Role of Child Marriage and Adolescent Childbearing on Hysterectomy Among Married Women in India: A Cross‐Sectional and Time‐to‐Event Analysis
article
OA: hybrid
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Child marriage forces a girl into adult roles before physical and psychological maturity, which can take a toll on women's health over the life course. This article aims to assess whether child marriage and adolescent childbearing are associated with elevated risk of gynaecologic disorders leading to hysterectomy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and time-to-event analysis. SETTING: India. POPULATION: 528 816 ever-married women, aged 20-49 years. METHODS: Women were grouped in four mutually exclusive categories: (i) married adult-not an adolescent mother (reference category), (ii) married adult-adolescent mother, (iii) married child-not an adolescent mother and (iv) married child-adolescent mother. Multivariable logistic regressions were fitted to assess the odds of hysterectomy for these groups. Nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survivor functions were estimated to evaluate survival rates across the groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Whether had a hysterectomy and age when hysterectomy was performed. RESULTS: Compared to women married as adults, not an adolescent mother, women married in childhood and gave birth in adolescence were 1.87 (95% CI: 1.78-1.96) times more likely to have a hysterectomy. The latter group also had the lowest survival probability for hysterectomy at all ages (e.g., 85.80% [95% CI: 85.41-86.18] at age 49 years as compared to 91.65% [95% CI: 91.37-91.89] for the former group). Women married as children but not adolescent mothers and married as an adult but gave birth in adolescence also had higher odds of hysterectomy-1.40 (95% CI: 1.31-1.50) and 1.53 (95% CI: 1.40-1.66) times of that of the reference group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, showing a strong relationship between child marriage and hysterectomy, contribute to the literature on later-life health consequences of child marriage.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (14)
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.019 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0973703020950263 via openalex
- W2758132205 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/03630242.2019.1687634 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.06.022 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.025 via openalex
- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178884 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/17455065211017068 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ijgo.15211 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_12_19 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/ije/dyad051 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.046 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.09.015 via openalex
- doi:10.1080/07399332.2019.1683847 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:48:13.915095+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK