Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Dogs and Associated Hematological Changes in Gombe State, Nigeria

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Dogs and Associated Hematological Changes in Gombe State, Nigeria | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Dogs and Associated Hematological Changes in Gombe State, Nigeria Y. Audu This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Gastrointestinal (GI) nematodes are a common parasitic problem in dogs, causing significant health issues. These parasites live in the digestive tract and can lead to a variety of symptoms, depending on the type and severity of infection. A cross sectional study was conducted from August 2023 to December 2023 to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs and their effect on haematological parameters in Gombe State, Nigeria. A total of 200 faecal samples from dogs were collected using systematic random sampling technique from six (two from each Senatorial zone) randomly selected Local Government Areas (LGAs) out of the eleven LGAs in the State. Formalin-ether centrifugation-floatation technique was used to detect nematode parasites using microscopy. Haematological evaluations were performed according to standard procedures. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in the study area was 36.5%. The parasites identified were Ancylostoma caninum, Toxocara canis and Trichuris vulpis with 58.9%, 28.7% and 12.3% prevalences respectively. The haematological parameters revealed reduction of the Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) of both the infected and non-infected dogs below the reference values while only the infected group has Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) below the reference values. There were eosinophilia, monocytosis and leukocytosis in the infected group whereas neutrophilia occurred in both the infected and non-infected groups. All other haematological values are within the reference ranges. This study establishes the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs and associated risk factors in Gombe State, Nigeria. Small Animal Medicine Dogs gastrointestinal nematodes haematology Gombe State Figures Figure 1 INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs are among the most frequent pathogenic agents that veterinarians who treat companion animals encounter. They are also one of the primary causes of dog mortality (Martínez-Moreno et al., 2007 ). As a result, they pose a risk to the animals, their owners, and veterinarians. Several intestinal parasites in dogs are zoonotic, meaning they have an impact on public health (Moro and Abah, 2019 ). Although the close bond between humans and dogs and their role as companion animals provide many benefits, they also pose a risk to public health because of the possibility of natural parasitic infection transmission from dogs to humans through unfavourable environmental and behavioral factors (Patz et al., 2002 ). Certain zoonotic illnesses like ancylostomiasis or cutaneous larva migrans, as well as toxocariasis or visceral larva migrans, are caused by some of these parasitic nematodes (Ugbomoiko et al., 2008 ). In most tropical and subtropical parts of the world, including Nigeria, canine gastrointestinal nematode infection continues to be a significant cause of hindrance to the health and well-being of dogs (Zelon, 2003 ; Ramirez-Barrios et al. , 2004). These gastrointestinal nematodes have a direct life cycle in which the larvae or eggs are shed in the excrement of infected dogs, hatch in the environment, and then infect other dogs by ingestion or skin penetration. Certain nematodes, such as Toxocara canis , can also spread through lactation or transplacentally (Endrias and others, 2010). Consequently, depending on the amount of infecting larvae as well as host characteristics like breed, age, and acquired resistance, canine helminthosis could range in severity from asymptomatic infection to rapidly lethal disease (Bowman et al., 2003 ). In dogs, intestinal nematodes can result in acute intestinal blockage, emaciation, anemia, constipation, intermittent diarrhea, and a potbelly appearance (Kumar et al., 2014 ). Anemia, fatigue, melena, and weight loss are the results of blood loss caused by Ancylostoma caninum . Intestinal blockage, malnourishment, and in extreme situations, the larvae's migration to other organs are caused by Toxocara canis. Bloody diarrhea, colitis, and dehydration are brought on by Trichuris vulpis (Epe, 2009 ). Dog intestinal nematodes cannot be diagnosed using only symptomatology-based diagnostics, as stated by Carroll and Grove in 1986. By identifying parasitic elements (eggs, larvae, and adults) in their feces, particularly based on the two main diagnostic parameters: size and shape, intestinal nematodes infections in small animals can be detected (Foreyt, 1989 ). To concentrate parasite materials in fecal samples, a variety of methods and techniques are available, each having pros and cons of their own. The majority of gastrointestinal parasites have been diagnosed by fecal flotation, which is also a highly helpful method for evaluating the majority of parasites that affect dogs (Dryden et al., 2005 ). This method has the benefit of recovering parasite cysts and eggs based on variations in the flotation solution, faecal debris, and egg specific gravities, which makes identification easier (Sloss et al., 1999 ). Utilizing several common flotation medium, the centrifugal-flotation process decreases the time for for eggs and cysts to float (Maurelli et al., 2014 ). Haematological measures are useful for evaluating pathological conditions in animals as well as serving as excellent markers of the physiological state of the animals. Apart from their application in the identification and tracking of illnesses and anomalies, haematological investigations aid medical professionals in the diagnosis of numerous ailments and the evaluation of blood damage (Audu et al., 2022 ). The current study therefore sought to ascertain the intestinal nematode infection rate in domestic dogs under field conditions as well as the effect of these infections on the health of the animals by evaluating several risk variables and hematological parameters of both infected and non-infected dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS STUDY AREA The study was carried out in Nigeria's northeastern geopolitical zone in Gombe State (Jewel in the Savannah). With Gombe Town serving as its administrative and commercial center, Gombe State was established in 1996 by separating from the former Bauchi State. Situated between latitudes 9°301N and 12°301E and longitudes 8°451 and 11°451E, the State spans 20,265 km². The Northeastern subregion's five other states—Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Taraba, and Yobe—share shared borders with the state. The State is divided into 114 Wards and eleven (11) Local Government Areas (LGAs). Akko, Balanga, Billiri, Dukku, Funakaye, Gombe, Kaltungo, Kwami, Nafada, Shongom, and Yamaltu/Deba are the Local Government Areas (Wikipedia, 2006 ). SAMPLING PROCEDURE AND STUDY DESIGN A cross sectional study was conducted from August 2023 to December 2023. Two LGAs from each senatorial zone, or six out of the eleven, were chosen. Targeted locations included homes, dog markets, and both private and public veterinary clinics. To choose the specific dog based on availability and accessibility, systematic random sampling was employed. A clinical examination was conducted. Dogs exhibiting symptoms like fever, diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia, ascites, dehydration, emaciation, and epilation all indicative of helminthosis were classified as sick, whereas those exhibiting no symptoms were considered to be apparently healthy. The canines' demographic characteristics were noted. Based on the average age at initial estrus and the age variation in canine dentition, dogs younger than 7 months were classified as pups, and those older than 7 months were classified as adults (Salvin et al., 2011 ). The study subjects' external reproductive structures were used to ascertain their sex. Dog breeds were divided into three categories: exotic, cross, and local. The formula of Thrusfield ( 2005 ) was used to calculate the sample size, with a 95% confidence interval and 22.4% prevalence rate as reported by Esonu et al. ( 2019 ) in Zaria, Nigeria. For accuracy, the originally estimated sample size of 197 was raised to 200. Dogs with and without infections had their hematological profiles taken, and compared with the reference values. ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE All samples were obtained using the usual procedure for sample collection without causing discomfort or injury to the animals. Approval was granted by the University of Maiduguri Research and Ethics committee before the study was carried out. Consent were sought from owners of all the dogs sampled in line with the research ethics before the sample collections. SAMPLES COLLECTION Each dog was securely restrained. Using sterile polythene bags, faecal samples were taken once per rectum. Every animal had at least 10g of feces collected, which were then put in a cool flask and brought to the lab for analysis. The cephalic vein was used to collect the blood sample. A volume of approximately 5 milliliters of blood was aseptically drawn and then placed into sample bottles with EDTA added as an anticoagulant. After being labeled and stored in an ice pack box, the blood and faecal samples were brought to the pathology and parasitology labs at the University of Maiduguri for processing. LABORATORY PROCEDURES PARASITOLOGICAL EXAMINATION Macroscopically, every faecal sample was inspected to check for adult nematodes or other endoparasites, as well as for color, blood, mucus, and consistency. Utilizing the Formalin-Ether concentration procedure, microscopic analysis was carried out (Garcia and Bruckner 1988; Sloss et al., 1999; Maurelli et al., 2014). To ensure proper fixation, the fecal sample was carefully mixed with 10 ml (10%) formalin and allowed to stand for 30 minutes. The formalin/stool combination was mixed with physiological saline (0.85%) and passed through two layers of gauze. After adding around 3 milliliters of ethyl ether to the filtrate, it was violently shaken for 30 seconds. The mixture was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes. The sediment was re-suspended in a saturated salt solution with a specific gravity of 1.2 g/mL, and the supernatant that was produced was disposed of. The solution was added more often until a convex meniscus developed. After the universal tube was filled, a coverslip was placed on it and left for roughly five minutes. After that, the coverslip was set on the glass slide and inspected under a microscope for eggs of the nematodes. HEMATOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS Determination of Packed Cell Volume (PCV). A microhaematocrits capillary tube was filled with approximately 0.05 ml of blood through capillary action, and one end of the tube was sealed with plastacine. The tubes were placed in a micro-haematocrit centrifuge machine (Hawsley, England) and spun for five minutes at 2,500 revolutions per minute (rmp). A hemocrit reader was used to read the PCV (%) in