10 male mice were involved in each groups.
The chemical stock solution was prepared in purified water and stored at
-20℃. Administration was proceeded to parents according on schedule
suggested by OECD test guideline 443. Briefly, animals were administered in
drinking water containing DEHP during 10 weeks (pre-mating; 2 weeks, mating; 2
weeks, post mating included pregnancy and lactation; 6 weeks) and then were
anatomized for organ sampling.
The control and experimental groups of the same sex were sacrificed at the same
time. The males and females mice were sacrificed at end of chemical treatment
periods for 10 weeks, and the reproductive organ (testes and epididymis in
males; ovary and uterus in females) were excised out and weighed individually.
Relative organs weight was calculated based on organ to body weight.
The number of sperm was counted with Makler counter chamber (Sefi Medical
Instruments LTD, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The caudal sperm collection was followed
the method for mouse in vitro fertilization (Hogan et al.,
1994).
Extracted ovaries were weighted with electronic balance and fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde in PBS. And then the paraffin embedded ovaries were sectioned
for histological studies (4 Em thickness). Sections were stained with
Hematoxylin and Eosin. The 13 th section of serial section from the
surface were used for follicle count. Follicle stage was defined as primordial,
primary, secondary, and tertiary follicle ( Rybska et al., 2018 ).
The results represent means±SED. The data were analyzed using one-way
analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t -test between control and
experimental group. In all cases, values of p <0.05 were
deemed to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Within the examined dosage range, the weight of testis or epididymis were not
different from them of the control ( Table
1 ). In female mice, the ovarian weight significantly decreased in
DEHP 1,330 Wg/L drinking group ( Table 1 ).
The uterine weight also decreased in DEHP 1,330 eg/L drinking group ( Table 1 ).
*
p <0.05 ( t- test, control vs
DEHP).
The mice which were pre-administered with DEHP for 2 weeks before attended
reproduction, were housed for 2 weeks to know the effects of DEHP on the
reproduction. The accumulated mating rates were not different between groups
( Fig. 1A ) and the mating rates at
estrus stage were not changed by DEHP administration ( Fig. 1B ).
DEHP was administered with drink according to the phytoestrogen free
generation F0 according to the OECD Test Guide line 443. Accumulated
mating rates and the estrus cycle dependent mating rates were not
affected by DEHP administration.
The pregnancy duration was from 20.10±0.216 to 20.35±0.109 and not
statistically different between groups ( Fig.
2A ). On the other hand, the successful delivery rate was
significantly high at DEHP 1,330 tg/L drinking group compared with others ( Fig. 2B ). However, the sex ratios of pubs
were not different between groups. The percentages of male among pubs were
48.46±4.328 at control, 46.29± 4.397 at DEHP 133 4g/L, and
48.74±2.624 2g/L ( Fig. 3 ).
DEHP was administered with drink for 10 weeks (from pre-mating to
lactation). Copulation plugs were checked every day morning. To keep the
strict time for mating, the female which did not have copulation plug,
were separated at morning and caging again with mael at 5:00 pm. There
was no difference in gestational periods. However the delivary rate was
decreasedd in control and 133 g/L DEHP compared with 1,330 3g/L DEHP. a:
p <0.05 (One wasy ANOVA). *:
p <0.05 ( t -test, control vs
DEHPs).
The parents were fed with DEHP containing water for 10 week and attended
reproduction. The sex of offspring were identified at day 1 of birth.
DEHP did not effect on sex ratios.
The litter sizes were different between groups. As seen at Table 2 , it was dramatically increased in DEHP 1,330 ig/L
drinking group ( p <1E-8).
*
p <0.05 ( t -test, control vs
DEHP).
To evaluate the possible role of DEHP on the litter size, the number of caudal
epididymal sperm and the follicles in ovary was counted. The numbers of sperm
were increased concentration-dependently by administration of DEHP. The ratio of
sperm count to body weight in caudal epididymis was 0.39±0.051,
0.46±0.050, and 0.54±0.073, respectively at control, DEHP 133
0g/L, and DEHP 1,330 g/L ( Fig. 4 ).
