Who says what when? Patterns in captive common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ) volubility

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,984 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Volubility, the number of vocalizations per unit of time, is a relatively understudied aspect of animal communication, potentially crucial in highly social systems like cooperative breeders that depend on coordinated behavior. Callitrichid monkeys, including common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), are often characterized as highly vocal, yet the variation in their calling rates due to context or individual differences remains poorly quantified. In this study, we systematically examined captive marmoset volubility across different social and informational contexts, call types, and individual characteristics.

Results

We tested marmosets in dyads in different experimental conditions and recorded a total of 70,260 vocalizations. Overall, calling rates were not influenced by sex or status. Instead, volubility varied mainly with condition: rates increased when visually separated from the partner and individually encountering ecologically salient stimuli such as ambiguous objects or food, consistent with context-sensitive signaling and information asymmetry. Contact calls were more frequent in food-related contexts, indicating a recruiting function. Arousal calls were strongly predicted by age, with younger individuals calling more, especially when confronted with an ambiguous object. Food calls occurred almost exclusively during direct interactions with food, particularly during feeding. Dyadic analyses revealed covariation between callers’ and partners’ arousal calls, consistent with vocal contagion. In contrast, we found no contagion effects for food calls. Instead, food calls by a breeder encountering food increased contact calling in their naïve dyad partners.

Conclusions

Overall, marmoset volubility is flexible and call-type-specific, shows signatures of information sharing under information asymmetry, and highlights their nuanced communication strategies. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00