accordance with Strin and Freeman (2022) instructions. Determination of Haemoglobin (HB) concentration The cyanmethaemoglobin technique, as detailed by Smock (2018), was used to determine the concentration of hemoglobin. In short, five milliliters of modified Drabeck's solution (200 mg of potassium ferricyanide or 50 mg of potassium cyanide and 140 mg of potassium hydrogen phosphate) were well mixed with 0.02 milliliters of blood. The volume was then increased to one liter using distilled water, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0. After letting this mixture remain for roughly ten minutes, a spectrometer was used to measure the hemoglobin concentration photometrically at 540 nm. Values for hemoglobin were obtained using a standard curve. Determination of Red Blood Cell (RBC) count The pipette from the hemocytometer kit and the red blood cell dilution solution were utilized Turgeon (2016). After gently suctioning the blood sample through the glass mouthpiece of the attached rubber tube with a toma red cell dilution pipette, the blood column was pushed until it reached the 0.5 mark on the stem. Simultaneously, a vertically positioned pipette was submerged in the diluting fluid, and it was slowly rotated while suction was applied until the bulb reached the 101-mark. Using an index finger over the tip, the pipette was removed. It was then held at one end with the second finger and the index finger at the other end horizontally while being combined for two minutes. Filling was accomplished by positioning the tip of a pipette containing freshly diluted blood against the edge of the cover slip at an angle of 450 directly opposite one of the cells, which was allowed to fill simultaneously. This was done using a clean, grease-free hemocytometer and cover slip that was placed on the groove of the Neubauer counting chamber. In the same manner, the second compartment was filled. The counting chamber was put on the microscope stage after being left for a few minutes to allow the cells to settle. A x10 eye piece and x40 objective were used to view the erythrocytes, and five of the twenty secondary squares each containing sixteen smaller squares were tallied. The RBC/mm3 value was computed as follows: H= N x 10 x 200 x 5 where N= Number of RBC counted 10= Depth of counting chamber 200= Dilution factor 5= secondary squares H= final answer/ cubic millimeters Red Blood Cells (RBC) Indices Using established formulas, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) were determined from RBC, PCV, and Hb data (Strin and Freeman, 2022). Determination of White Blood Cell (WBC) count Strin and Freeman (2022) described the use of an improved Neubauer counting chamber. A minimum of 25% of the bulb content was discharged using the same method as for the erythrocyte count after mounting and letting it settle for three minutes. The process was otherwise identical to that of the erythrocyte count. The dilution factor was filled to the 11marks in the stem distal to the bulb. Next, the nucleated cells in the first little squares on the immediate right were revealed, followed by the second row. The huge square (1mm 3 ) in the upper left corner, made up of 16 smaller squares, was revealed. The process was repeated for the 16 small squares. The total count was calculated by multiplying the proportionately produced diluted sample's number of cells (L) in millimeters squared by the dilution factor. The typical size of a big Corner square is 1 mm 2 , and its depth is 0.1 mm 3 . After counting four squares and using a dilution factor of 20, the total count per milliliter was ascertained as follows: 20x 10/4 x L cells = 50 x L cells Differential Leucocytes Count (DLC) The Differential Leucocytes Count (DLC) was carried out in compliance with Wang and Hasserjian's (2018) instructions. Cover slips and a spotless, grease-free slide were employed. The glass slide was held horizontally on the bench with the thumb and forefinger of the left hand, and a drop of well-mixed blood was deposited close to the right end. The cover slip was then used to create a neat, thin smear with the edge. The date and identification were then inscribed in pencil on the slide after it had been dried by waving it in the air. After fixing the air-dried slide with methyl alcohol for three minutes, the freshly made staining solution, which included some Giemsa, was applied.An equivalent volume of buffered distilled water (PH 7.2) was used to wash the stained smears. For counting, the battlement method was employed. The stained smear was coated with a drop of immersion oil, placed under a microscope, and counted using an x100 objective. Starting at the narrow end of the smear and moving around the edge in three fields two filed up and two filed down the film was thoroughly analyzed. Until at least 100 cells were counted, the sequence was repeated. The quantity of each type of cell was determined using the percentages of white blood cells that were acquired along with the overall count of white blood cells. Thus: DLC (%)/100 xWBC STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Graph pad prism version 5 was used to analyse the data generated. Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test was employed to determine the association between helminthosis and age, sex, breed and health status of dogs (p≤0.05). The hematological data obtained in the study were summarized as means and standard deviations using statistical model in Microsoft excel software and compared with the standard reference values as described by Meinkoth and Clinkebeard, (2010). Independent samples t-test was used to determine the difference between the mean haematological values of the infected and non-infected dogs, values of p<0.05 were considered significant. The prevalence was calculated for all data as the number of infected individuals divided by the number of examined individuals and was expressed in percentage by multiplying by 100. RESULTS The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in this study was 36.5% out of the 200 faecal samples examined. The nematodes identified were Ancylostoma caninum, Toxocara canis and Trichuris vulpis with prevalences of 58.9%, 28.7% and 12.3% respectively occurring either in single or mixed infections (Table 1). Out of the 112 Male dogs and 88 Female dogs sampled, 41(36.6%) and 32(36.4%) were positive respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the Sex of the dogs sampled (P>0.05). Out of the 116 Adult dogs and 84 Puppies sampled, 32(27.6%) and 41(48.8%) were positive respectively. There was statistically significant association between the Age of the dogs sampled (P>0.05). Out of the 36 Exotic, 66 Cross and 98 Local breeds of dogs sampled, 11(30.6%), 23(34.8%) and 39(39.8%) were positive respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the breed of dogs sampled. Out of the 68 sick and 132 apparently healthy dogs sampled, 31(45.6%) and 42(31.8%) were positives respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the health status of the dogs sampled (P>0.05) (Table 2). The associated hemogram showed that, the Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) of both the infected and non-infected dogs were below the reference values while only the infected group has Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) below the reference values indicating Microcytic hypochromic (Iron deficiency) anaemia. There was eosinophilia, monocytosis and leukocytosis in the infected group whereas neutrophilia occurred in both the infected and non-infected groups. All other haematological values are within the reference ranges. There was no statistically significant difference between the Mean haematological values of the infected and non-infected dogs (Table 3) (P>0.05). DISCUSSION Intestinal nematodes are a common parasite problem that can pose a severe health risk to dogs and the general public in developing countries such as Nigeria. The topic of canine intestinal parasites is highly relevant in numerous parts of the world since dogs can act as hosts, reservoirs, carriers, and transmitters of multiple illnesses (Traub et al., 2005). In this study, the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes is 36.5%. This is higher than 22.4% reported by Esonu et al., (2019) in Zaria and 31.5% reported by Ezema et al., (2019) in Maiduguri. The higher prevalence might be due to the cohabitation and mingling of many non-infected dogs with infected dogs which enhances cross transmission resulting from continuous environmental contamination with eggs from infected feaces. The nematodes identified were; Ancylostoma caninum (58.9%), Toxocara canis (28.7%) and Trichuris vulpis (12.3%) in either single (83.6%) or mixed (16.4%) infections. Prevalence of intestinal parasites among the sexes recorded in this study revealed a slightly higher prevalence among the males, which correlates with the reports of Kutdang et al. (2010) who reported a higher prevalence of intestinal parasites in male dogs compared to female in his studies conducted in Jos, Plateau State. The higher prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in male dogs might be due to the fact that they tend to travel great distances in pursuit of female partners during their breeding season which could increase their exposure to the infectious agents, as reported by Mustapha et al. , (2016). Puppies showed significantly higher prevalence (48.8%) of intestinal nematodes compared to the Adult dogs (27.6%) (P<0.05). This is similar with the report of Ahmed et al., (2014) who also reported higher prevalence in the puppies than the adults. This observation can be explained by the adult's age-specific immunity to parasites and the puppies' exposure to transplacental or transmammary infection in their early days of life, as noted by Epe (2009). Although, canine helminthosis does not show disposition for any particular breed (Eguı´a Aguilar et al., 2005), the higher prevalence rate among local (39.8%) and cross (34.8%) breeds dogs might be due to their higher proportion among the dogs sampled, whereas the lower prevalence among the exotic (30.6%) breed might be attributed to the humane handling such as; routine deworming, intensive confinement, good nutrition and proper hygienic measures by the owners, possibly because of the value accorded to them and companionship. Similar findings on breed based prevalences was also reported by Kumar et al., (2014). Compared to dogs that appeared healthy (31.8%), sick dogs exhibited a greater prevalence (45.6%). This could be because the parasites are widespread in the research area, host vulnerability, ease of infection, and immunological impairment leading to a high incidence of clinical cases. Blood parameters are reported to be negatively impacted by intestinal helminths (Shahat et al., 2022). The haematological data showed that the infected group had significantly lower RBC, Hb, and PCV values than the non-infected group, indicating iron deficiency anemia brought on by ongoing blood loss. The RBC, Hb, and PCV results in this investigation were in agreement with the findings of Kumar et al. (2014) and Qadir et al . (2011). Dogs with the infection had higher WBC counts, which suggested leukocytosis. This result was in agreement with Sharma et al. (2010). The release of histamine and