Risk factors for small-for-gestational age births among nulliparous and parous women after gastric bypass: A population-based cohort study

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Objective: : To investigate potential risk factors for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) among nulliparous and parous women with a history of gastric bypass. Design: Population-based cohort study. Setting: Nationwide, Sweden. Population: Singleton pregnancies in women with a history of gastric bypass, delivery year: 2014-2021 (n=8155). Methods: : Risk factors of interest were surgery-to-conception interval and surgery-to-conception weight change in kg, early-pregnancy BMI, pregnancy weight gain (gestational age-specific z-scores), maternal age, Nordic born, smoking during pregnancy, and education level. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) of SGA with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by parity were estimated using logistic regression with marginal standardization. Main Outcome Measure: SGA (<10th percentile). Results: : The risk of SGA birth was 13% overall, 19.4% in nulliparous, and 9.8% in parous pregnancies. Increased SGA risk was observed in women who entered pregnancy with BMI 18.5-24.9 vs. BMI 25-29.9 (nulliparous: absolute risk 27.3% vs. 19.2%, aRR [95%CI] 1.38 [1.15, 1.66]; parous: 13.6% vs. 9.4%, 1.39 [1.13, 1.71]), had low vs. adequate pregnancy weight gain (nulliparous: 24.1% vs. 18.0%, 1.26 [1.01, 1.57]; parous: 14.1% vs 7.5%, 1.90 [1.52, 2.38]), or smoking vs. non-smoking during pregnancy (nulliparous: 32.6% vs. 17.2%, 1.85 [1.56, 2.21]; parous: 18.9% vs. 8.0%, 2.34 [1.95, 2.80]). No associations were found between surgery-to-conception interval/weight change, being Nordic born, or education level and having an SGA infant. Conclusion: Women who underwent gastric bypass and either entered pregnancy with a BMI 18.5-24.9, had low weight gain, or who smoked during pregnancy are at higher risk of delivering an SGA infant and therefore may require closer monitoring.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00