Evaluating the contribution of genome 3D folding to variation in human height using machine learning

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants associated with complex traits, yet the majority lie in noncoding regions, making it difficult to determine their functional impact. Alterations to the three-dimensional (3D) spatial interactions among gene regulatory elements are increasingly recognized as a mechanism by which genetic variants influence gene expression. However, experimentally evaluating whether variants disrupt 3D-genome structure is not feasible at GWAS scale. To address this, we developed a computational framework that integrates GWAS summary statistics with predictions from the Akita sequence-based deep learning model of 3D chromatin contacts. We applied the framework to 9,917 genomic regions associated with human height, assessing both individual variants and haplotypes for their predicted impact on 3D genome architecture. Only a small fraction of height-associated haplotypes had substantial predicted disruption of 3D folding (17 regions, 0.17%, exceeded a disruption score of 0.1). Considering all common variants in a haplotype together generally produced greater perturbations than individual variants, but several highly divergent regions were driven by single variants. We highlight a variant that disrupts the binding motif at a confirmed CTCF binding site and is predicted to modify 3D genome contacts with the LCOR promoter, suggesting that 3D-genome-mediated disruption of gene regulation underlies the association with height. This work presents a scalable and interpretable strategy for integrating 3D genome modeling with GWAS, enabling investigation of this important regulatory mechanism in the connection of non-coding genetic variation to complex traits.
Full text 1,820 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified thousands of variants associated with complex traits, yet the majority lie in noncoding regions, making it difficult to determine their functional impact. Alterations to the three-dimensional (3D) spatial interactions among gene regulatory elements are increasingly recognized as a mechanism by which genetic variants influence gene expression. However, experimentally evaluating whether variants disrupt 3D-genome structure is not feasible at GWAS scale. To address this, we developed a computational framework that integrates GWAS summary statistics with predictions from the Akita sequence-based deep learning model of 3D chromatin contacts. We applied the framework to 9,917 genomic regions associated with human height, assessing both individual variants and haplotypes for their predicted impact on 3D genome architecture. Only a small fraction of height-associated haplotypes had substantial predicted disruption of 3D folding (17 regions, 0.17%, exceeded a disruption score of 0.1). Considering all common variants in a haplotype together generally produced greater perturbations than individual variants, but several highly divergent regions were driven by single variants. We highlight a variant that disrupts the binding motif at a confirmed CTCF binding site and is predicted to modify 3D genome contacts with the LCOR promoter, suggesting that 3D-genome-mediated disruption of gene regulation underlies the association with height. This work presents a scalable and interpretable strategy for integrating 3D genome modeling with GWAS, enabling investigation of this important regulatory mechanism in the connection of non-coding genetic variation to complex traits. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00