compounds similar to histamine from tissues harmed by the parasite impact may be the cause of this increase. Ogunkoya et al. (2006) and Sharma et al. (2010) found comparable results to the significant increase in eosinophils reported in the infected group, suggesting eosinophilia. According to Kirkova et al. (2005), this increase may be related to the larval migration and defensive mechanism against intestinal nematodes. In addition to monocytosis shown in the infected group, neurophilia in both the infected and non-infected groups may also be caused by concurrent chronic infections, inflammatory reactions, or physiological stress (Audu et al., 2022). CONCLUSION This study established the prevalence (36.5%) of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in association with haematological alteration in Gombe State, Nigeria. Gastrointestinal nematodes are a significant health concern for dogs in Nigeria, leading to various clinical and hematological abnormalities. Effective management and control of these parasites are crucial not only for the health of dogs but also for public health. Regular deworming, improved veterinary care, and public education are essential components in combating GI nematode infections in this region. Declarations FUNDING INFORMATION The research work is funded by the authors of the manuscript. There was no external funding. COMPETING OF INTEREST The authors declared that, there is none. AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS Y. Audu conceived the idea, design the research work and write the draft manuscript. M. H. Timta collected the samples in the field and performed the laboratory procedures. U. M. Bamanga compiled and analyzed the data generated. AKNOWLEDGEMENT We sincerely appreciate the technical assistance of Malam Yauba and Malam Samaila of the Veterinary Parasitology and Veterinary Pathology laboratories respectively of the University of Maiduguri and all those who contributed in one way or the other toward the success of this work. References Abere T, Bogale B, Melaku A (2013) Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pet and stray dogs as a potential risk for human health in Bahir Dar town, north-western Ethiopia. Veterinary World 6(7):388–392 Ahmed WM, Mousa WM, Aboelhadid SM, Tawfik MM (2014) Prevalence of zoonotic and other gastrointestinal parasites in police and house dogs in Alexandria, Egypt. Veterinary World 7(5):275–280 Audu Y, Mustapha M, Ezema KU, Mairiga IA, Bukar-kolo YM, Mamman MM (2022) Seroprevalence of haemoparasites and associated haematological changes in dogs in Potiskum Local Government Area, Yobe State, Nigeria. Savannah Veterinary J 5(1):33–39 Bowman DD, Lynn RC, Eberhard ML, Alcarez AA (2003) Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians. Eighth edition. Elsevier Health Sciences Division, St. Louis, USA, p 422 Brown BA (1976) Haematology. Principles and Procedures 2nd Edition . Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 56–81 Carrol SM, Grove DI (1986) Response of dogs to challenge with Ancylostoma ceylanicum during the tenure of a primary hookworm infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 80:406–411 Coelho WMD, Gomes JF, Amarante AFT, Bresciani KDS, Lumina G, Koshino-Shimizu S (2013) A new laboratorial method for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 22(1):1–5 Coles EH (1986) Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 4th edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London and Toronto Davoust B, Normand T, Bourry O, Dang H, Leroy E, Bourdoiseau G (2008) Epidemiological survey on gastrointestinal and blood-borne helminths of dogs in northeast Gabon. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 75(4):359–364 Dryden MW, Payne PA, Ridley R, Smith V (2005) Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocystis. Veterinary Therapeutics: Res Appl Veterinary Med 6:15–28 Eguı´a-Aguilara P, Cruz-Reyesb A, Martı´nez-Mayac JJ (2005) Ecological analysis and description of the intestinal helminths present in dogs in Mexico City. Vet Parasitol 127(2):139–146 Endrias Z, Yohannes S, Berhanu M (2010) Prevalence of helminth parasites of dogs and owners' awareness about zoonotic parasites in Ambo town, central Ethiopia. Ethiop Veterinary J 14(2):17–30 Epe C (2009) Intestinal nematodes: biology and control. Veterinary Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 39(6):1091–1107 Esonu DO, Ibrahim MD, Otolorin GR, Per MF, Esonu MC (2019) Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminthes eggs of Public Health importance in house-hold Dogs presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State. Nigerian Veterinary J 40(3):211–217 Ezema KU, Malgwi SA, Zango MK, Kyari F, Tukur SM, Mohammed A, Kayeri BK (2019) Gastrointestinal parasites of dogs ( Canis familiaris ) in Maiduguri, Borno State, Northeastern Nigeria: Risk factors and zoonotic implications for human health. Veterinary World 12(7):1150–1153 Foreyt WJ (1989) Diagnostic parasitology. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Anim Pract 19:979–1000 Garcia LS, Bruckner DA (1988) Diagnostic medical parasitology. Manual of Commercial Methods in Clinical Microbiology. Elsevier, New York, pp 284–308 Kirkova Z, Dinev I (2005) Morphological changes in the intestine of dogs, experimentally infected with Trichuris vulpis. Bulgarian J Veterinary Med 8(4):239–243 Kumar M, Sharma B, Kumar A, Lal HP, Kumar V, Tripathi MK (2014) Prevalence and Haemato-Biochemical Studies of Toxocara canis Infestation in dogs and risk perception of zooneses by dog owners in Mathura. India Asian J Anim Veterinary Adv 9(10):653–663 Kutdang ET, Bukbuk DN, Ajayi JAA (2010) The prevalence of intestinal helminths of dogs ( Canis familiaris ) in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Researcher 2(8):51–56 Martínez-Moreno FJ, Hernández S, López-Cobos E, Becerra C, Acosta I, Martínez-Moreno A (2007) Estimation of canine intestinal parasites in Córdoba (Spain) and their risk to public health. Veterinary Parasitology , doi.10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.004 Maurelli MP, Rinaldi L, Rubino G, Lia R, Musella V, Cringoli G (2014) FLOTAC® and Mini-FLOTAC® for Uro-microscopic diagnosis of Capillaria plica (syn. Pearsonerma plica ) in dogs. BMC Res Notes, Pp 591 Meinkoth JH, Clinkebeard KD (2010) Normal hematology of the dog. In: Feldman BF, Zinkel JG, Jain NC (eds) Schalm’s veterinary hematology. William & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1053–1063 Moro KK, Abah AE (2019) Epizootiology of zoonotic parasites of dogs in Abua area of Rivers State. Veterinary and Animal Science , doi.10.1016/j.vas.2018.100045 Mustapha FB, Balami SB, Malgwi SA, Adamu SG, Wakil Y (2016) Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of hunting dogs in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. IOSR J Agric Veterinary Sci 9(8):39–42 Ogbaje CI, Ofukwu RA, Ajogi IA (2015) Zoonotic gastrointestinal parasite burden of local dogs in Zaria, Northern Nigeria: Implications for human health. International Journal of One Health , doi.10.14202/IJOH.2015.32-36 Ogunkoya AB, Useh NM, Esievo KAN (2006) The Haemogram of Dogs with Gastrointestinal Parasites in Zaria, Nigeria. J Anim Veterinary Adv 5(9):782–785 Patz JA, Gractzyk TK, Gella N, Vittor AY (2002) Effects of environmental changes on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol 30:1395–1405 Pfeiffer DU (2002) Veterinary epidemiology - An Introduction . The Royal Veterinary College. University of London Pp54-64 Qadir S, Dixit AK, Dixit P, Sharma RL (2011) Intestinal helminths induce haematological changes in dogs from Jabalpur, India. J Helminthol 85(4):401–403 Ramírez-Barrios RA, Barboza-Mena G, Munoz J, Angulo-Cubillan F, Hernandez E, Gonzalez F, Escalona F (2004) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs under veterinary care in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Vet Parasitol 121(1–2):11–20 Salvin HE, McGreevy PD, Sachdev PS, Valenzuela MJ (2011) Growing old gracefully—Behavioral changes associated with successful aging in the dog, Canis familiaris . J veterinary Behav 6(6):313–320 Shahat MS, Abdel-Raheem AA, Mohamed AA (2022) Hemato-Biochemical changes in dogs infected with toxocara canis in Hurghada and Luxor governorate, Egypt. SVU-IJVS 2022, 5(1): 56–67 Sharma SK, Sinha SRP, Sinha S, Jayachandran C, Kumar M (2010) Post treatment haematological studies in toxocariosis in dogs. J Veterinary Parasitol 24(1):63–65 Sloss MW, Zajac AM, Kemp RL (1999) Parasitologia Clínica Veterinária Manole , São Paulo (1999) p. 198 Smock KJ (2018) : Hemoglobin concentration In: Wintrobe Clinical Hematology , 11 Th Edition by John P. Greer, John Foerster, John N. Lukens, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Pp 223–235 Strin M, Freeman KP Quantitative management of hematology techniques. Chapter 137. Schalm’s Veterinary Hematology, 7th Edition. Brooks MB, Harr, Seelig KE (2022) DM Swai ES, Kaaya EJ, Mshanga DA, Mbise EW (2010) A Survey on Gastro-Intestinal Parasites of Non-Descript Dogs in and Around Arusha Municipality, Tanzania. Int J Anim Veterinary Adv 3(2):63–67 Thrusfield M (2005) Veterinarinary epidemiology , 3rd edition Blackwell science ltd London, UK Pp 228–246 Traub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RA (2005) : Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol 21:42–48 Turgeon ML (2016) Clinical Hematology: Theory and Procedures , Fifth Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Walnut Street Philadelphia, Pp 18–29 Ugbomoiko US, Ariza L, Heukelbach J (2008) Parasites of importance for human health in Nigerian dogs: high prevalence and limited knowledge of pet owners. BMC Vet Res 4:49 Wang SA, Hasserjian PR (2018) Diagnosis of blood and bone marrow disorders. Springer Cham, pp 10–11 Wardrop KJ, Weiss DJ (eds) John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Pages 969–982 Wikipedia (2006) http://www.en.m.wikipedia/wiki/GombeState . [Last accessed on 12th July, 2024] Zanzani SA, Gazzonis AL, Scarpa P, Berrilli F, Manfredi MT (2014) Intestinal Parasites of owned dogs and cats from metropolitan and micropolitan areas: Prevalence, Zoonotic risks and Pet owner awareness in North Italy. