Coding sequence clustering universally predicts fine- and coarse-scale chromatin compartment landscapes

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
Full text 1,554 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Intra-chromosomal contact maps from many species display a striking plaid pattern, reflecting chromatin compartmentalization at a sub-chromosomal scale. Although widely regarded as a core feature of genome architecture, such patterns are absent in many organisms, and their underlying determinants remain unclear. Here we systematically examine the relationships among sequence features, chromatin compartmentalization, and evolutionary conservation across 247 species spanning five kingdoms. By testing the usual genomic suspects as determinants of compartmentalization within and between species, we identify the coding DNA sequence (CDS) density landscape as the most consistent predictor of compartmentalization, including whether an organism exhibits a fine-scale plaid or coarse-scale non-plaid chromatin contact map. In contrast, correlations with GC content, CpG density, or repeat element composition vary across lineages, contextualizing long-standing observations such as the prominence of chromosome G-banding in amniotes and its absence elsewhere. Notably, compartment organization is conserved across syntenic blocks between species separated by up to 1 billion years of evolution, and this conservation tracks with preservation of CDS density profiles rather than other sequence features. These findings establish the genomic distribution of coding sequences as a universal and deeply conserved organizing principle of nuclear compartment architecture. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00