94-Monate-Follow-up (94 Monaten) von Patientinnen mit Endometriose des Septum rectovaginale und Z.n. radikaler Operation mit Darmteilresektion
This long-term follow-up study assessed symptoms, recurrence rates, and reproductive outcomes in patients with rectovaginal septum endometriosis treated with radical fertility-sparing surgery and bowel resection.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of 55 premenopausal women who underwent radical, fertility-sparing surgery for rectovaginal septum and rectal endometriosis between 1998 and 2003. Using a combined laparoscopic-vaginal technique that included en bloc resection of the Douglas pouch and partial bowel resection, researchers followed up with thirty patients after a median interval of 94 months via questionnaires. The results indicated that twenty-seven of the thirty respondents remained symptom-free, while eleven patients achieved pregnancy with a total of eighteen births post-operation. Relevance to endometriosis: Centrally about deep infiltrating endometriosis affecting the rectovaginal septum and rectum, specifically focusing on surgical excision and long-term symptom relief and fertility preservation.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,940 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00