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/696508 Zelon DB (2003) Dogs, humans and gastrointestinal parasites: unraveling epidemiological and zoonotic relationships in an endemic tea-growing community in northeast India. http://www.lookd/dogs , retrieved 07-05-2024. Tables Table 1 Prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State NEMATODES NUMBER POSITIVE PREVALENCE (%) A. caninum 43 58.9 T. canis 21 28.7 T. vulpis 9 12.3 A. caninum/T. Canis 7 9.6 A. caninum/T. canis/ T. vulpis 5 6.8 Total single infections 61 83.6 Total mixed infections 12 16.4 Total 73 36.5 Table 2 Prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State according to sex, age, breed and health status VARIABLES NUMBER POSITIVE (%) NUMBER EXAMINED P VALUE SEX MALE 112 41(36.6) 0.9807 FEMALE 88 32(36.4) AGE ADULT 116 32(27.6) 0.0376 PUPPY 84 41(48.8) BREED EXOTIC 36 11(30.6) 0.7741 CROSS 66 23(34.8) LOCAL 98 39(39.8) HEALTH STATUS SICK 68 31(45.6) 0.1978 APPARENTLY HEALTHY 132 42(31.8) Table 3 Means and standard deviations (SD) of the haematological parameters of dogs infected and non-infected by the gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State Blood parameters Infected (Mean ± SD) Non-Infected (Mean ± SD) Reference ranges PCV (%) 35.20 ± 1.41 36.15 ± 3.24 37.00–55.00 Hb (g/dl) 11.25 ± 0.43 13.17 ± 1.17 12.00–18.00 RBC (*10 12 /L) 6.05 ± 0.28 6.64 ± 1.15 5.50–8.50 MCV (fl) 58.12 ± 3.68 54.36 ± 5.31 60–77 MCH (pg) 19.25 ± 1.05 19.95 ± 2.64 19.5–24.5 MCHC (g/dl) 31.96 ± 2.41 34.80 ± 1.80 32.00–36.00 WBC (*10 9 /L) 17.55 ± 1.72 9.53 ± 1.64 6.00–17.00 Neutophil (*10 9 /L) 16.25 ± 3.82 12.98 ± 2.76 3.00-11.50 Eosinophil (*10 9 /L) 1.81 ± 0.38 0.62 ± 0.27 1.00-1.25 Basophil (*10 9 /L) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00-1.40 Monocyte (*10 9 /L) 1.91 ± 0.25 0.37 ± 0.18 0.15–1.35 Lymphocyte (*10 9 /L) 3.28 ± 1.47 2.35 ± 0.39 1.00-4.80 Thrombocyte (*10 5 /µL) 2.85 ± 0.21 3.98 ± 0.50 2.00–5.00 T = 1.017, df = 12, P value = 0.3294 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-4852349","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":335505318,"identity":"fa19c0b6-566e-4794-b0c1-1ab89173f874","order_by":0,"name":"Y. Audu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"University of Maiduguri","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Y.","middleName":"","lastName":"Audu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2024-08-03 08:47:30","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":false,"vertebrateSubjects":true,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false,"humanSubjectConsent":false,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":61819062,"identity":"b18ed833-1c29-4a41-a164-9b4b1f582ad3","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-06 01:12:00","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":347016,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003eMap of Gombe State showing the study area\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOCHA, ESRI, WFP, DCW OSM, OSGOF, Copernicus\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4852349/v1/7b2b9f02bcf25b12795d5231.png"},{"id":61819377,"identity":"3dfe803f-875d-4f41-8ba5-368cabdb2b9d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2024-08-06 01:20:00","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":735346,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-4852349/v1/1128522c-1b64-4cd6-bbaf-ba08e6058eb5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePrevalence of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Dogs and Associated Hematological Changes in Gombe State, Nigeria\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"INTRODUCTION","content":"\u003cp\u003eGastrointestinal nematodes of dogs are among the most frequent pathogenic agents that veterinarians who treat companion animals encounter. They are also one of the primary causes of dog mortality (Mart\u0026iacute;nez-Moreno et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR21\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2007\u003c/span\u003e). As a result, they pose a risk to the animals, their owners, and veterinarians. Several intestinal parasites in dogs are zoonotic, meaning they have an impact on public health (Moro and Abah, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e). Although the close bond between humans and dogs and their role as companion animals provide many benefits, they also pose a risk to public health because of the possibility of natural parasitic infection transmission from dogs to humans through unfavourable environmental and behavioral factors (Patz et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR28\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2002\u003c/span\u003e). Certain zoonotic illnesses like ancylostomiasis or cutaneous larva migrans, as well as toxocariasis or visceral larva migrans, are caused by some of these parasitic nematodes (Ugbomoiko et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR42\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2008\u003c/span\u003e). In most tropical and subtropical parts of the world, including Nigeria, canine gastrointestinal nematode infection continues to be a significant cause of hindrance to the health and well-being of dogs (Zelon, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR47\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Ramirez-Barrios \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, 2004). These gastrointestinal nematodes have a direct life cycle in which the larvae or eggs are shed in the excrement of infected dogs, hatch in the environment, and then infect other dogs by ingestion or skin penetration. Certain nematodes, such as \u003cem\u003eToxocara canis\u003c/em\u003e, can also spread through lactation or transplacentally (Endrias and others, 2010). Consequently, depending on the amount of infecting larvae as well as host characteristics like breed, age, and acquired resistance, canine helminthosis could range in severity from asymptomatic infection to rapidly lethal disease (Bowman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR4\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e). In dogs, intestinal nematodes can result in acute intestinal blockage, emaciation, anemia, constipation, intermittent diarrhea, and a potbelly appearance (Kumar et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR19\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Anemia, fatigue, melena, and weight loss are the results of blood loss caused by \u003cem\u003eAncylostoma caninum\u003c/em\u003e. Intestinal blockage, malnourishment, and in extreme situations, the larvae's migration to other organs are caused by \u003cem\u003eToxocara canis.\u003c/em\u003e Bloody diarrhea, colitis, and dehydration are brought on by \u003cem\u003eTrichuris vulpis\u003c/em\u003e (Epe, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2009\u003c/span\u003e). Dog intestinal nematodes cannot be diagnosed using only symptomatology-based diagnostics, as stated by Carroll and Grove in 1986. By identifying parasitic elements (eggs, larvae, and adults) in their feces, particularly based on the two main diagnostic parameters: size and shape, intestinal nematodes infections in small animals can be detected (Foreyt, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR16\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1989\u003c/span\u003e). To concentrate parasite materials in fecal samples, a variety of methods and techniques are available, each having pros and cons of their own. The majority of gastrointestinal parasites have been diagnosed by fecal flotation, which is also a highly helpful method for evaluating the majority of parasites that affect dogs (Dryden et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e). This method has the benefit of recovering parasite cysts and eggs based on variations in the flotation solution, faecal debris, and egg specific gravities, which makes identification easier (Sloss et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR35\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1999\u003c/span\u003e). Utilizing several common flotation medium, the centrifugal-flotation process decreases the time for for eggs and cysts to float (Maurelli et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Haematological measures are useful for evaluating pathological conditions in animals as well as serving as excellent markers of the physiological state of the animals. Apart from their application in the identification and tracking of illnesses and anomalies, haematological investigations aid medical professionals in the diagnosis of numerous ailments and the evaluation of blood damage (Audu et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR3\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). The current study therefore sought to ascertain the intestinal nematode infection rate in domestic dogs under field conditions as well as the effect of these infections on the health of the animals by evaluating several risk variables and hematological parameters of both infected and non-infected dogs.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"MATERIALS AND METHODS","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSTUDY AREA\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study was carried out in Nigeria's northeastern geopolitical zone in Gombe State (Jewel in the Savannah). With Gombe Town serving as its administrative and commercial center, Gombe State was established in 1996 by separating from the former Bauchi State. Situated between latitudes 9\u0026deg;301N and 12\u0026deg;301E and longitudes 8\u0026deg;451 and 11\u0026deg;451E, the State spans 20,265 km\u0026sup2;. The Northeastern subregion's five other states\u0026mdash;Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Taraba, and Yobe\u0026mdash;share shared borders with the state. The State is divided into 114 Wards and eleven (11) Local Government Areas (LGAs). Akko, Balanga, Billiri, Dukku, Funakaye, Gombe, Kaltungo, Kwami, Nafada, Shongom, and Yamaltu/Deba are the Local Government Areas (Wikipedia, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR45\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2006\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec4\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSAMPLING PROCEDURE AND STUDY DESIGN\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eA cross sectional study was conducted from August 2023 to December 2023. Two LGAs from each senatorial zone, or six out of the eleven, were chosen. Targeted locations included homes, dog markets, and both private and public veterinary clinics. To choose the specific dog based on availability and accessibility, systematic random sampling was employed. A clinical examination was conducted. Dogs exhibiting symptoms like fever, diarrhea, vomiting, anorexia, ascites, dehydration, emaciation, and epilation all indicative of helminthosis were classified as sick, whereas those exhibiting no symptoms were considered to be apparently healthy. The canines' demographic characteristics were noted. Based on the average age at initial estrus and the age variation in canine dentition, dogs younger than 7 months were classified as pups, and those older than 7 months were classified as adults (Salvin et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR32\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e). The study subjects' external reproductive structures were used to ascertain their sex. Dog breeds were divided into three categories: exotic, cross, and local. The formula of Thrusfield (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR39\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2005\u003c/span\u003e) was used to calculate the sample size, with a 95% confidence interval and 22.4% prevalence rate as reported by Esonu et al. (\u003cspan citationid=\"CR14\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2019\u003c/span\u003e) in Zaria, Nigeria. For accuracy, the originally estimated sample size of 197 was raised to 200. Dogs with and without infections had their hematological profiles taken, and compared with the reference values.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAll samples were obtained using the usual procedure for sample collection without causing discomfort or injury to the animals. Approval was granted by the University of Maiduguri Research and Ethics committee before the study was carried out.