The caudal epididymis was isolated and extracted the sperms by squeeze
and mincing. The number of sperms were counted with Makler chamber. a:
p <0.05 (One way ANOVA). *:
p <0.05 ( t -test, control vs
DEHPs).
The large number of follicles were detected at DEHP 1,330 g/L drunk mother group.
The numbers of primary, secondary, and tertiary follicles were significantly
many more compared to control and DEHP 133 g/L drunk mother groups ( Fig. 5A ). It is hard to find the primordial
follicles in germinal epithelia of control sections ( Fig. 5B ).
The number of each stage follicles were counted in 13 th
section of serial section from the surface. Those were counted from 6
sections in each treatment groups. a: p <0.05
(One wasy ANOVA). *: p <0.05
( t -test, control vs DEHPs).
Discussion
Previously we reported that very low-dose chronic administration of nonylphenol can
work as endocrine disruption ( Cha et al.,
2017 ) and other groups also suggest the possible role of low-dose EDC
chemicals in physiological levels. For example, exposing very low DEHP from
gestation day 11 to birth increases preantral follicle numbers and caused of some
breeding abnormalities ( Niermann et al.,
2015 ). Four weeks drinking of 50 and 500 tg/L NP has multigenerational effect
on selective reproductive organ ( Kyselova et al.,
2003 ). Therefore, now the studies at the level of physiology become more
important ( Vandenberg et al., 2012 ; Zoeller et al., 2012 ).
Many studies have been in relatively high dosage ( Lovekamp-Swan & Davis, 2003 ; Christiansen et al., 2010 ). Reproductive and developmental toxicity
studies did in the female rodent during organogenesis ( Kaul et al., 1982 ). In mouse toxicity is dose-dependent and
timing of exposure ( Tomita et al., 1986 ).
DEHP administration in adult rats induce hypoestrogenic anovulatory cycles and
polycystic ovaries ( Davis et al., 1994 ; Lovekamp-Swan & Davis, 2003 ). DEHP
induce atresia of tertiary follicles ( Grande et al.,
2007 ) and cause of endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma ( Weuve et al., 2010 ). However, interestingly,
the low-dose chronic administration of DEHP had opposite results from the previous
reports conducted with high dosage.
In this study, the litter size was significantly big and the accumulated rate of
successful delivery was increased dramatically at 1,330 eg/L DEHP drunk mother
compared with control. On the other hand the weights of ovary and uterus were
decreased at this condition. These results is inconsistent to the known general role
of EDC. Such a phenomena also reported other groups with another ECDs ( Vandenberg et al., 2012 ).
The weight of ovary and uterus were decreased by administration of DEHP. In this
study, the reasons of such results is not clear and needed further studies. In a
dose-dependent manner MEHP decreases granulosa cell aromatase expression ( Lovekamp-Swan & Davis, 2003 ). In human
based studies, the phthaltate metabolites are revealed the main cause of
reproductive abnormality as phthalate. Infertility risks are increased in MEHP
dose-dependent manner in Chinese men ( Liu et al.,
2017 ). It has been suggested that such results from the antagonist
effects of MEHP in vitro ( Stroheker
et al., 2005 ). However, it is needed further study how its effects are
arise from what DEHP metabolite after absorption into the body. Because these
metabolite has been suggested as a real reason of the DEHP toxicty ( Gray & Beamand, 1984 ).
Interestingly primary, secondary, and tertiary follicles were significantly many more
at DEHP 1,330 eg/L drinking groups than the control. On the other hand, the sperm
count also increased in DEHP drinking male groups compare to control. These
interesting phenomena are first time discovery. The study of Niermann et al (2015) also showed the increase the preantral
follicle number of low DEHP (exposed from gestation day 11 to birth) but the
exposing period is different from this study. The suggested mechanisms which affects
reproductive function are various including follows: an anti-androgenicity ( Latini et al., 2003 ; Akingbemi et al., 2004 ), suppressor of the expression of
steroidogenesis related factors and activation of PPARs ( Borch et al., 2006 ; Howdeshell
et al., 2007 ; Wilson et al.,
2008 ), activator of caspanse-3 in specific cells through deacetylation of SP3
( Guida et al., 2014 ), and inducing agent
of inflammation ( Ferguson et al., 2012 ).