\u0026nbsp;Consent were sought from owners of all the dogs sampled in line with the research ethics before the sample collections.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSAMPLES COLLECTION\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEach dog was securely restrained. Using sterile polythene bags, faecal samples were taken once per rectum. Every animal had at least 10g of feces collected, which were then put in a cool flask and brought to the lab for analysis. The cephalic vein was used to collect the blood sample. A volume of approximately 5 milliliters of blood was aseptically drawn and then placed into sample bottles with EDTA added as an anticoagulant. After being labeled and stored in an ice pack box, the blood and faecal samples were brought to the pathology and parasitology labs at the University of Maiduguri for processing.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLABORATORY PROCEDURES \u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePARASITOLOGICAL EXAMINATION\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMacroscopically, every faecal sample was inspected to check for adult nematodes or other endoparasites, as well as for color, blood, mucus, and consistency. Utilizing the Formalin-Ether concentration procedure, microscopic analysis was carried out (Garcia and Bruckner 1988; Sloss \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e 1999; Maurelli \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e 2014). To ensure proper fixation, the fecal sample was carefully mixed with 10 ml (10%) formalin and allowed to stand for 30 minutes. The formalin/stool combination was mixed with physiological saline (0.85%) and passed through two layers of gauze. After adding around 3 milliliters of ethyl ether to the filtrate, it was violently shaken for 30 seconds. The mixture was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 minutes. The sediment was re-suspended in a saturated salt solution with a specific gravity of 1.2 g/mL, and the supernatant that was produced was disposed of. The solution was added more often until a convex meniscus developed. After the universal tube was filled, a coverslip was placed on it and left for roughly five minutes. After that, the coverslip was set on the glass slide and inspected under a microscope for eggs of the nematodes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eHEMATOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDetermination of Packed Cell Volume (PCV).\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA microhaematocrits capillary tube was filled with approximately 0.05 ml of blood through capillary action, and one end of the tube was sealed with plastacine. The tubes were placed in a micro-haematocrit centrifuge machine (Hawsley, England) and spun for five minutes at 2,500 revolutions per minute (rmp). A hemocrit reader was used to read the PCV (%) in accordance with Strin and Freeman (2022) instructions.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDetermination of Haemoglobin (HB) concentration \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp; \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe cyanmethaemoglobin technique, as detailed by Smock (2018), was used to determine the concentration of hemoglobin. In short, five milliliters of modified Drabeck\u0026apos;s solution (200 mg of potassium ferricyanide or 50 mg of potassium cyanide and 140 mg of potassium hydrogen phosphate) were well mixed with 0.02 milliliters of blood. The volume was then increased to one liter using distilled water, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0. After letting this mixture remain for roughly ten minutes, a spectrometer was used to measure the hemoglobin concentration photometrically at 540 nm. Values for hemoglobin were obtained using a standard curve.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDetermination of Red Blood Cell (RBC) count \u0026nbsp;\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe pipette from the hemocytometer kit and the red blood cell dilution solution were utilized Turgeon (2016). After gently suctioning the blood sample through the glass mouthpiece of the attached rubber tube with a toma red cell dilution pipette, the blood column was pushed until it reached the 0.5 mark on the stem. Simultaneously, a vertically positioned pipette was submerged in the diluting fluid, and it was slowly rotated while suction was applied until the bulb reached the 101-mark. Using an index finger over the tip, the pipette was removed. It was then held at one end with the second finger and the index finger at the other end horizontally while being combined for two minutes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFilling was accomplished by positioning the tip of a pipette containing freshly diluted blood against the edge of the cover slip at an angle of 450 directly opposite one of the cells, which was allowed to fill simultaneously. This was done using a clean, grease-free hemocytometer and cover slip that was placed on the groove of the Neubauer counting chamber. In the same manner, the second compartment was filled. The counting chamber was put on the microscope stage after being left for a few minutes to allow the cells to settle. A x10 eye piece and x40 objective were used to view the erythrocytes, and five of the twenty secondary squares each containing sixteen smaller squares were tallied. The RBC/mm3 value was computed as\u0026nbsp;follows:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eH= N x 10 x 200 x 5 where\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eN= Number of RBC counted\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e10= Depth of counting chamber\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e200= Dilution factor\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e5= secondary squares\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eH= final answer/ cubic millimeters\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRed Blood Cells (RBC) Indices\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eUsing established formulas, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) were determined from RBC, PCV, and Hb data (Strin and Freeman, 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDetermination of White Blood Cell (WBC) count\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStrin and Freeman (2022) described the use of an improved Neubauer counting chamber. A minimum of 25% of the bulb content was discharged using the same method as for the erythrocyte count after mounting and letting it settle for three minutes. The process was otherwise identical to that of the erythrocyte count. The dilution factor was filled to the 11marks in the stem distal to the bulb. Next, the nucleated cells in the first little squares on the immediate right were revealed, followed by the second row. The huge square (1mm\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e) in the upper left corner, made up of 16 smaller squares, was revealed. The process was repeated for the 16 small squares. The total count was calculated by multiplying the proportionately produced diluted sample\u0026apos;s number of cells (L) in millimeters squared by the dilution factor. The typical size of a big Corner square is 1 mm\u003csup\u003e2\u003c/sup\u003e, and its depth is 0.1 mm\u003csup\u003e3\u003c/sup\u003e. After counting four squares and using a dilution factor of 20, the total count per milliliter was ascertained as follows:\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e20x 10/4 x L cells = 50 x L cells\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDifferential Leucocytes Count (DLC)\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Differential Leucocytes Count (DLC) was carried out in compliance with Wang and Hasserjian\u0026apos;s (2018) instructions. Cover slips and a spotless, grease-free slide were employed. The glass slide was held horizontally on the bench with the thumb and forefinger of the left hand, and a drop of well-mixed blood was deposited close to the right end. The cover slip was then used to create a neat, thin smear with the edge. The date and identification were then inscribed in pencil on the slide after it had been dried by waving it in the air. After fixing the air-dried slide with methyl alcohol for three minutes, the freshly made staining solution, which included some Giemsa, was applied.An equivalent volume of buffered distilled water (PH 7.2) was used to wash the stained smears. For counting, the battlement method was employed. The stained smear was coated with a drop of immersion oil, placed under a microscope, and counted using an x100 objective. Starting at the narrow end of the smear and moving around the edge in three fields two filed up and two filed down the film was thoroughly analyzed. Until at least 100 cells were counted, the sequence was repeated. The quantity of each type of cell was determined using the percentages of white blood cells that were acquired along with the overall count of white blood cells.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThus: DLC (%)/100 xWBC\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGraph pad prism version 5 was used to analyse the data generated. Chi-square/Fisher\u0026rsquo;s exact test was employed to determine the association between helminthosis and age, sex, breed and health status of dogs (p\u0026le;0.05). The hematological data obtained in the study were summarized as means and standard deviations using statistical model in Microsoft excel software and compared with the standard reference values as described by Meinkoth and Clinkebeard, (2010). Independent samples t-test was used to determine the difference between the mean haematological values of the infected and non-infected dogs, values of p\u0026lt;0.05 were considered significant. The prevalence was calculated for all data as the number of infected individuals divided by the number of examined individuals and was expressed in percentage by multiplying by 100.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"RESULTS","content":"\u003cp\u003eThe overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in this study was 36.5% out of the 200 faecal samples examined. The nematodes identified were Ancylostoma caninum, Toxocara canis and Trichuris vulpis with prevalences of 58.9%, 28.7% and 12.3% respectively occurring either in single or mixed infections (Table 1). Out of the 112 Male dogs and 88 Female dogs sampled, 41(36.6%) and 32(36.4%) were positive respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the Sex of the dogs sampled (P\u0026gt;0.05). Out of the 116 Adult dogs and 84 Puppies sampled, 32(27.6%) and 41(48.8%) were positive respectively. There was statistically significant association between the Age of the dogs sampled (P\u0026gt;0.05). Out of the 36 Exotic, 66 Cross and 98 Local breeds of dogs sampled, 11(30.6%), 23(34.8%) and 39(39.8%) were positive respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the breed of dogs sampled. Out of the 68 sick and 132 apparently healthy dogs sampled, 31(45.6%) and 42(31.8%) were positives respectively. There was no statistically significant association between the health status of the dogs sampled (P\u0026gt;0.05) (Table 2). The associated hemogram showed that, the Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) of both the infected and non-infected dogs were below the reference values while only the infected group has Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) below the reference values indicating Microcytic hypochromic (Iron deficiency) anaemia. There was eosinophilia, monocytosis and leukocytosis in the infected group whereas neutrophilia occurred in both the infected and non-infected groups. All other haematological values are within the reference ranges. There was no statistically significant difference between the Mean haematological values of the infected and non-infected dogs (Table 3) (P\u0026gt;0.05).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"DISCUSSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eIntestinal nematodes are a common parasite problem that can pose a severe health risk to dogs and the general public in developing countries such as Nigeria. The topic of canine intestinal parasites is highly relevant in numerous parts of the world since dogs can act as hosts, reservoirs, carriers, and transmitters of multiple illnesses (Traub \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e 2005).\u0026nbsp;In this study, the overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes is 36.5%. This is higher than 22.4% reported by Esonu \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e (2019) in Zaria and 31.5% reported by Ezema \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e (2019) in Maiduguri. The higher prevalence might be due to the\u0026nbsp;cohabitation and mingling of many non-infected dogs with infected dogs which enhances cross transmission resulting from continuous environmental contamination with eggs from infected feaces.\u0026nbsp;The nematodes identified were; \u003cem\u003eAncylostoma caninum\u003c/em\u003e (58.9%),\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;Toxocara canis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(28.7%)\u0026nbsp;and \u003cem\u003eTrichuris vulpis\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(12.3%) in\u003cem\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003eeither single (83.6%) or mixed (16.4%) infections.\u0026nbsp;Prevalence of intestinal parasites among the sexes recorded in this study revealed a slightly higher prevalence among the males, which correlates with the reports of Kutdang \u003cem\u003eet al.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/em\u003e(2010) who reported a higher prevalence of intestinal parasites in male dogs compared to female in his studies conducted in Jos, Plateau State. The higher prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes in male dogs might be due to the fact that they tend to travel great distances in pursuit of female partners during their breeding season which could increase their exposure to the infectious agents, as reported by Mustapha \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e, (2016). Puppies showed significantly higher prevalence (48.8%) of intestinal nematodes compared to the Adult dogs (27.6%) (P\u0026lt;0.05). This is similar with the report of Ahmed \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e (2014) who also reported higher prevalence in the puppies than the adults.\u0026nbsp;This observation can be explained by the adult\u0026apos;s age-specific immunity to parasites and the puppies\u0026apos; exposure to transplacental or transmammary infection in their early days of life, as noted by Epe (2009).\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough, canine helminthosis does not show disposition for any particular breed (Eguı\u0026acute;a Aguilar et al., 2005), the higher prevalence rate among local (39.8%) and cross (34.8%) breeds dogs might be due to their higher proportion among the dogs sampled, whereas the lower prevalence among the exotic (30.6%) breed might be attributed to the humane handling such as; routine deworming, intensive confinement, good nutrition and proper hygienic measures by the owners, possibly because of the value accorded to them and companionship. Similar findings on breed based prevalences was also reported by Kumar \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e (2014).\u0026nbsp;Compared to dogs that appeared healthy (31.8%), sick dogs exhibited a greater prevalence (45.6%). This could be because the parasites are widespread in the research area, host vulnerability, ease of infection, and immunological impairment leading to a high incidence of clinical cases. Blood parameters are reported to be negatively impacted by intestinal helminths (Shahat \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e 2022). The haematological data showed that the infected group had significantly lower RBC, Hb, and PCV values than the non-infected group, indicating iron deficiency anemia brought on by ongoing blood loss. The RBC, Hb, and PCV results in this investigation were in agreement with the findings of Kumar \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2014) and Qadir \u003cem\u003eet al\u003c/em\u003e. (2011).\u0026nbsp;Dogs with the infection had higher WBC counts, which suggested leukocytosis. This result was in agreement with Sharma \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2010). The release of histamine and compounds similar to histamine from tissues harmed by the parasite impact may be the cause of this increase. Ogunkoya \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2006) and Sharma \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2010) found comparable results to the significant increase in eosinophils reported in the infected group, suggesting eosinophilia. According to Kirkova \u003cem\u003eet al.\u003c/em\u003e (2005), this increase may be related to the larval migration and defensive mechanism against intestinal nematodes. In addition to monocytosis shown in the infected group, neurophilia in both the infected and non-infected groups may also be caused by concurrent chronic infections, inflammatory reactions, or physiological stress (Audu \u003cem\u003eet al.,\u003c/em\u003e 2022).\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"CONCLUSION","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study established the prevalence (36.5%) of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in association with haematological alteration in Gombe State, Nigeria. Gastrointestinal nematodes are a significant health concern for dogs in Nigeria, leading to various clinical and hematological abnormalities. Effective management and control of these parasites are crucial not only for the health of dogs but also for public health. Regular deworming, improved veterinary care, and public education are essential components in combating GI nematode infections in this region.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Declarations","content":"\u003cp\u003eFUNDING INFORMATION\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe research work is funded by the authors of the manuscript. There was no external funding.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eCOMPETING OF INTEREST\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors declared that, there is none.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAUTHORS\u0026apos; CONTRIBUTIONS\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eY. Audu conceived the idea, design the research work and write the draft manuscript. M. H. Timta collected the samples in the field and performed the laboratory procedures. U. M. Bamanga compiled and analyzed the data generated.\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAKNOWLEDGEMENT\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWe sincerely appreciate the technical assistance of Malam Yauba and Malam Samaila of the Veterinary Parasitology and Veterinary Pathology laboratories respectively of the University of Maiduguri and all those who contributed in one way or the other toward the success of this work.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAbere T, Bogale B, Melaku A (2013) Gastrointestinal helminth parasites of pet and stray dogs as a potential risk for human health in Bahir Dar town, north-western Ethiopia. Veterinary World 6(7):388\u0026ndash;392\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAhmed WM, Mousa WM, Aboelhadid SM, Tawfik MM (2014) Prevalence of zoonotic and other gastrointestinal parasites in police and house dogs in Alexandria, Egypt. Veterinary World 7(5):275\u0026ndash;280\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eAudu Y, Mustapha M, Ezema KU, Mairiga IA, Bukar-kolo YM, Mamman MM (2022) Seroprevalence of haemoparasites and associated haematological changes in dogs in Potiskum Local Government Area, Yobe State, Nigeria. Savannah Veterinary J 5(1):33\u0026ndash;39\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBowman DD, Lynn RC, Eberhard ML, Alcarez AA (2003) \u003cem\u003eGeorgis\u0026rsquo; Parasitology for Veterinarians.\u003c/em\u003e Eighth edition. Elsevier Health Sciences Division, St. Louis, USA, p 422\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eBrown BA (1976) \u003cem\u003eHaematology. Principles and Procedures 2nd Edition\u003c/em\u003e. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 56\u0026ndash;81\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCarrol SM, Grove DI (1986) Response of dogs to challenge with \u003cem\u003eAncylostoma ceylanicum\u003c/em\u003e during the tenure of a primary hookworm infection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 80:406\u0026ndash;411\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eCoelho WMD, Gomes JF, Amarante AFT, Bresciani KDS, Lumina G, Koshino-Shimizu S (2013) A new laboratorial method for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites in dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 22(1):1\u0026ndash;5\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eColes EH (1986) Veterinary Clinical Pathology, 4th edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, London and Toronto\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDavoust B, Normand T, Bourry O, Dang H, Leroy E, Bourdoiseau G (2008) Epidemiological survey on gastrointestinal and blood-borne helminths of dogs in northeast Gabon. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 75(4):359\u0026ndash;364\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eDryden MW, Payne PA, Ridley R, Smith V (2005) Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocystis. Veterinary Therapeutics: Res Appl Veterinary Med 6:15\u0026ndash;28\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEguı\u0026acute;a-Aguilara P, Cruz-Reyesb A, Martı\u0026acute;nez-Mayac JJ (2005) Ecological analysis and description of the intestinal helminths present in dogs in Mexico City. Vet Parasitol 127(2):139\u0026ndash;146\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEndrias Z, Yohannes S, Berhanu M (2010) Prevalence of helminth parasites of dogs and owners' awareness about zoonotic parasites in Ambo town, central Ethiopia. Ethiop Veterinary J 14(2):17\u0026ndash;30\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEpe C (2009) Intestinal nematodes: biology and control. Veterinary Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 39(6):1091\u0026ndash;1107\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEsonu DO, Ibrahim MD, Otolorin GR, Per MF, Esonu MC (2019) Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminthes eggs of Public Health importance in house-hold Dogs presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State. Nigerian Veterinary J 40(3):211\u0026ndash;217\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eEzema KU, Malgwi SA, Zango MK, Kyari F, Tukur SM, Mohammed A, Kayeri BK (2019) Gastrointestinal parasites of dogs (\u003cem\u003eCanis familiaris\u003c/em\u003e) in Maiduguri, Borno State, Northeastern Nigeria: Risk factors and zoonotic implications for human health. Veterinary World 12(7):1150\u0026ndash;1153\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eForeyt WJ (1989) Diagnostic parasitology. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Anim Pract 19:979\u0026ndash;1000\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eGarcia LS, Bruckner DA (1988) Diagnostic medical parasitology. Manual of Commercial Methods in Clinical Microbiology. Elsevier, New York, pp 284\u0026ndash;308\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKirkova Z, Dinev I (2005) Morphological changes in the intestine of dogs, experimentally infected with Trichuris vulpis. Bulgarian J Veterinary Med 8(4):239\u0026ndash;243\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKumar M, Sharma B, Kumar A, Lal HP, Kumar V, Tripathi MK (2014) Prevalence and Haemato-Biochemical Studies of Toxocara canis Infestation in dogs and risk perception of zooneses by dog owners in Mathura. India Asian J Anim Veterinary Adv 9(10):653\u0026ndash;663\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eKutdang ET, Bukbuk DN, Ajayi JAA (2010) The prevalence of intestinal helminths of dogs (\u003cem\u003eCanis familiaris\u003c/em\u003e) in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Researcher 2(8):51\u0026ndash;56\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMart\u0026iacute;nez-Moreno FJ, Hern\u0026aacute;ndez S, L\u0026oacute;pez-Cobos E, Becerra C, Acosta I, Mart\u0026iacute;nez-Moreno A (2007) Estimation of canine intestinal parasites in C\u0026oacute;rdoba (Spain) and their risk to public health. \u003cem\u003eVeterinary Parasitology\u003c/em\u003e, doi.10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.004\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMaurelli MP, Rinaldi L, Rubino G, Lia R, Musella V, Cringoli G (2014) FLOTAC\u0026reg; and Mini-FLOTAC\u0026reg; for Uro-microscopic diagnosis of \u003cem\u003eCapillaria plica\u003c/em\u003e (syn. \u003cem\u003ePearsonerma plica\u003c/em\u003e) in dogs. BMC Res Notes, Pp 591\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMeinkoth JH, Clinkebeard KD (2010) Normal hematology of the dog. In: Feldman BF, Zinkel JG, Jain NC (eds) Schalm\u0026rsquo;s veterinary hematology. William \u0026amp; Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1053\u0026ndash;1063\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMoro KK, Abah AE (2019) Epizootiology of zoonotic parasites of dogs in Abua area of Rivers State. \u003cem\u003eVeterinary and Animal Science\u003c/em\u003e, doi.10.1016/j.vas.2018.100045\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eMustapha FB, Balami SB, Malgwi SA, Adamu SG, Wakil Y (2016) Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites of hunting dogs in Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria. IOSR J Agric Veterinary Sci 9(8):39\u0026ndash;42\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOgbaje CI, Ofukwu RA, Ajogi IA (2015) Zoonotic gastrointestinal parasite burden of local dogs in Zaria, Northern Nigeria: Implications for human health. \u003cem\u003eInternational Journal of One Health\u003c/em\u003e, doi.10.14202/IJOH.2015.32-36\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eOgunkoya AB, Useh NM, Esievo KAN (2006) The Haemogram of Dogs with Gastrointestinal Parasites in Zaria, Nigeria. J Anim Veterinary Adv 5(9):782\u0026ndash;785\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePatz JA, Gractzyk TK, Gella N, Vittor AY (2002) Effects of environmental changes on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol 30:1395\u0026ndash;1405\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003ePfeiffer DU (2002) \u003cem\u003eVeterinary epidemiology\u003c/em\u003e- \u003cem\u003eAn Introduction\u003c/em\u003e. The Royal Veterinary College. University of London Pp54-64\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eQadir S, Dixit AK, Dixit P, Sharma RL (2011) Intestinal helminths induce haematological changes in dogs from Jabalpur, India. J Helminthol 85(4):401\u0026ndash;403\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eRam\u0026iacute;rez-Barrios RA, Barboza-Mena G, Munoz J, Angulo-Cubillan F, Hernandez E, Gonzalez F, Escalona F (2004) Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs under veterinary care in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Vet Parasitol 121(1\u0026ndash;2):11\u0026ndash;20\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSalvin HE, McGreevy PD, Sachdev PS, Valenzuela MJ (2011) Growing old gracefully\u0026mdash;Behavioral changes associated with successful aging in the dog, \u003cem\u003eCanis familiaris\u003c/em\u003e. J veterinary Behav 6(6):313\u0026ndash;320\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eShahat MS, Abdel-Raheem AA, Mohamed AA (2022) Hemato-Biochemical changes in dogs infected with \u003cem\u003etoxocara canis\u003c/em\u003e in Hurghada and Luxor governorate, Egypt. SVU-IJVS 2022, 5(1): 56\u0026ndash;67\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSharma SK, Sinha SRP, Sinha S, Jayachandran C, Kumar M (2010) Post treatment haematological studies in toxocariosis in dogs. J Veterinary Parasitol 24(1):63\u0026ndash;65\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSloss MW, Zajac AM, Kemp RL (1999) \u003cem\u003eParasitologia Cl\u0026iacute;nica Veterin\u0026aacute;ria Manole\u003c/em\u003e, S\u0026atilde;o Paulo (1999) p. 198\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSmock KJ (2018) : Hemoglobin concentration In: \u003cem\u003eWintrobe Clinical Hematology\u003c/em\u003e, 11\u003csup\u003eTh\u003c/sup\u003e Edition by John P. Greer, John Foerster, John N. Lukens, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Pp 223\u0026ndash;235\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eStrin M, Freeman KP Quantitative management of hematology techniques. Chapter 137. Schalm\u0026rsquo;s Veterinary Hematology, 7th Edition. Brooks MB, Harr, Seelig KE (2022) DM\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eSwai ES, Kaaya EJ, Mshanga DA, Mbise EW (2010) A Survey on Gastro-Intestinal Parasites of Non-Descript Dogs in and Around Arusha Municipality, Tanzania. Int J Anim Veterinary Adv 3(2):63\u0026ndash;67\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eThrusfield M (2005) \u003cem\u003eVeterinarinary epidemiology\u003c/em\u003e, 3rd edition Blackwell science ltd London, UK Pp 228\u0026ndash;246\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTraub RJ, Robertson ID, Irwin PJ, Mencke N, Thompson RA (2005) : Canine gastrointestinal parasitic zoonoses in India. Trends Parasitol 21:42\u0026ndash;48\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eTurgeon ML (2016) \u003cem\u003eClinical Hematology: Theory and Procedures\u003c/em\u003e, Fifth Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Walnut Street Philadelphia, Pp 18\u0026ndash;29\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eUgbomoiko US, Ariza L, Heukelbach J (2008) Parasites of importance for human health in Nigerian dogs: high prevalence and limited knowledge of pet owners. BMC Vet Res 4:49\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWang SA, Hasserjian PR (2018) Diagnosis of blood and bone marrow disorders. Springer Cham, pp 10\u0026ndash;11\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWardrop KJ, Weiss DJ (eds) John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Pages 969\u0026ndash;982\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eWikipedia (2006) \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.en.m.wikipedia/wiki/GombeState\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.en.m.wikipedia/wiki/GombeState\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e. [Last accessed on 12th July, 2024]\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZanzani SA, Gazzonis AL, Scarpa P, Berrilli F, Manfredi MT (2014) Intestinal Parasites of owned dogs and cats from metropolitan and micropolitan areas: Prevalence, Zoonotic risks and Pet owner awareness in North Italy. Biomed Res Int. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttps://doi.org/10.1155/2014/696508\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"10.1155/2014/696508\" targettype=\"DOI\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e \u003cli\u003e\u003cspan\u003eZelon DB (2003) Dogs, humans and gastrointestinal parasites: unraveling epidemiological and zoonotic relationships in an endemic tea-growing community in northeast India. \u003cspan class=\"ExternalRef\"\u003e\u003cspan class=\"RefSource\"\u003ehttp://www.lookd/dogs\u003c/span\u003e\u003cspan address=\"http://www.lookd/dogs\" targettype=\"URL\" class=\"RefTarget\"\u003e\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/span\u003e, retrieved 07-05-2024.\u003c/span\u003e\u003c/li\u003e\u003c/ol\u003e"},{"header":"Tables","content":"\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNEMATODES\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNUMBER POSITIVE\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePREVALENCE (%)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eA. caninum\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e43\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e58.9\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eT. canis\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e21\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e28.7\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eT. vulpis\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12.3\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eA. caninum/T. Canis\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e7\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9.6\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eA. caninum/T. canis/ T. vulpis\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6.8\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTotal single infections\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e61\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e83.6\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTotal mixed infections\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e16.4\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eTotal\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e73\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"char\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e36.5\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePrevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State according to sex, age, breed and health status\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eVARIABLES\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNUMBER POSITIVE (%)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNUMBER EXAMINED\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eP VALUE\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\" colspan=\"1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eSEX\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMALE\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e112\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e41(36.6)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.9807\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eFEMALE\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e88\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e32(36.4)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eAGE\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eADULT\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e116\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e32(27.6)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.0376\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePUPPY\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e84\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e41(48.8)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBREED\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eEXOTIC\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e36\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e11(30.6)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.7741\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eCROSS\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e66\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e23(34.8)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLOCAL\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e98\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e39(39.8)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eHEALTH STATUS\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eSICK\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e68\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e31(45.6)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\" rowspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.1978\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eAPPARENTLY HEALTHY\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e132\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\" colspan=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e42(31.8)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e\n\u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003ctable id=\"Tab3\" border=\"1\"\u003e\n \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 3\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMeans and standard deviations (SD) of the haematological parameters of dogs infected and non-infected by the gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in Gombe State\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/caption\u003e\n \u003cthead\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBlood parameters\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eInfected (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNon-Infected (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003cth align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eReference ranges\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/th\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/thead\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003ePCV (%)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e35.20\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.41\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e36.15\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.24\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e37.00\u0026ndash;55.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eHb (g/dl)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e11.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.43\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e13.17\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.17\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12.00\u0026ndash;18.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eRBC (*10\u003csup\u003e12\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6.05\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.28\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6.64\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.15\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e5.50\u0026ndash;8.50\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMCV (fl)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e58.12\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.68\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e54.36\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.31\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e60\u0026ndash;77\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMCH (pg)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.05\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19.95\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.64\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e19.5\u0026ndash;24.5\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMCHC (g/dl)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e31.96\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.41\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e34.80\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.80\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e32.00\u0026ndash;36.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eWBC (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e17.55\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.72\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e9.53\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.64\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e6.00\u0026ndash;17.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eNeutophil (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e16.25\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.82\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e12.98\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;2.76\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.00-11.50\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eEosinophil (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.81\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.38\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.62\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.27\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00-1.25\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eBasophil (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.00\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.00-1.40\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eMonocyte (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.91\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.25\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.37\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.18\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e0.15\u0026ndash;1.35\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eLymphocyte (*10\u003csup\u003e9\u003c/sup\u003e/L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.28\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.47\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.35\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.39\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e1.00-4.80\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003eThrombocyte (*10\u003csup\u003e5\u003c/sup\u003e/\u0026micro;L)\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.85\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.21\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e3.98\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;0.50\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd align=\"left\"\u003e\n \u003cdiv class=\"SimplePara\"\u003e2.00\u0026ndash;5.00\u003c/div\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n \u003ctfoot\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd colspan=\"4\"\u003eT\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.017, df\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;12, P value\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.3294\u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tfoot\u003e\n \u003c/table\u003e\n\u003c/div\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"University of Maiduguri","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Dogs, gastrointestinal nematodes, haematology, Gombe State","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eGastrointestinal (GI) nematodes are a common parasitic problem in dogs, causing significant health issues. These parasites live in the digestive tract and can lead to a variety of symptoms, depending on the type and severity of infection. A cross sectional study was conducted from August 2023 to December 2023 to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs and their effect on haematological parameters in Gombe State, Nigeria. A total of 200 faecal samples from dogs were collected using systematic random sampling technique from six (two from each Senatorial zone) randomly selected Local Government Areas (LGAs) out of the eleven LGAs in the State. Formalin-ether centrifugation-floatation technique was used to detect nematode parasites using microscopy. Haematological evaluations were performed according to standard procedures. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs in the study area was 36.5%. The parasites identified were \u003cem\u003eAncylostoma caninum, Toxocara canis\u003c/em\u003e and \u003cem\u003eTrichuris vulpis\u003c/em\u003e with 58.9%, 28.7% and 12.3% prevalences respectively. The haematological parameters revealed reduction of the Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) of both the infected and non-infected dogs below the reference values while only the infected group has Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) below the reference values. There were eosinophilia, monocytosis and leukocytosis in the infected group whereas neutrophilia occurred in both the infected and non-infected groups. All other haematological values are within the reference ranges. This study establishes the prevalence of gastrointestinal nematodes of dogs and associated risk factors in Gombe State, Nigeria.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Dogs and Associated Hematological Changes in Gombe State, Nigeria","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2024-08-06 01:11:55","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4852349/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"a63d5694-4532-40c2-aefd-0b4a00dac171","owner":[],"postedDate":"August 6th, 2024","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[{"id":35630903,"name":"Small Animal Medicine"}],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2024-08-06T01:11:55+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2024-08-06 01:11:55","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-4852349","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-4852349","identity":"rs-4852349","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"qtupq5eGEP_6zYnWcrvyt","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}