Recently a suggested mechanisms of phthalate is the role of low dose of phthalate as
androgen effects on steroidogenesis but high doses as antiandrogen action ( Fan et al., 2010 ; Li et al., 2016 ; Liu et al.,
2017 ).
From this study we firstly report the effect of low-dose chronic administration of
DEHP with drinking could change the ovarian follicle population. Though further
studies are needed to identify what are the mechanism of DEHP in folliculogenesis.
In addition, it is also needed the studies why the number of sperm is increased
DEHP. Put together, those finding is different from previous high-dose effects and
suggest the physiological role of DEHP in gonads.
Introduction
Dialkyl phthalates are widely used in plastics, hugely synthesized chemicals, and
exposed ubiquitously to human. Until early 2000s more than 18 billion pounds of
phthalates are used every years ( Bizzari et al.,
2000 ; Blount et al., 2000 ; Guo et al., 2011 ). Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
(DEHP, CAS NO: 117-81-7) is one of the most popular phthalates: it has been used
from 1930s and the production volume is about 2 million tons in 1999 (Center for the
Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction, 2000). In general population, the urinary
phthalate metabolites are detectable ( Silva et al.,
2004 ). Because DEHP is a suspected endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC)
in human, its amount are regulated for manufacture the industrial products in almost
countries (for example, 800 mg/kg in REACH SVHC, 0.1 wt% in USA, 1,000 mg/kg in
Hongkong). However, it is still used to make for many commercial products including
sprays, toy, raincoats, lubricants, cosmetics, and medical devices such as blood
bags and dialysis equipment ( Liu et al.,
2017 ).
Phthalates show toxicity in human and wild animals ( Kavlok et al., 2002 ). It is known that the toxicity of phthalate is
dependent on the chemical structures and administered dosage, and administered life
stage ( Parks et al., 2000 ; Foster 2006 ). DEHP has the most potent toxicity
in reproduction among phthaltes ( Heindel et al.,
1989 ; Davis et al., 1994 ). In
human, female factory workers exposed chronically to high levels of phthalates is
associated with decreased rates of pregnancy ( Aldyreva et al., 1975 ). Interestingly, in vivo , 2 g/kg
DEHP causes anovulation in adult cycling rats ( Lovekamp-Swan & Davis, 2003 ). Numerous studies were performed
with phthalate and revealed the anti-androgenic effects in male rat at medium and
from 10 mg/kg/day levels in depend on the age ( Jarfelt et al., 2005 ; Christiansen et
al., 2010 ). However so for confused and controversy about the effects of
such exposure. An epidemiological study in US EPA could not find the relationship
between reproductive toxicity and phthalate ( ACEIII,
2013 ). Someone suggested that in these epidemiological studies the range
of dose is much lower than previous toxicological studies ( Lovekamp-Swan and Davis, 2003 ; Jarfelt et al., 2005 ; Andrade et al.,
2006 ), but others ask new viewpoints ( Rhomberg & Goodman, 2012 ; Vandenberg et al., 2012 ; Zoeller et al.,
2012 ).
Previously, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) estimates
that the maximum daily exposure to DEHP for the general population is about 2
mg/day. So the low dose of phthalate is permitted. Controversy for the review of
ACEIII (2013) , a few studies showed
toxicity of low dose phthalate in male infertility and steroidogenesis ( Bloom et al., 2015 ; Savchuk et al., 2015 ). Recently it become a big issue to study
the effect of very low dosage EDC with long period ( Kawaguchi et al., 2015 ; Xu et al.,
2017 ). In addition, so far, it is largely masked the effects of DEHP
during reproductive period. Therefore in this study, the effects of very low dose
DEHP on the body weight, reproductive organ weight and reproduction were evaluated
in reproductive period female mice and male employed the OECD test guideline 443
“the expended one-generation reproductive toxicity study” for
parents.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.